Overthrowing a small country
Grimm
How feasible is it for us to take control of a small unknown country? Through legal means? Through Violent means? How many people would realistically be required? How much money? I think somewhere in Africa where no foreign state is involved is the best bet, somewhere coastal, the Boers could help.
Recruitment-wise it's probably possible to get unpaid volunteers as long as there is promise of glory. Maybe it's possible to simply carve out a piece of uninhabited land without anybody noticing, giving us time to fortify by the time they do notice.
And should people have military training before launching an operation like this? Or train them on-site? I fully believe this is achievable, if we break it down step by step it won't be just a larp pipe-dream.

[Image: Map-of-contemporary-Africa-showing-expor...ources.png]

Namibia looks attractive to me, it's close to South-Africa which might get us some help from white-Africans, not too close to some important minerals and oil that the Chinese use such as Bauxite (unless we have the resources to launch a war on China but I'm doubtful)
Inner Congo is isolated from other people but has a lot of dangerous diseases and a hostile jungle environment. Any ideas?

[Image: Africa-agricultural-resources-map.png]

Madagascar would be the grand prize, (especially to any Attack on Titan enjoyers) a mountainous island, the biggest defence advantages of Switzerland and Great Britain into one, and a potential trade hub due to its position in the ocean. Maybe it's worth spending a longer time preparing just to seize it?
The next step would be to figure out a way to ethnically cleanse the entire local population, preferably without hurting the wildlife (my personal bias).
JohnnyRomero
I read a Twitter thread someone posted in another thread recently that is relevant to this topic. The thread was written by a white worker in an African country who explained how it all works. In short, in most (Sub-Saharan) African countries there is a tiny elite of extremely wealthy and powerful blacks who run the country like gangsters, stealing and embezzling everything they can from their two primary sources of income - local resource exploitation and foreign aid. They then blow all of this money on gaudy, expensive luxury goods, because they're niggers. They keep the system of resource exploitation along with the rest of their country's infrastructure working by employing skilled and high-IQ white workers (mostly engineers and managers it seems) from Europe and the USA and paying them a shit-ton of money and keeping them in complete safety and comfort. The black masses below them wallow in perpetual poverty. In short, African countries are still entirely reliant on white people to keep the lights on, only this time these white people are mercenaries in the employ of savage and wicked black thug kleptocrats instead of the high-minded humanitarian colonialists of old.

If all of these white people decide to hold the government hostage, they can. All that needs to happen is for them to have both the awareness of the reality of their situation and a collective will and 'asabiyya to risk life and limb to seize power for themselves. It reminds me of a passage from Bronze Age Mindset, Aphorism 69:

Quote:There is story from Heian period in Japanese history that I always found amazing. Japan was still ruled by the Imperial court and there were local administrators and so on, like any Oriental centralized despotism. But there was also warrior class. They inherited this from some steppe invasions that changed their society a few centuries before. Anyway as always happens, the Imperial bureaucrats grew useless and weak and by the end of this age, all the actual physical power was with the samurai. What I find amazing is how long it took them to figure out they no longer had to listen to the weak commands of the Imperial hierarchy, and that they were actually the rulers. Words like “legitimacy,” “soft power,” “rights,” or, in their time honor, duty, divine right and so on are all delusions meant to distract and obscure men of power from their own strength and aims, and put them in service to someone else. Such men are more likely than others to be driven by notions of honor and responsibility. And this sense is therefore very easy to abuse…and such men can be manipulated for some time. Eventually they do realize, however, that they don’t have to listen, and that they are actually the ones who rule. This moment, when “the game is up,” the moment of revelation, is what I’ve always found very amazing.


However, in the case of Africa this may not even need be an armed revolt of soldiers against rulers. If you have read the first book in Asimov's Foundation series, you will recall how the Foundation controlled the insurgent barbarian warlords of the post-imperial Dark Age by supplying them with all of their technology, and then remotely deactivating said technology whenever a barbarian group went against their wishes. I imagine that a small group of white men with ultimate control over an African country's electrical and communications systems could hold a regime hostage in a similar manner.

At the risk of giving up some doxable information, I work in a career which is involved in large-scale necessary infrastructure and resource management projects in African countries. My career plan has always been to entrench myself into such a position as I have mentioned and then perform the coup. When I do so, I will put ankhs on everything so that you will all know what's up and can move over here to receive your palatial estates.

