03-06-2022, 09:31 AM
Full disclosure: "Incelbund" is not my phrase -- stole it from this great forum.
I just had a thought while killing time at work: the next decade when it comes to biopolitics, especially sexual politics, will be very interesting. First of all, as F. Roger Devlin discusses in Sexual Utopia in Power, the current zeitgeist in re: dating and relationship formation favors females. Men are told to "be themselves," which makes sex selection for women even easier. Women get to be more cunning and manipulative, while men are consoled with "No bitches?" memes and other crap following constant rejection. As Devlin notes, a sexual aristocracy of men are having more sex than ever, while a vast majority of men and women are not having sex at all. Nobody seems interested in "settling" either. Data backs this up:
Millennials Lose Their Virginity Later Than Previous Generations (businessinsider.com)
Amount of men under 30 not having sex has tripled in the past decade | JOE is the voice of Irish people at home and abroad
The whole "West Elm Caleb" e-drama (remember that?) was basically women complaining that a man treated them like women treat men. One of the women even stated that Caleb's intended fate was to be just another addition to her "stable." This was a mask-off moment that society turned into men = bad. Such events will continue to turn many men away from dating altogether, thereby further increasing an already Manichaean sexual politics.
If we factor in Zoomer confusion (highest rate of gay preference) and COVID-19 (a large percentage of the left will never recover from it; permanent hypochondriacs afraid of contact), then we are racing towards a sexless future on top of a future of downward economic mobility for most too. This future will not have the fortune of widespread gospel either, as church attendance is down and being replaced by the hollow machinations of Scientism. There is also the "femcel" phenomenon, which will further contribute to general unhappiness. While the mainstream memes will not change (only men can ever be "losers" or "pathetic" in the sexual marketplace), I do think femcels will have to be reckoned with by the larger culture. They can't be ignored.
My point in all of this is this: what comes next? People can continue to live as they do now, pretending that their disconnected lives are great because they make art, or have a dog, or whatever. A lot of these people will become boring spinsters and bachelors. Many will commit suicide, thereby contributing to the already awful epidemic of "deaths of despair." Most will maybe have a fling or two, but that will be it.
However, there will be those unhappy with the bleak duality of die alone or die early. Many will find religion (great). Others may become aggressive. History shows that wife-less men tend to seek danger, and giving the possibility of a multi-polar world, the Age of Incels could coincide with an age of warfare. Are Incelbunds a possibility?
I don't know, friends. What do you think?
I just had a thought while killing time at work: the next decade when it comes to biopolitics, especially sexual politics, will be very interesting. First of all, as F. Roger Devlin discusses in Sexual Utopia in Power, the current zeitgeist in re: dating and relationship formation favors females. Men are told to "be themselves," which makes sex selection for women even easier. Women get to be more cunning and manipulative, while men are consoled with "No bitches?" memes and other crap following constant rejection. As Devlin notes, a sexual aristocracy of men are having more sex than ever, while a vast majority of men and women are not having sex at all. Nobody seems interested in "settling" either. Data backs this up:
Millennials Lose Their Virginity Later Than Previous Generations (businessinsider.com)
Amount of men under 30 not having sex has tripled in the past decade | JOE is the voice of Irish people at home and abroad
The whole "West Elm Caleb" e-drama (remember that?) was basically women complaining that a man treated them like women treat men. One of the women even stated that Caleb's intended fate was to be just another addition to her "stable." This was a mask-off moment that society turned into men = bad. Such events will continue to turn many men away from dating altogether, thereby further increasing an already Manichaean sexual politics.
If we factor in Zoomer confusion (highest rate of gay preference) and COVID-19 (a large percentage of the left will never recover from it; permanent hypochondriacs afraid of contact), then we are racing towards a sexless future on top of a future of downward economic mobility for most too. This future will not have the fortune of widespread gospel either, as church attendance is down and being replaced by the hollow machinations of Scientism. There is also the "femcel" phenomenon, which will further contribute to general unhappiness. While the mainstream memes will not change (only men can ever be "losers" or "pathetic" in the sexual marketplace), I do think femcels will have to be reckoned with by the larger culture. They can't be ignored.
My point in all of this is this: what comes next? People can continue to live as they do now, pretending that their disconnected lives are great because they make art, or have a dog, or whatever. A lot of these people will become boring spinsters and bachelors. Many will commit suicide, thereby contributing to the already awful epidemic of "deaths of despair." Most will maybe have a fling or two, but that will be it.
However, there will be those unhappy with the bleak duality of die alone or die early. Many will find religion (great). Others may become aggressive. History shows that wife-less men tend to seek danger, and giving the possibility of a multi-polar world, the Age of Incels could coincide with an age of warfare. Are Incelbunds a possibility?
I don't know, friends. What do you think?