Amarna Forum

(03-02-2023, 03:27 PM)Datacop Wrote: [ -> ] reveals his Satanist connections, should I be worried about the secret meanings of Templism?

The meaning is the meaning, there's nothing secret about it. I actually have included certain "dog whistles" in TC for my Satanist connections to find, but logos-chads know that meaning does not reside in little hints and allegorical allusions and other such faggotry. It's just for marketing. Admitting this openly is also part of the brand.

some people will say that Amarna Forum was a reaction against third worldism,sinophilia and nazbol types https://archive.is/u5K7o ,but don't you think those tendencies were justified ? Part of why a lot of the more "third worldist" tendencies were so popular before 2021 is because they were the only ones who oppose all the poz/wokeism/degeneracy(negrolatry,homosexualism,feminism) that comes from the american government,also that nearly every foreign policy action taken by the US and friends use a toxic liberalism to justify itself. https://archive.ph/sj15R
https://archive.ph/i4yNf

---

(05-13-2023, 03:47 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]some people will say that Amarna Forum was a reaction against third worldism,sinophilia and nazbol types  https://archive.is/u5K7o  ,but don't you think those tendencies were justified ?  Part of why a lot of the more "third worldist" tendencies were so popular before 2021 is because they were the only ones who oppose all the poz/wokeism/degeneracy(negrolatry,homosexualism,feminism) that comes from the american government,also that nearly every foreign policy action taken by the US and friends use a toxic liberalism to justify itself.  https://archive.ph/sj15R 
https://archive.ph/i4yNf

There is no opposition when one is the same as what he purports to oppose.

(05-13-2023, 03:47 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]some people will say that Amarna Forum was a reaction against third worldism,sinophilia and nazbol types  https://archive.is/u5K7o  ,but don't you think those tendencies were justified ?  Part of why a lot of the more "third worldist" tendencies were so popular before 2021 is because they were the only ones who oppose all the poz/wokeism/degeneracy(negrolatry,homosexualism,feminism) that comes from the american government,also that nearly every foreign policy action taken by the US and friends use a toxic liberalism to justify itself.  https://archive.ph/sj15R 
https://archive.ph/i4yNf

---

Amarna sphere is not reactionary! It’s has it’s own substance and ideals, it’s a progressive congregation that sees nigger-worship as a road block to eugenics and meritocracy. Also why would brown worship ever be based, teaching them(turd-worlders) how to use toilets and wokism has apparently been met with the same exact response. We’re not a traditionalist aggregate that collectively apposes new things, we are the new thing. Turd-worlders would appose our worldview more then they would ever appose wokism! 

This is a low iq viewpoint. “Bu—but the enemy of my enemy is muh friendo.” Trying to apply a rule without evaluating the circumstance will lead to a misapplication of the rule. Also is not even having an alliance with the turd-world but worshipping it. Worship of another is self-abasement, why would any sane person cripple their own movement? Why would any sane person who believes this world belongs to the white man counter-signal forcing your will and ideals upon browns? “Wokism bad, so ummmm… that means since America woke and America’s trying and force woke on based traditionalist brownorinos then forcing things upon others is also bads.” Again, nigger level intelligence. 

We’re not counter-signaling the US Government for making browns do stuff, just wokism, so again why the need to worship browns when their main Problem is just being force to do anything? They hate white rule and not wokism.

(05-13-2023, 03:47 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]some people will say that Amarna Forum was a reaction against third worldism,sinophilia and nazbol types 

The Amarna Forum as in this forum which you are posting on was founded as a place for Anthony to post longform writing and nothing more according to its founder when I am asked him why he was doing it before during and after its sudden take down and revival. "Amarnites" as they are so called predate its existence in many respects and merely took on the label. The true roots of that current ideological tent was a crusade spearheaded by a Nigel Carlsbad and a few select others against people using the term neoliberalism. Because said persons were third worldists nazbols indeed but above all POST LIBERALS. In short they looked at these supposed right wingers went "No they have it all backwards liberalism is dead, useless baggage from leftists like Chomsky abound, these all cloud the real alternatives from our current order and in the past!" and then preceded at least in my mind to destroy those beliefs pointing out inconvenient facts such as the avg based third world state has in fact worked in lockstep with every moral decree from the cabal laws established at Nuremberg 99% of the time, the total ahistorical nature many of these supposed timelines of degeneracy blamed on "liberalism" unmoored from history, and of course the utter nonsense solutions that anything taking from the cast off of Marxists college professors will lead you. It should be noted NONE of the above being new in what would be considered such intellectual circles but beliefs merely hidden by the sands of time and bad internet memes. There being no justification naturally for cheer leading such beliefs because many men such as the persons who spearheaded the move to real progress never falling for them or quickly realizing their unsoundness(I myself years ago realized something was a foot when Iranian state media was shared as a legit source on conflict that was unbiased.) None of what you said proves how such Noam Chomsky third worldist cheer leading is intellectually sound or accurately shows the history of the groups you mention.