As for specific countries, some notes:
  • Any country in Francophone Africa (la Francafrique) is a bad idea, as France stays deeply involved in the politics of these countries; the French military is what keeps the peace in the Islamist-ridden Sahara.
  • If you want to maximize your Dune LARP, go for Western Sahara. It is competed for by the Moroccans and the Algerians due to the valuable phosphates there on which the global agricultural economy relies, while the native people chafe at the rule of either. If you're fine espousing Islam and learning the local dialect of Arabic and Berber, you can try your hand at declaring yourself the Mahdi/Mu'addib and rallying the Western Saharans and the other Berbers of the Sahara against the Arab governments.
  • I have always thought Equatorial Guinea was a good target. It is very small, extremely resource-rich in oil, and is horribly run by an exceptionally evil (even for an African ruler) kleptocrat. The only major downside is its location right on the Equator, so heat and disease are problems.
  • Burundi is small and rather incompetently run (in contrast to its prosperous northern neighbor, Rwanda, which is run like an NRx city-state in the model of Singapore by a tall and thoroughly Hamitic Tutsi Machiavellian who ran an anonymous shitposting account on Twitter where he called President Zuma of South Africa a "black retard"), so it might make a good target. It is still close to the Equator, but is more highland, so the climate is more tolerable.
  • Zimbabwe has a good cool highland climate free of tsetse flies and many other typical African disease vectors (which is why it is one of the few areas of Sub-Saharan Africa with any significant pre-colonial civilizational development), and the people there are also primed for white rule by the contrast of their experiences under Rhodesian rule and under the disaster that was Mugabe's regime. They basically worship white people there and see us as magical angelic beings who generate plentiful crops and well-paying jobs by our mere presence.
  • Namibia, as you mentioned, is a good pick as well. Unlike South Africa or Zimbabwe, there was never a concerted anti-white movement in this country, and as such it has large populations of Afrikaners and even Germans from the old pre-WWI colonial era who help the country's economy immensely. You also get NatSoc cred from the presence of Adolf Hitler's reincarnation as a fat Bantu (God has a splendid sense of humor) and Hakanian cred for the presence of the pre-Bantu Hottentot Bushmen. The uranium deposits there are also portentous - I dream of world clean.
  • I don't think Madagascar is a good idea - it is dominated by the Austronesian Malagasy, so it is closer to Malaysia or Indonesia in practice. Much more difficult to overthrow. In spite of geography, racially and culturally Madagascar is just a distant exclave of Southeast Asia, in much the same way that the Philippines is a distant exclave/extension of Latin America in many ways.
  • Malawi might be a good pick: it is small, has a similar climate to Zimbabwe, has good wildlife to protect, is very thoroughly undeveloped and lacks strong ties with any outside states, and flies under the radar for most people. Whenever I see it on a map of Africa, I always think it's a lake at first.
  • South Sudan has oil resources and is inhabited by Nilotes, who are pitch-black non-Bantu people (mostly pastoralists, so a bit nobler than the horticulturalist Bantus) who are all between 6'4" and 7'0" or more in height. A nation of Endermen. Suffers from the same heat problem as Equatorial Guinea; the country more or less consists of the area of impenetrable, fetid, malaria-ridden swamps around the Upper Nile that marked the boundary where Arabs, Ethiopians, and other Semites could expand no further.


