The Melancoly of Keith Woods
#1
[Image: image.png]
"White birth rates are too low. The white race is going extinct. This is because of liberalism."

"What's liberalism?"

"Liberalism is when you are allowed to own things and have sex with women under the age of 25."

"..."
#2
>"Liberalism is when you are allowed to own things and have sex with women under the age of 25."

Where does he say this? I don't pay enough attention to him to know, his content is pretty boring to me.
#3
It's "Keet Woods".
#4
A few months ago I had trouble falling asleep, so I tried putting on Keef Woods monologues and it actually helped. I hope it didn't affect my subconscious...
#5
I had the misfortune of showing my dad his videos.
#6
Keith Woods is a Marxist Humanist who realized immigration might be bad actually, and hates Jews for being capitalists. If he was alive in the 30s he'd be a mildly unorthodox communist.
#7
[Image: anglosaxonm.jpg]

#8
"It would be absurd to appraise a man’s worth by the race to which he belongs and at the same time to make war against the Marxist principle, that all men are equal, without being determined to pursue our own principle to its ultimate consequences. If we admit the significance of blood, that is to say, if we recognize the race as the fundamental element on which all life is based, we shall have to apply to the individual the logical consequences of this principle. In general I must estimate the worth of nations differently, on the basis of the different races from which they spring, and I must also differentiate in estimating the worth of the individual within his own race. The principle, that one people is not the same as another, applies also to the individual members of a national community. No one brain, for instance, is equal to another; because the constituent elements belonging to the same blood vary in a thousand subtle details, though they are fundamentally of the same quality."

"A Weltanschhauung which repudiates the democratic principle of the rule of the masses and aims at giving this world to the best people - that is, to the highest quality of mankind - must also apply that same aristocratic postulate to the individuals within the folk-community. It must take care that the positions of leadership and highest influence are given to the best men. Hence it is not based on the idea of the majority, but on that of personality."

"The racial Weltanschhauung is fundamentally distinguished from the Marxist by reason of the fact that the former recognizes the significance of race and therefore also personal worth and has made these the pillars of its structure. These are the most important factors of its Weltanschhauung. If the National Socialist Movement should fail to understand the fundamental importance of this essential principle, if it should merely varnish the external appearance of the present State and adopt the majority principle, it would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground. For that reason it would not have the right to call itself a Weltanschhauung. If the social programme of the movement consisted in eliminating personality and putting the multitude in its place, then National Socialism would be corrupted with the poison of Marxism, just as our national-bourgeois parties are."

This is all that needs to be said about "Nationalists" of the BookCat/Davis/Woods variety.
#9
(06-03-2023, 03:26 AM)obscurefish Wrote:
"It would be absurd to appraise a man’s worth by the race to which he belongs and at the same time to make war against the Marxist principle,...
This is all that needs to be said about "Nationalists" of the BookCat/Davis/Woods variety.


Yeah but quoting things and pointing at them is for nerds though.  Can you rephrase in your own words so that I may attack?
#10
(06-03-2023, 10:01 AM)casual rapist Wrote:
(06-03-2023, 03:26 AM)obscurefish Wrote:
"It would be absurd to appraise a man’s worth by the race to which he belongs and at the same time to make war against the Marxist principle,...
This is all that needs to be said about "Nationalists" of the BookCat/Davis/Woods variety.


Yeah but quoting things and pointing at them is for nerds though.  Can you rephrase in your own words so that I may attack?

I can’t speak for exactly obscurefish’s point but there is a latent egalitarianism in the thought of Keet Woods and his capital N “Nationalist” circle. It takes the form of their commitment to wholesome chungus nationalism for everyone. Advocating this position requires that one at least on paper admit to the fundamental equality of all nations. Given how much of his content amounts to Chomskyite anti-imperialism, this national equality of sovereignty (self-determination) is very obviously a central tenet of his position. Woods has a video where he says his best moral defense of nationalism is an appeal to the “Platonic principle of plenitude” which he claims values preserving natural diversity as a moral good in itself. His environmentalism follows a similar logic. Woods is the best example of a substantial current in the e-right of people who are essentially “white preservationists”. Their entire aim is to just preserve Europe and European society and little else. “Let’s throw out all the jews and non-whites and then beg the rest of the world to just give us some space”. It's turning Europe into a massive museum in political form.

Other than that Woods is at heart a Nazbol, and is obsessed with the masses and the feelings and desires of the masses. There is a certain egalitarian impulse here. He hates Nietzsche for being elitist, and seems to hate jews in part for a similar reason. I think he might have even outright said that he was previously a leftist, and its very obvious regardless. Part of his issue with BAP is again his resentment of any kind of elitism or corresponding Nietzschean vitalism. He hates the British Empire for being a dominating elitist force, he hates capitalism for allowing for stratified elitism, and he hates modernism for being elitist.

It was very common in the Cold War that the appeal of communism to African nationalists was that it offered a vision similar to the traditional communal life of pre-modern Africa. Someone in another post said that Woods is basically a white equivalent to a Cold War African revolutionary, and with that aforementioned sentiment in mind it rings true. His anti-tech positions, socialism, “neo-tribalism”, hatred of elitism, he even has a video where he frames Ireland as being a victim of neo-colonialism re the immigration issue. I think it's evident that the appeal of "Nationalism" to him is the same: a return to pre-modern, pre-capitalist, tribal communalism. If WWW you want to create your trad ecological commune out of a plot of land then you should be free to, but these are not empowering principles in the moment.
#11
Didn't Keith say Lysenko was right and that gene theory was a replacement for God?
#12
(06-03-2023, 03:26 AM)obscurefish Wrote: [...]
Where is this quote from?



(06-10-2023, 11:01 AM)Guest Wrote: Where is this quote from?
Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)