“Oldfag here. Amarna was literally never about politics or loli or being hateful to any minority groups. It was originally just for anthony to talk about PS2 games lol. What you call ‘amarnites’ was actually invented by Nigel Carlsbad. I love how you guys now hate him and worship the literal communist Mikka. So ironic lmao.”

(05-14-2023, 04:48 PM)BillyONare Wrote: [ -> ]“Oldfag here. Amarna was literally never about politics or loli or being hateful to any minority groups. It was originally just for anthony to talk about PS2 games lol. What you call ‘amarnites’ was actually invented by Nigel Carlsbad. I love how you guys now hate him and worship the literal communist Mikka. So ironic lmao.”

That fellow your quoting sounds rather confused for mixing up Carlsbad not being alone, nor how he himself was chummy with Mikka and published by him or that Mikka was after many many asine posts agreed to be the better party in the rolling debates of that time between the two. Along with not understanding Anthony's video game posts clear connection to radical worldviews.

In 2017 there started a turn in the e-right towards more leftist/socialist sympathies reaching its peak in the existence of actual Nazbols, NatSyndicalists, and people like Cultured Thug who worshipped every third world dictator that happened to be nationalist from Gaddafi to Sankara. I’ve long suspected that at least some of this shift was due to the debate culture of that period leading people on the right to think they needed to become more ‘sophisticated’ by adopting some of the ideas of their leftist opponents, giving up on cultural marxism because it was ‘unsophisticated’ to instead focus on how capitalism and liberalism is to blame, actually. Some others were actual leftists suddenly hopping on board with the e-right to keep up with the culture of it. Coming out of this mold were deeply boring and unintelligent people like Keith Woods who sperged over capitalism and set up basically a right-wing version of Chomskyite anti-imperialism alongside environmentalism. Keith Woods is basically a hippie who happens to hate Jews. Imperium Press affiliated figures like Joel Davis and Matt Parrott were a similar deal with a focus on “allying with the third world”, sinophilia, and socialist sympathies. On Twitter and Youtube these ideas became hugely influential, reaching their peak around 2020 with “post-liberalism” becoming a thing. Most of these people are still around and have substantial presences unfortunately. They’ve also paired up with negro-worshipping homosexual Nick Fuentes to create what’s basically a white version of Nation of Islam ideologically.

The first reaction against this stuff I can really remember was with the Giulisphere which is now dead but at its height did work to dispel a lot of the more obnoxious tendencies coming from these left-nats and third worldists, focusing on geopol and realism as opposed to faulty boring metaphysical theories or RW anti-imperialism. “Amarnites” to me generally refers more to the Twitter accounts associated than to posters on this forum, but they alongside Carlsbad emerged basically as a reaction against the aforementioned obnoxious third-worldist Nazbol sphere on Twitter, bringing with them imperialism, eugenics, tech-positivity, and actual white supremacy (as opposed to some vague identitarian nationalism for all). Amarnites and Carlsbad have done the most to combat and dispel garbage associated with the Imperium Press/Nazbol/Woods/etc crowd. When the BAP drama went down on Twitter the only real outcome was basically the bisection of the e-right into an Amarna/BAP sphere and an AF/Keith Woods sphere with some big accounts and figures smartly ignoring the drama.

