(02-14-2023, 01:39 PM)JohnnyRomero Wrote: [ -> ] (02-14-2023, 07:40 AM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ] (02-14-2023, 12:28 AM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]The only possible solution is genocide. Anything else, slavery included, is a glorified miscegenation vector. You trade high labour productivity in the short-term for, evidently, utter societal destruction and unraveling in the long-term.
This is ideal but it's just not going to happen. People in the future might look back and say "how terrible" but ultimately life is just normal and they live better in blissful ignorance of lower peoples. Like how today a white Australian girl might condemn her ancestors but carries on enjoying the highest standards of living in the world. This is the ideal, that our descendants could laud or condemn us but they are better regardless. This isn't going to happen though, not in America.
The only plausible glimmer of hope in the long term is the insular self preservation of higher peoples who are able to keep the Bantu World at bay until their day comes to cull the world.
But yeah, America is over.
IMO the threat of the Bantu is greatly overblown. The common wignat fixation on population numbers and birthrates in general is misplaced, as "the white man walks alone." Hitler correctly observed that Britain was able to effortlessly control and rule hundreds of millions of Hindoos with but a few thousand Anglo & Scots soldiers and officers. The negroid (Bantu & WestAfro alike) got to where he is now because:
>White people exported them for cheap, tropical disease-resistant labor (Darwin correctly observed that blacks never would or even could have left Africa on their own, even nearby Madagascar was first colonized by Austronesians originating in distant Formosa of all places before Bantus ever got there)
>White people with uniquely white & Western ideals rallied hundreds of thousands of other white people behind said uniquely white ideals to liberate negros from slavery
>White people took over all of Africa and gave them the inventions of writing, the wheel, medicine, mathematics, paved roads, trains, electricity, etc. in exchange for the exploitation of natural resources (rubber, gold, oil, etc.) which the negro himself never would've touched or even cared for in a million years
>White people once again campaigned behind very uniquely white idealisms to further liberate and empower the negro, aided and abetted by cynical Jewish bad actors and now-liberated female maternal instinct gone haywire
>Retarded and brain-wormed white people use the full force and power of the most powerful government in history to constantly force society to grant the negro a status of artificial aristocratic social privilege and to subsidize the life of the negro at the white man's expense, both domestically (through welfare) and internationally (through govt & NGO foreign aid & private charity to Africa)
>The stupid whites and cynical Jews running said powerful government lead a constant global campaign to make sure that no one in the world is ever mean to a negro
Aside from the Haitian Revolution, I cannot think of a single example of negroes accomplishing anything on their own. Throughout his entire history, the negro has constantly been propped up by the white man. My biggest fear of them is the same which I have with regards to other large, fetid, farming human biomasses such as Hindoos or Han Chinese, which is that of uncontrolled population growth and the resultant environmental destruction. The negro as a whole is a house of cards propped up by the combined stupidity, malice, wretchedness, lassitude, and misplaced idealism of the mentally degenerated whites of late Western Civilization. Caesarist-era general political apathy and cynicism among whites in the West would spell the end of Bantu dominance outside of their traditional role as cheap/free labor for Arabs and now, thanks to increased transportation technology, the Chynese as well.
Thank you for the post. You raise many good points. That said, I don't believe the Haitian Revolution could be considered much more than a perfect storm in blacks' favour. In short, they benefited greatly from severe instability in France caused by the revolution (and, later, Napoleon being at war with the entire continent), powers like Britain and Spain blockading the island or providing material aid to the rebels, a massive numerical advantage (and those few Whites in Saint-Domingue being woefully underarmed), French resistance to the revolt being more disjointed and factional than unified, and outbreaks of disease like yellow fever culling the few reinforcements that the political situation permitted.
I am inclined to agree with the guest you quoted; it seems like America is just too far gone demographically to hope for a turnaround to the glorious ethnostate it deserves to be. Again, projections place America at <50% white by 2045. We are currently suffering an invasion on the order of millions of spics, and no one's even talking about it (well, the same applies of any actual relevant political issue or anything that isn't "Does Israel deserve $3.5 or $4 billion this fiscal year?"). By the time any far-right political entity could gain power, you'd be looking at removing over half of the population. How can you secure sufficient public support for such a thing? It seems like people will just start going out of their way to undermine the government in the name of "human rights". AH had to deal with countless of these asinine resistance movements in his age, and that was back when the world was far more patriarchal and closer to reality than today. But if there is one thing that gives me hope, it's this: if properly weaponised in
our hands, I have faith in the media's ability to convince the masses of what needs to be done; you'd think that, nowadays, it'd be more difficult than ever to effectively and widely spread lies, but it's the exact opposite. This makes me feel like (and correct me if I'm coping here) it could be possible to turn things around about as quickly as they turned on us. A rejection of Whig historiography, so to speak.
