Kiwifarms: Let's Watch the Watchers
anthony
Heil Wrote:I thought it was nice that Null acknowledged immediately that Emily Youcis was not really a lolcow in the thread that leftists made about her, that at least showed some restraint.

I think we can all agree that null himself is basically fine. He stands up for some awful people, but only incidentally. His motivation is attacking internet hall-monitors by refusing to die. The hill doesn't seem to matter too much as far as I can see, the fact he's decided he's dying on it does. I'd be interested in talking to null about what he thinks of the current state of his site. No I will not watch the 75 hour long livestreams.
calico
Null has kept a thread up dedicated to stalking a clearly unbalanced woman who shot a porno two weeks after her 18th birthday for years. The entire thing appears to be updated by a single jaded and disturbed man who has been stalking her for a decade or more.

Even moreso than the shallow excuse that the normal crowd of autists have somehow invited it on themselves with their publicly pathetic behavior; this shows the inherent cruelty in the place. He could just take the thread down, but he won't. He's as bad as the worst of them.

What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?
anthony
calico Wrote:Null has kept a thread up dedicated to stalking a clearly unbalanced woman who shot a porno two weeks after her 18th birthday for years. The entire thing appears to be updated by a single jaded and disturbed man who has been stalking her for a decade or more.

Even moreso than the shallow excuse that the normal crowd of autists have somehow invited it on themselves with their publicly pathetic behavior; this shows the inherent cruelty in the place. He could just take the thread down, but he won't. He's as bad as the worst of them.

What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?

This reads more like an argument against both porn and having personal details available on the internet at all, both of which I'd probably be inclined to agree with. Again, I see this as something awful enabled by null's autistic obstinacy (as far as I can tell, I don't actually know which parts of the site/culture he's into). Does anything get taken off the site?
calico
From my limited understanding before any thread is posted to the general audience it undergoes review and many are removed. 

I hardly see how some obscure perpetual liberal arts graduate student who appears desperate to escape her past (two porn videos from over a decade ago shot in some sort of manic state) is a "lolcow" worthy of constant ridicule and constant updates on her various name changes. The obvious answer appears to be that her father hired some law firm to DMCA the videos of his daughter being violated on the internet a decade ago and Null holds some sort of grudge. 

Is this a heroic stand against the forces of censorship?
anthony
calico Wrote:From my limited understanding before any thread is posted to the general audience it undergoes review and many are removed. 

I hardly see how some obscure perpetual liberal arts graduate student who appears desperate to escape her past (two porn videos from over a decade ago shot in some sort of manic state) is a "lolcow" worthy of constant ridicule and constant updates on her various name changes. The obvious answer appears to be that her father hired some law firm to DMCA the videos of his daughter being violated on the internet a decade ago and Null holds some sort of grudge. 

Is this a heroic stand against the forces of censorship?

I'm not saying "heroic stand against the forces of censorship". I don't think anybody is (I don't care to read the thread again). I think null is a retarded autist. "Obstinacy" is the word I used. If he has some active interest in the thread I would call that a strong mark against his character, yes. There is a general trend in the thread of people holding a grudge against the idea of trying to cheat the internet like this. The fact she and her dad are rich, white coded, etc. Also the fact she was a 4chan meme first I suppose gives her internet reputation some kind of legacy status.
Mason Hall-McCullough
calico Wrote:What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?

What use are principles if they only apply to things you already like and support? Null believes DMCA should not be abused with motivations unrelated to protecting copyright, to take down content that is permitted under fair use. Considering how common bad faith DMCA takedown requests are, I respect that.
Montherlant
Null is obsessed with lolicon and pedophillia. If you watch his streams, he constantly seethes about the existence of anime. He’s a lumberjack through and through.
I do admire his stance against censorship
Recent Friend
Montherlant Wrote:Null is obsessed with lolicon and pedophillia. If you watch his streams, he constantly seethes about the existence of anime. He’s a lumberjack through and through.
I do admire his stance against censorship

He's just trying hard to make up for his shota phase. Trying to make up for past flaws by making fun of others is a common theme among users there.
Buden
I never really felt the urge to explore chris-chan "lore" back in the day, mostly because i saw nothing interesting in it, nor nowadays with Daniel Larrson (I think thats his name), some of the stuff they do or say is mildly funny, but i could never bring myself to spend hours and hours seeing their twisted faces and engraving those images in my mind.

I think the KF audiance is people who were perhaps bullied or ostracized in middle school or high school, thus leading to alot of weird subgroups of people like zoos and furries and of 13-25 women.

Perhaps its some kind of an attempt to gain power, to actually be the bully for once, to be in the kool kids klub, all while tapping yourself and others on the back saying its normal and moral.

As with women, when i was in middle school or high school, whenever a kid was teased or bullied they would virtue signal and try to appear kind to the rest of the classmates, but when they were left alone with other girls or boys of a higher social standing they would mask off and give tease ideas and laugh at the "lolcows" of the class.
Reply 



[-]
Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)