03-18-2024, 03:16 PM
Among topics made taboo to discuss by the guiding Afro-Semitic feminist principles of the new order we find ourselves living under, few are regarded with as much sacrality as female sexuality. By "female sexuality", I obviously do not mean the private workings of the female body; there is nothing Afro-Semitic feminists love more than smearing a woman's bloody discharge on paintings or whatever to remind you of how disgusting their bodies are, removing the traditional veil of ignorance that could facilitate seductivity and romance. Rather, I mean the private workings of what arouses their sexual interest -- because quite a few of them are rather embarrassing for the modern woman who is supposed to be a good feminist.
It is an ancient boomer meme that women are impossible to understand. I propose that they are relatively easy to understand with rote observation (and, in fact, were fairly well understood by men before the onset of Afro-Semitic feminism discouraged pattern recognition in general), provided you have the time and the stomach for it. I don't think I have to mention PUAs and incels as trailblazers of female sociology (even if I don't think they're completely correct). One could even say that the idea that women can't be understood is a conspiracy theory disseminated by Afro-Semitic feminists to lend women some air of mystery they should not rightfully possess. Once you understand the female as a primarily social creature who is also driven by biological-psychological phenomena that she rarely acknowledges and understands even less so, you can basically "decode" any woman you come across. I imagine this isn't anything new for any of you.
Anyway, have you guys ever heard of trauma? I'm sure you have, and I'm also sure you've heard of sex positivity. I've written elsewhere that sex positivity is, in essence, an attempt to remove all seductive mystery and romantic passion from male-female relationships and make them a legalistic ritual of exchanging the arcane and unknowable "consent" and stinking bodily fluids. But have you ever heard of the very interesting ways these intersect in the heads of young women?
Mouse here is a "survivor". She "copes" by writing underage incest rape fanfiction. Elsewhere, she has stated that a therapist recommended this to her. I hope you see where I'm going with all this.
Mouse is putting out these posts in the context of a great, apocalyptic female culture war of "pro-ship" vs. "anti-ship", of which she supports the former. This topic perhaps deserves its own related thread, but the basic gestalt on a surface level is that pro-shippers enjoy porn that contains themes odious to the modern Afro-Semitic feminist while anti-shippers think such things should be censored. Pro-shippers tend to trend older (and Whiter) while anti-shippers tend to trend younger (and less White), although this changes on a case-by-case basis. Unlike male culture wars, where the two sides represent fundamentally different beliefs that define the struggles of our age in miniature (i.e. Gamergate), this entire debate is an utterly dishonest purity spiral. Essentially, two different generations of Afro-Semitic feminists are clashing: one which believes women should have the freedom to do any degenerate thing they wish, even things that violate Afro-Semitic feminist social mores, and the other who believes these women are revealing their hand, so to speak, and have looped themselves back around to the logic of religious conservatism regarding sex. There's really no side to root for here for a right-winger. Since this is ZOG, both sides are absolutely dedicated to making everything uglier and stupider, and both sides are still opposed to natural White male sexuality, albeit by different vectors of attack. And, despite the fact that they ruin lives over this stuff, a little bit of digging reveals that they both like the same "problematic" things in slightly different ways.
("I would never sexually desire a rapist. I only like creepy, obsessive stalkers who, I assure you, are completely distinct from rapists.")
Naturally, women have no idea what's going on, so they think this culture war is the result of the rise of fascism or something.
("Fascists [read: third worlders who think you ain't havin' a normal one, bruh] and their governments [read: brown theocracies] are attacking me for drawing Creek rape.")