You only need to look at the 70s New Right and people like Alain de Benoist or Franco Freda to see how easily rightists when locked out of power slip into praising third worlders for being based and trad contra Western countries without pressures against it

(05-20-2023, 06:53 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]In 2017 there started a turn in the e-right towards more leftist/socialist sympathies reaching its peak in the existence of actual Nazbols, NatSyndicalists, and people like Cultured Thug who worshipped every third world dictator that happened to be nationalist from Gaddafi to Sankara. I’ve long suspected that at least some of this shift was due to the debate culture of that period leading people on the right to think they needed to become more ‘sophisticated’ by adopting some of the ideas of their leftist opponents, giving up on cultural marxism because it was ‘unsophisticated’ to instead focus on how capitalism and liberalism is to blame, actually. Some others were actual leftists suddenly hopping on board with the e-right to keep up with the culture of it. Coming out of this mold were deeply boring and unintelligent people like Keith Woods who sperged over capitalism and set up basically a right-wing version of Chomskyite anti-imperialism alongside environmentalism. Keith Woods is basically a hippie who happens to hate Jews. Imperium Press affiliated figures like Joel Davis and Matt Parrott were a similar deal with a focus on “allying with the third world”, sinophilia, and socialist sympathies. On Twitter and Youtube these ideas became hugely influential, reaching their peak around 2020 with “post-liberalism” becoming a thing. Most of these people are still around and have substantial presences unfortunately. They’ve also paired up with negro-worshipping homosexual Nick Fuentes to create what’s basically a white version of Nation of Islam ideologically.

The first reaction against this stuff I can really remember was with the Giulisphere which is now dead but at its height did work to dispel a lot of the more obnoxious tendencies coming from these left-nats and third worldists, focusing on geopol and realism as opposed to faulty boring metaphysical theories or RW anti-imperialism. “Amarnites” to me generally refers more to the Twitter accounts associated than to posters on this forum, but they alongside Carlsbad emerged basically as a reaction against the aforementioned obnoxious third-worldist Nazbol sphere on Twitter, bringing with them imperialism, eugenics, tech-positivity, and actual white supremacy (as opposed to some vague identitarian nationalism for all). Amarnites and Carlsbad have done the most to combat and dispel garbage associated with the Imperium Press/Nazbol/Woods/etc crowd. When the BAP drama went down on Twitter the only real outcome was basically the bisection of the e-right into an Amarna/BAP sphere and an AF/Keith Woods sphere with some big accounts and figures smartly ignoring the drama.

You only need to look at the 70s New Right and people like Alain de Benoist or Franco Freda to see how easily rightists when locked out of power slip into praising third worlders for being based and trad contra Western countries without pressures against it

Good summary guest, thank you. Now this may be off topic, but considering the discussion I would like to chime in and say that rendering "far right" ideas in a leftist mold would be beneficial in "converting" others to our side who wouldn't usually come to us through the usual pipeline that begins with reactions like "i just want to play video games". Most necessary of these groups to be converted through psuedo-leftist rhetoric are the (primarily women) on Tumblr. Now I am not going to divulge on *why* this must be done because that's a discussion for another thread, but suffice to say a friend of mine enlightened me in regards to the many similarities that 4chan (which we can all agree this forum's culture descends from) and Tumblr have, which 4chan users have themselves noted in the past. The first similarity that comes to my mind is how they both have a tradition of short, generally humorous monologues from anons about interesting moments in their lives (greentexts in 4chanspeak, I don't know the tumblr equivalent term). That seemingly random connection between the two sites seems highly interesting and worth a thread elucidating on and also because I like my hopeful belief that for every chud there's a tumblrite waiting for him.

(05-20-2023, 07:54 PM)Verlion Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 06:53 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]Amarnites…

Good summary guest, thank you. Now this may be off topic, but considering the discussion I would like to chime in and say that rendering "far right" ideas in a leftist mold would be beneficial in "converting" others to our side who wouldn't usually come to us through the usual pipeline that begins with reactions like "i just want to play video games". Most necessary of these groups to be converted through psuedo-leftist rhetoric are the (primarily women) on Tumblr.

Sometimes form is the essence. What does “far right” ideas look like in a leftist mold? We use their rhetoric to prove our points? What is attractive in rhetoric is actually what speaks to them, the points become intermediates. Behind all leftist rhetoric is the justice of the slave revolt. The people getting together to put things to how they should be. This is all you speak towards when using a leftist mold.