I digress, because I am derailing the thread by talking about America specifically. I believe that there are reasons for optimism; there are still more Whites alive today than ever before in the past, and our population is only growing. There is no reason to believe African population growth is sustainable, but it will require things to get worse, perhaps worldwide, before they get better.
(02-14-2023, 04:11 PM)... Wrote: [ -> ] (02-14-2023, 01:39 PM)JohnnyRomero Wrote: [ -> ] (02-14-2023, 07:40 AM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ] (02-14-2023, 12:28 AM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ]The only possible solution is genocide. Anything else, slavery included, is a glorified miscegenation vector. You trade high labour productivity in the short-term for, evidently, utter societal destruction and unraveling in the long-term.
This is ideal but it's just not going to happen. People in the future might look back and say "how terrible" but ultimately life is just normal and they live better in blissful ignorance of lower peoples. Like how today a white Australian girl might condemn her ancestors but carries on enjoying the highest standards of living in the world. This is the ideal, that our descendants could laud or condemn us but they are better regardless. This isn't going to happen though, not in America.
The only plausible glimmer of hope in the long term is the insular self preservation of higher peoples who are able to keep the Bantu World at bay until their day comes to cull the world.
But yeah, America is over.
IMO the threat of the Bantu is greatly overblown. The common wignat fixation on population numbers and birthrates in general is misplaced,...
I don't take Bantu World to be literally about birth rates but rather the proliferation of the human slime mold and suffocation of higher distinction. Some races are destined for infinite proliferation without distinction, mediocrity or sub-mediocrity forever (not failure, but worse, an equilibrium). But it is not granted that even much more capable races should necessarily always achieve greatness. If the will is not there the higher races too fall into a sorry state, even they will be broken and worn if the environment doesn't facilitate achievement, which should be obvious to anyone whos seen the modern anglo. The danger (so called Bantu World) is to fall into a perpetually broken state, both in the material sense of a poor environment which can't facilitate higher life and of the will, a reduction of the subject to a kind of nothing-person, the "last man".
The biggest danger is not the proliferation of the global south but the disappearance of the nobility. That the "elite" are uneducated and tasteless and are just as broken as the commoner. The disappearance of any higher ideal, "transcendentals" of any sort. How could anyone who doesn't know beauty or good create anything beautiful or good? Without this even the "elite" are reduced to a state of pure biology, food and sex. In place of the transcendental ideal you have its total inversion: in its place of the will to beauty there is "feeding the world" and the proactive promotion of bare life.
Well, niggers definitely are an appropriate totem for the ignobility of our current society and its utter disdain and resentment for true beauty. For some reason, I am reminded of Andrew Tate, and he's probably as good as it gets wrt negroes. I was talking to a friend recently who told me that Tate represents the "dangers of the browning of the world". His worldview is utterly simplistic and self-serving, his definition of masculinity is pathetic and hollow, and he thinks he's a god among men because... I don't know, he has a bunch of supercars or whatever (not to start an argument on this tangent, but I can personally excuse milking this degenerated, wretched society for one's own benefit, like frauding for money, due to its utter lack of virtue and its founding principle being disdain for me, but blacks just do that to
every society they inhabit--and they have no intent of paying forward, ever, their gains). Your woman gets pregnant? Oh, it doesn't matter, just find another. Love and relationships? Fuck that, give me five wives. It is the stereotypical "bitches, money, cars", except conveyed with the predictably marginally higher eloquence of an only partly melanated individual. Do what you want, there is no sublimity to their conduct; their existence is inherently brutish and their actions about as dignified as flies hovering over a turd on the street in Delhi.
Tate talks about "escaping the Matrix", but his worldview overlaps considerably with that espoused by the elite. If that's all to which blacks will ever aspire, then it makes me fucking miserable that so many White boys and men are buying into that grifter's soulless nonsense. Pick your thoughtvirus, I guess.