I will also give a quick disclaimer that, as a Christian, I oppose any violent ethnic cleansing efforts on a personal moral level. I would personally prefer a stratified caste system, like the Spanish castas system but also a bit like the Hindoo system in that it would strictly forbid miscegenation, combined with a strong eugenics program oriented towards cultivating the best among the natives and reshaping their race into something new and better. But this is mostly a personal moral preference and less so a strategic decision, and I would not clutch my pearls too much if any of you took power in a region and did what you thought needed to be done. While I do very much understand the rather noble urge to wipe the slate clean of rotten excess, even without my religious beliefs I still find mass killings to be rather wasteful, a needless waste of human capital; at the very least a waste of potential serf/slave stock. I don't fear the African; Africa was only taken from whites through the concerted efforts of other white people in control of the most powerful empires in human history (cf. joint Soviet-American-Chinese efforts to undermine Portuguese colonies and Rhodesia in the 60s and 70s).
Muskox
It's a shame that Operation Red Dog got so screwed up. Terrible that all these beautiful little islands were just ceded to the slaves. A tiny island nation like Dominica probably has much less potential than somewhere like Zimbabwe, but one could almost imagine a maritime republic like Venice or Amalfi... A Dutch pirate in the 17th century founded a republic in Salé, right across the river from Rabat, the modern capital of Morocco. His son (an ignorant half-breed by all accounts) moved to New York and is the ancestor of many prominent Americans, such as Cornelius Vanderbilt.
Carbide
Knocking over all these African, South American, and South Asian countries has always been part of my long term ideal, though at this point in time I believe it's too early for conquests. Aryans need leadership from proven winners. Glowposters who have a visible track record of breaking international law and getting away with it, whose followers end up well off. Needless to say we don't have such leaders right now, and it's hard  to imagine one rising to prominence while the Globohomo monopolar order is still up and running. This is a pretty boring take, I know, but a boring take is right twice a day. It's like imagining Kim Dot Com starting up some more e-piracy sites, using the money to start whites only enclaves for some reason, and then nothing ever happening to any of the enclaves or his illicit businesses.
Perhaps a more realistic vision would be for Johnny Romero's white managerial class coup idea to be toned down to a white managerial class extorting actual white privileges for themselves. For example, let's say that the white managerial class in Equatorial Guinea formed a union after some black-on-white crime happened, and demanded the right to bear arms. The right to carry full auto rifles and smgs anywhere they go and be above reproach by any police forces. The union would have to review every case of breach of this privilege, and demand the death penalty for any police or military forces who violated the rights of one of its members. The union would then set up its own parallel white sharia court to review these cases and find out if petition for redress was warranted. And then these white privileges could be expanded over time, into paramilitaries such as sanctioned militia groups that functioned as the military arm of the union.

Then you could begin expanding white immigration to the country (who would all be hand picked internet racists) in order to create an economic and political base for your union. At this point, a consciousness of the union's power and right to rule would start to form, but it would still be very vulnerable to being purged by the nigger warlord with force. I believe a religious group would be a necessary component of expanding the white power base, strictly from a recruiting point of view. It would need a state-side or EU-side religious front for drawing in internet racists in sufficient numbers to then train the smartest ones as engineers and accountants and send them to the Africa-side settlement zones. It would be a large, ongoing, logistical operation and only a religious organization could provide the cover on both sides of the sea to keep things plausibly deniable. As a Pagan, I am thinking of something like the AFA, but I'm sure there's probably a chr*stian equivalent.

A knock-on benefit is that you would be growing pro-white communities in the US and Europe, as joining and settling with AFA (or templist, or chr*stian identity, whatever) settlement zones would be a necessary step in getting your free 120 acre estate, SMG, and house in Africa. The economic benefits of your estate in Africa and your job as a well paid engineer/accountant is the lure that provides the basis for white people to participate in your system, join your religion, and go live in your settlements. If things ever got too hot in the USA or EU, the whole community could be shut down by the religion, sold off, and all the members could be resettled to new settlement zones or sent to Africa. It would be a tiresome whack-a-mole game for the regime to suppress your religious group, and any attempts to suppress you would only become fuel to get more internet racists to Africa. Putting a stop to this approach would require the state department to leverage enormous amounts of diplomatic resources and news media resources to shine a light on you for a very extended amount of time as they tried to wrangle the world into crushing your "racist neocolonialism." It would just never happen, because the costs would be too high. This is something seen in nature, where prey animals simply make themselves too costly for predators to bother hunting them. We can't oppose the westoids directly yet, but it is within our power to exploit their weaknesses in relying on a very unwieldy and politically-inefficient UN to control their world empire and make ourselves too troublesome to crush. And like thorny vines in the forest, even if you suffer the bleeding and irritated skin of tearing them down, both ends of the vine you cut just take root and grow back twice as strong.