Trying to spread your ideal(which is what I think you mean by “far right” ideas) will not be fruitful. Ideals are inherent to our character, tied to our biology and set from birth. You spread ideals to awaken those who are alike you, and it can only be accepted because the germ of the ideal already exists within them. 

With women this doesn’t really matter, they conform to power. Even then they try to pick the most innocuous socially beneficial opinion. But they are insane, try not to think to much about how women come to their opinions. 

I think our goal is not necessarily the spreading of ideal(still should be done) but rather in political union towards the satisfaction of material benefits. The people are not spiritual but material. Your ideals won’t fill their belly, and they only know hunger. This hunger is what drives them, their desire for wealth and riches. Think about the Russian revolution, it was bolstered in a time of strife, after the abdication of the Tzar the people wanted someone to save them, they cheered “Soviets take charge” and the Bolshevik’s gladly stepped in. Look at Weimar Germany suffering poverty and with its Berlin, Europe's capital of sin, the people suffered and the National Socialist arrived. None of this was born from the peoples want for a spiritual(ideals) salvation but a material one. 

Unforgivably have our enemies made our demise such that the people would not suffer til it was too late. Our doom lies in mass immigration of turd worlders. We have not the same conditions for revolution as Bolshevik or National Socialist but we do have a condition that does touch their hearts, the reason trump was elected, mass immigration. A movement based solely on mass immigration is what we need.

(05-20-2023, 07:54 PM)Verlion Wrote: [ -> ]Good summary guest, thank you. Now this may be off topic, but considering the discussion I would like to chime in and say that rendering "far right" ideas in a leftist mold would be beneficial in "converting" others to our side who wouldn't usually come to us through the usual pipeline that begins with reactions like "i just want to play video games". Most necessary of these groups to be converted through psuedo-leftist rhetoric are the (primarily women) on Tumblr. Now I am not going to divulge on *why* this must be done because that's a discussion for another thread, but suffice to say a friend of mine enlightened me in regards to the many similarities that 4chan (which we can all agree this forum's culture descends from) and Tumblr have, which 4chan users have themselves noted in the past. The first similarity that comes to my mind is how they both have a tradition of short, generally humorous monologues from anons about interesting moments in their lives (greentexts in 4chanspeak, I don't know the tumblr equivalent term). That seemingly random connection between the two sites seems highly interesting and worth a thread elucidating on and also because I like my hopeful belief that for every chud there's a tumblrite waiting for him.

Slightly keyed for bringing up the 4chan-tumblr convergence (I made many memes about this back in the day), but thoroughly locked for sincerely talking about "converting (leftist) women to our ideals. A fool's errand through and through, as the only thing you need to do to "convert" a w*man to your "ideals" is to fuck her. In fact, this may be the only way to even do such a thing in the first place.

(05-20-2023, 08:56 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 07:54 PM)Verlion Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 06:53 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]Amarnites…

Good summary guest, thank you. Now this may be off topic, but considering the discussion I would like to chime in and say that rendering "far right" ideas in a leftist mold would be beneficial in "converting" others to our side who wouldn't usually come to us through the usual pipeline that begins with reactions like "i just want to play video games". Most necessary of these groups to be converted through psuedo-leftist rhetoric are the (primarily women) on Tumblr.

Sometimes form is the essence. What does “far right” ideas look like in a leftist mold?

There is a loose dictionary between certain 'leftist' values and certain current 'right-wing' values.

Opposition to globohomo ~ Opposition to imperialism/colonialism

Opposition to immigration (racial/cultural perspective) ~  Opposition to immigration (labor perspective)

Opposition to ruling elite/regime ~ Opposition to billionaires 

These aren't intended to be gotchas (*smugface* 'liberals are the real racists'), but ideas that are more nebulous and unformed in origin. When people talk about opposing globalism or imperialism, the sentiment is often stronger than the meaning, which itself may be unknown to the speaker on a precise level. At best - they are usually built on half-formed moral sentiments of what is right, and what is wrong. It's precisely because these ideas exist at such a nebulous level that conceptual redirection becomes possible. You really won't convince anyone over 90 IQ that democrats are the real racists, but you might with strong enough rhetoric convince them that immigration harms Americans, particularly poor Americans, and particularly poor African Americans at that. After all, even Bernie opposed immigration for decades. 

