Age of Consent

[Guest]

Something appears to have gone wrong with the quote function here. But while I'm in the thread again, is there a funny story behind this?

Before I give you the rundown I wish to note to our guest here if you seriously believe appeal to balding socialist podcast host counts for a rebuttal here it does not.

Cool. Doesn't change the fact that there isn't a single thing that he, GarbageApe, hbomberguy etc. say about you that isn't true.

---

I'm Trans BTW idk if that matters

[a system is failing]

Cool. Doesn't change the fact that there isn't a single thing that he, GarbageApe, hbomberguy etc. say about you that isn't true.

It's never going to stop being funny that Chapo, Bread Tube and twitter users like GA really are your guys' cutting edge. We don't even have to strawman you with it, every time people like you show up you immediately bear the standard for this same insular circle of retards.

[BillyONare]

I like hbomberguy's critique of Sherlock. Rare moment of lucidity for the dirtbag left movement.

[carcinoEugenicist]

The age of consent should ideally be targeted at achieving some equilibrium of both fertility and quality of offspring, while keeping the typical arrangement non-outrageous for all stakeholders in childrearing. You could make some argument about whether it should be 18 or 16; but neither of these options are really unconscionable - and the AoC is very far from being a top priority issue for us when it comes to what is presently determining the quality and quantity of offspring.

I think AoC discussions in these spaces are somewhat of an example of when people conflate how much of a social third rail some issue is with its importance in determining outcomes.

[BillyONare]

It is a top priority precisely because it is such a “third rail”. If we don’t talk about any third rails and just let things slide and talk about uncontroversial things, then we are no different than Charlie Kirk or Jordan B Peterson. You cannot let anything slide with leftists or they will just take things further and further until civilization is destroyed. If we just let this slide then they will raise the age of “consent” to 30 or 40. Do you see how age of consent as 30 or 40 (only for white heterosexuals) would be deleterious in any way? Consider that “16 or 18” is already outrageous because you are drastically impeding people’s ability to find mates, lead normal lives, and start families and that it is as much of an unconscionable evil to throw a man in jail for having sex with a teenager as it is to throw him in jail over a rape allegation. Consider how the culture of society takes these evil leftist rules beyond the legal realm to the point where normalfags slandering a 24 year old man as a “pedophile” for dating a 20 year old woman and how painful this is to men who want free and successful lives rather than play destructive leftist gossip games.

Stop letting things slide. Take the thong out of your bussy and take a stand for things that matter. Even if it makes you uncomfortable or normalfags and dirtbags slander you for it. Lion roar.

The only way to win against leftists is to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If you give them even one exception then they can take that exception and blow it out of proportion to destroy civilization. This is currently happening with the “pedophilia” blood libel and you are too in denial or insensitive to see it. If you could oppose leftism by telling mostly the truth, in a way that normalfags can stomach, then Fox News would have saved the world. We can see that that does not work.

[carcinoEugenicist]

It is a top priority precisely because it is such a “third rail”. If we don’t talk about any third rails and just let things slide and talk about uncontroversial things, then we are no different than Charlie Kirk or Jordan B Peterson. You cannot let anything slide with leftists or they will just take things further and further until civilization is destroyed. If we just let this slide then they will raise the age of “consent” to 30 or 40. Do you see how age of consent as 30 or 40 (only for white heterosexuals) would be deleterious in any way? Consider that “16 or 18” is already outrageous because you are drastically impeding people’s ability to find mates, lead normal lives, and start families and that it is as much of an unconscionable evil to throw a man in jail for having sex with a teenager as it is to throw him in jail over a rape allegation. Consider how the culture of society takes these evil leftist rules beyond the legal realm to the point where normalfags slandering a 24 year old man as a “pedophile” for dating a 20 year old woman and how painful this is to men who want free and successful lives rather than play destructive leftist gossip games.

Stop letting things slide. Take the thong out of your bussy and take a stand for things that matter. Even if it makes you uncomfortable or normalfags and dirtbags slander you for it. Lion roar.

The only way to win against leftists is to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If you give them even one exception then they can take that exception and blow it out of proportion to destroy civilization. This is currently happening with the “pedophilia” blood libel and you are too in denial or insensitive to see it. If you could oppose leftism by telling mostly the truth, in a way that normalfags can stomach, then Fox News would have saved the world. We can see that that does not work.

I get where you are coming from, my rationale is that we (or anybody, for that matter) have limited resources for Third Rail Touching in le Public Space, and that they are better spent on questions of race, genetics, and the technologies and policies to push both in the right direction. Of course, these are my personal top issues, and the whole point of a place like this is to touch all the longhouse rails - so I don't mean to try and opticsfag on you or the existence of this thread in favor of focusing on My Shit Exclusively. Carry on, friend.

[Crackrobatty]

It's never going to stop being funny that Chapo, Bread Tube and twitter users like GA really are your guys' cutting edge.