What's important to note here is the inherent dishonesty present on both sides, but especially the "pro-ship" one. As I stated earlier, women are primarily social creatures with biological urges they very rarely understand. With that in mind, I find it very interesting that Mouse apparently writes underage rape porn to "cope" with being touched as a child. In fact, I might go out on a limb and say that isn't true at all. Do Japanese women who write and draw similarly deranged rape porn do it as a cope for being raped? Perhaps on the Japanese subway, where five bazillion Japanese women are raped every day? Marquess de OMOCAT made excuses about her old posts about being attracted to shotas, but even she is too Asian to lie and claim that Omori was made to deal with trauma. I propose that Mouse writes underage rape fanfiction because it scratches a sexual itch which is fundamentally anti-feminist to have, something which she and people like her desperately try to cover up with the tactical employment of therapeutic language.
Therapeutic language, through which the modern woman understands the world, is one of the strongest tools women possess in the War on Truth. I believe that psychology is a legitimate field filled with illegitimate work produced by neurotic women and Jews, and their employment of this kind of language preserves no aspect of any psychological truth. The therapeutic world is a great charade act to hide uncomfortable truths from you.
Here's another, more popular, way women deploy therapeutic language.
This Instagram post is about Wilbur Soot, one of the Minecraft YouTuber heartthrobs I briefly discussed in the pooner thread. Notice the really stupid therapy formulations here. "Love bombing". "Emotional abuse". Even a charitable reading of this only proves that Wilbur is somewhat unpleasant and self-obsessed, and that's only providing anything here happened as our unreliable narrator says it did. Even the "rape" narrative at the end -- if you even believe women getting themselves drunk and then having sex is somehow "rape" -- seems to imply that the narrator said no in a drunken stupor and Wilbur obliged. This woman is using therapeutic language to obfuscate the fact that she is vindictive and jealous that her dark-eyed English boy broke up with her and started talking to other girls. His fans are joining in because they, too, had to experience this heartbreak when Wilbur first announced he had a girlfriend. Perhaps this is the fate of all girl YouTubers who do not live like monks.
This thread is a bit all over the place, mashing together a few independent observations I've made over the past few months, and I don't really have a satisfying conclusion for it that wouldn't already be obvious. I suppose you could combine this with the pooner thread into a general thesis on how, after the onset of Afro-Semitic feminism and their ascendance to power, females are experiencing a sort of "honesty crisis" among themselves, and how this has knock-on effects on their poor, mistreated serf: the average male. Therapeutic language allows for the maintenance of these lies and delusions. Any thoughts you all have on these matters are, of course, very much appreciated.
It is an ancient boomer meme that women are impossible to understand. I propose that they are relatively easy to understand with rote observation (and, in fact, were fairly well understood by men before the onset of Afro-Semitic feminism discouraged pattern recognition in general), provided you have the time and the stomach for it. I don't think I have to mention PUAs and incels as trailblazers of female sociology (even if I don't think they're completely correct). One could even say that the idea that women can't be understood is a conspiracy theory disseminated by Afro-Semitic feminists to lend women some air of mystery they should not rightfully possess. Once you understand the female as a primarily social creature who is also driven by biological-psychological phenomena that she rarely acknowledges and understands even less so, you can basically "decode" any woman you come across. I imagine this isn't anything new for any of you.
Anyway, have you guys ever heard of trauma? I'm sure you have, and I'm also sure you've heard of sex positivity. I've written elsewhere that sex positivity is, in essence, an attempt to remove all seductive mystery and romantic passion from male-female relationships and make them a legalistic ritual of exchanging the arcane and unknowable "consent" and stinking bodily fluids. But have you ever heard of the very interesting ways these intersect in the heads of young women?
Mouse here is a "survivor". She "copes" by writing underage incest rape fanfiction. Elsewhere, she has stated that a therapist recommended this to her. I hope you see where I'm going with all this.
