Performative pseudo-intellectualism and the dictatorship of attention whores
#1
The aristocratic and fraternal "dissident right" I fell in love with years ago has descended into a clown show of grifting attention whores and their retarded gooner followers. A common but not universal trait of these attention whores is the self-aggrandizing performance of intellectualism -- they like to think of themselves, and market themselves as, people with important and unique "thought" and "insight."  They of course are not -- rather they are merely businessmen who are in it for the money and attention, and have 0 intellectual achievement whatsoever. As pseudo-intellectuals, however, they market their entertainment portfolio as "intellectual output" -- I have had two Twitter attention whore grifters directly tell me that they thought they were geniuses Thinkers of the Age. When asked where their intellectual achievements were (studies, books, models, essays, etc), they said, and I am not exaggerating here, with straight "faces" they said that their genius output is their Twitter feed. These two users were "Covfefe Anon" and "Evil Political Scientitist." Both, of course, are obviously sub 120 IQ attention whores. The performance of genius they put on is good for business -- marketing oneself as an entertainer is modest. Entertainers may be ignored. Brilliant thinkers of insight and truth must be paid attention to! 

The irony of course is that the actual brilliant minds are ignored more than ever on the right. Never has brilliance been worse for business. The actual genius will embarrass the grifter attention whore completely -- imagine if this thread got more than 20 views. Imagine if prominence were ordered by actual merit and every far right prole had this thread shoved down their throat by all of their leaders as required reading. The grift would be totally over, the trough would run empty. This would be the mass deportation and figurative holocaust of Der Ewige Grifter. By the dozen their Twitter accounts would lie in ruin, their youtubes destroyed, their substacks emptied, no more donations or "Welcome to Hell" sales or "Raw Egg Buttsex" sales or whatever else these scammer prole niggers are passing off as books of right wing "philosophy" and "thought." Nothing short of this is justice on the right! Remember that the next time you are consooming your favorite grifter's business-optimized, vapid click bait Twitter feed, or their livestreams on The Structure of Society or whatever else they freely babble about because there is no science of it yet. 

The decline of the right mirrors the decline of the fraternal Mannerbund way of life to the slave biomass way of life found in the history of our race. This thing used to be an online mannerbund, a forum ecosystem, a true network -- one where merit was rewarded, where good ideas could flourish. But then came the assclowns and their subhuman slaves. Over time the logic of capitalism and the free market won out. There was a massive incentive for grifters to get brainless materialist consoomers to watch their stuff and prop them up. The influencers and youtubers and livestreamers emerged and were eventually successful. They have all but wiped out the mannerbund system -- now one must suck off these inferiors or simply be done with it. Otherwise you are not allowed to have a voice -- the biomass of retard slaves demands to be catered to, and their attention whore masters only want money. What were brothers and comrades are now mere competitors in the marketplace. And the market is democratic, it selects for funko pop ideas and funko pop personalities -- this is what the 70k far right twitter account is, the living funko pop of angry virgin 100 IQers who only support rightism because they are mad they get no pussy, because they are economic automatons and incapable of moral agency.
#2
The difference between the garden-variety grifters and the RW ones is that falling for the latter might, except of draining your pockets, actually benefit you in some way; make you a better and stronger man or teach you something useful. Goes without saying that the required knowledge is already available for free and can be put to use without paying a dime, but for some people money is a burden which has to be relieved, which is a tale as old as time. Personally I think it might be better for that money (since it absolutely has to be spent) to go to some vaguely RW self-made-man who has managed to correctly gauge the market, and not to a soulless bugman from San Francisco, CA.
#3
(11-07-2022, 02:47 PM)Guest Wrote: The difference between the garden-variety grifters and the RW ones is that falling for the latter might, except of draining your pockets, actually benefit you in some way; make you a better and stronger man or teach you something useful. Goes without saying that the required knowledge is already available for free and can be put to use without paying a dime, but for some people money is a burden which has to be relieved, which is a tale as old as time. Personally I think it might be better for that money (since it absolutely has to be spent) to go to some vaguely RW self-made-man who has managed to correctly gauge the market, and not to a soulless bugman from San Francisco, CA.

