The Character of Denmark and longhoused nationalism
#1
This will be a thread on how danish nationalism cucked itself by mixing up it's different aspects, and I will try to showcase it through history. First the aspects, then the history and lastly relating it to modernity. Let this be the danish putlerspergout on history and culture. "If you don't mind I will take only 30 seconds to 1 minute"...

The Higher Drive and the Faustian sailor

The Sailor, the man of the Sea, is a faustian figure and motivating drive, the spirit of which united the north and conquered Britain. He discovered America, colonized Iceland and faced the power of oceans. As an integral part of danish aristocracy, sailing served both as a political weapon of power, an interest and experience and a tool for trade and money. The point is that the aryan/indo-european element of danish culture has a strong connection to the sea, and in a sense depends upon it.

[Image: Carl_Rasmussen_-_Skibe_som_morgenen_efte..._Kunst.jpg]

The backbone of the Homeland: The Peasant

The peasant is the lucky, dumb fool, working on agriculture, man who out of chance wins. He is the cuck. Read Klods-Hans and see how this plays out as an antithesis to aristocracy. He is venerated by certain nationalistic types in the danish romanticism, but I will get to that. The important thing is that he is a dumb, naive peasant, who stands as the opposite of the landlord, and his role in literature is just like the marxist working class against the evil rich aristocracy. 

[Image: netlundbye.jpg]

History

Since Denmarks founding, the massive 8750 kilometers of coastline seeping into the country through its many rivers and ponds, has been a central part to it's formation and development. One can see this in the location and use cases for the big cities: all of them are ports or trade stations next to a river or sea. This was built by the vikings, a word which I hate because of the associations to God of War and the like. Vikings (understood as seafaring pirates) were expanding and following that aryan tradition of just going towards the horizon.

The backbone of the country was agriculture and small farms. These were united under a larger farm, then an aristocracy of high-ranking military men and finally the king who took advice from them, much different than the supposed "tyranny" democracy "freed" us from. But you know that already. Note at this time the divide between the peasant and the viking - the home and the sea - in the aversion to "sotdöden": dying in bed.

The end of danish sea dominance is marked by Napoleons defeat and Great Britain bombing/stealing the danish navy:

[Image: folkeskolens%20historiekanon%2016%20K%C3...k=rsRo-rnW]

And only 42 years later, Denmark became a democracy. In the years post-catastrophe a new national identity was formed, focusing not on the grand horizons of the sea, but the Peasant. Grundtvig was the cultural icon together with H.C. Andersen, and it is these people the wholesome chungus nationalists of danish modernity still worship. The age of vikings, ships and expansion is in this semi-romantic era described as dusty old monuments, who yes took Denmark to where it is, but now we are something else and we should move on. The Peoples Church is dominant, seeking to impose itself like the american mexicans of today want a Papal state. Kierkegaard, a voice of the old aristocrats, had an intense disgust of this new church. He is the last cultural author worth reading in the danish canon, period. But this thread is not about him.

The spirit of the sea was never forgotten though, just challenged and laid to rest within national libraries and statues. The new political system was introduced, and the parties are as such: The Left (peasant-class and workers) vs. The Right (the rich). The latter got reformed into the Conservatives and the former became the voice of the right-wing when the Social Democrats introduced themselves. As the Left and Social Democrats spent the next hundred years arguing about economic systems, the Conservatives forgot themselves. They still stood for the military, King and family - but the military doesn't exist anymore, the king is without power and the family structure is destroyed by women's liberation (something the Conservatives initially opposed). So they are entirely cucked, and any sort of nationalistic voice keeps mixing these aspects up - they always sneak in wholesome family farm life. And of course it's relevant, as the farmers were the backbone of Denmark, but these nationalists hail it as the highest aspects, completely forgetting the old navy tradition still somewhat present. Their only real achievement was through Dansk Folkeparti, who basically bullied the other parties in the government to accept immigration restrictions. Even the far-right will cuck to the peasant. It's almost impressive. It's the inheritance of this entirely forged identity emerging as Denmark becomes a democracy.

