10-06-2023, 08:50 PM
I was watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj8z2xyen2Y
The gist is that some local cops decided to spend tax dollars on entrapping a normal looking 29 year old man with a wife and kids to come cheat on his wife. I'm not a big fan of adultery, but it isn't illegal in this country and most normies don't seem like they would want the police to be entrapping men to commit adultery.
I could be wrong though, because nobody seems upset by this. The comments on the video are unanimously in support of the cops' behavior ... many are even mad that the man only received parole, after an arrest and an injunction to not see his family, on account of his adulterous nature. He was facing 60 years in prison, and many comments are receiving le updoots talking about how the man should be thrown into a woodchipper and worse ...
Now here is what I really don't understand. Even though the man's only crime is adultery, the normies seem insistent that this isn't the reason why they want to murder this man. They have a very strange interpretation of what he was entrapped for. They keep wrongly insisting the virtual female seducer in this situation is not only the abstract victim, as opposed to the man's wife, the seducess being another criminal, but that she is only a victim because, though she is an adult trying to seduce a married man, she is under the age of 18.0 years and therefore is a "child".
This untrue fact alone is the whole of the crime, it not only makes it a crime but one that necessitates a "woodchipper" to fix ...
I don't understand this. I don't understand thinking that a 15 year old seducess is a child in any meaningful way. I don't understand not understanding that all normally functioning men are attracted to women this age. I don't understand not understanding that women that age are getting dicked anyway, often by young loser males such as high school football players. I don't understand thinking that it's magically wrong if she gets dicked by a man who is older than high school aged but not if she gets dicked by a man that is high school aged. I don't understand thinking that dicking a teenage girl in your late 20s should warrant your execution or the end of your life as you know it. I don't understand how people can't be enraged at those cops and indignified by this whole video. I don't understand believing that dicking a 15 year old woman with her consent is equivalent to murdering people morally while caring so little about sexual morality generally that you think homosexual marriage is okay and if a man cheats on his wife with a 25 year old it's only a domestic issue that needs no violent morality policing.
The people who think a man's life should be ruined over this are the real murderers and should be dealt with accordingly ...
The gist is that some local cops decided to spend tax dollars on entrapping a normal looking 29 year old man with a wife and kids to come cheat on his wife. I'm not a big fan of adultery, but it isn't illegal in this country and most normies don't seem like they would want the police to be entrapping men to commit adultery.
I could be wrong though, because nobody seems upset by this. The comments on the video are unanimously in support of the cops' behavior ... many are even mad that the man only received parole, after an arrest and an injunction to not see his family, on account of his adulterous nature. He was facing 60 years in prison, and many comments are receiving le updoots talking about how the man should be thrown into a woodchipper and worse ...
Now here is what I really don't understand. Even though the man's only crime is adultery, the normies seem insistent that this isn't the reason why they want to murder this man. They have a very strange interpretation of what he was entrapped for. They keep wrongly insisting the virtual female seducer in this situation is not only the abstract victim, as opposed to the man's wife, the seducess being another criminal, but that she is only a victim because, though she is an adult trying to seduce a married man, she is under the age of 18.0 years and therefore is a "child".
This untrue fact alone is the whole of the crime, it not only makes it a crime but one that necessitates a "woodchipper" to fix ...
I don't understand this. I don't understand thinking that a 15 year old seducess is a child in any meaningful way. I don't understand not understanding that all normally functioning men are attracted to women this age. I don't understand not understanding that women that age are getting dicked anyway, often by young loser males such as high school football players. I don't understand thinking that it's magically wrong if she gets dicked by a man who is older than high school aged but not if she gets dicked by a man that is high school aged. I don't understand thinking that dicking a teenage girl in your late 20s should warrant your execution or the end of your life as you know it. I don't understand how people can't be enraged at those cops and indignified by this whole video. I don't understand believing that dicking a 15 year old woman with her consent is equivalent to murdering people morally while caring so little about sexual morality generally that you think homosexual marriage is okay and if a man cheats on his wife with a 25 year old it's only a domestic issue that needs no violent morality policing.
The people who think a man's life should be ruined over this are the real murderers and should be dealt with accordingly ...