This is true, basically liberal grifters are to right wing grifters as right wing grifters are to the actual intellectuals and thinkers they pretend to be & lock out from attention. The rw grifter is marginally better than the liberal and suffers because of it. But the actual ubermensch suffers most of all because he is ultimately the most superior.
#4
(11-07-2022, 02:01 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: The aristocratic and fraternal "dissident right" I fell in love with years ago
Who were they and what did they do?

Quote: When asked where their intellectual achievements were (studies, books, models, essays, etc)
And I suppose you have the threads you make here and maybe on other forums? What do you consider to be the great intellectual achievements of the 21st century?
#5
(11-07-2022, 06:00 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 02:01 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: The aristocratic and fraternal "dissident right" I fell in love with years ago
Who were they and what did they do?

Most old /pol/ and other boards, maybe part of it is nostalgia and growing past that but those boards have degenerated and now we have a bunch of figureheads that we didn't have back in 2014 or so. Who was there before 2016 or 2017, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald? I guess Moldberg goes back to 2007. Even in that sphere, back from 2007-2014 you could start a cool blog and people would read it, it wasn't a slave based dictatorship of influencers on mainstream social media who treat supposed comrades like McDonalds treats Burger King (lest they lose profits/attention market share!). 

>And I suppose you have the threads you make here and maybe on other forums? What do you consider to be the great intellectual achievements of the 21st century?

When it comes to politically relevant output of the last 50 years, I'd say HBD, public choice theory, and assorted political psychology findings (Haidt impressed me though there are some problems with his research) are the most significant output of the last 50 years. To name specific people I'd go with Arthur Jensen, Robert Plomin, Kevin MacDonald, Emil Kirkegaard, Charles Murray, Haidt, and certainly others. 

It's sad and briefly confusing when someone genuinely seems to think that a Twitter feed is "intellectual output." I genuinely don't think such an error could be due to malice, so the cause must be sad. Like if I talked about musical achievement and some nigger piped up genuinely thinking his shitty soundcloud jungle noise were "music."
#6
(11-07-2022, 07:31 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 06:00 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 02:01 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: The aristocratic and fraternal "dissident right" I fell in love with years ago
Who were they and what did they do?

Most old /pol/ and other boards, maybe part of it is nostalgia and growing past that but those boards have degenerated and now we have a bunch of figureheads that we didn't have back in 2014 or so. Who was there before 2016 or 2017, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald? I guess Moldberg goes back to 2007. Even in that sphere, back from 2007-2014 you could start a cool blog and people would read it, it wasn't a slave based dictatorship of influencers on mainstream social media who treat supposed comrades like McDonalds treats Burger King (lest they lose profits/attention market share!). 

>And I suppose you have the threads you make here and maybe on other forums? What do you consider to be the great intellectual achievements of the 21st century?

When it comes to politically relevant output of the last 50 years, I'd say HBD, public choice theory, and assorted political psychology findings (Haidt impressed me though there are some problems with his research) are the most significant output of the last 50 years. To name specific people I'd go with Arthur Jensen, Robert Plomin, Kevin MacDonald, Emil Kirkegaard, Charles Murray, Haidt, and certainly others. 

It's sad and briefly confusing when someone genuinely seems to think that a Twitter feed is "intellectual output." I genuinely don't think such an error could be due to malice, so the cause must be sad. Like if I talked about musical achievement and some nigger piped up genuinely thinking his shitty soundcloud jungle noise were "music."
This is just going to be a do-over of your other thread. You have no personal "intellectual work" of note to show and your idea of important intellectual work is just stuff you can point to to provide authority to things you already believed before discovering them. What is someone supposed to see in this thread that will destroy grifting? What do you actually want and expect from people?
#7
(11-07-2022, 07:51 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 07:31 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 06:00 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 02:01 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: The aristocratic and fraternal "dissident right" I fell in love with years ago
Who were they and what did they do?

Most old /pol/ and other boards, maybe part of it is nostalgia and growing past that but those boards have degenerated and now we have a bunch of figureheads that we didn't have back in 2014 or so. Who was there before 2016 or 2017, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald? I guess Moldberg goes back to 2007. Even in that sphere, back from 2007-2014 you could start a cool blog and people would read it, it wasn't a slave based dictatorship of influencers on mainstream social media who treat supposed comrades like McDonalds treats Burger King (lest they lose profits/attention market share!). 

>And I suppose you have the threads you make here and maybe on other forums? What do you consider to be the great intellectual achievements of the 21st century?