If one wants to see the hidden spirit still waiting to unleash itself, I will provide some examples:

1. Songs. The highest culture of the danish people is still appriciated in music, probably because people are too stupid to understand the lyrics:



2. The least cucked party, which currently is on the brink of collapse, Nye Borgerlige, has the Swan as their logo.

[Image: 330px-Logo_of_the_New_Right_%28Denmark%29.svg.png]


3. Mærsk, the last danish fleet.

4. Frømændene (the frog-men), a special military division, who resemble the navy seals.

5. Recently we got a new king. Former frogman too; the king has traditionally been in the navy and has his own ship for travels to Greenland.





And with these we see the echoes of what could have been. I think other cases of this internal cucking and higher drives being present but "in the background" is very typical of the western right-wing, especially in world after WW2. Much more can be said of this topic, but for now I think it provides as a clear example of european nationalism cucking itself again and again.
#2
We see throughout the history of the Germanic people a contrast between the settled farmers and the warlike raiders, and how the former gives rise to the latter which then degenerates back into the former once again; a theme which plays out among all the masses of humanity too, just in different ways.

Something that most people seem to be ignorant of is just how far we've really come, the ascension of Rome was nothing compared to the rise of the German in historical importance. In 400 BC, all of Europe short of Scandinavia was either Celtic or Mediterranean, yes, even Germany (The real homeland of all Germanic people's is Scandinavia) In the cold forests of the North, even the farmers had to be more resilient and thoughtful than the masses of comparatively swarthier and decadent people's found among the Celtic and Mediterranean City states. (The Celts by Caesar's time weren't really Barbarians as typically imagined, they had large urban population centers, advanced metal working, civilization. It's why they were so easy for Caesar to divide against each-other. The real Barbarians were the Germans.)

All the lands where Germanics now call home, Germany, Normandy, Great Britain, Australia, America, they were conquered by nomads, adventurers, pirates, vikings. Men who came from Longhoused farming cultures in the bitter cold, where nothing of value grew (Even if only metaphorically) And who carved out new territories for themselves rather than just accepting their lot in life. 2500 years ago the Germans were the most irrelevant culture in Europe, yet their rage against fate and lust for conquest eventually drove the Roman Empire to its knees; and they have dominated the entire planet ever since.

The thing about Empire however, is that the prosperity it brings makes a people forget their roots and slide into decadence. The freedom the ancestors sacrificed so much for is replaced by slavish servitude. The mentality of the average modern German can be summed as. "Please! I don't want to rock the boat! I just want to sit on my laurels and eat up the wealth my forefathers took for me!" They miss the point, they don't understand why their ancestors did what they did, they're parasites that just want to consume the scraps left behind by greatness. They're the same men that stay on the shitty farm in Scandinavia, wasting their time digging in the permafrost all day, rather than carving out Empires and forcing lesser people to do that for them. The thing is, no one cares about the stupid slaves, people care about the conquerors. George Washington was more of a Viking than the modern American that soyjacks watching the Superbowl.

The German's Steppe is the Sea, we've never been a horse people like the easterners, because we don't live on steppes. The Sea is where freedom and wealth can be found for us, it's how we have always conducted trade and conquest. It's what separated us from the Mediterraneans too, the Romans feared the deep water. The sea even seemed to war against the Byzantines, the Great Sperm Whale Porphyrios (The inspiration for Moby Dick) wrecked Byzantine shipping for 50 years. The German has the blessing of Ran, she is our waifu, and she brings us much wealth and chances to coom into virgin lands.  Even the American Empire (Which is still a Germanic Empire, as degenerate as it is.) Finds its wealth and in its mastery of the sea. We have the strongest Navy by-far, and it's what allows to project power across the entire world. Rejecting the sea is rejecting what we are. 

