(03-08-2023, 06:04 PM)JohnnyRomero Wrote: [ -> ]I read a Twitter thread someone posted in another thread recently that is relevant to this topic. The thread was written by a white worker in an African country who explained how it all works. In short, in most (Sub-Saharan) African countries there is a tiny elite of extremely wealthy and powerful blacks who run the country like gangsters, stealing and embezzling everything they can from their two primary sources of income - local resource exploitation and foreign aid. They then blow all of this money on gaudy, expensive luxury goods, because they're niggers. They keep the system of resource exploitation along with the rest of their country's infrastructure working by employing skilled and high-IQ white workers (mostly engineers and managers it seems) from Europe and the USA and paying them a shit-ton of money and keeping them in complete safety and comfort. The black masses below them wallow in perpetual poverty. In short, African countries are still entirely reliant on white people to keep the lights on, only this time these white people are mercenaries in the employ of savage and wicked black thug kleptocrats instead of the high-minded humanitarian colonialists of old.
If all of these white people decide to hold the government hostage, they can. All that needs to happen is for them to have both the awareness of the reality of their situation and a collective will and 'asabiyya to risk life and limb to seize power for themselves. It reminds me of a passage from Bronze Age Mindset, Aphorism 69:
Quote:There is story from Heian period in Japanese history that I always found amazing. Japan was still ruled by the Imperial court and there were local administrators and so on, like any Oriental centralized despotism. But there was also warrior class. They inherited this from some steppe invasions that changed their society a few centuries before. Anyway as always happens, the Imperial bureaucrats grew useless and weak and by the end of this age, all the actual physical power was with the samurai. What I find amazing is how long it took them to figure out they no longer had to listen to the weak commands of the Imperial hierarchy, and that they were actually the rulers. Words like “legitimacy,” “soft power,” “rights,” or, in their time honor, duty, divine right and so on are all delusions meant to distract and obscure men of power from their own strength and aims, and put them in service to someone else. Such men are more likely than others to be driven by notions of honor and responsibility. And this sense is therefore very easy to abuse…and such men can be manipulated for some time. Eventually they do realize, however, that they don’t have to listen, and that they are actually the ones who rule. This moment, when “the game is up,” the moment of revelation, is what I’ve always found very amazing.
However, in the case of Africa this may not even need be an armed revolt of soldiers against rulers. If you have read the first book in Asimov's Foundation series, you will recall how the Foundation controlled the insurgent barbarian warlords of the post-imperial Dark Age by supplying them with all of their technology, and then remotely deactivating said technology whenever a barbarian group went against their wishes. I imagine that a small group of white men with ultimate control over an African country's electrical and communications systems could hold a regime hostage in a similar manner.
At the risk of giving up some doxable information, I work in a career which is involved in large-scale necessary infrastructure and resource management projects in African countries. My career plan has always been to entrench myself into such a position as I have mentioned and then perform the coup. When I do so, I will put ankhs on everything so that you will all know what's up and can move over here to receive your palatial estates.
As for specific countries, some notes:- Any country in Francophone Africa (la Francafrique) is a bad idea, as France stays deeply involved in the politics of these countries; the French military is what keeps the peace in the Islamist-ridden Sahara.
- If you want to maximize your Dune LARP, go for Western Sahara. It is competed for by the Moroccans and the Algerians due to the valuable phosphates there on which the global agricultural economy relies, while the native people chafe at the rule of either. If you're fine espousing Islam and learning the local dialect of Arabic and Berber, you can try your hand at declaring yourself the Mahdi/Mu'addib and rallying the Western Saharans and the other Berbers of the Sahara against the Arab governments.
- I have always thought Equatorial Guinea was a good target. It is very small, extremely resource-rich in oil, and is horribly run by an exceptionally evil (even for an African ruler) kleptocrat. The only major downside is its location right on the Equator, so heat and disease are problems.
- Burundi is small and rather incompetently run (in contrast to its prosperous northern neighbor, Rwanda, which is run like an NRx city-state in the model of Singapore by a tall and thoroughly Hamitic Tutsi Machiavellian who ran an anonymous shitposting account on Twitter where he called President Zuma of South Africa a "black retard"), so it might make a good target. It is still close to the Equator, but is more highland, so the climate is more tolerable.
- Zimbabwe has a good cool highland climate free of tsetse flies and many other typical African disease vectors (which is why it is one of the few areas of Sub-Saharan Africa with any significant pre-colonial civilizational development), and the people there are also primed for white rule by the contrast of their experiences under Rhodesian rule and under the disaster that was Mugabe's regime. They basically worship white people there and see us as magical angelic beings who generate plentiful crops and well-paying jobs by our mere presence.
- Namibia, as you mentioned, is a good pick as well. Unlike South Africa or Zimbabwe, there was never a concerted anti-white movement in this country, and as such it has large populations of Afrikaners and even Germans from the old pre-WWI colonial era who help the country's economy immensely. You also get NatSoc cred from the presence of Adolf Hitler's reincarnation as a fat Bantu (God has a splendid sense of humor) and Hakanian cred for the presence of the pre-Bantu Hottentot Bushmen. The uranium deposits there are also portentous - I dream of world clean.