[Image: smglee_hk_mp7_holster.jpg]
Standard Issue in Equatorial Guinea
Grimm
(03-08-2023, 06:04 PM)JohnnyRomero Wrote: I read a Twitter thread someone posted in another thread recently that is relevant to this topic. The thread was written by a white worker in an African country who explained how it all works. In short, in most (Sub-Saharan) African countries there is a tiny elite of extremely wealthy and powerful blacks who run the country like gangsters, stealing and embezzling everything they can from their two primary sources of income - local resource exploitation and foreign aid. They then blow all of this money on gaudy, expensive luxury goods, because they're niggers. They keep the system of resource exploitation along with the rest of their country's infrastructure working by employing skilled and high-IQ white workers (mostly engineers and managers it seems) from Europe and the USA and paying them a shit-ton of money and keeping them in complete safety and comfort. The black masses below them wallow in perpetual poverty. In short, African countries are still entirely reliant on white people to keep the lights on, only this time these white people are mercenaries in the employ of savage and wicked black thug kleptocrats instead of the high-minded humanitarian colonialists of old.

If all of these white people decide to hold the government hostage, they can. All that needs to happen is for them to have both the awareness of the reality of their situation and a collective will and 'asabiyya to risk life and limb to seize power for themselves. It reminds me of a passage from Bronze Age Mindset, Aphorism 69:

Quote:There is story from Heian period in Japanese history that I always found amazing. Japan was still ruled by the Imperial court and there were local administrators and so on, like any Oriental centralized despotism. But there was also warrior class. They inherited this from some steppe invasions that changed their society a few centuries before. Anyway as always happens, the Imperial bureaucrats grew useless and weak and by the end of this age, all the actual physical power was with the samurai. What I find amazing is how long it took them to figure out they no longer had to listen to the weak commands of the Imperial hierarchy, and that they were actually the rulers. Words like “legitimacy,” “soft power,” “rights,” or, in their time honor, duty, divine right and so on are all delusions meant to distract and obscure men of power from their own strength and aims, and put them in service to someone else. Such men are more likely than others to be driven by notions of honor and responsibility. And this sense is therefore very easy to abuse…and such men can be manipulated for some time. Eventually they do realize, however, that they don’t have to listen, and that they are actually the ones who rule. This moment, when “the game is up,” the moment of revelation, is what I’ve always found very amazing.


However, in the case of Africa this may not even need be an armed revolt of soldiers against rulers. If you have read the first book in Asimov's Foundation series, you will recall how the Foundation controlled the insurgent barbarian warlords of the post-imperial Dark Age by supplying them with all of their technology, and then remotely deactivating said technology whenever a barbarian group went against their wishes. I imagine that a small group of white men with ultimate control over an African country's electrical and communications systems could hold a regime hostage in a similar manner.

At the risk of giving up some doxable information, I work in a career which is involved in large-scale necessary infrastructure and resource management projects in African countries. My career plan has always been to entrench myself into such a position as I have mentioned and then perform the coup. When I do so, I will put ankhs on everything so that you will all know what's up and can move over here to receive your palatial estates.

As for specific countries, some notes:
  • Any country in Francophone Africa (la Francafrique) is a bad idea, as France stays deeply involved in the politics of these countries; the French military is what keeps the peace in the Islamist-ridden Sahara.
  • If you want to maximize your Dune LARP, go for Western Sahara. It is competed for by the Moroccans and the Algerians due to the valuable phosphates there on which the global agricultural economy relies, while the native people chafe at the rule of either. If you're fine espousing Islam and learning the local dialect of Arabic and Berber, you can try your hand at declaring yourself the Mahdi/Mu'addib and rallying the Western Saharans and the other Berbers of the Sahara against the Arab governments.
  • I have always thought Equatorial Guinea was a good target. It is very small, extremely resource-rich in oil, and is horribly run by an exceptionally evil (even for an African ruler) kleptocrat. The only major downside is its location right on the Equator, so heat and disease are problems.
  • Burundi is small and rather incompetently run (in contrast to its prosperous northern neighbor, Rwanda, which is run like an NRx city-state in the model of Singapore by a tall and thoroughly Hamitic Tutsi Machiavellian who ran an anonymous shitposting account on Twitter where he called President Zuma of South Africa a "black retard"), so it might make a good target. It is still close to the Equator, but is more highland, so the climate is more tolerable.
  • Zimbabwe has a good cool highland climate free of tsetse flies and many other typical African disease vectors (which is why it is one of the few areas of Sub-Saharan Africa with any significant pre-colonial civilizational development), and the people there are also primed for white rule by the contrast of their experiences under Rhodesian rule and under the disaster that was Mugabe's regime. They basically worship white people there and see us as magical angelic beings who generate plentiful crops and well-paying jobs by our mere presence.
  • Namibia, as you mentioned, is a good pick as well. Unlike South Africa or Zimbabwe, there was never a concerted anti-white movement in this country, and as such it has large populations of Afrikaners and even Germans from the old pre-WWI colonial era who help the country's economy immensely. You also get NatSoc cred from the presence of Adolf Hitler's reincarnation as a fat Bantu (God has a splendid sense of humor) and Hakanian cred for the presence of the pre-Bantu Hottentot Bushmen. The uranium deposits there are also portentous - I dream of world clean.
  • I don't think Madagascar is a good idea - it is dominated by the Austronesian Malagasy, so it is closer to Malaysia or Indonesia in practice. Much more difficult to overthrow. In spite of geography, racially and culturally Madagascar is just a distant exclave of Southeast Asia, in much the same way that the Philippines is a distant exclave/extension of Latin America in many ways.
  • Malawi might be a good pick: it is small, has a similar climate to Zimbabwe, has good wildlife to protect, is very thoroughly undeveloped and lacks strong ties with any outside states, and flies under the radar for most people. Whenever I see it on a map of Africa, I always think it's a lake at first.
  • South Sudan has oil resources and is inhabited by Nilotes, who are pitch-black non-Bantu people (mostly pastoralists, so a bit nobler than the horticulturalist Bantus) who are all between 6'4" and 7'0" or more in height. A nation of Endermen. Suffers from the same heat problem as Equatorial Guinea; the country more or less consists of the area of impenetrable, fetid, malaria-ridden swamps around the Upper Nile that marked the boundary where Arabs, Ethiopians, and other Semites could expand no further.


