Rape and Civilisation

[GoldenOstrich]

Rape everything that exists! A greek view of sexual power


Nietzschean Sex: 
Nietzsche came up with the idea that sex is power (also Freud, the copycat). To love is to exude power onto an object. The lover has power and uses it on his beloved, as a male spends his semen. Sex and Love goes from high to low, the lover being superior to the beloved. A man’s domination over a woman, the stronger exercising his natural right over the weaker as well as the weaker offering a willing and proud submission. (And we all know women prefer to yield to those who care nothing for their preference or consent.)

The opposite is in Plato (the phoencian ass-kisser that he was), in which sex is not power but attraction, not from high to low but from low to high, the beloved being superior. Love is a dependency, even an enslavement. 

Some deranged femcels and feminists distrust love when felt by women. A woman in love justifies and invites the oppression of the man she loves by giving him power over herself: better to have the “autonomy” of an open marriage with many lovers, or homosexuality, or—well, not celibacy - because they can't control themselves. Marriage is civilizing for the women and an entrapment for the man.

Aristotle:
Aristotle discussed the concept of "active" and "passive" roles in copulation. He believed that in most species, including humans, the male played an active role in the process, while the female took on a passive role. This is part of the hierarchy of nature. His view is also more broadly stated in his theory on hylomorphism where form, supplied by the man, is superior and prior to matter, supplied by the f-void.


Machiavelli on raping (fortuna): 
"I conclude, thus, that when fortune varies and men remain obstinate in their modes, men are happy while they are in accord, and as they come into discord, unhappy. I judge this indeed, that it is better to be impetuous than cautious, because fortune is a woman; and it is necessary, if one wants to hold her down, to beat her and strike her down. And one sees that she lets herself be won more by the impetuous than by those who proceed coldly. And so al­ ways, like a woman, she is the friend of the young, because they are less cautious, more ferocious, and command her with more audacity."


A dominating person could make use of the ability to seem caring - the reverse with not be possible. 

 
Spatial ability is related to aggression, which is self-centered. But to be self-centered, you need to be free or make yourself free from the environment in which you find yourself.  Men orient themselves more objects, the object of their desire, their will. Women look to the environment, the milieu, they don't will, they are prone to submit to their circumstances.
  
To free yourself, you need to be able to abstract yourself, you need to be able to think abstractly, to see things as they might be in different contexts or without a context. Aggression and abstraction are two forms of being single-minded. Women can't rape because they aren't single-minded enough, they are fundamentally more enslaved by the world, the context, which they are given.




BAP on rape (veils it in the context of soyence):


"...it depends on a state of the mind where the perceiving part of the intellect is absolutely focused, limpid, yet driven by the most relentless energy, an energy to penetrate. Direct perception is already “intellectualized” and in fact much closer to the innate “intelligence” of things than cerebral syllogisms. No scientist worth anything has ever felt pride at using algorithms or trial-and-error to solve a problem. Yes, feminists are right that “science” is patriarchal in this sense, that it is a “rape” of nature. Real scientists like Galois are monsters of will, and the preponderance of
men in the hard sciences is explained by this orientation of character, as also by the fact that the minds of men more than of women are capable of sustained focus on one thing (women are better at multitasking). There are women who were great scientists, but, like women who were great chess players, or poets, they are probably spiritual lesbians."


Civilization relies on male supremacy to liberate human beings from their enslavement to biology. Liberal sensitive males also need to re-enslave women with romantic delusions - if they want civilization to continue...

Controlling superior men, and men with arms, liberal men have "libertarded" their women, who are now deranged feminists, who want to larp as men while simultaneously behaving in their typical low mode of gossip and shame. 
Yet isn’t it better to be wooed insincerely than beaten up, you dumb bitches? Kill Praxagora, if you want liberalism to continue.

This post is largely informed by Harvey Mansfield's book on Manliness.

[anthony]

"Uhhhh, yeah! Uh-huh. Exactly!"

[GraalChud]

Rape everything that exists! A greek view of sexual power


Nietzschean Sex: 
Nietzsche came up with the idea that sex is power (also Freud, the copycat). To love is to exude power onto an object. The lover has power and uses it on his beloved, as a male spends his semen. Sex and Love goes from high to low, the lover being superior to the beloved. A man’s domination over a woman, the stronger exercising his natural right over the weaker as well as the weaker offering a willing and proud submission. (And we all know women prefer to yield to those who care nothing for their preference or consent.)

The opposite is in Plato (the phoencian ass-kisser that he was), in which sex is not power but attraction, not from high to low but from low to high, the beloved being superior. Love is a dependency, even an enslavement. 

Some deranged femcels and feminists distrust love when felt by women. A woman in love justifies and invites the oppression of the man she loves by giving him power over herself: better to have the “autonomy” of an open marriage with many lovers, or homosexuality, or—well, not celibacy - because they can't control themselves. Marriage is civilizing for the women and an entrapment for the man.

Aristotle:
Aristotle discussed the concept of "active" and "passive" roles in copulation. He believed that in most species, including humans, the male played an active role in the process, while the female took on a passive role. This is part of the hierarchy of nature. His view is also more broadly stated in his theory on hylomorphism where form, supplied by the man, is superior and prior to matter, supplied by the f-void.


Machiavelli on raping (fortuna): 
"I conclude, thus, that when fortune varies and men remain obstinate in their modes, men are happy while they are in accord, and as they come into discord, unhappy. I judge this indeed, that it is better to be impetuous than cautious, because fortune is a woman; and it is necessary, if one wants to hold her down, to beat her and strike her down. And one sees that she lets herself be won more by the impetuous than by those who proceed coldly. And so al­ ways, like a woman, she is the friend of the young, because they are less cautious, more ferocious, and command her with more audacity."


