I don't understand the Age of Consent
#1
I was watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj8z2xyen2Y

The gist is that some local cops decided to spend tax dollars on entrapping a normal looking 29 year old man with a wife and kids to come cheat on his wife. I'm not a big fan of adultery, but it isn't illegal in this country and most normies don't seem like they would want the police to be entrapping men to commit adultery.

I could be wrong though, because nobody seems upset by this. The comments on the video are unanimously in support of the cops' behavior ... many are even mad that the man only received parole, after an arrest and an injunction to not see his family, on account of his adulterous nature. He was facing 60 years in prison, and many comments are receiving le updoots talking about how the man should be thrown into a woodchipper and worse ...

Now here is what I really don't understand. Even though the man's only crime is adultery, the normies seem insistent that this isn't the reason why they want to murder this man. They have a very strange interpretation of what he was entrapped for. They keep wrongly insisting the virtual female seducer in this situation is not only the abstract victim, as opposed to the man's wife, the seducess being another criminal, but that she is only a victim because, though she is an adult trying to seduce a married man, she is under the age of 18.0 years and therefore is a "child".

This untrue fact alone is the whole of the crime, it not only makes it a crime but one that necessitates a "woodchipper" to fix ...

I don't understand this. I don't understand thinking that a 15 year old seducess is a child in any meaningful way. I don't understand not understanding that all normally functioning men are attracted to women this age. I don't understand not understanding that women that age are getting dicked anyway, often by young loser males such as high school football players. I don't understand thinking that it's magically wrong if she gets dicked by a man who is older than high school aged but not if she gets dicked by a man that is high school aged. I don't understand thinking that dicking a teenage girl in your late 20s should warrant your execution or the end of your life as you know it. I don't understand how people can't be enraged at those cops and indignified by this whole video. I don't understand believing that dicking a 15 year old woman with her consent is equivalent to murdering people morally while caring so little about sexual morality generally that you think homosexual marriage is okay and if a man cheats on his wife with a 25 year old it's only a domestic issue that needs no violent morality policing. 

The people who think a man's life should be ruined over this are the real murderers and should be dealt with accordingly ...
#2
The (heterosexual) "age of consent" is the only sexual norm that ZOG allows its subjects to get angry over, and there's a lot of reasons to be angry about sexual immorality in 2023, so they they have a lot of bile to channel into this one permitted outlet.

These people really don't need to be "dealt with", in basedworld they'll be screaming for the blood of kikes and niggers.
#3
At fifteen, you can unconsciously have naïve and child-like ideas about the world. Wouldn't you want the possibility of childhood to be protected at that age?

I do wish for childhood to be extended as long as possible, but it's ridiculous at a certain point.
University of Wikipedia, class of 2023, summa cum laude in all the articles of the "Nazi Germany" expandobox
#4
(10-07-2023, 11:27 AM)Striped_Pyjama_Boy_Nietzschean Wrote: At fifteen, you can unconsciously have naïve and child-like ideas about the world. Wouldn't you want the possibility of childhood to be protected at that age?

I really don't care but I do think anyone who thinks you can ruin a man's life for screwing a teenaged girl should be thrown in the gas chamber during Total Normie Death
#5
(10-07-2023, 11:27 AM)Striped_Pyjama_Boy_Nietzschean Wrote: At fifteen, you can unconsciously have naïve and child-like ideas about the world. Wouldn't you want the possibility of childhood to be protected at that age?

I do wish for childhood to be extended as long as possible, but it's ridiculous at a certain point.

Innocence should be protected, I agree. But this is very obviously not about that.
#6
(10-07-2023, 06:20 PM)GymChad Wrote: I really don't care but I do think anyone who thinks you can ruin a man's life for screwing a teenaged girl should be thrown in the gas chamber during Total Normie Death

(10-08-2023, 12:15 AM)anthony Wrote: Innocence should be protected, I agree. But this is very obviously not about that.

Of course, I didn't mean to imply otherwise.
University of Wikipedia, class of 2023, summa cum laude in all the articles of the "Nazi Germany" expandobox
#7
in the same vein as stuff about the inverse correlation between speed of mental maturation and peak mental capability for dogs, women and men. does anyone remember some twxtter footage of a classroom from the 80s and it was all highschool kids but they looked so mature? like just an illustration of something being definitely screwed up in the biological process. probably not hard to find similar footage. the average age of menarchy has dropped by a few years since 1820, used to be around 16 or 17. Some sources put it at nearly half a decade sooner. Exposure to sexual content and experiences hastens the process. Obesity too. bet brown girls probably mature more carelessly. a bunch of takes could conclude this post. it is increasingly hard to find women who are properly developed. none of the normie signalling protects girls from losing their biological innocence sooner than ever. idk, cyoa
#8
The normgroids are at it again. Some low IQ sportsball player had sex with a 17 year old woman and they want blood.

Comments are full of "the age of consent should be 21", "straight to gen pop", "POV: You wake up to black SUVs surrounding your crib" (this one is particularly putrid, celebrating NKVD style tactics, i.e. creepy federal secret police surprise home/night arrests instead of transparent due process).

https://archive.ph/mRbTN

https://twitter.com/AmiriKing/status/172...3392663715

Haven't seen one person say that this woman is not a child. Also the sportsball player is only a few years older than her. In fact, the age gap is 3 years which is the same as the average age gap in a marriage. Also, in the state this happened in the age of consent is 16. Absolutely crazy.
#9
In the history books of the future it will be written that:
With the end of the Age Of Consent, the Age Of Amarna ushered in.
#10
I think maybe having sex with children is bad, actually.
#11
cozy.tv is more your speed then
#12
The most interesting part of politics is the motivations towards cognitive dissonance. There are so many smart people who disagree with me, not just on self-interested issues or matters of identity either. Some of the strongest dissonance motivators are the tendency towards inaction, the desire to believe oneself unjustly crushed by an unconquerable power, and being a faggot.

Around half a percent of marriages in the usa are minor-adult marriages, 10k to 14k per annum out of some number between 2M and 2.3M that I am not going to find. How does this fit with the theory that you can never claim a wife before she is defiled? If over ten thousand men are doing it every year, why can't you? Do 16 year olds just not know enough Shoppenshower or whatever for you to impregnate?

Also, just noticed something funny about the comments gymchad summarizes. A 3 year age gap case where the normie is generalizing an 18 age of consent + "the age of consent should be 21!" = "it isn't statutory rape because he is also under 21". To truly restrict they will need to add more ages of consent or max age gap rules.
#13
Guest Wrote:Around half a percent of marriages in the usa are minor-adult marriages, 10k to 14k per annum out of some number between 2M and 2.3M that I am not going to find. How does this fit with the theory that you can never claim a wife before she is defiled? If over ten thousand men are doing it every year, why can't you? Do 16 year olds just not know enough Shoppenshower or whatever for you to impregnate?

There has been a concerted effort to raise the marriageable age to 18. Several states, including Pennsylvania and New York, have done it in the past few years alone. The Elvis model, where one obtains parental consent for future marriage, is obviously still feasible but involves pretty substantial risk. At any rate, the taboo has grown so much by now that I would imagine that most parents who would be willing to enter into an arrangement like that are not exactly good stock.



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)