It is generally too much to hope that you can get people to completely 180 their politics, but you might be able to make them unintentionally based - on at least one issue.

(05-22-2023, 01:16 AM)Zed Wrote: [ -> ]There is a loose dictionary between certain 'leftist' values and certain current 'right-wing' values.

Opposition to globohomo ~ Opposition to imperialism/colonialism

Opposition to immigration (racial/cultural perspective) ~  Opposition to immigration (labor perspective)

Opposition to ruling elite/regime ~ Opposition to billionaires 

These aren't intended to be gotchas (*smugface* 'liberals are the real racists'), but ideas that are more nebulous and unformed in origin. When people talk about opposing globalism or imperialism, the sentiment is often stronger than the meaning, which itself may be unknown to the speaker on a precise level. At best - they are usually built on half-formed moral sentiments of what is right, and what is wrong. It's precisely because these ideas exist at such a nebulous level that conceptual redirection becomes possible. You really won't convince anyone over 90 IQ that democrats are the real racists, but you might with strong enough rhetoric convince them that immigration harms Americans, particularly poor Americans, and particularly poor African Americans at that. After all, even Bernie opposed immigration for decades. 

It is generally too much to hope that you can get people to completely 180 their politics, but you might be able to make them unintentionally based - on at least one issue.

Kind of relevant to this thought of "nebulous and unformed" key ideas. I saw some stuff coming up about our guy Henry Kissinger (100th birthday victory imminent) and decided to actually investigate a left org's problems with him in their own words.



Look. A website link. Let's get the full story. (https://www.codepink.org/attempting_citi...war_crimes)



The charges. Apparently Kissinger is guilty of existing while wars happened. Considering the decades running popular (in meme politics) hatred of this man I actually expected something halfway interesting here.

Otherwise, key point I believe in this dichotomy, or dictionary, or whatever you're drawing here is that this is clearly not even. One side is far more conspiratorial and far more habitually aligned against its own interests. And it's not the one that's fond of smugly saying that about the other. Strongest case to be made for the stupidity of the right side of this is that they don't constantly push that. Imperialism/Colonialism are not real anymore and nothing approximating them is any harm to people who care about these "issues". Labour perspective anti immigration stances are practically non existent. Show me an example with any kind of force comparable to the low but real impulse of "Get the darkies OUT" that's present in all right voting bases. And again, interests. You are not in a healthy country if racial and cultural destiny are non concerns (or more likely still being actively destroyed by the state) but there's some arbitrary cap on migrants (only 700,000 a year maybe) as calculated by some decrepit sperg who convinced himself Marxism is real economic theory. And as for the last point, you know who's actually right in how you put it. You can oppose "the regime", by definition the people actually in charge, or you can pretend Elon Musk is the secret grand dragon of the RethugliKKKan congress and is scheming to not give you even more subsidised therapy sessions than you already have because you live in a Nazi dystopia because Operation Paperclip won.

The two sides here have half-formed moral sentiments in common. But that doesn't make them the same. Even if I hate both sides one set of weak half formed moral sentiments clearly leads to far stupider, more conspiratorial, and actively harmful ideas than the other. You can talk redirection, but the possibility and practicality of that seem so far out as to be a non-factor in any considerations of the state of things. Most people are retarded. Especially in the wider English speaking world. But even beyond that I would say anybody whose baseline seems set leftward should be considered a kind of more or less functional insane person wired for the destruction of themselves, their posterity, and civilisation.

Quote:our guy Henry Kissinger

He will burn for stabbing Rhodesia in the back, that is a good enough reason to hate him. Leftist hatred of the (white) establishment always amounts to lamenting about muh brown people and lacks any sophistication beyond that. Being aware of the US politics in Africa and treatment of Portugal and South Africa is enough to dispel the myth of 'based cold war america'. Pinochet is widely memed by the right but he had close ties to Israel and his rule is insignificant and irrelevant in the present day.

---

Rhodesia was weak. It deserved to die.

BAP in 2023 is a right wing Norwoodian

menaquinone04 was terribly overrated as a poster, he would be chungus-tier if he was still around.

I didn't know where to post this.