A dominating person could make use of the ability to seem caring - the reverse with not be possible. 

 
Spatial ability is related to aggression, which is self-centered. But to be self-centered, you need to be free or make yourself free from the environment in which you find yourself.  Men orient themselves more objects, the object of their desire, their will. Women look to the environment, the milieu, they don't will, they are prone to submit to their circumstances.
  
To free yourself, you need to be able to abstract yourself, you need to be able to think abstractly, to see things as they might be in different contexts or without a context. Aggression and abstraction are two forms of being single-minded. Women can't rape because they aren't single-minded enough, they are fundamentally more enslaved by the world, the context, which they are given.




BAP on rape (veils it in the context of soyence):


"...it depends on a state of the mind where the perceiving part of the intellect is absolutely focused, limpid, yet driven by the most relentless energy, an energy to penetrate. Direct perception is already “intellectualized” and in fact much closer to the innate “intelligence” of things than cerebral syllogisms. No scientist worth anything has ever felt pride at using algorithms or trial-and-error to solve a problem. Yes, feminists are right that “science” is patriarchal in this sense, that it is a “rape” of nature. Real scientists like Galois are monsters of will, and the preponderance of
men in the hard sciences is explained by this orientation of character, as also by the fact that the minds of men more than of women are capable of sustained focus on one thing (women are better at multitasking). There are women who were great scientists, but, like women who were great chess players, or poets, they are probably spiritual lesbians."


Civilization relies on male supremacy to liberate human beings from their enslavement to biology. Liberal sensitive males also need to re-enslave women with romantic delusions - if they want civilization to continue...

Controlling superior men, and men with arms, liberal men have "libertarded" their women, who are now deranged feminists, who want to larp as men while simultaneously behaving in their typical low mode of gossip and shame. 
Yet isn’t it better to be wooed insincerely than beaten up, you dumb bitches? Kill Praxagora, if you want liberalism to continue.

This post is largely informed by Harvey Mansfield's book on Manliness.

Roman and early Indo-Aryan civilization were built on the backs of Aryan rapists (the Luperci and the Gandharvas, respectively). 

Take from this what you will.

[Guest]

Man and woman are different in that while man lives in nature woman lives in the artificial world man has created. Man is exposed to the danger and trials of struggle—bound in an eternal battle that can only end in the escape of death. Woman on the other hand is safe and protected in the confines of the home—she lives with the other women and their children safe from nature, but not completely. 

Woman does in fact have pathway of interaction with nature in the form of the beast from which is hails—man. Thus does man to woman represent the same thing that the world does to man; a cruel tyranny from which one can not escape. Rape then is woman’s first true interaction with nature bare and naked. If you have ever seen a gazelle pinned down by a lion you see in its last moments a lack of perceive struggle, although it may kick and tries to fight back, but it knows lord death looms over it—it finally knows true submission. This is what a woman experiences in rape but without dying. Thus does man represent the highest force of nature in her view; in the same way the deer views the wolf—as a servant doing the will of the divine. 

Rape is thus the closest woman can get to struggle—the closest she can ever get to the sensation of life, and better yet she can exploit this experience with its anti-death(usually) consequence to its fullest. She can be raped over and over—in this does she, like man, know the spirit of struggle. Man knows this in battle and war, woman in being raped. Therefore as all men hope for war and tell tales of it and sings its glories do woman do the same for rape. All women seek to be raped; this is there darkest desire which must be kept secret or else it would lack the authenticity of which they crave. 

But then what does this say about the man who does not rape? He remains a child in the world his father made. He is the same as woman in this regard. The man who can not rape is also like woman in that he can only know nature by being raped, thus he is a faggot. Thus do we come to our current world; where men remain children or faggots and women who have been completely cut off from nature due to lack of rape beg vehemently to be raped, yet they too do not truly know what they beg for—what they lack—only that they need it. A world divorced from nature can only be perverted—towards higher or lesser outcomes, and in this case without will to guide it will it decline into its lowest form.

The rise of feminism and PUA are that of women begging to be raped and men looking to correct this. But then progress this to MGTOW and finally we are at our current stage of man—incel. Incel who remains a child or who eventually will troons out and becomes a faggot. Is our civilization sickly without rape—most likely, yet it’s not like raping a bunch of women by yourself would change it; nor would legalizing rape which would lead to social collapse, unfortunately. The only way for this to be reversed would be for a small group of men to take control, topple the old order and bring in a new age as it’s new tyrants. 

Yes, a group of men bound by politics(although romantically referred to as fate) must usurp the rotten corrupt world and exert their will(the will of nature) upon all. If all have been reduced to faggots and children do not slacken in making them your slaves—they seek masters. The world needs you with your tyrannical will to renew it will blood and slaughter; nature needs its servants to once more do justice in earth. Now form groups and seek dominate—learn the art of politics and save the civilization your forbearers left you! Rape, rape everything that exist! Let your will know it’s true form—Rape!

[casual rapist]

This post is largely informed by Harvey Mansfield's book on Manliness.

Harvey Mansfield is a goddamn faggot. 

He wrote a book about manliness and look how he acted when Trump ascended.  Case closed. 

But we dig deeper. 

Harvey Mansfield is not an intellectual.  He's an artifact of kike horseshit.  Concentrated, ethnocentric kikery, subpar in every other respect, displacing actual knowledge.  A virus on civilization proper, as they always have been. 

Little harvey owes his entire station to performative mimicry of kike perversion, perpetuating its forms and rewarded by its goblins. 

It's all fake.  And the 4 foot beakmen, and those sufficiently weak for the beakmen to elevate without running a risk, fall apart worse than children when a real Aryan enters the room.