Looksmaxxing, Male Models, Diet, And Optics
#21
(09-03-2022, 09:22 PM)GraphWalkWithMe Wrote: Interesting passage courtesy of the Nigerian academe:

Quote:Certain preconceptions about 'blacks' in predominantly 'white' societies have distorted modern visions of the ways in which Aethiopes were perceived in Roman society, resulting in much misinterpretation of the relevant texts. In Roman perceptions categories like black African, white, 'paleface' and swarthy were neither communities nor socially defined 'races' with ascribed group-statuses. Categorisation was determined by the physical appearance of the individual person, not by parentage or 'blood'.

https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ElA...mpson.html

[Image: https://booru.soy/_images/3abf202401440f...k_ears.jpg]
#22
(08-30-2022, 05:20 AM)a system is failing Wrote: Facial aesthetics are an interesting one and can go a number of different ways, not to take too much from the schizo-fags but everything even in material reality can be said to be symbolic. The face is a medium of communication just as any other visual thing, as is established by its use in communicating emotions and intent behind words. Whether a face is appealing or "appreciable" I think is a matter of consistency of features with personality and reflects the mind at least a little bit in the sense that one has choice over public presentation. Nobody faults Sam Hyde for not being handsome because his look is highly consistent with his presence. Above all I would say have an appearance that reflects some sense of actual awarness of yourself. 

With leftist faces and bodies, there is usually a specific kind of discord that really creates a deep, resonant ugliness. That screechy Dash Dobrofsky guy is pretty much the archetypical example, at least to me he is monstrously ugly yet what feature can specifically be said to be ugly about his face? He just seems to be totally unconstructed, like some clattering nightmarish animatronic. Leftists have no sense of moral or intellectual consistency and it seems to manifest in their face. Again I emphasize self awareness, which in their case is totally lacking and hinders their ability to present themselves well (see also: hideous troons calling themselves hot).

I think the Dash Dobrofsky guy has many attractive facial features, I think his eyes are the real problem. In his manic videos he has almost bulging psychopath eyes. He looks to have always had bad eye area but his videos where he looks to be on an amphetamine fueled rage about entry level politics makes him look even worse. I think he has some eugenic features and some dysgenic features to him. I would not say he manifested his ideas into his face as he has always looked how he looks. Perhaps his looks have brought him to where he is today.
#23
(09-04-2022, 11:33 AM)HIGHIQSTIMHEAD Wrote: I think the Dash Dobrofsky guy has many attractive facial features, I think his eyes are the real problem. In his manic videos he has almost bulging psychopath eyes. He looks to have always had bad eye area but his videos where he looks to be on an amphetamine fueled rage about entry level politics makes him look even worse. I think he has some eugenic features and some dysgenic features to him. I would not say he manifested his ideas into his face as he has always looked how he looks. Perhaps his looks have brought him to where he is today.
Eugenic is not a synonym for "good". Dysgenic is not a synonym for "bad".
#24
^i disagree


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)