Norwood Vocal Tics
#61
(04-09-2022, 04:50 AM)Opossum Wrote: I think as of recently I'm anti-soyjak-posting as a matter of principle. Someone mentioned here about how soyjak/gigachad posters tend to post a lot of either one or the other - their minds tend to either jolly self-exuberance in the face of opposition, or else to seeking out ugliness, pointing at it, and amplifying it. There's some cartoonist, I can't and don't care to remember the name, who only, exclusively, posts depictions of hated leftists in the ugliest most revolting way possible. That's the entirety of their artistic career, and entirety of what they're putting out into the world, is ugliness. If this is the case, and as such you're of the devil, why should I care whether you're "right-wing"? The product is the same.

Yes, sometimes ugly things must be pointed at so they can be torn down, but at the end of the day nourishing beauty is your singular duty to God. The career critic has no real existence, and contributes nothing.

You are what you eat, and what you post. This has nothing to do with "being nice" to others, but with what you're nourishing within yourself. If you spend all day immersing yourself in ugliness, you're going to be an ugly person. Be careful out there.

Eli Valley immediately springs to mind as an artist famous only for grotesque caricatures of his opponents, but he's an archlib

Maybe that guy who makes conservative comics depicting, say Ocasio Cortez, as a spittle-spewing, shrieking harpy with saucers for eyes?
#62
My appreciation for beauty and good increased tenfold as my soyjak folder grew into hundreds upon hundreds of images.
#63
(04-09-2022, 04:50 AM)Opossum Wrote: I think as of recently I'm anti-soyjack-posting as matter of principle...You are what you eat, and what you post. This has nothing to do with "being nice" to others, but with what you're nourishing within yourself. If you spend all day immersing yourself in ugliness, you're going to be an ugly person. Be careful out there.


[Image: https://i.ibb.co/C7395kw/Kike-System.png]
#64
@Opossum you confuse shitposting with going out your way to consume garbage. The trick is to take it as satire, mockery. What you describe would arise when someone would start treating (their own) soyjaking like a janny treats his "job"
#65
(04-09-2022, 04:50 AM)Opossum Wrote: You are what you eat, and what you post. This has nothing to do with "being nice" to others, but with what you're nourishing within yourself. If you spend all day immersing yourself in ugliness, you're going to be an ugly person. Be careful out there.

Normies have been trying to taint gigachad and soyjaks to little avail. They still remain one of the more amusing shitpost styles. And these "beauty" obsessives are on the pipeline to having an adopted black son like that Achilles guy.
#66
To get the norwood catalog rolling again, my contribution is the resort to sarcasm since you can't/won't say retard:
"smooth brain"
"galaxy brain"
"brain genius"
#67
Norwoods might actually take some impotent action against "the system" like throwing a brick through a window of a bank during a BLM riot without actually realizing this doesn't hurt the system at all - a soyjack / bugman type would never do that.

Norwoodism is about being edgy within system approved guildelines - bugmen or NPCs are generally not critical of the system at all.

E.g. Podcasts:

Norwood - listening to Chapo or Cumtown because occasionally the hosts might say "in minecraft" or almost say the N word.

NPC / Bugman - listening to Pod Save America or some Tim Ferris thing - totally anodyne

Another Norwood thing can be seen in Paradox games.

Normal bugmen / NPCs / Soytypes don't play Paradox games while HOI4 is very Norwood. Victoria 2 OTOH is not Norwood but just for autists.
#68
I have had a cashier say “What’s up boss” although I’m near the same age or younger than him and not his boss. Also another cashier that has no accent, but randomly in the middle or end of a conversation will break out into a New York accent for a few words before switching back to his regular way of speaking.
#69
(04-25-2022, 03:02 PM)Exile Wrote: I have had a cashier say “What’s up boss” although I’m near the same age or younger than him and not his boss.