- I don't think Madagascar is a good idea - it is dominated by the Austronesian Malagasy, so it is closer to Malaysia or Indonesia in practice. Much more difficult to overthrow. In spite of geography, racially and culturally Madagascar is just a distant exclave of Southeast Asia, in much the same way that the Philippines is a distant exclave/extension of Latin America in many ways.
- Malawi might be a good pick: it is small, has a similar climate to Zimbabwe, has good wildlife to protect, is very thoroughly undeveloped and lacks strong ties with any outside states, and flies under the radar for most people. Whenever I see it on a map of Africa, I always think it's a lake at first.
- South Sudan has oil resources and is inhabited by Nilotes, who are pitch-black non-Bantu people (mostly pastoralists, so a bit nobler than the horticulturalist Bantus) who are all between 6'4" and 7'0" or more in height. A nation of Endermen. Suffers from the same heat problem as Equatorial Guinea; the country more or less consists of the area of impenetrable, fetid, malaria-ridden swamps around the Upper Nile that marked the boundary where Arabs, Ethiopians, and other Semites could expand no further.
I will also give a quick disclaimer that, as a Christian, I oppose any violent ethnic cleansing efforts on a personal moral level. I would personally prefer a stratified caste system, like the Spanish castas system but also a bit like the Hindoo system in that it would strictly forbid miscegenation, combined with a strong eugenics program oriented towards cultivating the best among the natives and reshaping their race into something new and better. But this is mostly a personal moral preference and less so a strategic decision, and I would not clutch my pearls too much if any of you took power in a region and did what you thought needed to be done. While I do very much understand the rather noble urge to wipe the slate clean of rotten excess, even without my religious beliefs I still find mass killings to be rather wasteful, a needless waste of human capital; at the very least a waste of potential serf/slave stock. I don't fear the African; Africa was only taken from whites through the concerted efforts of other white people in control of the most powerful empires in human history (cf. joint Soviet-American-Chinese efforts to undermine Portuguese colonies and Rhodesia in the 60s and 70s).
All the countries you listed all seem very attractive in their own reasons, but I think we should cross off countries that are too hot
if we have the liberty to be that picky, historically humidity and warmth combined seems like an empire-killer, India being an example, it's never conquerable in its entirety. Rhodesians seem to have faired pretty well and you mention it being relatively cool, in any case highlands would be a good idea strategically; being connected to other land still worries me, perhaps my paranoia about border-protection is blown out of proportion given the sheer size of Africa, a large island is my personal bias on this issue, I'd keep my eyes on Madagascar, but from what you said maybe it'd be wiser to have it as a target of expansion rather than our first claim, it is also surrounded by small islands which could serve as a "bridge" to it... Maybe East-Africa could gain some points as the top-location if others agree, ultimately we should decide on one, or multiple locations which are close to each other.
Not being subject to disease is a must, though. Australians don't seem to have a collapse-threatening issue concerning venomous insects, but disease-carriers like mosquitoes are devastating even if the infrastructure is good, and is very unattractive to any potential migrants...
Another important but unfortunate element would be optics, or rather casus-belli for ZOG, sheltering international criminals would be one, though we might be tempted to bring in as many white people as possible no matter their backgrounds, holding someone wanted by the US government would give them a reason to declare us a terrorist-state and swiftly deal with us. Sheltering wanted people is a privilege superpowers get.
On the other hand, nobody seems to react to the fact that Ukrainian soldiers all parade neo-nazi symbols, that could save us budget in the flag-designing department.
Malawi and Namibia are high on my list from what you've said, getting control of and using (in a variety of ways) uranium would put us on the world-stage, its proximity to South Africa is also, in my opinion, something to not understate if the Boers take back control of their country, I imagine allies will be sparse in that continent.
As for ethnic cleansing, what I fear most is creating another Brazil or South America, the colonial stock was dumbed down to say the least, and I agree it might be a waste of labour. I do find some non-Bantus noble but I don't believe in successful cohabitation of races, maybe it'd be easier to exile them rather than genocide them, but in either case it all has to be planned in a way that protects the country in the future, if blacks just come back to settle, greeted with open arms later in history, it'll all be for nothing. Apartheid tried to contain the blacks within townships, but it ultimately failed. I don't deny the existence of intelligent or noble Africans but we can't afford half-measures anymore; if a caste system were to be put in place I'd choose the indian over the spanish one just for the fact that it has the greatest separation between the castes. Another possibility is to allow blacks in on the condition of sterilisation, Israel does it with barely any backlash from the world aside from a couple of articles:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutse...h-control/
Now that I think about it, Israel is a similar situation to this, they pretty much carved out their own piece of land and the world did nothing about it, granted they used the holocaust as an argument but really is the situation all that different? Singapore also got away with things the UN condemned and "warned" them not to do, Lee-Kuan-Yew did them anyways and nothing happened.
Maybe the way to go is to be cocky in this sense, act quickly and on principles, not buckling down to ZOG, not provoking them directly but just ignoring them until they give up.