(05-29-2023, 08:30 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]BAP in 2023 is a right wing Norwoodian

BAP is orbited by various Norwood & brown orbiters (MedGold, Breast Milk Enjoyer, Delicious Tacos, Conan Esq, Benjamin Braddock, etc.) whom he shamefully fails to denounce and occasionally will half-heartedly retweet, but it is exceedingly clear that his Heart lies with the Incelbund. His most enthusiastic postings come in the form of supporting Amarnite concepts (TND, Hiterlism, etc.) and opposing Norwood idols (muh women, muh sex, etc.).

(05-29-2023, 08:30 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]BAP in 2023 is a right wing Norwoodian

menaquinone04 was terribly overrated as a poster, he would be chungus-tier if he was still around.

I didn't know where to post this.

I've been mentally tagging BAP and most of these people as "conservative commentators", which I guess is the same thing. Functionally he is one, but his gimmick is that he says the enword on the podcast (gumroad only).

what's the difference between amarnites and the old White nationalism (stormfront,VNN,William luther pierce,George Lincoln rockwell)?

(06-12-2023, 06:44 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]what's the difference between amarnites and the old White nationalism (stormfront,VNN,William luther pierce,George Lincoln rockwell)?

Les amarnites n'existent pas.

(05-22-2023, 01:16 AM)Zed Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 08:56 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 07:54 PM)Verlion Wrote: [ -> ]

(05-20-2023, 06:53 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]Amarnites…

Good summary guest, thank you. Now this may be off topic, but considering the discussion I would like to chime in and say that rendering "far right" ideas in a leftist mold would be beneficial in "converting" others to our side who wouldn't usually come to us through the usual pipeline that begins with reactions like "i just want to play video games". Most necessary of these groups to be converted through psuedo-leftist rhetoric are the (primarily women) on Tumblr.

Sometimes form is the essence. What does “far right” ideas look like in a leftist mold?

There is a loose dictionary between certain 'leftist' values and certain current 'right-wing' values.

Opposition to globohomo ~ Opposition to imperialism/colonialism

Opposition to immigration (racial/cultural perspective) ~  Opposition to immigration (labor perspective)

Opposition to ruling elite/regime ~ Opposition to billionaires 

These aren't intended to be gotchas (*smugface* 'liberals are the real racists'), but ideas that are more nebulous and unformed in origin. When people talk about opposing globalism or imperialism, the sentiment is often stronger than the meaning, which itself may be unknown to the speaker on a precise level. At best - they are usually built on half-formed moral sentiments of what is right, and what is wrong. It's precisely because these ideas exist at such a nebulous level that conceptual redirection becomes possible. 

As the 4chan-tumblr connection suggests, these sorts of values/ideas are mimetically inevitable for any self-identified "outsider" political movement. The thought of being a rebel fighting an evil and corrupt system is too appealing to disregard. The kind of person who is open to heterodox political theory is the kind of person who instinctively roots for the underdog. He's also the kind of person who will view whoever he believes to be in charge as bad simply because they're in charge. Potential counter-examples that come to mind are nothing more than this contrarianism applied to itself. This is inverted in normie politics, where the benefit of the doubt is given to members of the System and anyone outside it is viewed with suspicion. The value of either intuition is entirely circumstantial. 

 If zog didn't exist it would be necessary to invent it. Every fringe political tendency will necessarily declare the powers that be diametrically opposed to itself, create a (pseudo-)scientific explanation for how it operates, and ideally find a plausible axis on which to base a new Manichaeism. Over time this will be refined through the addition of various tropes to the narrative. Sympathetic insiders, silent majorities, hard and soft-line interpretations, martyrs, intellectual precursors etc will all be created as individuals attempt to profit off the movement in various ways. Some of these will be real/true/correct, but any insight they offer will be a lucky coincidence.

It's good that Kissinger was brought up. His sort of Realpolitik is a refreshing break from all this and more useful to study, regardless of how much of an ideologue you are.

Russophilia and admiration of "Based Putin" is synonymous with Norwoodism which BAP embarrassingly turned towards. It is right wing third-worldism.

---

(06-14-2023, 06:52 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]Russophilia and admiration of "Based Putin" is synonymous with Norwoodism which BAP embarrassingly turned towards. It is right wing third-worldism.

How is Third worldism supporting one of the most Whites countries in the world that hasn't been flooded with browns and blacks ?