What race was he? This is very common Mexican vernacular in L.A. across all ages, I think they do this in New York as well but I'm less familiar.
#70
Yeah, that or "ethnic whites" like Slavs etc
#71
(04-25-2022, 04:58 PM)PIGSAW Wrote:
(04-25-2022, 03:02 PM)Exile Wrote: I have had a cashier say “What’s up boss” although I’m near the same age or younger than him and not his boss.

What race was he? This is very common Mexican vernacular in L.A. across all ages, I think they do this in New York as well but I'm less familiar.

Yeah you may be right. He might have brown. It was a few years ago so I can’t really remember his face, but do remember he was younger and balding. It just always stuck with me what he said cause I’ve never heard anyone say it to me again.
#72
The whole "brother in christ" thing is already overused
#73
(02-23-2022, 04:07 PM)cats Wrote: Referring to a group of people as "dudes" is high Norwood.

However, the most Norwood phrase on the internet at the moment has to be "goes hard". When not pretending to be schoolyard bullies, Norwoods will use the phraseology of their favorite wholesome niggos.

Anything that mimics what they see as "hip urban speak" (except the big-n), because their politics is fundamentally about courting black praise. Nothing brings them more joy than imagining a black woman going "So true nigga!" to something they said.
#74
(04-26-2022, 08:11 AM)Svevlad Wrote: The whole "brother in christ" thing is already overused

I immediately despised it the minute I heard it. It seems to be a stand in for "nigga" of sorts? It also appears to be mocking Christianity. Hard to put my finger on exactly what's so bad about it but its easily one of the worst norwoodisms out there.
#75
I guess it started as one of those meme antiquarianisms on pseudo-trad facebook meme pages, but quickly grew to be a replacement for nigga.

There are correct usages, however, all depends on who the wordsmith is and the context, as most things are...
#76
Don't forget their usage of "edgy". Like many Norwoodisms it's an attempt to dismiss an outsider's criticism or transgression of one of their sacred cows, but this one has the added attempt to cast the target or their opinion as immature, with the implication that they'll grow out of it and "mature" into a norwood like themselves.
#77
More and more frequently I'm seeing "based" be attributed to things relating to GayTrannyNiggerWorld. Is this classifiable as norwood? Or is the word simply just a part of the regular lexicon now? Either way it's amusing to see yet another aspect of the racist internet being stolen by the masses.
#78
"[Insert opinion]
I will not elaborate"

Seems Norwood, but not quite sure. A mechanism for communicating some borderline edgy or strange take without committing to it. Like "lol" at the end of a sentence.
#79
(05-06-2022, 01:20 AM)Talionis Wrote: More and more frequently I'm seeing "based" be attributed to things relating to GayTrannyNiggerWorld. Is this classifiable as norwood? Or is the word simply just a part of the regular lexicon now? Either way it's amusing to see yet another aspect of the racist internet being stolen by the masses.

Based did come from Based God, so in effect it's simply returned to its roots as a niggerism. But I would draw a parallel with the libtard co-opting of "wholesome", where troons & co. realized they too could say "based" (because it's not a slur, they can only take positive language) and they could start calling troon shit "based" in the same way they call troon shit "wholesome".

There're multiple reasons for this, one being the "dissident right" (or whatever you'd like to call it) following in the footsteps of 4chan as the only "culture" machine left online (niggers will insist they drive online culture, but this is mostly because of Pavlovian nigger conditioning and ZOG astroturfing).
Another is troons do understand consciously (although they'll never admit it, which is smart on their part) that it's a form of poisoning the well. This is similar to how we now see many on the "right" freely using chud, shitlord, etc.

My position is to take any form of language that can be used as a weapon, regardless of where it's from. As well as mirror the troon tactic of poisoning the well. But it's important to discard language when it becomes self-defeating (like much of older RW Twitter culture).
#80
"None of these words are in the Bible."

I even forgot about this one, and remembered only due to an imagined conversation - it's actually one of the worst ones now


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)