I will also give a quick disclaimer that, as a Christian, I oppose any violent ethnic cleansing efforts on a personal moral level. I would personally prefer a stratified caste system, like the Spanish castas system but also a bit like the Hindoo system in that it would strictly forbid miscegenation, combined with a strong eugenics program oriented towards cultivating the best among the natives and reshaping their race into something new and better. But this is mostly a personal moral preference and less so a strategic decision, and I would not clutch my pearls too much if any of you took power in a region and did what you thought needed to be done. While I do very much understand the rather noble urge to wipe the slate clean of rotten excess, even without my religious beliefs I still find mass killings to be rather wasteful, a needless waste of human capital; at the very least a waste of potential serf/slave stock. I don't fear the African; Africa was only taken from whites through the concerted efforts of other white people in control of the most powerful empires in human history (cf. joint Soviet-American-Chinese efforts to undermine Portuguese colonies and Rhodesia in the 60s and 70s).

All the countries you listed all seem very attractive in their own reasons, but I think we should cross off countries that are too hot if we have the liberty to be that picky, historically humidity and warmth combined seems like an empire-killer, India being an example, it's never conquerable in its entirety. Rhodesians seem to have faired pretty well and you mention it being relatively cool, in any case highlands would be a good idea strategically; being connected to other land still worries me, perhaps my paranoia about border-protection is blown out of proportion given the sheer size of Africa, a large island is my personal bias on this issue, I'd keep my eyes on Madagascar, but from what you said maybe it'd be wiser to have it as a target of expansion rather than our first claim, it is also surrounded by small islands which could serve as a "bridge" to it... Maybe East-Africa could gain some points as the top-location if others agree, ultimately we should decide on one, or multiple locations which are close to each other.

Not being subject to disease is a must, though. Australians don't seem to have a collapse-threatening issue concerning venomous insects, but disease-carriers like mosquitoes are devastating even if the infrastructure is good, and is very unattractive to any potential migrants... 

Another important but unfortunate element would be optics, or rather casus-belli for ZOG, sheltering international criminals would be one, though we might be tempted to bring in as many white people as possible no matter their backgrounds, holding someone wanted by the US government would give them a reason to declare us a terrorist-state and swiftly deal with us. Sheltering wanted people is a privilege superpowers get.
On the other hand, nobody seems to react to the fact that Ukrainian soldiers all parade neo-nazi symbols, that could save us budget in the flag-designing department.

Malawi and Namibia are high on my list from what you've said, getting control of and using (in a variety of ways) uranium would put us on the world-stage, its proximity to South Africa is also, in my opinion, something to not understate if the Boers take back control of their country, I imagine allies will be sparse in that continent.