Mouse is putting out these posts in the context of a great, apocalyptic female culture war of "pro-ship" vs. "anti-ship", of which she supports the former. This topic perhaps deserves its own related thread, but the basic gestalt on a surface level is that pro-shippers enjoy porn that contains themes odious to the modern Afro-Semitic feminist while anti-shippers think such things should be censored. Pro-shippers tend to trend older (and Whiter) while anti-shippers tend to trend younger (and less White), although this changes on a case-by-case basis. Unlike male culture wars, where the two sides represent fundamentally different beliefs that define the struggles of our age in miniature (i.e. Gamergate), this entire debate is an utterly dishonest purity spiral. Essentially, two different generations of Afro-Semitic feminists are clashing: one which believes women should have the freedom to do any degenerate thing they wish, even things that violate Afro-Semitic feminist social mores, and the other who believes these women are revealing their hand, so to speak, and have looped themselves back around to the logic of religious conservatism regarding sex. There's really no side to root for here for a right-winger. Since this is ZOG, both sides are absolutely dedicated to making everything uglier and stupider, and both sides are still opposed to natural White male sexuality, albeit by different vectors of attack. And, despite the fact that they ruin lives over this stuff, a little bit of digging reveals that they both like the same "problematic" things in slightly different ways.
("I would never sexually desire a rapist. I only like creepy, obsessive stalkers who, I assure you, are completely distinct from rapists.")
Naturally, women have no idea what's going on, so they think this culture war is the result of the rise of fascism or something.
("Fascists [read: third worlders who think you ain't havin' a normal one, bruh] and their governments [read: brown theocracies] are attacking me for drawing Creek rape.")
What's important to note here is the inherent dishonesty present on both sides, but especially the "pro-ship" one. As I stated earlier, women are primarily social creatures with biological urges they very rarely understand. With that in mind, I find it very interesting that Mouse apparently writes underage rape porn to "cope" with being touched as a child. In fact, I might go out on a limb and say that isn't true at all. Do Japanese women who write and draw similarly deranged rape porn do it as a cope for being raped? Perhaps on the Japanese subway, where five bazillion Japanese women are raped every day? Marquess de OMOCAT made excuses about her old posts about being attracted to shotas, but even she is too Asian to lie and claim that Omori was made to deal with trauma. I propose that Mouse writes underage rape fanfiction because it scratches a sexual itch which is fundamentally anti-feminist to have, something which she and people like her desperately try to cover up with the tactical employment of therapeutic language.
Therapeutic language, through which the modern woman understands the world, is one of the strongest tools women possess in the War on Truth. I believe that psychology is a legitimate field filled with illegitimate work produced by neurotic women and Jews, and their employment of this kind of language preserves no aspect of any psychological truth. The therapeutic world is a great charade act to hide uncomfortable truths from you.
Here's another, more popular, way women deploy therapeutic language.
This Instagram post is about Wilbur Soot, one of the Minecraft YouTuber heartthrobs I briefly discussed in the pooner thread. Notice the really stupid therapy formulations here. "Love bombing". "Emotional abuse". Even a charitable reading of this only proves that Wilbur is somewhat unpleasant and self-obsessed, and that's only providing anything here happened as our unreliable narrator says it did. Even the "rape" narrative at the end -- if you even believe women getting themselves drunk and then having sex is somehow "rape" -- seems to imply that the narrator said no in a drunken stupor and Wilbur obliged. This woman is using therapeutic language to obfuscate the fact that she is vindictive and jealous that her dark-eyed English boy broke up with her and started talking to other girls. His fans are joining in because they, too, had to experience this heartbreak when Wilbur first announced he had a girlfriend. Perhaps this is the fate of all girl YouTubers who do not live like monks.
This thread is a bit all over the place, mashing together a few independent observations I've made over the past few months, and I don't really have a satisfying conclusion for it that wouldn't already be obvious. I suppose you could combine this with the pooner thread into a general thesis on how, after the onset of Afro-Semitic feminism and their ascendance to power, females are experiencing a sort of "honesty crisis" among themselves, and how this has knock-on effects on their poor, mistreated serf: the average male. Therapeutic language allows for the maintenance of these lies and delusions. Any thoughts you all have on these matters are, of course, very much appreciated.