The Dumpster Defenders and the Pro-Crime Society
#41
I vote Bitchard Hanania be promoted to mod, and the forum be renamed "RationalWiki-Forum".

Y'know I was reading their page on David Dees the other day researching him:

RationalWiki Wrote:Dees believed in all the conspiracies.

No, seriously. All of them. His cartoons featured every possible conspiracy theory and in every possible combination.

Fuck I hate libtards so much. Can someone spread a rumor that whoever wrote this page fucked Spic Fuentes? Or whatever gets him arrested and flashmobbed faster.

Man, RationalWiki is complete dogshit. What a stupid fucking website.

This is how I imagine RationalWiki was formed:

"Hey what if we made Encyclopedia Dramatica but it wasn't funny and everything was written like shit?"
"Wow, that's a great idea! Also, I'm retarded and suck my own dick at night sometimes."

Wikipedia Wrote:RationalWiki is an online wiki which is written from a skeptical, secular, and progressivist perspective. Its stated goals are to "analyze and refute pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, document 'crank' ideas, explore conspiracy theories, authoritarianism, and fundamentalism, and analyze how these subjects are handled in the media." It was created in 2007 as a counterpoint to Conservapedia after an incident in which some editors of Conservapedia were banned. RationalWiki has been described as liberal.

Okay, I decided to read the Wikipedia article for this piece of shit site. Damn, this is even worse than I expected. Also, WTF is "Conservapedia"? Jesus Christ, the world normalfaggots live in is shockingly pathetic.

Anyway, back to the shit that matters:

I agree with everything in Anthony's OP, I don't really have anything to add, but great jumpstart for what is an extremely important topic in modern life.

(02-04-2023, 10:05 AM)Starn Wrote: On a related note, one of the most aggravating things about Self-Defense is that you have to pretend to be a whimpering coward afterwards.
You could have video evidence of shooting a moron mere inches away from him stabbing your throat, and if you refuse to grovel and repeat "I was so afraid for my life!" to every question, you WILL be charged.

Such a pointless humiliation ritual. At least it has two funny byproducts:
You always have to kill after drawing a gun, otherwise you 'weren't afraid for your life.'
And you always have to dump your entire mag into them as fast as possible, to prove you're 'afraid.'

Really fucking funny observation.

(02-04-2023, 10:05 AM)Starn Wrote: I very much doubt the Millers would have been charged if it wasn't for that lib-empathy hijacking shot of the shirtguy's brains being splattered.
If they visually see the criminal dying a gruesome death it's basically over for you. The gore is your fault, somehow. This is why a 9mm handgun is the only viable Self-Defense weapon.

Great point that gore = "empathy" spike in the normalfreaks mind.

(02-04-2023, 12:25 PM)Datacop Wrote: This story reminds me a lot of the Pennsylvania snow shoveling murder-suicide last winter. A guy is tortured by his neighbors for years until he snaps over them shoveling snow onto his lawn; shoots the couple, then goes back inside to blow his head off. 


(footage starts at 1:07)

This is the funniest thing I've seen this month. When he went inside I was expecting it to be so he could call the cops on himself, when he came back out with a rifle to execute them I laughed outloud.

(Laughing at the fag with a snake tattoo saying "This is an utterly terrible outcome", and then telling us the Goys had a retarded kid. Like pottery.)

(02-04-2023, 12:25 PM)Datacop Wrote: Where does this immortality delusion come from? It can't be from familiarity with weapons like I've heard some non-Americans suggest; even the ghettoest pavement apes will start into a sprint when seeing a gun in any context. Is it just blind, bull-headed retardation? The idea that you can push someone around as long as you like and expect nothing in return? You could argue that, just as the Millers refused to back down from the thuggish Edwards, the Goys (that's the couple's actual last name) refused to concede an inch to Spaide until their dying breath. Why does one inspire in me approval and the other distain? Probably because the Goys were annoying + female

This is the most important question wrt this phenomenon. Thomas777 had commented (on a now banned account) about the exact same details regarding Rittenhouse, how randos charging someone with an AR-15 in the street is completely insane, and generally unheard of.

