Post-Romance:The Future Of Man and Womankind?
NuclearAbsolutist
Or The Once And Future Patriarchal State

Greetings recently a conversation here brought to my mind a topic touched on but not a subject of dedicated discussion here or really anywhere else that comes to my mind. Everyone reading this is aware that male and female relations in not just our Western World but the rest of the planet seemingly to various degrees have undergone a complete degradation so much so that the term The Woman Question has arisen much like the Jewish Question in 19th/early 20th century Europe.

I don't wish to tread over the  debates over the cause of the WQ or history behind this if you believe it is due to The Round Table/Elders Of Zion/The Dread March Of Modernity you come naturally to the same of the conclusion of the  utter state of women now being tied to their nature of women and women in the past likely being no different other than men knew better/worse in some regards.

These truths are often so striking on learning them whatever romance a man has is deadened forever a hate planted a hate for how they are get in the way and refuse to conform to any ideal or reasonable standard. Some settle in such a state, but many others wonder if things could be made different or as they were again-and some within that group propose that it is not by new or old sowing up of a torn social fabric but by the light of reason and technology that such aims will be met once and for all.

It is this I wish to open the floor to discuss. Man has developed a mind after romance in understanding seeking and taking control over women one I have seen most developed not by any proper futurists but on hentai boards firebrand dens of the farthest right and cold readers of open science papers today. All three of course despite assumption usually sharing the same spaces. A mind that now whirs with ideas and desires on dealing with women with no real comparison to the past outside certain brief episodes and persons not truly similar with our time. In short I want to discuss those who speak of 2D>3DPD their forebears their ideals and plans to realize it in the real world by any means social technical biotechnical etc. The Post Romantics as I call them.

Please feel free to point out any errors in my description and view and share your thoughts on the matter on these concepts and what future do they hold?...Or will bring into being.
[Image: 3RVIe13.gif]

“Power changes its appearance but not its reality.”― Bertrand De Jouvenel
Datacop
There exists in every man the impulse to mold a woman to your own specifications. Call it a Pygmalion Complex. In the ideal relationship, a woman is naturally inclined to mirror her husband, but as the time in a woman's life between childhood and marriage grows, this process becomes harder and harder. Women aren't designed to be the engines of change in their own lives, so they often steer them into directions opposite their goal (which is inevitably having a husband & kids). The career woman too bullheaded for any man believing herself to be "too intimidating" is a perfect example of this. This is the actual wall; the point at which a woman is beyond malleability. The act of falling in love is in a sense the process by which the single woman corrects herself into the man and the single man corrects himself into the object of imitation. The advantage of 2D makes itself clear when romance is viewed this way. This is also why Rei is my personal choice on the Best Girl Question, btw.
parsifal
(02-03-2023, 09:32 PM)NuclearAbsolutist Wrote: These truths are often so striking on learning them whatever romance a man has is deadened forever a hate planted a hate for how they are get in the way and refuse to conform to any ideal or reasonable standard. Some settle in such a state, but many others wonder if things could be made different or as they were again-and some within that group propose that it is not by new or old sowing up of a torn social fabric but by the light of reason and technology that such aims will be met once and for all.
. . .
In short I want to discuss those who speak of 2D>3DPD their forebears their ideals and plans to realize it in the real world by any means social technical biotechnical etc. The Post Romantics as I call them.

i have spent so much time agonizing over this problem with not a thing to show for it. the difficulty of reconciling romance with our world is immense to the point that one would be forgiven for thinking every aspect of modern life is set up with the specific intent of making it impossible. every day one is confronted with the ugliest, vilest, most repulsive aspects of the female sex in every respect: from birth they are stuffed with "food" that makes them obese, every effort is made to disarray their hormones and fill their heads with pernicious antisocial lies to promote insufferable behaviour, not a single glimpse of femininity is shown to them but instead every medium depicts adversarial parodies of womanhood, they are made to comingle with men in every mundane activity and given impunity over their reputations, faced with every possible social pressure to ruin themselves by racking up body counts, forbidden from any healthy monogamy, &c, &c, &c.

the only natural response any rational young man would have is to conclude women are beastly, subhuman creatures, and the internet abounds with jimian game theory to explain exactly this in neat scientific terms. how can a man ever fall in love after becoming aware of that? yet the cruel yearning for romance still remains, gnawing at the heart. it is conceivable that if we were in control of society directly, we could change all of this. we could put young girls in camps where they watch anime and learn to behave like 2D ladies, really there are so many things we could do, but in the mean time we are tasked with extracting blood from stones.
Reply 



[-]
Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)