When it comes to politically relevant output of the last 50 years, I'd say HBD, public choice theory, and assorted political psychology findings (Haidt impressed me though there are some problems with his research) are the most significant output of the last 50 years. To name specific people I'd go with Arthur Jensen, Robert Plomin, Kevin MacDonald, Emil Kirkegaard, Charles Murray, Haidt, and certainly others. 

It's sad and briefly confusing when someone genuinely seems to think that a Twitter feed is "intellectual output." I genuinely don't think such an error could be due to malice, so the cause must be sad. Like if I talked about musical achievement and some nigger piped up genuinely thinking his shitty soundcloud jungle noise were "music."
This is just going to be a do-over of your other thread. You have no personal "intellectual work" of note to show and your idea of important intellectual work is just stuff you can point to to provide authority to things you already believed before discovering them. What is someone supposed to see in this thread that will destroy grifting? What do you actually want and expect from people?

I don't cast pearls before swine. 

Sometimes I wonder how innocent the failure to recognize natural hierarchy is. I wonder if there's a sort of metaphysical glow, where someone who's above can say poo poo pee pee and still be recognized as superior -- or if this is just stupid schizoism and the pearl eating swine really just don't know any better.
#8
(11-07-2022, 08:16 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: I don't cast pearls before swine. 

Sometimes I wonder how innocent the failure to recognize natural hierarchy is. I wonder if there's a sort of metaphysical glow, where someone who's above can say poo poo pee pee and still be recognized as superior -- or if this is just stupid schizoism and the pearl eating swine really just don't know any better.

You're this site's raving homeless person. People are beginning to doubt that you possess pearls at all.
#9
(11-07-2022, 08:29 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:16 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: I don't cast pearls before swine. 

Sometimes I wonder how innocent the failure to recognize natural hierarchy is. I wonder if there's a sort of metaphysical glow, where someone who's above can say poo poo pee pee and still be recognized as superior -- or if this is just stupid schizoism and the pearl eating swine really just don't know any better.

You're this site's raving homeless person. People are beginning to doubt that you possess pearls at all.

One point for innocence I guess? Why do you think I'm a "raving homeless person"? I don't think you can find anything like this thread from anyone else on the whole internet.
#10
(11-07-2022, 08:52 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:29 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:16 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: I don't cast pearls before swine. 

Sometimes I wonder how innocent the failure to recognize natural hierarchy is. I wonder if there's a sort of metaphysical glow, where someone who's above can say poo poo pee pee and still be recognized as superior -- or if this is just stupid schizoism and the pearl eating swine really just don't know any better.

You're this site's raving homeless person. People are beginning to doubt that you possess pearls at all.

One point for innocence I guess? Why do you think I'm a "raving homeless person"? I don't think you can find anything like this thread from anyone else on the whole internet.

This thread already existed on this very website. You haven't offered any original insights or frames of thought. You've just said that you hate grifters. That's a very common sentiment. Most people can get it out in under three paragraphs.

Let's try asking again. Who constituted the aristocratic and fraternal dissident right that you miss? No, your favourite authors of studies you haven't read on IQ science are not dissident rightists. And even if they were that wouldn't make their work valuable.
#11
(11-07-2022, 08:57 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:52 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:29 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 08:16 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: I don't cast pearls before swine. 

Sometimes I wonder how innocent the failure to recognize natural hierarchy is. I wonder if there's a sort of metaphysical glow, where someone who's above can say poo poo pee pee and still be recognized as superior -- or if this is just stupid schizoism and the pearl eating swine really just don't know any better.

You're this site's raving homeless person. People are beginning to doubt that you possess pearls at all.

One point for innocence I guess? Why do you think I'm a "raving homeless person"? I don't think you can find anything like this thread from anyone else on the whole internet.

This thread already existed on this very website. You haven't offered any original insights or frames of thought. You've just said that you hate grifters. That's a very common sentiment. Most people can get it out in under three paragraphs.

Let's try asking again. Who constituted the aristocratic and fraternal dissident right that you miss? No, your favourite authors of studies you haven't read on IQ science are not dissident rightists. And even if they were that wouldn't make their work valuable.