I can't answer this question, but I want to bring up that this is why the "school shooter" is the most feared caricature in American life. Despite the fact that clearly the large majority of mass casualty events are psyops, it still proposes (intentionally, as IIA) the idea of an "equalizer" (or maybe more accurately a "decider") who burns down the entire system with themselves inside of it. The horrific panicked fear of "white terrorism" is the same as the overwhelmingly negative responses to "vigilantism"— that any mode of "radical change" is completely disgusting to the normalfag.

As Anthony said:

(02-04-2023, 09:27 AM)anthony Wrote: "You didn't have to do anything? You could theoretically put up with this and worse behaviour forever."

[Image: 3547e4c1a6ac5199d5627d69dc4cce51.gif]
[Image: 0b065d24f0c9a57c24af80cac8885ba2.jpg]
#42
Quote: Bitchard Hanania
What's your problem with Hanania, of all people?
#43
Quote:In January and Feburary 2021, Michael Coombs was reported to Metropolitan Police by academic Adam Rutherford for malicious communications.[21] Coombs sent Rutherford thousands of abusive tweets on at least 5 different Twitter accounts, including Felicity (@felicit52636930).



Quote:Coombs posts on Gab,[19] a freedom of speech website popular with the alt-right, although even they have had to censor and delete some of his comments that broke their rules, including posting threats of violence.

[/url]
Quote:[url=https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Michael_Coombs#2021_activity]"Michael Coombs, a rabid racist white supremacist who has sent me more than 3000 messages in the last year, from at least 4 different sock puppet accounts, as well as my live events. The police are aware, as at least 2 crimes have been committed."

Again: I'm seeing a whole lot of excuses being made for this guy, with not a single one of them coming across as anything more than elaborate ways of saying "Actually it's good when we do it."



Quote:seeing as you find Jordan Neely comparable to this guy who is a gross online troll at absolute worst


Quote:None of the things you posted about Mike would make me think he's a nuisance in pubilc or assaults people while they wait for the bus. Has he assaulted shop owners or pushed people onto subway tracks?

"The internet is real life, except when it conveniently isn't."
#44
Ok, sending violent threats to people is anti-social, I admit it. When I am god emperor I will give this guy two years in jail, but businesses are allowed to discriminate against blacks and all civil rights laws are revoked. Do we have a deal, Hanania?
#45
While Bichard Hanania composes another insightful  post wherein all quotes are unreadable on the Cindy theme I will share two recent articles by the New York Times one on the death of Jordan Neely the man you have likely seen a video of being headlocked by a marine on the subway and a article published a few days after that on the life of one homeless man Abdul Curry in San Diego. There's a common thread in both I will point out.

https://archive.ph/MG8LE

The New York Times Wrote:In November 2021, Mr. Neely’s aggression seemed to peak, when he punched a 67-year-old woman in the street on the Lower East Side, the police said. The woman suffered severe facial injuries, including a broken nose, according to court documents. He was charged with assault and, awaiting the resolution of his case, spent 15 months in jail, the police said, though his family said the stint was shorter.
He pleaded guilty on Feb. 9 of this year, in a carefully planned strategy between the city and his lawyers to allow him to get treatment and stay out of prison.

But just 13 days later, he abandoned the facility. Judge Biben issued a warrant for his arrest.
In March, an outreach worker saw him in the subway, neatly dressed, calm and subdued, and got him a ride to a shelter in the Bronx. (The outreach workers typically do not check for arrest warrants when interacting with homeless people.) But a downward spiral followed.
On April 8, when outreach workers approached him in a subway car at the end of the line in Coney Island, Mr. Neely urinated in front of them. When an outreach worker went to call the police, according to a worker’s notes, Mr. Neely shouted, “Just wait until they get here, I got something for you, just wait and see.”

Something I feel is lost in the recent discourse over the event are the events reported by the Gray Lady here, which is Neely was a wanted felon that should have never been on that train to begin with. But that is secondary in itself to how the reason did not end up in jail for punching a old lady so hard her nose broke was the Judge and thus Are Justice System/Society deemed him reformable. I once read the reason THX1138 the protagonist of George Lucas's  classic dystopian film is jailed, tortured, chased down is not because he broke any law per say(None exist by any sane definition in that world) but is in the eyes of his society ill. Same logic here. All those no doubt well funded homeless helpers that saw him on the street apparently not typically in the business of seeing if one of the main engines of urban disorder have a warrant out. Would get in the way of proper orthodox treatment as decreed by the civic cult I suppose.