Your own 'cutting edge' amounts to reboiled 4chan terminology from over 10 years ago and laughably petulant internet tough guy posturing. I think it's safe to say we bear a relatively high standard in comparison

Laws don’t really exist in America. They just put you in prison for doing stuff the government doesn’t like.

"Laws don't really exist in America, also we need to imprison the world"

[BillyONare]

that's not me take your meds

[Guest]

"Laws don't really exist in America, also we need to imprison the world"

Total Nigger Death(TND) Billions Must Die(BMD)
No, not imprison. This World is Rotten, and those who are making it rot deserve to die. Someone has to do it, so why not me? Even if it means sacrificing my own mind and soul, it's worth it. Because the world can't go on like this. I wonder what if someone else had picked up this notebook? Is there anyone out there other than me who'd be willing to eliminate the vermin from the world? If I don't do it, then who will? That's just it. There's no one. But I can do it. In fact, I'm the only one who can, I'll do it. Using the death note, I'll change the world. I'm a hardworking honors student who's considered to be one of Japan's best and brightest. And I... I will become the God of this new World.

[Campbell]

The age of consent should be 25. Call me "Longhouse" but I think sex should coincide with mental maturity.

[anthony]

The age of consent should be 25. Call me "Longhouse" but I think sex should coincide with mental maturity.

Our 25 year olds, or ideally cultivated 25 year olds?

[Campbell]

The age of consent should be 25. Call me "Longhouse" but I think sex should coincide with mental maturity.

Our 25 year olds, or ideally cultivated 25 year olds?

What do you mean? I don't understand.

[anthony]

The age of consent should be 25. Call me "Longhouse" but I think sex should coincide with mental maturity.

Our 25 year olds, or ideally cultivated 25 year olds?

What do you mean? I don't understand.

I believe that mental maturity could be a valid standard. But I don't believe that mental maturity is something the average 25 year old has achieved.

[BillyONare]

The age of consent should be 25. Call me "Longhouse" but I think sex should coincide with mental maturity.

I diagnosis you with GRIDS and concomitant parasitic worm infections of the full gastrointestinal tract. Treatment: anti-parasitic pharmaceutical course, abstinence from sodomy

[Zed]

No, he has a point. Sex is a telos, the end onto itself. It is not meant to be had, or even reached for. It is past this life and it is probably past the universe itself. Only at the end of time, with our souls fully absorbed and scribed into the completed body of God, as the curtain of phenomenology is pulled from behind the theatre, should we contemplate the actual potentiality of sex. It's apocalyptic consumation, weighted against an eternity of epididymal hypertension, shall birth the next universe.

[Guest]

The age of consent was invented by crones disguised as "good Christian moralists" (remember that it being was parallel to the Prohibition); it must be destroyed. Women have never been hurt by marrying young and to good men of aristocratic mindset. Anyone who disagrees has had their heads imperceptibly warped by the ideas of a modern world and should be euthanized if leftist and reeducated if a rwer. At the same time, young men should be protected from haglust and grooming, as their seed is best saved for women who are more fertile (and motherly).

[Datacop]

"The brain doesn't finish developing until 25" is gobbledygook anyway, the brain never stops developing and changing over a person's life. 25 is around when the prefrontal cortex "finishes" its maturation, plateauing in its development of white matter. That's all it means, it isn't when the brain stops changing, its just tracking the growth of one part of the brain. It's almost as arbitrary as the current AoC being 18 and the drinking age being 21. If you really want to make an argument for the AoC based on that adage, 25 should be the LAST time a woman should be considered for marriage, as any older and her haggard dried up brain won't have the neuroplasticity to effectively enter a symbiotic relationship dependent on another person.

[BillyONare]

^Gem. The white matter part might not even be true. I remember a twitter thread or blog post saying that “the brain doesn’t mature until 25” was the biggest and most unscientific scam in all of of neurology; it’s based on zero evidence. I wish I could find it. It wasn’t arguing against age of consent or anything, just exposing pseudoscience.

[Campbell]

The age of consent was invented by crones disguised as "good Christian moralists" (remember that it being was parallel to the Prohibition); it must be destroyed. Women have never been hurt by marrying young and to good men of aristocratic mindset. Anyone who disagrees has had their heads imperceptibly warped by the ideas of a modern world and should be euthanized if leftist and reeducated if a rwer. At the same time, young men should be protected from haglust and grooming, as their seed is best saved for women who are more fertile (and motherly).

What is wrong with prohibition and the early Progressive, Temperance movements? You sound like a nigger and your shit's fucked up. You're a nigger who believes in dualities, "leftists", "rwers". That's why you're a guest and not a user, you're a cowardly nigger.

[BillyONare]

“dualities like left and right”

shoo shoo wignat. this is not the place to talk about metaphysics, phenomenology, and le thurd position