03-04-2024, 09:15 PM
I was going to make this a reply in the Scenarios for the 2024 Election thread, but it would be far too long and off topic, so I'd like to make a thread for this discussion. The discussion being: How Do We Dispose of the AFricans in WWWW? Now, there are some people among us who think that the Multiracial Anti-Semitic Co-Prosperity Sphere of the Niggers First movement are useful, even potential allies! I would like to dispel all of this nonsense as soon as possible, as Fuentes and his group are a blight on anything remotely "right wing".
For those of you who don't want to discuss this person at all, this can be seen as a study of sorts as to how someone can go from a person with a bright future to being a disgraceful plaything of powers he doesn't understand.
I will lay out my argument, and then respond to these comments in kind
Why I Originally Liked Nick
Before any of his issues, Fuentes was a normal kid who wanted to do good and I think many posters let this somewhat endearing quality overtake their better judgement. At the end of the day, what we want is to Win, and Win, and keep Winning, and this individual is an impediment to that.
As for me, I remember the first few episodes of "America First". Nick was awkward, but he was on point. He focused on the Big Three: Immigration, Trade, and War, with implicit anti-semitism and racism--that is, never overtly Naming Them, but guiding people towards that direction. His show could have been seen as a supplement to Trumpism for a younger audience. Could have.
Where Did Things Go Wrong?
The point was likely the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville which was, in reality, a Fed Op to associate Donald Trump with Naziism and Anti-Semitism: "There were good people on both sides". This is true from the perspective of the liberal worldview, but the Media played it as if everyone at that rally were a Nazi; thus the damage was done, to Trump, and to one Nick Fuentes.
From The Independent:
Back in 2017, he was completely on message. The above is precisely what one should say overtly when one operates publicly.
After this event, however, many people on the far right were lost, specifically younger people who were newly red-pilled like myself. This was supposed to be the moment "a tidal wave of White Identity is coming" per Fuentes, and I remember thinking the same. It was some time after this event that Andrew Anglin's The Daily Stormer declared Fuentes to be The Leader of The Movement... perhaps he let this get to his head? I'm not sure.
I finally have an excuse to use this
To The Point
Now, I could wax poetic about his problems with the "Reformed Homosexual" and Federal Informant Milo Yiannopolous, or the debacle of the capital where his own people were set up but he was let off scot-free, or his myriad inconsistencies in belief we all know; but that in and of itself is the point. We all know his problems, his inconsistencies, the immense evidence that he is a plaything of the feds, so why continue to go to bat for him?
An especially egregious and illustrative moment was when in 2022 he began attacking BAP and that sphere right before the primary elections while simultaneously using the very common leftist trope of the Evil CIA Agent against a very promising candidate named Joe Kent. Whatever you think of BAP and his orbiters, they are consistently on message towards electing smart, Trump supporting people. Most importantly, they understand the power of the Q Anon Movement.
For some reason Nick ordered his faux groypers to attack BAP at this moment over something that happened 3 years prior. A moment where BAP never attacked Fuentes, but rather said something to the effect of "be careful about going to a convention that will be presented as a White Nationalist meeting". For this benign statement 3 years prior, Fuentes divided the online right at a crucial moment. The most important thing to understand here is that this hurt Donald Trump and the MAGA agenda and prevented someone who is truly and openly hard right from being accepted in the public sphere which could have potentially been a watershed moment.
My sources indicate Fuentes received this text immediately after the election.
In Conclusion...
Yes, Nick did start out with best intentions (barring conspiracy theories about him being a plant of the Wilks Brothers all along), but for years he has been an impediment to Donald Trump--including that impromptu meeting with Coonye--and an impediment to the right as a whole, as I will get to in the following replies.
I am not the biggest fan of Tucker Carlson. For being the best journalist of the day--and unfortunately that's true--he falls very short. He rarely meets with interesting people, and when he does (see Trump or Putin) he asks subpar questions. He also made a fool of himself with his low-brow Moscow tour; it reminded me of that one 50s commie nigger whose name I fail to remember talking about how much better Russia is than the US because people in Moscow didn't call him a nigger.