Not much better on the other coast, while the Times does mention Neely having gone on a spiral due to drug abuse(Weed) it is sparing. The next article goes into more detail likely due to the moral logic of both the authors and readers not being able to sense what is wrong with the picture they see

The New York Times Wrote:Abdul[Age 64] had come to rely on their weekly visits as his only semblance of stability during a time in which living on the street in San Diego had become what he called “a daily game of Russian roulette.” His longtime partner, Phasia McKee, had died in November of a suspected fentanyl overdose at 46 years old. Three of his friends had been run over and killed in their tents by an intoxicated driver who swerved onto the sidewalk. In the last year, Abdul had revived six people after fentanyl overdoses by administering CPR and the nasal spray naloxone. He had also overdosed five times himself, including once a few days earlier, when he collapsed on the sidewalk, gashed open his forehead, suffered a minor stroke and spent 36 hours in the emergency room before being released back to the street.
“How’s your recovery going?” Laine asked.
“I’ve got my miracle drug,” he said, holding up a small container of olive oil, pouring some onto his hands and massaging it into his skin.
“What about your medications?”
“They’re either lost, stolen or in here somewhere,” he said, as he began to sift through a grocery cart, a suitcase and two plastic bins that contained all his belongings. Laine knelt next to him to check his vitals. He had a slight fever, and his blood pressure was dangerously high. She gave him aspirin and took out her computer to add another line to his medical chart, which told the story of a life outside: chronic fatigue, malnourishment, alcoholism, blurred vision, schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety, paranoia.
The article is at times almost a parody of showing how the homeless are not down on their luck persons. Beyond whatever disorders they naturally have drug abuse the true shared bond between them makes them all worse and adds new ones. Drug abuse in America has become epidemic and entered a new phase with the rise of fentanyl, and thus beyond the issues caused by dealers fighting other dealers there is the fact drugies turn to crime of which the homeless are merely the most visible kind of criminal. With the Ferguson Effect and the recent George Floyd riots of 2020 however police have pulled back from their duties either by choice or orders of recent Pro Crime public officials. A ever expanding therapeutic approach to stem the bleeding and treat criminals and outcasts the RIGHT way.

[Image: tpFEP4a.png]
[Image: Fmk79NH.png]

A form of criminal enrichment worse than the fent dealer perhaps, creating a vast blob of special interests to pad the underclass out mostly from the tax payer while solving nothing. Well its no different from the civil rights revolution in that respect.
[Image: 3RVIe13.gif]

“Power changes its appearance but not its reality.”― Bertrand De Jouvenel
#46
(05-15-2023, 03:22 PM)Bitchard Hanania Wrote: Again: I'm seeing a whole lot of excuses being made for this guy, with not a single one of them coming across as anything more than elaborate ways of saying "Actually it's good when we do it."

What’s his IQ, what has he made, what are his positive contributions to society? I can not pass a judgement without this information, the idea that street niggers should be held to the same standard as high iq white men is absurd(not like they do anyway, but it’s always a slap on the wrist for the nigger). 

I mean should not geniuses be given immunity to the law? Liberty and application of the law should coincide with personal capacity and nature. Higher men deserve more liberty because they have the capacity to do more, contribute more. Lesser men only benefit others when they are restrained and suppressed. The technology, math, and science that perpetuate this world of ours was created by a select few. Why humanity is a dynamic animal unlike any other is because we have the ability for creation, and all creation and invention starts in the mind. The mind is supreme, the intelligence supreme, why should not those with the capacity to progress the world be freed from the same constrains meant to control the Criminal/Slave class?

