Marrying Dumb

[Guest]

...when considered with respect to the authoritative tone it tried to take, that is.

[chevauchee]

You don't want to marry dumb. Failure to understand women as reservoirs of genetic potential is what led to the dysgenic collapse of Aryan society in India. It was acceptable in this society for a man to marry down in caste and status while a woman could only marry up; now most Indians are brown. The daughters of heroes and kings were considered desirable not only for social and political maneuvering but because they transmitted the traits that made for superior men across the generations. There is an Icelandic saga in which a Viking buys a slave-girl at the auction block to warm his bed and later discovers that she is the missing daughter of a king; as his concubine she gives birth to a superior man.

Of course it's hard sometimes to judge just how smart a woman is by interacting with her. Better to look at the quality of her male relatives. Intense thymos and will-to-power may be transmitted in an orderly fashion to sons, but will often present as disorder in the female. This disorder is not such a problem when women are "in captivity", but causes serious issues when women are "in the wild". I have a young female cousin who displays aristocratic atavism, and though she is shy, sensitive, and well-mannered, she also has a great degree of latent rage, and cannot play a multiplayer videogame without alienating the friends and family she is competing against.

Anyway, one is very unlikely to be successful with women vastly lower in IQ unless ensnared by a ruthless and used-up gold digger.

[Handi]

My troon friends

Kill yourself.

Great thread, and it's worth emphasizing that IQ is not inherited evenly from both parents; I believe it's something like 80% carried on the X chromosome (all modern "science" is suspect of course, but this result seems like a pretty straightforward statistical regression and I see no particular reason to question it aside from my own hazy memory). You can expect that the heirs to your bloodline will be about as intelligent as your wife, so marrying dumb should only be taken as a worst-case alternative to nonreproduction. Yet again does concrete data vindicate the desire for spiritual beauty.

In the present environment the smartest women I've met tend to become fat dorky lesbians. I've even toyed with the idea of trying to claim one of these for myself, in the hopes that the physical and behavioral state will wash out in subsequent generations while preserving IQ. A silver lining with the dorky lesbian category is that they presumably have some of the lowest cock counts available, so they may show enough benefit from male discipline to make up for their scenario conditions. But the usual problem of action arises in that my desire is just not enough there, and there are no remaining social tools available to get anywhere with women on a pragmatic basis (as opposed to the burning lust cues they respond to). The "suck up your feelings and make rational trade-offs to get the job done" angle is simply a non-starter when any solution also has to be routed through women's own preferences.

[august]

fat

This poses an immediate problem, Handi. No chubsters.

[Handi]

Hey, I already said it's a non-starter...

[calico]

Stupid women aren't little students you can plant your strange ideas in. They're women. The most important thing women look for in a partner is what their friends think of him. A dumb woman isn't going to respect your intellectual curiosity when she finds out you've read a bunch of books on Hitler; she's going to think you're a bad person for reading them. She's going to ask her friends about this. Dumb people have dumb friends, they're going to agree with her. 

Stupid people also lack insight into their own actions. They aren't able to view what they're doing as unreasonable. This is why they're always calling the cops on each other. "Maybe I'm overreacting. Maybe I've had too much to drink. Maybe I'm about to ruin a good thing if I keep this up;" these aren't thoughts some people are actually capable of having. A significant portion of your tax dollars goes to paying men with guns to drive around at night intervening in these disputes.

If you really want to find a woman to seriously date with eye towards marriage you want to find one who thinks you're more attractive than she is. Even better if you think she's the attractive one. 90% of problems men have with women is because they do the opposite of this thinking having a hot gf will make their father's respect them. This never works. It probably started over little league baseball or something.

Not all very attractive women let it get to their head. The one's who don't are usually in long term relationships. They get married young. You probably missed the bus here. Maybe not if they're Asian, or something: a lot of them don't seem to seriously date until into their 20s. You can also look for girls with big noses or cystic acne.

Look: it doesn't matter. The point is you need to your girlfriend to think that you could sleep with other attractive women if you felt like it. Not if you got the chance, that shows you're desperate. You're with her because she's special. You being with her means she's special. This is like heroin for women. 

If you combine this incredible insight I have most generously given, without screwing it up by listening to whatever the zoomer version of PUA's are, you'll at the very least gain a lot of experience to draw your own conclusions about women from.

[a system is failing]

Look: it doesn't matter. The point is you need to your girlfriend to think that you could sleep with other attractive women if you felt like it. Not if you got the chance, that shows you're desperate. You're with her because she's special. You being with her means she's special. This is like heroin for women. 

If you combine this incredible insight I have most generously given, without screwing it up by listening to whatever the zoomer version of PUA's are, you'll at the very least gain a lot of experience to draw your own conclusions about women from.

I find this all to be tautlogical and counter-productive. Yes it's a probably a requirement that your girlfriend doesn't think "lmao this sexless incel wouldn't be able to get laid if I wasn't fucking him" but if she thinks that you got problems that long precede the relationship. If she thinks this you are not turning her on in the slightest and that's the only reason she'd start wondering. If she requires you to demonstrate this to her regularly or she stops being turned on then she's a worthless idiot as well. And if that's just how literally all women are and there's nothing we can do then we just need to bind them up in legally enforceable contracts so they can't do shit. Once again there is no point in humoring them or going along with them.

[rockies]

Oh, this is where Asif is still writing.

Agreed. It's a stupid concept, which dodges a short term political problem, only to manifest much larger long-term political problems later on.