What is unique about my "insight" and frame here is that I am saying that the DR is DOMINATED by grifters. You don't realize this, but EVERYONE on here is a grifter. What is unique is my total criticality, my perfectionism -- my absolute demand that not a single money seeker open its mouth, lest Justice be raped. All are mere attention whores: BAP, t777, 0hpl, etc. EVERYONE. Not a single one is good enough -- all should be gagged for inferiority (figuratively speaking). Only the geniuses (there are one or two and they are currently SUBJUGATED) should be allowed to have any attention -- anything sort of this is a TOTALLY fake clown show. The mere performance of natural hierarchy by children. Not a single one of you understand the total phoneyness of the DR. 

This is necesarrily a rare sentiment, otherwise by definition the people that I criticize wouldn't be around.
#12
(11-07-2022, 09:49 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: What is unique about my "insight" and frame here is that I am saying that the DR is DOMINATED by grifters. You don't realize this, but EVERYONE on here is a grifter. What is unique is my total criticality, my perfectionism -- my absolute demand that not a single money seeker open its mouth, lest Justice be raped. All are mere attention whores: BAP, t777, 0hpl, etc. EVERYONE. Not a single one is good enough -- all should be gagged for inferiority (figuratively speaking). Only the geniuses (there are one or two and they are currently SUBJUGATED) should be allowed to have any attention -- anything sort of this is a TOTALLY fake clown show. The mere performance of natural hierarchy by children. Not a single one of you understand the total phoneyness of the DR. 

This is necesarrily a rare sentiment, otherwise by definition the people that I criticize wouldn't be around.

Everyone wants something. Attention, adoration, respect, money, security, etc. Why don't we try reframing this as an issue of intellectual/spiritual corruption. Do you believe that the people you have mentioned have been corrupted by their impure desires? I myself have posted on this forum about my disdain for BAP's general online presence even if I agree with a lot of what he says. I would say that it's fair to suggest he is grifting some of his audience. But not by corrupting his ideas so much as selling them to people he knows can't process them and allowing them to be corrupted in their minds.

And another question. Who are the current geniuses? Aside from yourself of course.
#13
(11-07-2022, 09:56 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 09:49 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: What is unique about my "insight" and frame here is that I am saying that the DR is DOMINATED by grifters. You don't realize this, but EVERYONE on here is a grifter. What is unique is my total criticality, my perfectionism -- my absolute demand that not a single money seeker open its mouth, lest Justice be raped. All are mere attention whores: BAP, t777, 0hpl, etc. EVERYONE. Not a single one is good enough -- all should be gagged for inferiority (figuratively speaking). Only the geniuses (there are one or two and they are currently SUBJUGATED) should be allowed to have any attention -- anything sort of this is a TOTALLY fake clown show. The mere performance of natural hierarchy by children. Not a single one of you understand the total phoneyness of the DR. 

This is necesarrily a rare sentiment, otherwise by definition the people that I criticize wouldn't be around.

Everyone wants something. Attention, adoration, respect, money, security, etc. Why don't we try reframing this as an issue of intellectual/spiritual corruption. Do you believe that the people you have mentioned have been corrupted by their impure desires? I myself have posted on this forum about my disdain for BAP's general online presence even if I agree with a lot of what he says. I would say that it's fair to suggest he is grifting some of his audience. But not by corrupting his ideas so much as selling them to people he knows can't process them and allowing them to be corrupted in their minds.

And another question. Who are the current geniuses? Aside from yourself of course.

I would say they're corrupted, yes. Maybe born corrupt, more so than the people they're stealing the reigns from. We should want justice and truth -- they want money and attention. Very low people serving a low audience!

You haven't heard of the geniuses. I haven't found all of them. Maybe some aren't born. Not knowing about them is the cost of the attention whore cancer.
#14
(11-07-2022, 10:10 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 09:56 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 09:49 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: What is unique about my "insight" and frame here is that I am saying that the DR is DOMINATED by grifters. You don't realize this, but EVERYONE on here is a grifter. What is unique is my total criticality, my perfectionism -- my absolute demand that not a single money seeker open its mouth, lest Justice be raped. All are mere attention whores: BAP, t777, 0hpl, etc. EVERYONE. Not a single one is good enough -- all should be gagged for inferiority (figuratively speaking). Only the geniuses (there are one or two and they are currently SUBJUGATED) should be allowed to have any attention -- anything sort of this is a TOTALLY fake clown show. The mere performance of natural hierarchy by children. Not a single one of you understand the total phoneyness of the DR. 