As for ethnic cleansing, what I fear most is creating another Brazil or South America, the colonial stock was dumbed down to say the least, and I agree it might be a waste of labour. I do find some non-Bantus noble but I don't believe in successful cohabitation of races, maybe it'd be easier to exile them rather than genocide them, but in either case it all has to be planned in a way that protects the country in the future, if blacks just come back to settle, greeted with open arms later in history, it'll all be for nothing. Apartheid tried to contain the blacks within townships, but it ultimately failed. I don't deny the existence of intelligent or noble Africans but we can't afford half-measures anymore; if a caste system were to be put in place I'd choose the indian over the spanish one just for the fact that it has the greatest separation between the castes. Another possibility is to allow blacks in on the condition of sterilisation, Israel does it with barely any backlash from the world aside from a couple of articles:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/eliseknutse...h-control/

Now that I think about it, Israel is a similar situation to this, they pretty much carved out their own piece of land and the world did nothing about it, granted they used the holocaust as an argument but really is the situation all that different? Singapore also got away with things the UN condemned and "warned" them not to do, Lee-Kuan-Yew did them anyways and nothing happened.
Maybe the way to go is to be cocky in this sense, act quickly and on principles, not buckling down to ZOG, not provoking them directly but just ignoring them until they give up.
JohnnyRomero
(03-09-2023, 07:22 PM)Grimm Wrote: Another important but unfortunate element would be optics, or rather casus-belli from ZOG, sheltering international criminals would be one, though we might be tempted to bring in as many white people as possible no matter their backgrounds, holding someone wanted by the US government would give them a reason to declare us a terrorist-state and swiftly deal with us. Sheltering wanted people is a privilege superpowers get.
On the other hand, nobody seems to react to the fact that Ukrainian soldiers all parade neo-nazi symbols, that could save us budget in the flag-designing department.

Good response. This part in particular made me think about how Rome was originally said to be a refuge city for criminals, bandits, outlaws, pirates etc. of all sorts, all seeking a new life and belonging. I think there is potential in this. You mentioned Israel, which does the same thing by making money off of serving as a refuge for rich Jewish pedophiles. A refuge for somewhat unsavory whites, people with a spark of goodness in them whom we can give a second chance, this is good; what you don't want is to just become a narco-state or the Dirlewanger Division. Perhaps something like the Pirate Republic of Libertalia (which was, quite portentously, founded on Madagascar).

The Malawi idea has certainly grown on me, and I thought today about how Northern Mozambique (i.e. the part next to Malawi) has an active ISIS problem. If it were still an issue by the time we took over Malawi, the presence of uncontrolled terrorists would make an excellent casus belli for a "special anti-terrorism military operation" to annex the northern third of Mozambique and gain sea access.
Verl
Great thread. I've been thinking about the funding issue and I think that later this year and earlier this year will be a great time to gamble on some shitcoins/memecoins that could 100x and get one of us to make it. Ideally we'd all be investing in crypto (or if you want to, deep value invest in stock) to quickly accrue enough wealth to make meaningful changes. One that is done you can follow the 'Great House' theory I saw on Twitter where you become a patron to noble whites discarded by the GNC regime, accept them into your "clan", and then they can work in the African colony.
If you want recommendations on coins, the only one I'm significantly bullish on is Don't Buy Inu ($DBI) for a multitude of reasons, which could easily moon. Of course you can be free to criticise my choice in shitcoin. Alternatively, we can work on making our own shitcoin to pump and dump (or, if you are noble, actually make it a worthwhile technology). Maybe get BAP in on it or some other twitter faces. We have the cultural power to.

If this is a group effort we will need specific roles to be fulfilled, specifically we will need one of us to be versed in leading a military or paramilitary, for example.
Grimm
(03-09-2023, 11:04 PM)Verl Wrote: Great thread. I've been thinking about the funding issue and I think that later this year and earlier this year will be a great time to gamble on some shitcoins/memecoins that could 100x and get one of us to make it. Ideally we'd all be investing in crypto (or if you want to, deep value invest in stock) to quickly accrue enough wealth to make meaningful changes. One that is done you can follow the 'Great House' theory I saw on Twitter where you become a patron to noble whites discarded by the GNC regime, accept them into your "clan", and then they can work in the African colony.
If you want recommendations on coins, the only one I'm significantly bullish on is Don't Buy Inu ($DBI) for a multitude of reasons, which could easily moon. Of course you can be free to criticise my choice in shitcoin. Alternatively, we can work on making our own shitcoin to pump and dump (or, if you are noble, actually make it a worthwhile technology). Maybe get BAP in on it or some other twitter faces. We have the cultural power to.

