11-05-2023, 04:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2023, 04:39 AM by TannenLG.
Edit Reason: ++
)
Are you the author? The line you draw is very indistinct. What significant difference is there between "our Indo-European peoples" and "ethnic Europeans"? The second quotation is very clearly aspirational, what "should" be. Specificity or not tribally, the general European tribe seems to be prescribed towards these qualities in the second passage, towards the chagrin of the first.
If I strain to ignore these objections: How do you distinguish between what can be freely stated: just the inherent nature of the European, and what shouldn't be disclosed to avoid unduly influencing European individuals? I'm unsure what the second passage specifically leaves unstated to avoid this kind of influence.
If I strain to ignore these objections: How do you distinguish between what can be freely stated: just the inherent nature of the European, and what shouldn't be disclosed to avoid unduly influencing European individuals? I'm unsure what the second passage specifically leaves unstated to avoid this kind of influence.