This is necesarrily a rare sentiment, otherwise by definition the people that I criticize wouldn't be around.

Everyone wants something. Attention, adoration, respect, money, security, etc. Why don't we try reframing this as an issue of intellectual/spiritual corruption. Do you believe that the people you have mentioned have been corrupted by their impure desires? I myself have posted on this forum about my disdain for BAP's general online presence even if I agree with a lot of what he says. I would say that it's fair to suggest he is grifting some of his audience. But not by corrupting his ideas so much as selling them to people he knows can't process them and allowing them to be corrupted in their minds.

And another question. Who are the current geniuses? Aside from yourself of course.

I would say they're corrupted, yes. Maybe born corrupt, moreso than the people they'll stealing the reigns from. 

You haven't heard of the geniuses. I haven't found all of them. Maybe some aren't born. Not knowing about them is the cost of the attention whore cancer.
Who are they stealing the reigns from? Do you know any, or are you waiting on a perfect genius to emerge who will save the world with a perfect flood of studies and essays and research papers?

I'm failing to see what your problem with the state of things is. Do you think if right wing podcasters didn't exist your messiah would emerge?
#15
(11-07-2022, 10:16 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 10:10 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 09:56 PM)anthony Wrote:
(11-07-2022, 09:49 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: What is unique about my "insight" and frame here is that I am saying that the DR is DOMINATED by grifters. You don't realize this, but EVERYONE on here is a grifter. What is unique is my total criticality, my perfectionism -- my absolute demand that not a single money seeker open its mouth, lest Justice be raped. All are mere attention whores: BAP, t777, 0hpl, etc. EVERYONE. Not a single one is good enough -- all should be gagged for inferiority (figuratively speaking). Only the geniuses (there are one or two and they are currently SUBJUGATED) should be allowed to have any attention -- anything sort of this is a TOTALLY fake clown show. The mere performance of natural hierarchy by children. Not a single one of you understand the total phoneyness of the DR. 

This is necesarrily a rare sentiment, otherwise by definition the people that I criticize wouldn't be around.

Everyone wants something. Attention, adoration, respect, money, security, etc. Why don't we try reframing this as an issue of intellectual/spiritual corruption. Do you believe that the people you have mentioned have been corrupted by their impure desires? I myself have posted on this forum about my disdain for BAP's general online presence even if I agree with a lot of what he says. I would say that it's fair to suggest he is grifting some of his audience. But not by corrupting his ideas so much as selling them to people he knows can't process them and allowing them to be corrupted in their minds.

And another question. Who are the current geniuses? Aside from yourself of course.

I would say they're corrupted, yes. Maybe born corrupt, moreso than the people they'll stealing the reigns from. 

You haven't heard of the geniuses. I haven't found all of them. Maybe some aren't born. Not knowing about them is the cost of the attention whore cancer.
Who are they stealing the reigns from? Do you know any, or are you waiting on a perfect genius to emerge who will save the world with a perfect flood of studies and essays and research papers?

I'm failing to see what your problem with the state of things is. Do you think if right wing podcasters didn't exist your messiah would emerge?

I know at least one, an absolute king if there was one. 

I think you're not seeing just how intrinsically gay all of the attention whores are -- you see it for the libs but not your own. The mote in your own eye is obscured by your obsession with your foe's.

The problem is essentially the subversion of the natural hierarchy. We have low people propped up by lower people, wilfully defying their superiors, sneering and crying when their low ears hear truth, performatively ignoring glorious light to instead revel in the filth of their low little catering entertainer idols. The right has fallen the Liberalism-- this is Liberalism.
#16
(11-07-2022, 10:26 PM)AryanGenius1488 Wrote: I know at least one, an absolute king if there was one. 

I think you're not seeing just how intrinsically gay all of the attention whores are -- you see it for the libs but not your own. The mote in your own eye is obscured by your obsession with your foe's.

Why don't you tell us about this king, what he's good for, and how the existence of Thomas777 frustrates his potential.

Also why don't you explain how a "dictatorship" of attention whores is possible. You can just not listen to these people if you don't like them. And what am I obsessed with which is obscuring my vision of this? Explain what I should be seeing and how I can't because of whatever it is you think is in the way?
#17
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
#18
(11-08-2022, 02:37 PM)Guest Wrote: "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."

Well said. Chris Chan is a great example of this phenomenon.


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)