I do think there's is an honorable sub-set of farmers among our people historically however. Remember, we all can trace our lines back to farmers. The difference is the difference of virtue, honor, and courage. The Waffen SS had its basis in peasant romanticism, the Feudal Lord is tied to the land same as the peasants, yet his existence is just and honorable, just different to that of the conquering viking. The problem with modern peasant worshipers however is that the feudal contract is entirely gone, there are no worthy masters to serve now; so the only thing the noble-hearted can do is destroy and carve out new frontiers for themselves. The National Socialists would say the modern peasant is no true peasant at all, but a slave. The title of "peasant" implies some manner of feudal obligation and honor that no longer exists.
#3
(02-13-2024, 07:33 AM)Cyber Viking Wrote: [The whole thing]

What does any of this have to do with the character of Danmark? You should've just posted a "Hyperborean Aryan Spirit x Wasted" edit from 2019. Would've conveyed the same thing.

Also are you "German" (born in Germany) or are you "American"? That's rhetorical, I know you're American ("Even the American Empire (Which is still a Germanic Empire, as degenerate as it is.) Finds its wealth and in its mastery of the sea. We have the strongest Navy by-far"), but I'm confused as to why you also call yourself German (The German's Steppe is the Sea, we've never been a horse people like the easterners, because we don't live on steppes). 

(02-13-2024, 07:33 AM)Cyber Viking Wrote: The mentality of the average modern German can be summed as. "Please! I don't want to rock the boat! I just want to sit on my laurels and eat up the wealth my forefathers took for me!"

Is that his mentality? What laurels is the "average modern German" resting on? Again, one has to wonder whether you're using the word "German" interchangeably with "American"—which would make a bit more sense when it comes to the laurels part but absolutely no sense regarding a people that has any serious consciousness of a "German" identity. 

(02-13-2024, 07:33 AM)Cyber Viking Wrote: the ascension of Rome was nothing compared to the rise of the German in historical importance. In 400 BC, all of Europe short of Scandinavia was either Celtic or Mediterranean, yes, even Germany (The real homeland of all Germanic people's is Scandinavia) In the cold forests of the North, even the farmers had to be more resilient and thoughtful than the masses of comparatively swarthier and decadent people's found among the Celtic and Mediterranean City states.

'Mediterranean swarthoids!'

[Image: happy-new-year-2017-hd-po.jpg]

>In 400 BC
>swarthier and decadent people's found among the Celtic and Mediterranean City states

Okay.

(02-13-2024, 07:33 AM)Cyber Viking Wrote: their rage against fate and lust for conquest eventually drove the Roman Empire to its knees; and they have dominated the entire planet ever since.

The Germanic peoples were possibly not even in the top 5 primary causes of the Western Empire's fall, at least not in the way you're envisioning them to be. Look up the Edict of Caracalla



Anyway

(02-13-2024, 06:03 AM)synesth Wrote: 2. The least cucked party, which currently is on the brink of collapse, Nye Borgerlige, has the Swan as their logo.

[Image: 330px-Logo_of_the_New_Right_%28Denmark%29.svg.png]

One question I have is about the current political situation. I recall BAP discussed on one episode of CR that many people saw [incorrectly, according to him] the Danish right-wing as cucking by allowing the left to co-opt the right's immigration platform (or something along these lines). IIRC he said that this was actually a strategic compromise and one of the only ways that it would be possible for the Danish right to effectuate meaningful changes to immigration policy. What are your thoughts on that? Is that just the best way of getting things done in Danish parliament?
[Image: JBqHIg7.jpeg]
Let me alone to recover a little, before I go whence I shall not return 
A land as dark as darkness itself, where even the Light is like darkness
#4
august Wrote:What does any of this have to do with the character of Danmark? You should've just posted a "Hyperborean Aryan Spirit x Wasted" edit from 2019. Would've conveyed the same thing.
It relates to the character of Denmark because the character of Denmark, including its historical trends, and its modern issues with Longhoused Nationalism is almost identical to that of other Germanic Nations, including the United States. Everything synesth wrote is not an exclusively Danish problem. Also, I'm autistic, so I enjoy writing text walls when the I feel like it.

