Inheritance Taxation

[BillyONare]

Why would you want your generational wealth expropriated and your descendants sterilized?

1. You don’t have any wealth and your bloodline has no hope of having wealth, ergo you are no different than any retarded dysgenic communist
2. You make some special exception for yourself, ergo you already became the monarch without any gibsmedats, gibsmedats are no longer necessary for you and you are now Aragorn with retarded tax policy.

This meritocrat LARP is dumb and reminds me of tankies. I support forcible inheritance. The government executes old people and give their wealth to their first born sons.

[Guest]

Why would you want your generational wealth expropriated and your descendants sterilized?

1. You don’t have any wealth and your bloodline has no hope of having wealth, ergo you are no different than any retarded dysgenic communist
2. You make some special exception for yourself, ergo you already became the monarch without any gibsmedats, gibsmedats are no longer necessary for you and you are now Aragorn with retarded tax policy.

This meritocrat LARP is dumb and reminds me of tankies. I support forcible inheritance. The government executes old people and give their wealth to their first born sons.

What if I just dont care about my descendants

[Carbide]

Why would you want your generational wealth expropriated and your descendants sterilized?

1. You don’t have any wealth and your bloodline has no hope of having wealth, ergo you are no different than any retarded dysgenic communist
2. You make some special exception for yourself, ergo you already became the monarch without any gibsmedats, gibsmedats are no longer necessary for you and you are now Aragorn with retarded tax policy.

This meritocrat LARP is dumb and reminds me of tankies. I support forcible inheritance. The government executes old people and give their wealth to their first born sons.

Not even really sure what you're trying to say here since lolberg thinking is too jewish and alien to my mind, but I'll do my best.
1. Those who do not have wealth will acquire wealth quickly in the absence of income taxes and so on, up to the maximum amount allowable (25 years for the youngest scion and 10 years for elder scions) and then my 'retarded' tax policy kicks in and holds their wealth steady there unless they can make more through their own skill, or conversely squander it through their own incompetence.

2. Yes I will make exception for myself, since, as King, my property is the whole country and everything in it. It cannot be otherwise, so the king will be allowed to be a trillionaire and pass on those trillions to his youngest scion. That is the nature of a kingdom and succession. State institutions are hypocritical, because it is unavoidable. You may not like it, but accept it.

[Reverend Moon Immortal]

(Here is another draft I was never going to post.)

This thread does Mikka’s concept a disservice by making it the object of non-idle conversation. The inheritance tax is not an idea to be put on equal footing in the “market place of ideas;” it is a fascist idea that should in no way be denied. Furthermore, tax is an unapt word to use as it brings up arguments about how money should be spend and other extraneous concerns that deviate from the quintessence of the Inheritance Tax: the rapine of all potential dissidents. Also, before I create any misunderstandings, when I use the word fascist I use it ambitiously.

The “game” of politics is all about rewarding your side; this reward can be received in many ways, but the most common is through profession. One of the most blatant examples are current colleges today that in no way reward economic benefits on a meritorious basis. What are gender and woman’s studies courses(and the plethora of other made up subjects) but sinecures meant to reward the most outspoken communist(I also will be using this word ambitiously) for praising communist ideals. This is one of the fundamental things to remember: reward and promote your guys in society to strengthen your own political grasp; but in this principle we see a conflict between the pragmatic and ideal in reference to meritocracy. In a meritocracy your ability to affirm the current political order should not be related to your position in that society. This means that the strivers who usually make up a party’s most fanatically outspoken members are denied a way to gain status, which then leaves them to only resent the current political order and become dissidents. There is no incentive for the non-“cream of the crop” of society to support meritocracy; therefore, seeing that as long as non-meritocrats have a voice and power they will seek to dispose meritocracy, an absolute state is necessitated. Meritocracy will never subsist on the popular principle, so all arguments stemming from that nature become superficial. From these thoughts the importance of the inheritance tax can be understood.

The IT is a stroke of genius in dissolving the problem concerning the continuation of meritocracy aforementioned. By confiscating all dissident wealth and awarding it to the deserving meritocrats you “kill two birds with one stone:” first, you reward your side(who also happen to align with meritocratic ideals); and secondly, you punish all rancorous strivers whom would have used their inheritance wealth to appose the rectitudinous system. The IT is a form of despotism that I believe is perfectly justified. The ideals of meritocracy are to be defended at any and all costs.

[Guest]

Mikka was an entertaining poster. He also enjoyed a non-meritocratic BOOST and now his ideas coast on that boost. Such is life. Inheritance will always exist, as will nepotism, no matter what one tries to enforce.

[Reverend Moon Immortal]

Mikka was an entertaining poster. He also enjoyed a non-meritocratic BOOST and now his ideas coast on that boost. Such is life. Inheritance will always exist, as will nepotism, no matter what one tries to enforce.

I disagree, and I am a fascist; therefore, I do not have to explain why. Debate is for the masses.

[Mason Hall-McCullough]

The government's role in taxing wealth is to prevent intergenerational wealth from billionaire families from accumulating and then being used privately for private inscrutable goals which might not be aligned with the best interests of the folk or the nation.

Billionaire families don't even pay substantial amounts of inheritance tax. Steve Jobs' estate didn't pay any for example.

In its current implementation inheritance tax is actually regressive and suppresses the upper-middle class, not billionaire elites. The anti-meritocrats in this thread should really be supporting it. I don't think reforming estate tax to prevent elites from avoiding it is practical, and I think we should prioritize the welfare of middle class Whites, so I oppose inheritance tax.

[BillyONare]

Dude I think Keith Woods is more your speed than The Amarna Forum