That being said, Tucker knows how to stay on message, even if some of that message isn't very good in the long run. Fuentes, on the other hand, does not. You say he doesn't like mass immigration, yet I remember many times him saying that we need latinos because they're Catholic and believe in Wholesome Family Values unlike those evil White Liberal Coastal Elites. His line is Tinkzorg but with a Catholic veneer. I won't go on about how retarded it is to try and turn America into a Catholic Monarchy(how?), which is his stated goal.
It may very well be true that that his anti-immigration posts are his real beliefs. I personally believe his Catholicism is merely a religious justification for his anti-semitism (a bad one at that). It doesn't really matter what he truly believes, what matters is he has no backbone. He was exposed as a White Nationalist, then egged on and promoted by people like Andrew Anglin to become The Leader of The Movement, a title he readily took yet was not prepared for the consequences. All he did was dig himself further into a hole, which is pitiable, but pity doesn't Win
That's just it though isn't it? It's an e-persona. It's a show for his audience of 10 Whites and 1000 niggers. Who gives a shit about what someone says? What matters is what someone does and whether or not it helps us Win. Imagine how absurd it is to a normalfag to see someone talking about child marriage. All it does is give legitimacy to the ADL/SPLC "Hate Watch", where they can say "he had a meeting with Trump", "he was a part of the J6 Insurrection", etc. That does not help me Win, which is all that matters.
As for the attacks on the BAP Sphere, please see the full post body.
For those of you who don't want to discuss this person at all, this can be seen as a study of sorts as to how someone can go from a person with a bright future to being a disgraceful plaything of powers he doesn't understand.
I will lay out my argument, and then respond to these comments in kind
Why I Originally Liked Nick
Before any of his issues, Fuentes was a normal kid who wanted to do good and I think many posters let this somewhat endearing quality overtake their better judgement. At the end of the day, what we want is to Win, and Win, and keep Winning, and this individual is an impediment to that.
As for me, I remember the first few episodes of "America First". Nick was awkward, but he was on point. He focused on the Big Three: Immigration, Trade, and War, with implicit anti-semitism and racism--that is, never overtly Naming Them, but guiding people towards that direction. His show could have been seen as a supplement to Trumpism for a younger audience. Could have.
Where Did Things Go Wrong?
The point was likely the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville which was, in reality, a Fed Op to associate Donald Trump with Naziism and Anti-Semitism: "There were good people on both sides". This is true from the perspective of the liberal worldview, but the Media played it as if everyone at that rally were a Nazi; thus the damage was done, to Trump, and to one Nick Fuentes.
From The Independent:
Quote:[Nick Fuentes] has said he is leaving Boston University because of the violent threats he has received since [Charlottesville].
Mr Fuentes said his reason for attending the Charlottesville rally was to demonstrate against immigration, multiculturalism and post-modernism.
On his Facebook page, Mr Fuentes proclaimed his fervent support of President Donald Trump and his belief that “multiculturalism is a cancer.”
Back in 2017, he was completely on message. The above is precisely what one should say overtly when one operates publicly.
After this event, however, many people on the far right were lost, specifically younger people who were newly red-pilled like myself. This was supposed to be the moment "a tidal wave of White Identity is coming" per Fuentes, and I remember thinking the same. It was some time after this event that Andrew Anglin's The Daily Stormer declared Fuentes to be The Leader of The Movement... perhaps he let this get to his head? I'm not sure.
I finally have an excuse to use this
To The Point
Now, I could wax poetic about his problems with the "Reformed Homosexual" and Federal Informant Milo Yiannopolous, or the debacle of the capital where his own people were set up but he was let off scot-free, or his myriad inconsistencies in belief we all know; but that in and of itself is the point. We all know his problems, his inconsistencies, the immense evidence that he is a plaything of the feds, so why continue to go to bat for him?
An especially egregious and illustrative moment was when in 2022 he began attacking BAP and that sphere right before the primary elections while simultaneously using the very common leftist trope of the Evil CIA Agent against a very promising candidate named Joe Kent. Whatever you think of BAP and his orbiters, they are consistently on message towards electing smart, Trump supporting people. Most importantly, they understand the power of the Q Anon Movement.