Quote:“The impulse upward, however, is supplied by a very small number of nations, and by a very small portion of the population in such nations. The section of any community that produces leaders or genius of any sort is only a minute percentage. To invent new processes, to establish new principles, to elucidate and unravel the laws of nature, calls for genius. To imitate or to adopt what others have invented is not genius but mimicry.”
Quote:“Mankind emerged from savagery and barbarism under the leadership of selected individuals whose personal prowess, capacity, or wisdom gave them the right to lead and the power to compel obedience. Such leaders have always been a minute fraction of the whole, but as long as the tradition of their predominance persisted they were able to use the brute strength of the unthinking herd as part of their own force, and were able to direct at will the blind dynamic impulse of the slaves, peasants, or lower classes. Such a despot had an enormous power at his disposal which, if he were benevolent or even intelligent, could be used, and most frequently was used, for the general uplift of the race. Even those rulers who most abused this power put down with merciless rigor the antisocial elements, such as pirates, brigands, or anarchists, which impair the progress of a community, as disease or wounds cripple an individual.”


Answer me why High IQ white men should be held to the same laws as niggers!
#47
(05-15-2023, 03:22 PM)Bitchard Hanania Wrote:
Quote:In January and Feburary 2021, Michael Coombs was reported to Metropolitan Police by academic Adam Rutherford for malicious communications.[21] Coombs sent Rutherford thousands of abusive tweets on at least 5 different Twitter accounts, including Felicity (@felicit52636930).



Quote:Coombs posts on Gab,[19] a freedom of speech website popular with the alt-right, although even they have had to censor and delete some of his comments that broke their rules, including posting threats of violence.

[/url]
Quote:[url=https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Michael_Coombs#2021_activity]"Michael Coombs, a rabid racist white supremacist who has sent me more than 3000 messages in the last year, from at least 4 different sock puppet accounts, as well as my live events. The police are aware, as at least 2 crimes have been committed."

Again: I'm seeing a whole lot of excuses being made for this guy, with not a single one of them coming across as anything more than elaborate ways of saying "Actually it's good when we do it."



Quote:seeing as you find Jordan Neely comparable to this guy who is a gross online troll at absolute worst


Quote:None of the things you posted about Mike would make me think he's a nuisance in pubilc or assaults people while they wait for the bus. Has he assaulted shop owners or pushed people onto subway tracks?

"The internet is real life, except when it conveniently isn't."

Cyberbullying and online harrassment aren't real. If that's the worst this guy has done, I don't really care.
#48
What's "evil" isn't forcing people to live around loathsome worthless crackheads. No, it's obviously recognizing said loathsome crackheads for what they are and treating them accordingly.

Quote:One third of Canadians fine with prescribing assisted suicide for homelessness
Quote:"the legalization of assisted suicide in canada has allowed previously unseen evil to show its face whether its this or the whole discussion of using it on older patients in care"

The sooner these people get ran over by Teslas the better.
#49


The flip-side of the pro-crime society. Though to be frank, this is scarcely even worth categorizing as an "other" side. Being that the whole point of the pro-crime society is to instill in people with natural law-abiding tendencies that they are slaves and they do not get to question justice or fairness or look out for their own interests in matters of the law, this is just part and parcel. Infinite compassion for the actually dangerous, insane criminals, infinite callousness towards random blokes who text someone while stationary behind a bus. And of course, the people who consume and create this kind of content are totally zealous about "proving" that this guy was an imminent and serious, LETHAL threat to pedestrians he might come across while committing the crime of "anti-social driving" as they call it. I would bet actual money that not a single one of these people, not even one, who are deeply goncerned about petty traffic violations uphold this "the law's the law" attitude, or indeed even enforcement, towards the actually malignant and dangerous criminal element in society. Just for random people minding their own business who want to be left alone. Something you see a lot with "karens" as well. The criminally deranged and these types of voluntary surveillance drones are very much kindred spirits.
#50
(07-07-2023, 08:36 PM)a system is failing Wrote: Being that the whole point of the pro-crime society is to instill in people with natural law-abiding tendencies that they are slaves and they do not get to question justice or fairness or look out for their own interests in matters of the law, this is just part and parcel. Infinite compassion for the actually dangerous, insane criminals, infinite callousness towards random blokes who text someone while stationary behind a bus.

Very well put. Note the cyclist's predatory remark upon encountering his victim: "Here we have someone." Being a libtard, his predatory instinct is directed only toward individuals cooperating with high-trust society, and the force required to overpower the victim is outsourced to agents of the state.

