HIGHIQSTIMHEAD
08-25-2022, 10:05 PM
I believe that having a good looking face is more important than having a muscular body. I have came to the conclusion that having a good looking face comes from adequate nutrition that you would find mostly in animal foods and that a good looking face goes along with a healthy well developed body and healthy mind.
I consider the average liberal to have something mentally and or spiritually wrong with them and those who are liberal and may be good looking attractive people are this way because of the modern environment they surround theirselves in. Though they were rewarded their good looks from animal nutrition, breastfeeding, etc., if they decide to have children and feed them modern food, participate in the modern medical system, and spend lots of time in a toxic polluted city instead of a rural area. their children will not be rewarded with the same fate.
Liberalism is very welcoming to and is mostly made up by the dysgenic. Not only does it welcome being dysgenic, it promotes it. Ideas within the fringe of leftism would be the complete destruction of beauty standards. Taking care of your health and the health of your children will be considered fascist, not vaccinating your children with 100 vaccines before they turn 18 will be considered fascist, not trusting modern zogslop "food" will be considered fascist. Being skinny and having good facial structure will be considered fascist. Eating meat, eggs, cheese, and milk will be considered fascist.
I believe that right now within Hollywood and within the fashion industry, Aryan beauty standards are for the most part still being upheld. Runway shows still prefer a cast of majority white thin models. Before the wokeification of Hollywood, you would see mostly attractive white people on TVs, magazines, and movies. Attractive white people are powerful for cultivating the energy of the masses. Young girls would crush on Hollywood white male hunks and young boys would crush on Hollywood symmetrical bimbos. Whether for good or evil, attractive white people are great for marketing a message/distributing information.
Politics and really any serious discussion of the world is being done by average looking men and women, not by the most eugenic. Those in schools whether that be high schools or colleges that are very into the idea of debating usually lack conventionally attractive facial physiognomy and vocal physiognomy. The most eugenic are having sex, partying, modeling, and enjoying life. What the most attractive do not realize is all that is being done behind the scenes to alter their way of life, their way of thinking, the food that they eat, what they can and cannot do moving forward. Those that are discussing it are as I said before, average looking. To some degree I believe political information is distributed by the less attractive more nerdy types for a reason because they may look the part of the job.
When it comes to optics, they are very important for a political movement. The most attractive and high status of say the America First movement is still average leaning towards dysgenic to my standards but this isn't based on physique like so many RWBBers focus on. They look the part for the movement that they are in. Maybe some initially expected attractive 6 foot tall Chads to be vigorously following the movement but those people lacked common sense. I think many understand what optics is but to the degree of not putting ugly and or cringe people to the forefront of your movement, when really it should mean let the most attractive people do the public speaking.
I think that the most attractive looking people should be recruited into right wing movements. With face being the most important part of one's body, people with good facial structure should be selected to make the overall public image look better. The focus on muscles alone sets the RW back. To the outside, we are just face covering lifters and we have very few that are facially attractive and openly based. Understand that being white alone does not make someone eugenic, working out does not make someone eugenic. Face is important and indicative of health. We need male and female models on our side. Don't allow the left to believe we are all chudjaks.
I consider the average liberal to have something mentally and or spiritually wrong with them and those who are liberal and may be good looking attractive people are this way because of the modern environment they surround theirselves in. Though they were rewarded their good looks from animal nutrition, breastfeeding, etc., if they decide to have children and feed them modern food, participate in the modern medical system, and spend lots of time in a toxic polluted city instead of a rural area. their children will not be rewarded with the same fate.
Liberalism is very welcoming to and is mostly made up by the dysgenic. Not only does it welcome being dysgenic, it promotes it. Ideas within the fringe of leftism would be the complete destruction of beauty standards. Taking care of your health and the health of your children will be considered fascist, not vaccinating your children with 100 vaccines before they turn 18 will be considered fascist, not trusting modern zogslop "food" will be considered fascist. Being skinny and having good facial structure will be considered fascist. Eating meat, eggs, cheese, and milk will be considered fascist.
I believe that right now within Hollywood and within the fashion industry, Aryan beauty standards are for the most part still being upheld. Runway shows still prefer a cast of majority white thin models. Before the wokeification of Hollywood, you would see mostly attractive white people on TVs, magazines, and movies. Attractive white people are powerful for cultivating the energy of the masses. Young girls would crush on Hollywood white male hunks and young boys would crush on Hollywood symmetrical bimbos. Whether for good or evil, attractive white people are great for marketing a message/distributing information.
Politics and really any serious discussion of the world is being done by average looking men and women, not by the most eugenic. Those in schools whether that be high schools or colleges that are very into the idea of debating usually lack conventionally attractive facial physiognomy and vocal physiognomy. The most eugenic are having sex, partying, modeling, and enjoying life. What the most attractive do not realize is all that is being done behind the scenes to alter their way of life, their way of thinking, the food that they eat, what they can and cannot do moving forward. Those that are discussing it are as I said before, average looking. To some degree I believe political information is distributed by the less attractive more nerdy types for a reason because they may look the part of the job.
When it comes to optics, they are very important for a political movement. The most attractive and high status of say the America First movement is still average leaning towards dysgenic to my standards but this isn't based on physique like so many RWBBers focus on. They look the part for the movement that they are in. Maybe some initially expected attractive 6 foot tall Chads to be vigorously following the movement but those people lacked common sense. I think many understand what optics is but to the degree of not putting ugly and or cringe people to the forefront of your movement, when really it should mean let the most attractive people do the public speaking.
I think that the most attractive looking people should be recruited into right wing movements. With face being the most important part of one's body, people with good facial structure should be selected to make the overall public image look better. The focus on muscles alone sets the RW back. To the outside, we are just face covering lifters and we have very few that are facially attractive and openly based. Understand that being white alone does not make someone eugenic, working out does not make someone eugenic. Face is important and indicative of health. We need male and female models on our side. Don't allow the left to believe we are all chudjaks.