If this is a group effort we will need specific roles to be fulfilled, specifically we will need one of us to be versed in leading a military or paramilitary, for example.

I'm really not knowledgeable on crypto so I can't comment on it, if you believe it's an opportunity then I don't want to discourage you from it. B
I've heard advice from someone who dealt on a regular basis with very-rich people and he said the surest way to get to that level is to own a "boring" industry something banal and uninteresting to most people like say, lightbulbs. It's worth keeping your eye out for these kind of opportunities, research what kind of new tech is developing and which common piece to all that new tech or industry is so indispensable that nobody can not use it.
Of course it takes a certain kind of personality to run a business, holding a well paying job instead can be extremely helpful to the cause, how far could a $10k worth donation take us? That's a decent amount of stuff you can acquire, especially in a developing region and with smart budgeters on on our side (getting smart budgeters/accountants should be another priority not to be forgotten or understated).
Running logistics operations (in Africa) seems to be the most profitable, and provides priceless training for running an independent state.

(Another point to raise, as many of us as possible should start actively educating ourselves, especially in math. I don't want to start fantasising too far ahead as it's a form of procrastination/escapism but if we're to become the ruling class we need to remain mentally sharp, at all times.)

Getting BAP to participate in pump and dump schemes seems a bit demystifying to the status he's managed to garner, he's friends with people here and some of you know him on a personal basis, but to his young impressionable Twitter-only followers he sits on a pedestal, if he were to participate in this he should be in some position which would get as many people to join to help as possible... Cultural power is cultural, monetary power is something else.
Toledo_Keyed
I felt the keyed, but our numbers are too low and we aren't organized enough yet.
gipazugos
The discussion here has been focused on Africa, but what about Latin America? Someone mentioned Operation Red Dog above, and while the Caribbean may be too close to the US (here there's the case of Cuba to consider, which survived with outside help) Guyana, Uruguay, Ecuador or Suriname could be considered. There would be more of a potentially sympathetic European population than most of Africa and, while being closer to the US would make it more dangerous (it's not like Africa is outside their reach: see the funding of black militias throughout the Cold War), it would also mean we would have a supply chain over land. I'm sure there would be friendly European Brazilians/Argentinians too, which is another point in favor of Latam.
Hamamelis
Rhodesia seems to me the obvious choice for re-colonisation, most reasons have been stated in the OP. My thoughts on this topic, beyond what has already been said, amount to the intuition that the claim to some piece of land will either have to be undeniable, or so small as to not draw the ire of the large players. Assume we pay mercenaries to fight Zimbabwean forces, and defeat them - will we pay mercenaries for decades, until we can put up an armed force to stand against not only other African nations, but also US, European, Chinese interference? If that is the way to go, not only would we need large sums of money, but also mercenaries who are willling to commit to this.
The best solution for this is Amarna Inc., (or Amarnacorp?), some sort of legal vehicle that not only carries our funds, but also produces some good that will give us economic leverage over rivals. Optimally, one of us will found the next Amazon, but it would also work if a company like that were to come under our control in other ways. If the Amarnite Free State of Neo-Rhodesia starts off under the patronage, and with the funding of, an important player in the Western economy, many problems could be averted.
The other scenario is more realistic, less ambitious, more larp-y: We get together with the limited funds that a bunch of internet autists can manage to scrape together, buy a farm and some land in a strategically chosen valley in one of these countries, and start a guerilla. We build a "solid base" (self-sufficient agriculture maybe managed by enslaving local populace) and start incorporating adjacent farms, until we have control over the valley. From there we scale our aims. This approach has the advantage of being tried and tested, mostly in Latin America, by other revolutionary forces. The usual endpoint is something like the FARC in Columbia, from where overtaking the whole country is dependent on outside help. Another advantage is that we could start right away, basically - no need to wait for one of us to become a billionaire. Members of the project could cycle through living in civilisation, working to supply money to the project, and working 3-6 months shifts in the colony.