august Wrote:but I'm confused as to why you also call yourself German
I'm not a German as in a man living in Germany, but I am Germanic. English is a Germanic language, my racial origins are Germanic (Norwegian, and Swedish, and German, with some Scottish so I'm not pvure.) Anglo Saxons are a Germanic people, they are the founding stock of America, so yes, we are "Germans" in that sense. The Cimbri didn't call themselves "Germans" either, but they were still Germanic. The American is biologically and spiritually a descendant of the Germanic People (You could call it race, but I don't think the term is proper.) America is a new nation, and "American" is a new identity, but we still have our roots that we couldn't change if we wanted to. Read this article to see what distinguishes us as a people.

https://templism.substack.com/p/preuentum

august Wrote:that his mentality? What laurels is the "average modern German" resting on? Again, one has to wonder whether you're using the word "German" interchangeably with "American"—which would make a bit more sense when it comes to the laurels part but absolutely no sense regarding a people that has any serious consciousness of a "German" identity. 
Jesus man it's not that difficult to grasp. We're living in a time of abundance, "the good times"  NPC scum don't think the "good times" have to be defended or fought for, they think wealth and prosperity just springs from the ground rather than something their forefathers had to bleed for. American, Danish, German, all the Germanic peoples face the same issue. It's how you get cucks worshiping slaves rather than warriors.

Most modern Germanics are cowards, and they have allowed themselves to internalize the idea that it was their forefathers being slaves that built the wealth they enjoy today, rather than because their forefathers were conquerors; and for that, they are resting on their laurels. They assume there is no need to fight to defend anything, because God or random chance has just given them wealth, for which it's their simple "right" to have. This is why our people think the ideal man is some fat boomer driving a tractor, a concept which is actually very powerful in our democracy if you care to look. The same governments which crack down on racialism and that import infinity niggers with barely any pushback completely abandon their plans when the Low IQ farmer worshipers chimp out.

https://www.rintrah.nl/eu-farmers-are-fi...alist-wef/

august Wrote:'Mediterranean swarthoids!'
Sorry, I have nothing against Meds personally, but they are browner than me. It's just how they look. It's biology. You can cope all you want about their racial soul or whatever, their skin is brown. Even the lighter ones are still browner than a Germanic.

august Wrote:The Germanic peoples were possibly not even in the top 5 primary causes of the Western Empire's fall, at least not in the way you're envisioning them to be. Look up the Edict of Caracalla
Germans were always Rome's strongest rivals. The Greeks, Carthaginians, and Celts were all defeated in detail. Germans fought Rome for hundreds of years starting in 100 BC with the Cimbrian War (When Rome first tried to stop Germanics from conquering the Celts) And remained pretty much unconquered. You can blame the racial diversity in Rome for its fall, and sure, it had something to do with it. Well, Rome built its power off that very diversity in the first place. Caesar never would have gotten as far as he did were it not for his Celtic auxiliaries, and Germanic mercenaries (His own bodyguards were Germans) The power of Rome came from its homogenizing, globohomo nature. From making foreign peoples into vassals and Romanizing them, So yeah, that ending up destroying them is only appropriate.

By the time Rome's collapse, the actual Roman people were so decadent, cowardly, and lazy that they barely even joined the Legions anymore. Than you had retarded Roman Governors discriminating against the very people (Germans) who they relied on to defend their lands and protect their positions. Rome's collapse was due to its own contradictory and retarded nature, and good riddance. The Edict of Caracalla if anything preserved the Empire longer, the Roman people had already degenerated, shown by the very fact that such an edict was implemented or even thought of at all. Look up the story of King Alaric, who was a loyal Germanic servant of Rome until Rome spurned him at every turn. Romans were decadent and retarded, they acted like they were racially superior, tried to placate their subjects with stupid edicts that meant nothing in reality, all the while they relied on the "inferior barbarians" to do their fighting for them. The day Germanics need to rely on foreign races to defend our own interests is the day we too deserve to die.
#5
(02-13-2024, 01:58 PM)Cyber Viking Wrote: Germans were always Rome's strongest rivals. The Greeks, Carthaginians, and Celts were all defeated in detail. Germans fought Rome for hundreds of years starting in 100 BC with the Cimbrian War (When Rome first tried to stop Germanics from conquering the Celts) And remained pretty much unconquered. You can blame the racial diversity in Rome for its fall, and sure, it had something to do with it. Well, Rome built its power off that very diversity in the first place. Caesar never would have gotten as far as he did were it not for his Celtic auxiliaries, and Germanic mercenaries (His own bodyguards were Germans) The power of Rome came from its homogenizing, globohomo nature. From making foreign peoples into vassals and Romanizing them, So yeah, that ending up destroying them is only appropriate.

