Norwood Vocal Tics
https://web.archive.org/web/200904120857...s_buffoon/

This might be of general interest to anybody interested in the above few posts. A very nice piece of work I won't quote in pieces.
(09-09-2022, 01:41 AM)Guest Wrote: If the ancient Greeks or conquistadors were transported to our time, they wouldn't obsess over the fact that young men choose to lift weights rather than join some gay MMA club. They wouldn't obsess over learning obscure, pointless techniques when you could just train with guns and other weapons.

I think both of these groups would be rather concerned (or amused) by the fact that someone would choose vanity bodybuilding over martial skills, since they had less leisure in their lives than we do. They didn't win their wars by having visually bigger muscles than the other side. Greeks didn't have guns, they had wrestling and pankration instead. The conquistadors had guns, but they were still impractical and very expensive, and everyone, including the gunners, learned conventional fighting skills - if you look into sword fighting you'll see it's a full-contact martial art that includes grappling and kicking. Nobles practiced fighting for sport and recreation, because they had the time and means, but also out of necessity as warrior class.

As to the argument that hand to hand fighting is obsolete - I don't know where you're from, but regardless, launching liveleak or twitter channels focused on the American cities will disprove it right away. In most of these places you're not allowed to own and carry a firearm. Even if you can legally carry one, using it in a self-defense situation will most likely cripple you financially, if just that, even if you're 100% in the right. Of course, when it comes to defending your life, firearms are the most effective means - but you won't be able to carry it everywhere - as opposed to your hands. Fighting skills are a definite advantage that might allow you to, at the very least, disengage and safely escape instead of falling victim to some deadbeat nigger.

Men have always fought for fun and for money, to deny it or demean it is complete idiocy. Similarly, there always have been dick-measuring contests, which seem to be your main issue here. Are there fags and sellouts in the MMA community? You bet. Are there fags in the bodybuilding scene? A lot, you don't have to look far. You'll see plenty in the firearm community too, since you brought it up. What's my point? Weightlifters will tell you that you NEED to go to the gym (and buy their merch). Martial artists will tell you that you NEED to learn their technique (and buy equipment with their brand on it). It's completely normal to advertise oneself and make others believe you're right - and solving the 'masculinity crisis' is a catchy phrase. You might as well ignore them and do both, or whatever else you want to do. For some men, driving fast cars or motorcycles is an expression of masculinity.
(09-09-2022, 05:00 AM)Guest Wrote: Men have always fought for fun and for money, to deny it or demean it is complete idiocy. Similarly, there always have been dick-measuring contests, which seem to be your main issue here. Are there fags and sellouts in the MMA community? You bet. Are there fags in the bodybuilding scene? A lot, you don't have to look far. You'll see plenty in the firearm community too, since you brought it up. What's my point? Weightlifters will tell you that you NEED to go to the gym (and buy their merch). Martial artists will tell you that you NEED to learn their technique (and buy equipment with their brand on it). It's completely normal to advertise oneself and make others believe you're right - and solving the 'masculinity crisis' is a catchy phrase. You might as well ignore them and do both, or whatever else you want to do. For some men, driving fast cars or motorcycles is an expression of masculinity.

I think you raise an extremely important point here that often gets lost when talking about force. There are also fags in the gun scene. There is no real power in physicality anymore, there is also not really power coming out of the barrel of a gun anymore in most of the world. It's as much of a show and pose as bodybuilding. I think from here we can get to the real heart of the issue, which is that there is simply no true flow of power left anywhere. Everything is some kind of performance and joke, and the power is in the hands of performers. You can defend property with a gun better than fists, but do it and then some showy jew/negro duo will get on tv and cry about how the KKK shouldn't be allowed to do whatever they want in current year, and now a bomber full of napalm is flying over your house and swat teams are arresting you. And none of these characters are sovereign either, they're all at the mercy of each other. The whole world now runs on something comparable more comparable to court politics than anything else.
(09-09-2022, 05:00 AM)Guest Wrote:
(09-09-2022, 01:41 AM)Guest Wrote: If the ancient Greeks or conquistadors were transported to our time, they wouldn't obsess over the fact that young men choose to lift weights rather than join some gay MMA club. They wouldn't obsess over learning obscure, pointless techniques when you could just train with guns and other weapons.

I think both of these groups would be rather concerned (or amused) by the fact that someone would choose vanity bodybuilding over martial skills, since they had less leisure in their lives than we do. They didn't win their wars by having visually bigger muscles than the other side. Greeks didn't have guns, they had wrestling and pankration instead. The conquistadors had guns, but they were still impractical and very expensive, and everyone, including the gunners, learned conventional fighting skills - if you look into sword fighting you'll see it's a full-contact martial art that includes grappling and kicking. Nobles practiced fighting for sport and recreation, because they had the time and means, but also out of necessity as warrior class.