I'm ready to sign up.
Guest
People talk about someone being a billionaire as an enabler to this scheme. I wonder if that is enough. The government has trillion dollar budget. Granted, money destined for some purpose isn't the same as money you can spend freely. But the military budget is desperate for ways to justify itself. Opposing colonialism/slavery is more marketable to normies than fighting for legal homo in Botswana. This project could take the form of something less based and more merely stabilizing or economically efficient, but that may be futile effort if you are still the most justifiable target they have. There might be some role to play in africa for the USG that could earn their favor. If they are actually enemies of China then such a project could prove to be a bulwark against chinese expansion.

I think a good way to test the waters while staying under the radar could be peacekeeping mercenary work. Specifically, a mercenary company could be hired by both sides of a tense peace to enforce a treaty against violators of either ethnicity/clan. I would intuit that mercenaries tend keep their word because their business is warfare, not managing the exfiltration of value from a region. Whether this company will stay true to that tendency in the long term is irrelevant to the present trust placed in them. In this way, the company is positioned as a sort of inter-state arbitrator. If an inter-state arbitrator starts to enforce a web of multiple treaties/contracts between multiple countries from multiple strongholds it starts to look more like an empire. Attacks on the stronghold between A and B by A can be presented as preliminary to attacks on B in western-targeted propaganda. Everything in this scheme in the early stages should be 100% compatible with international law as proto-imperial law to void propaganda for as long as possible.

Leftists simplify money into mere power. Money is most interesting when you think of how it is fundamentally different from power. It is a promise from the powers that be. They can't break the promise trivially or all their promises leak value. But, they don't have to let you convert that money into power. They have rules that throttle the efficiency of buying weapons. They have bureaucracy that selectively inhibit international transactions and cashing out of hard-to-regulate cryptocurrencies. They could make rules against using that money (e.g. crypto earnings) in political campaigns. They have untaxed advantages in the media arena.

They can, at expense of public trust in their system, concoct an excuse to deprive you of your wealth. If they can definitely link you to the reconquest efforts that may be enough. The strongest reason they would not do this is if they have to pay a proportionate cost when seizing your assets. If you just have a few billion sitting in generic assets that isn't any barrier to seizure. If you have half your fortune in a critical industry in a way that relies on your competence, they might at least regret seizing it. For example, if you are a genius robotics engineer and your wealth is from the income of your billion-dollar-reputation automation consulting firm. Even if you aren't using your expertise hands-on all the time, being able to acquire competent hires can be very valuable. Seizure can also be inefficient by way of loyalty in your subordinates in a context where earnest accidents are indistinguishable from spite or carelessness. Some positions of great value generation are largely based on your own honor and trustworthiness- I associate this tendency with escrow services, forensics, data providers, security and arbitration.

If your plan is to make a lot of money in crypto I would recommend going through darknet-bible-tier opsec to break the chain between the money you accumulate and money you started with. Even if you feel that you need to pay your taxes for sake of personal safety you can pull a chunk back out through the same processes again. The advantage remains that if the bulk of your accumulated wealth is in currency not linked to your person you can fund operations without the controversy trailing back to your own legally vulnerable person.
Guest
@guest (most recent post)

https://politics.stackexchange.com/quest...istance-ag

there appears to be some degree of PMC presence in africa already. There appears to be a meme that is mostly russian, and that this was established by residual goodwill towards the post-soviet territory and the unwillingness of the USA to involve itself in africa at the time. who knows how much of this is libtard psychosis, and how much is fate beckoning.

It is unclear to me if this presence is exaggerated in magnitude- the OP claims they play a praetorian-type guard role. It may be that one would be unable to set up broader operations focused on protecting industrial assets without an unofficial nation state backer or initial america-deterrent.
anthony
(08-07-2023, 05:08 PM)Guest Wrote: @guest (most recent post)

https://politics.stackexchange.com/quest...istance-ag

there appears to be some degree of PMC presence in africa already. There appears to be a meme that is mostly russian, and that this was established by residual goodwill towards the post-soviet territory and the unwillingness of the USA to involve itself in africa at the time. who knows how much of this is libtard psychosis, and how much is fate beckoning.

It is unclear to me if this presence is exaggerated in magnitude- the OP claims they play a praetorian-type guard role. It may be that one would be unable to set up broader operations focused on protecting industrial assets without an unofficial nation state backer or initial america-deterrent.

Did you see that Wagner documentary that came out before Prigozhin unpersoned himself? Lots of Africa footage in there.
Reply 



[-]
Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)