For some reason Nick ordered his faux groypers to attack BAP at this moment over something that happened 3 years prior. A moment where BAP never attacked Fuentes, but rather said something to the effect of "be careful about going to a convention that will be presented as a White Nationalist meeting". For this benign statement 3 years prior, Fuentes divided the online right at a crucial moment. The most important thing to understand here is that this hurt Donald Trump and the MAGA agenda and prevented someone who is truly and openly hard right from being accepted in the public sphere which could have potentially been a watershed moment.
My sources indicate Fuentes received this text immediately after the election.
In Conclusion...
Yes, Nick did start out with best intentions (barring conspiracy theories about him being a plant of the Wilks Brothers all along), but for years he has been an impediment to Donald Trump--including that impromptu meeting with Coonye--and an impediment to the right as a whole, as I will get to in the following replies.
JohnnyRomero Wrote:I think that [Fuentes] is a bit better than most people here make him out to be... but not by much. He has terrible, trashy tastes and an obnoxious negro-brained Zoomer fanbase, but he is nevertheless very much *not* in favor of mass non-white immigration. Tucker, on the other hand, seems to be a completely lost cause. I think it is now becoming painfully obvious that everything "good" about Tucker was just his Fox News writers copying right-wing Twitter.
I am not the biggest fan of Tucker Carlson. For being the best journalist of the day--and unfortunately that's true--he falls very short. He rarely meets with interesting people, and when he does (see Trump or Putin) he asks subpar questions. He also made a fool of himself with his low-brow Moscow tour; it reminded me of that one 50s commie nigger whose name I fail to remember talking about how much better Russia is than the US because people in Moscow didn't call him a nigger.
That being said, Tucker knows how to stay on message, even if some of that message isn't very good in the long run. Fuentes, on the other hand, does not. You say he doesn't like mass immigration, yet I remember many times him saying that we need latinos because they're Catholic and believe in Wholesome Family Values unlike those evil White Liberal Coastal Elites. His line is Tinkzorg but with a Catholic veneer. I won't go on about how retarded it is to try and turn America into a Catholic Monarchy(how?), which is his stated goal.
BillyONare Wrote:Fuentes is a witty, good-hearted SYM. The Jews melted his brain, but not as badly as you would believe by following the Zero HP Lovecraft sphere who retweet his worst coal takes. If you just scroll through his twitter without biasing the worst posts you can see that he's a pretty staunch and reasonable white nationalist. Not that we should stop making fun of him for turd worlding it up and being deranged about Zionism.
It may very well be true that that his anti-immigration posts are his real beliefs. I personally believe his Catholicism is merely a religious justification for his anti-semitism (a bad one at that). It doesn't really matter what he truly believes, what matters is he has no backbone. He was exposed as a White Nationalist, then egged on and promoted by people like Andrew Anglin to become The Leader of The Movement, a title he readily took yet was not prepared for the consequences. All he did was dig himself further into a hole, which is pitiable, but pity doesn't Win
Selim Wrote:Fuentes often attacks what he sees as the "BAP sphere", but these are usually the most mild RW content farmers and unoriginal Substack grifters who have gravitated around BAP. These are those who were targeted by the 1488 accounts. Fuentes' xenophilic tendencies are rightly ridiculed, but exaggerated in the zeitgeist. Just recently he was talking about Mexicans being parasites on productive people. There are a lot of keyed little things about his e-persona I could list. He supports child marriage. As a testament to his Sensitivity, he will go on a tangent and start bitching about how tedious and cluttered the internet is to use, or talk about all the epic things he would do in a post-apocalyptic scenario.
Quote:his e-persona
That's just it though isn't it? It's an e-persona. It's a show for his audience of 10 Whites and 1000 niggers. Who gives a shit about what someone says? What matters is what someone does and whether or not it helps us Win. Imagine how absurd it is to a normalfag to see someone talking about child marriage. All it does is give legitimacy to the ADL/SPLC "Hate Watch", where they can say "he had a meeting with Trump", "he was a part of the J6 Insurrection", etc. That does not help me Win, which is all that matters.
Quote:An especially egregious and illustrative moment was when in 2022 he began attacking BAP and that sphere right before the primary elections while simultaneously using the very common leftist trope of the Evil CIA Agent against a very promising candidate named Joe Kent. Whatever you think of BAP and his orbiters, they are consistently on message towards electing smart, Trump supporting people. Most importantly, they understand the power of the Q Anon Movement.
As for the attacks on the BAP Sphere, please see the full post body.