As to the argument that hand to hand fighting is obsolete - I don't know where you're from, but regardless, launching liveleak or twitter channels focused on the American cities will disprove it right away. In most of these places you're not allowed to own and carry a firearm. Even if you can legally carry one, using it in a self-defense situation will most likely cripple you financially, if just that, even if you're 100% in the right. Of course, when it comes to defending your life, firearms are the most effective means - but you won't be able to carry it everywhere - as opposed to your hands. Fighting skills are a definite advantage that might allow you to, at the very least, disengage and safely escape instead of falling victim to some deadbeat nigger.

Men have always fought for fun and for money, to deny it or demean it is complete idiocy. Similarly, there always have been dick-measuring contests, which seem to be your main issue here. Are there fags and sellouts in the MMA community? You bet. Are there fags in the bodybuilding scene? A lot, you don't have to look far. You'll see plenty in the firearm community too, since you brought it up. What's my point? Weightlifters will tell you that you NEED to go to the gym (and buy their merch). Martial artists will tell you that you NEED to learn their technique (and buy equipment with their brand on it). It's completely normal to advertise oneself and make others believe you're right - and solving the 'masculinity crisis' is a catchy phrase. You might as well ignore them and do both, or whatever else you want to do. For some men, driving fast cars or motorcycles is an expression of masculinity.

You're completely right in all those points of course. There's fags everywhere. I'm just pointing out that some peoples' obsession with MMA and BJJ over just lifting weights is norwood.

I'm not trying to cast aspersions against you or people who enjoy MMA or anything like that. But I think that if you believe everyone should do MMA and you play-act as somehow superior to people who just want a more aesthetic body, it's norwood. There's no real power to be gained anywhere, like @anthony said.
Photo 
that pretty sums up the norwood phenomenon


[Image: 6nj737jiobn91.jpg]
(09-30-2022, 07:14 PM)Guest Wrote: that pretty sums up the norwood phenomenon


[Image: 6nj737jiobn91.jpg]

This would be more of the dread "dirtbag leftist" - though easy mistake to make, seeing how similar 'woods are to those types.
All sorts of Ebonics
(09-30-2022, 07:14 PM)Guest Wrote: that pretty sums up the norwood phenomenon


[Image: 6nj737jiobn91.jpg]

Going to start referring to myself as anti-semitic, not anti-zionist.
I stopped reading at this arbitrary point where my outrage eclipses your analytical integrity. How dare you go against the currents. Do you even critical thinking?
Wholesome 4chan screencaps or 4chan screencaps in general. This likely plays into the performative edginess described in this thread where you have a re-imagining of 4chan as if to say "see chud, YOU were the newfag all along!"

The text may contain faggot or retard, but the general themes presented are wholesomeness, based niggers/minorities, vague depictions of leftist sentiments, proto-chud dunking, etc.
(12-13-2022, 07:48 PM)Guest Wrote: Wholesome 4chan screencaps or 4chan screencaps in general. This likely plays into the performative edginess described in this thread where you have a re-imagining of 4chan as if to say "see chud, YOU were the newfag all along!"

The text may contain faggot or retard, but the general themes presented are wholesomeness, based niggers/minorities, vague depictions of leftist sentiments, proto-chud dunking, etc.

Pretty sure people still post the ancient "WHY everyone hates /pol/" screencap which is written like an Aaron Sorkin monologue. 4chan screencaps have always been the worst thing about the site.
(12-13-2022, 08:28 PM)anthony Wrote:
(12-13-2022, 07:48 PM)Guest Wrote: Wholesome 4chan screencaps or 4chan screencaps in general. This likely plays into the performative edginess described in this thread where you have a re-imagining of 4chan as if to say "see chud, YOU were the newfag all along!"

The text may contain faggot or retard, but the general themes presented are wholesomeness, based niggers/minorities, vague depictions of leftist sentiments, proto-chud dunking, etc.