(07-07-2023, 08:36 PM)a system is failing Wrote: And of course, the people who consume and create this kind of content are totally zealous about "proving" that this guy was an imminent and serious, LETHAL threat to pedestrians he might come across while committing the crime of "anti-social driving" as they call it.

Such a LETHAL threat (while motionless) that the cyclist is compelled to walk into traffic to harass him. Which behavior ought to carry a substantial risk of getting one's skull caved in with a tire iron, if not backed down from.
#51
🆃🅷🅴🆈 🆆🅰🅽🆃 🆃🅾 🅴🅽🅲🅾🆄🆁🅰🅶🅴 🆆🅴🅰🅺🅽🅴🆂🆂. 🅱🅴🅰🆃 🅳🅾🆆🅽 🅿🅴🅾🅿🅻🅴 🅵🅾🆁 🅱🅴🅸🅽🅶 🅲🅰🅿🅰🅱🅻🅴 🅾🅵 🆂🆃🅰🅽🅳🅸🅽🅶 🆄🅿 🅵🅾🆁 🆃🅷🅴🅼🆂🅴🅻🆅🅴🆂. 🅵🅾🆁 🅸🅵 🆈🅾🆄 🅼🅰🅺🅴 🅿🅴🅾🅿🅻🅴 🆂🆃🆁🅾🅽🅶 🅴🅽🅾🆄🅶🅷 🆃🅾 🆁🅴🆂🅸🆂🆃 🅰 🅱🆄🅻🅻🆈, 🆃🅷🅴🆈 🆆🅸🅻🅻 🆃🅷🆄🆂 🆁🅴🆂🅸🆂🆃 🆃🅷🅴 🅱🅸🅶🅶🅴🆁 🅱🆄🅻🅻🅸🅴🆂 🅸🅽 🆂🅾🅲🅸🅴🆃🆈.

🆂🅻🅰🆅🅴 🅲🆄🅻🆃🆄🆁🅴.
#52
Bumping this thread to ask if anybody knows about cases similar to the death of Ken McElroy. I know only about this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_at_W%C5%82odowo

Quote:Ciechanowicz was a 60 year old recidivist who spent over 30 years in prison, for batteries, thefts and rapes. While out of prison he extorted pensions and bullied residents of Włodowo and Brzydowo villages and robbed local shops.

[...]

Later on they drove to nearby Dobre Miasto. Police officers were still refusing to send officers to Włodowo, claiming that none were available. After they returned, a group of locals (including two Winek brothers) gathered. Ciechanowicz returned, waiving his cleaver and threatening to kill "you all and your brats" (Winek's young son was playing in the yard), the group started to chase him. They caught him in the hollow near the forest and beat him with bats, shovels and car spring.
Surprisingly, the story ended not so badly:

Quote:On 18 December 2009, they were pardoned by the president of Poland Lech Kaczyński and their sentence was changed to 10 years of probation.

Unfortunately no anthropological analysis of the criminal can be done. The case is forgotten in Poland and unknown in other countries, so I am not able to find even a single photograph of Ciechanowicz.
#53
The "pro-crime society" is actually extremely easy to explain. Jews and libs promote policies which are easy on crime because they ARE criminals. They want to create an environment which is more comfortable for themselves by minimizing any potential consequences of their own antisocial behaviors. Nothing starts big and complex. At the core of every big, complex conspiracy is a very simple goal which can be summarized in one sentence. The jew, the fag, and the liberal are motivated by the exact same goal as the negro: Gibsmedat! Unlike the negro, they know that they cannot simply take things whenever they want. Thus, they created the scheme we all know and love: "If I can convince people that it's wrong to punish me, then I can do whatever I want!" They'll never state it so bluntly or in so few words, but the intent is obviously there. They have tried many different methods to achieve this, but it always (and I do mean always, in every circumstance you can possibly imagine) comes back to the same simple idea.
#54
Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein would never have been charged with anything in a past era when America was tough on crime. It's communist anarcho-tyranny, not some Zionist scheme.
#55
BillyONare Wrote:Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein would never have been charged with anything in a past era when America was tough on crime. It's communist anarcho-tyranny, not some Zionist scheme.

Your staunch refusal to ever blame jews for anything is very suspicious.
#56
Not an argument



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)