01-03-2023, 01:59 AM
This is a highly disorganized note inquiring best procedure from the state of current American politic:
Contemporary Leftist rhetoric tends to be rejected outright among the vast majority of prepropagandized people on the planet, and even a lot of the propagandized... on what grounds would it be attractive to people who don't additionally possess ethnic resentments against White people? If they were "Gay"? If they were misanthropic on an alternative basis? (Yes, or maybe the propaganda (Read: "Social Engineering") is also enough, too - See New Englanders, other Cargo Cults deifying American Conformist/System opinion (The Netherlands).)
Formula: Propagandization + Ethnic Resentment = The Median Leftist Partisian. The proof seems in the pudding: See Trump voter statistics by race versus other variables. Question lies in what the more significant factor is - the latter type of thing tends to immediately stir people at their core; the former seems a softer/gradual process, usually instilled beginning at childhood - familial political alignment, "Schooling", being turned via the Internet, etc.... less static?
-Case: the "Rightist" whose alignment solely depends on familial political alignment, or Internet videos... easily turned?
-Case: Blacks, etc. They generally don't approve of things like "being Gay" - they politically align with Leftism because it's a vote towards their pocket, and because it's a club to hit Whitey with.
-Case: consider the "antiracist Rightist", often "POC" Conthervative/"Rightist". It might be the most important political clefts of 2023 lie in a triad - between the "Rightist POC" and other "Maintainers of Conservatism", Median Leftists and Homosexuals/Negrolatrists (more thoroughly allied), and people like us. Who would either of the other groups point to as the primary target of political elimination?
For all of the recent interest in Schmitt it seems much of the American "Right" has a real problem with Friend versus Enemy distinction. Basic problem with Democracy, maybe. The petty infighting within "The Real Right" reveals this further. The Internet has yet to solve the Personality Cult problem (ofc it doesn't want to - Left infighting + Right infighting = Profit).
- Free Speech/Disagreeableness issue?
My question is how political actors can adequately fight the Left. Forgive me if I'm throwing nuclear-grade salad retardation or basic shit here, I'm thinking on the keyboard.
Contemporary Leftist rhetoric tends to be rejected outright among the vast majority of prepropagandized people on the planet, and even a lot of the propagandized... on what grounds would it be attractive to people who don't additionally possess ethnic resentments against White people? If they were "Gay"? If they were misanthropic on an alternative basis? (Yes, or maybe the propaganda (Read: "Social Engineering") is also enough, too - See New Englanders, other Cargo Cults deifying American Conformist/System opinion (The Netherlands).)
Formula: Propagandization + Ethnic Resentment = The Median Leftist Partisian. The proof seems in the pudding: See Trump voter statistics by race versus other variables. Question lies in what the more significant factor is - the latter type of thing tends to immediately stir people at their core; the former seems a softer/gradual process, usually instilled beginning at childhood - familial political alignment, "Schooling", being turned via the Internet, etc.... less static?
-Case: the "Rightist" whose alignment solely depends on familial political alignment, or Internet videos... easily turned?
-Case: Blacks, etc. They generally don't approve of things like "being Gay" - they politically align with Leftism because it's a vote towards their pocket, and because it's a club to hit Whitey with.
-Case: consider the "antiracist Rightist", often "POC" Conthervative/"Rightist". It might be the most important political clefts of 2023 lie in a triad - between the "Rightist POC" and other "Maintainers of Conservatism", Median Leftists and Homosexuals/Negrolatrists (more thoroughly allied), and people like us. Who would either of the other groups point to as the primary target of political elimination?
For all of the recent interest in Schmitt it seems much of the American "Right" has a real problem with Friend versus Enemy distinction. Basic problem with Democracy, maybe. The petty infighting within "The Real Right" reveals this further. The Internet has yet to solve the Personality Cult problem (ofc it doesn't want to - Left infighting + Right infighting = Profit).
- Free Speech/Disagreeableness issue?
My question is how political actors can adequately fight the Left. Forgive me if I'm throwing nuclear-grade salad retardation or basic shit here, I'm thinking on the keyboard.