Pretty sure people still post the ancient "WHY everyone hates /pol/" screencap which is written like an Aaron Sorkin monologue. 4chan screencaps have always been the worst thing about the site.

do you mean this ?  https://1d4chan.org/images/9/9d/Srgfd.png


the website where i got the screencap  from seems very norwood to me https://1d4chan.org/wiki//pol/

basically it's the  /tg/ 4chan board wiki but with "humor"

the curious thing about it is this  https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Humanity_Fuck_Yeah

someone else in another thread https://amarna-forum.net/t-Curtis-Yarvin...05#pid3305

said something about redditors and norwood people identifying with the lower forms of humanity like mere men with beards.

the funny thing about "humanity,fuck yeah" it's that those traits those people associate with humans in reality belongs to the White European race like the faustian spirit,martial warrior cultures and its desire for expansion and not browns and black peoples.
(12-30-2022, 01:15 AM)Guest Wrote: do you mean this ?  https://1d4chan.org/images/9/9d/Srgfd.png


the website where i got the screencap  from seems very norwood to me https://1d4chan.org/wiki//pol/

basically it's the  /tg/ 4chan board wiki but with "humor"

the curious thing about it is this  https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Humanity_Fuck_Yeah

someone else in another thread https://amarna-forum.net/t-Curtis-Yarvin...05#pid3305

said something about redditors and norwood people identifying with the lower forms of humanity like mere men with beards.

the funny thing about "humanity,fuck yeah" it's that those traits those people associate with humans in reality belongs to the White European race like the faustian spirit,martial warrior cultures and its desire for expansion and not browns and black peoples.

Yeah that's the one. And you're completely right that "Humanity, fuck yeah" is a defanged and deracinated "white people, fuck yeah". Perhaps related to our ongoing Heidegger discussions.
(12-30-2022, 01:15 AM)Guest Wrote: the funny thing about "humanity,fuck yeah" it's that those traits those people associate with humans in reality belongs to the White European race like the faustian spirit,martial warrior cultures and its desire for expansion and not browns and black peoples.

There's something inherently humorous / interesting about watching things engage in behavior that isn't like them. When blacks are "based" it's kind of like seeing a dog wearing people clothes
The last quarter of that article turns notably rancid. Perhaps notably Norwood?
They manufacture a safe way to celebrate the aspects that led the Master Race to greatness, and then turn and loathe themselves for it before it can even hatch.

You don't want to ruthlessly dominate the universe and develop a superiority complex like those Elves(Aryan), do you? Or be a 'Mary Sue?'
(Categorical error. No male can be a Mary Sue.)

It's criticized down into a way to lionize vague 'badassery' over any Human(Aryan) trait of substance. And the message it ends on...

"In short, if you want to make the world an equitable and fair place that doesn't force humans to create bullets in 17 hour shifts in 120 degree sweatshops, then welcome to the Humanism movement."
No thank you!
it's not norwood per se but today i was thinking about that phrase "first world problems" which was popular a decade ago. the moral subtext is that your complaints are not valid because they pale in comparison to the physical privation experienced by brown people on the other side of the world (a concept which has not gone out of vogue with libtards) and implicit in this is the idea that your emotional/spiritual suffering is a fact of life which you simply have to accept. in actuality, i think it's the other way around. for the sensitive young man, the pain of living in a world which falls short of his depth of feeling is immense. in comparison, physical discomforts like hunger or cold are so easy to tolerate that one routinely forgets about them entirely. third world problems are much less pressing than tfw no gf.
(01-18-2023, 02:01 AM)parsifal Wrote: it's not norwood per se but today i was thinking about that phrase "first world problems" which was popular a decade ago. the moral subtext is that your complaints are not valid because they pale in comparison to the physical privation experienced by brown people on the other side of the world (a concept which has not gone out of vogue with libtards) and implicit in this is the idea that your emotional/spiritual suffering is a fact of life which you simply have to accept. in actuality, i think it's the other way around. for the sensitive young man, the pain of living in a world which falls short of his depth of feeling is immense. in comparison, physical discomforts like hunger or cold are so easy to tolerate that one routinely forgets about them entirely. third world problems are much less pressing than tfw no gf.

Adjacent to many important things. The 2000s spirit of "nothing is wrong", boomers (shit parents struggling to cope with the death of culture in general) using moralism to cement over social decay and poorer quality of life, and more recently picked up by the spiritually broken to attempt to catch the legs of upwardly mobile crabs. Not essentially norwood, but norwoods are into this. I had this one leveraged against me constantly in my childhood, especially early years.

It's very norwood to invert morality and the truth of human feeling like this.
Using -able neologisms to assess consumables/content. Watchable, drinkable, playable etc
"let me keep 'rapeable'"

[Image: image.png]
(02-02-2023, 09:12 PM)capgras Wrote: Using -able neologisms to assess consumables/content. Watchable, drinkable, playable etc

"Usable, recyclable, edible, permittable, fuckable, portable."

"Unacceptable, harmful, impenetrable, inaccessible, impermeable."



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)