[Image: h5QK3ZD.jpeg]

(02-13-2024, 01:58 PM)Cyber Viking Wrote: Look up the story of King Alaric

Okay. Thank you. I've never heard the story of King Alaric before. I'll look up the story of King Alaric and educate myself on King Alaric and his story.

(02-13-2024, 01:58 PM)Cyber Viking Wrote: Anglo Saxons are a Germanic people, they are the founding stock of America, so yes, we are "Germans" in that sense.

The day Germanics need to rely on foreign races to defend our own interests is the day we too deserve to die.

I don't feel so good.

[Image: ppptWlx.jpeg]

[Image: 3IUxrsk.jpeg]

[Image: 9KhLBaS.jpeg]

Oh I almost forgot about the United Kingdom's continued use of biological weapons (Look up Operation Bloody Bastard):

[Image: 3iGDILj.jpeg]
[Image: JBqHIg7.jpeg]
Let me alone to recover a little, before I go whence I shall not return 
A land as dark as darkness itself, where even the Light is like darkness
#6
I get it august, you're a prancing dramatic homosexual just like your husbando, the Roman Empire. Do you take after Elagabalus. the tranny Emperor? I think Elagabalus is a perfect representation of the Roman, swarthy, wants to castrate himself, obsessed with boys, enjoys being a prostitute in his own palace...
#7
Cyber Viking Wrote:The title of "peasant" implies some manner of feudal obligation and honor that no longer exists.

Exactly. The cucked part of the modern nationalistic parties is the attempt to return to this and hail the peasant as the same rank as the men above these. No sense of history, just vomiting out past culture for the sake of it.

august Wrote:One question I have is about the current political situation. I recall BAP discussed on one episode of CR that many people saw [incorrectly, according to him] the Danish right-wing as cucking by allowing the left to co-opt the right's immigration platform (or something along these lines). IIRC he said that this was actually a strategic compromise and one of the only ways that it would be possible for the Danish right to effectuate meaningful changes to immigration policy. What are your thoughts on that? Is that just the best way of getting things done in Danish parliament?

The danish parliment requires 90 mandates to get anything done. These are distributed among different parties, numbers of which are decided during election. For a long time you had the left and right unable to form governments on their own wing alone, and so had to seek help another place. That place became the danish peoples party with just enough mandates to, in reality, decide who to govern with. This meant that the danish peoples party had to both "cuck" and bully at the same time. Be radical enough to achieve something and be soft enough to coorperate. How much of this was strategy or just how things naturally turned out, I don't know.

My criticism to this party still persists, because much like the Argentine wholesome nationalist parties pre-Milei, offered much welfare to these underclass foreigners. Out of this critique formed the before-mentioned New Right, that embraced low taxation AND low immigration, something unheard of since the farmers party (remember? The party first left-wing, then right-wing once social democrats came) were basically neocon americans.

A recent good move was the New Rights former leader to join Liberal Alliance - the new "youth party", and hopefully she can influence the only viable alternative to social democratic psychopath, Alex Vanopslagh to be immigration-critical behind closed doors. As for Vanopslagh he is a soft Milei, that is: he isn't the funny weirdo autist, but more like the professional business man, who doesn't want thousands of state-paid retards to suck out the money of an immence bureaucratic mammy state. He is keyed, but still supported more immigration because "we want good workers", and this recent move by hard anti-immigration politicians to get into this party is very good.



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)