There are a number of dissident right ("DR") networks, mostly revolving around "content creation", each with different schools of thought, etc. Keith Woods lists a bunch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VgqovWGTNk
I wanted to make a thread to think about not only these different groups and their disagreements but also to think about what goes on "behind the scenes." The most important networks often do things other than just making content on free to use websites like Substack and Youtube. Some make a ton of money off catering to DR sentiments, and it's unclear where the money goes and why. It is also known that at this point there are big donors involved, including Thiel, Horowitz, and Andreesen, and several random bitcoin millionaires. In fact, the biggest networks can be split up according to their massive donors:
1) The Thiel-Horowitz-Andreesen network includes Yarvin, BAP, Red Scare, several congressional candidates like Blake Masters and JD Vance, Claremont Institute, Michael Anton, several other podcasters like Jack Murphy, Alex Kuschata, several Twitter orbiters like 0hpl and more minor people.
2) The Nick Fuentes network seems to be funded by random bitcoin millionaires, retarded superchatters, and includes Fuentes, his orbiters, Milo Yianoppolus, Andrew Anglin, potentially Alex Jones and some weak connections to Russia (Fuentes goes on RT now occasionally) and some weakly connected congress persons like Paul Gosar and Margery Taylor Greene.
3) The third DR network is more mysterious in terms of funding. It includes Keith Woods, Joel Davis, Neema Parvini aka Academic Agent, some guy named Mike who runs "Imperium Press", a book publishing website that publishes these guys, and a few others. These guys thrive on their not-banned, medium sized Youtube channels, while being banned from Twitter collectively (except Parvini who has a retarded sock puppet called "Original Roland Rat") while Fuentes is btfo from everywhere and the THA network is the most powerful and uses many platforms such as Substack, Youtube, Twitter, etc. THA network can definitely make deals since BAP has been banned at least 2 times and gets to come back each time, while Fuentes is banned after 12 hours on his numerous sock puppets, as are Woods and Davis. Both Davis and Woods are probably being funded from someone because they were able to quit their jobs to face fag on medium sized Youtube channels. It is unclear who is funding them. They could be trust fund kids funding themselves. They could be reckless. Maybe "Mike" is a bitcoin millionaire. Some have suggested they could be a THA project, because they purged somebody named Chris Bond for stating that BAP was a part of the THA network (is this supposed to be secret? he is definitely in the network, we know who he is, he's publicly friends with Yarvin and astroturfed on their media platforms). Maybe they just want to court the THA network and get accepted into it. They have been observed courting both the NF network and the THA network, which suggests they are not a part of either, since NF hates the THA network, has done far worse than Chris Bond, to BAP in particular, stating his real name, posting his face, talking about his family, discussing his Zionist network, and claiming he is a pedophile zionist Jew subverter. Bond only made reference to the Kant Bot name doxx and family background. I am guessing the funding comes from Mike, or a friend of Mike, because publishing houses take seed money as do coordinated, risky, experimental full-time face phag Youtube channels run by 25 year old philosophy majors like Woods and Davis. The Imperium network, as I will call it, seems desperate to either join the NF or the THA network, and does not care which.
4) It seems dead and I know little about it, but there is/was a Wignat network that seemed connected. Richard Spencer is a millionaire IIRC. He was central to it at least before his "fall." NJP is probably a part of this network. If anyone has experience with these people please post what you know.
5) HBD network. Academic, you can center around Emil Kirkegaard if you want. He has a few friends he publishes papers with -- Edward Dutton, George Francis, Richard Lynn some others. Money seems to come from this thing called the Pioneer Fund, maybe some others. It was founded by old Southern Eugenicists. This is probably why they mostly focus on Negro inferiority in their research. It is a very based, elitist, intellectual operation, centered around furthering race science and persuading academics. The other networks are power players and grifters because they seek mass appeal and as much money as possible from their efforts. The HBD network rejects grifting and survives off of philanthropy and personal funding. It is the closest thing to a DR academia.
Once the different networks are identified, the people in them can be judged as to whether or not they are grifters or subverters. You can judge whole networks by understanding what range of traits are allowed to join, and who sits at the top of their hierarchies. Sometimes whole networks are bad, sometimes only individual members suck. For example, in the Imperium network, Neema Parvini is a mixed race mega grifter. He sells web courses for over 700 GBP. They consist of power point slides summarizing books he merely skimmed, like Jouvenel's On Power. Probably 80% of his substack posts are paywalled. He doesn't face fag and only name fagged once the income got good enough. He is a narcissist with anger problems and is 100% only in it for the money. His job which he recently quit was also grift -- he was a Shakespeare professor. Shamelessly parasiting off of students, first in the actual education system, now on the DR. Davis, Woods, and Mike don't seem as bad though. They seem like they might actually be based in some ways and wanted to go out of their way to make a modest living spreading basedness. Their main shortcoming is low intellectual rigor -- low enough that they let a notorious, noxious grifter into their ranks.
The NF network can basically be judged by judging Nick Fuentes, because he demands personal loyalty and, like it or not, has erected this network through personal comedic talent. There's little room for dissent, so you're basically either on board with his brand of Christian Nationalism or you aren't. He names the Jew, wants an 80%+ white Christian nation, and is based on the woman question. For now, he simps for blacks, pop culture, and his network is basically devoted to entertainment. I hope that he will support the HBD network eventually a start a think tank operation, but this has not happened yet.
The THA network is the largest and has the most variance, but Thiel-Andreesen-Horowitz are at the center, and you can't stray too far from the center. Nobody in it is anti-gay or pro-traditionalism, probably because Thiel won't tolerate it. Several big players are gay themselves. The network supports Israel, because of Horowitz. They are based on black people. They are not essentially Christian. They are basically Yarvinists -- BAP is the most extreme among them but is allowed to accrue influence among the hyper based on Twitter because they know he's loyal to the network IRL and doesn't disagree with the fundamentals.
The HBD network is based but not overtly political in a lot of ways. Respectability is big and 0 optics poasting is looked down on. BAP sphere is the main outlet for that currently -- THA has given it refuge and is harnessing its energy.
Will be posting more observations / classifications of people by network affiliation in the future.
Recently Joel Davis and Academic Agent sperged out on each other and Davis also got a cozy.tv (NF streaming site) channel https://cozy.tv/joeldavis. Keith Woods made a youtube video trying to debunk what AA was arguing that made Davis sperg. So it would seem that AA might be drifting away from the Imperium network, which is in turn drifting towards the NF network.
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/4nfrhMr.png]
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/gjXpID0.png]
Davis might fund the Imperium network with bitcoin bux or trust fund or something, I'm trying to figure out why Keith Woods acts like his bitch when Davis is lazy and has 8k youtube subscribers after like 3 years and Woods has 40k. Davis does not act like he needs money, a larger direct audience, and has no fear that starting tons of drama will negate people's loyalty to him. Similarly, NF starts tons of drama, resting secure on a few million from super chats and gay bitcoin donors who wanted to take the little catboy to baseball games.
I wanted to make a thread to think about not only these different groups and their disagreements but also to think about what goes on "behind the scenes." The most important networks often do things other than just making content on free to use websites like Substack and Youtube. Some make a ton of money off catering to DR sentiments, and it's unclear where the money goes and why. It is also known that at this point there are big donors involved, including Thiel, Horowitz, and Andreesen, and several random bitcoin millionaires. In fact, the biggest networks can be split up according to their massive donors:
1) The Thiel-Horowitz-Andreesen network includes Yarvin, BAP, Red Scare, several congressional candidates like Blake Masters and JD Vance, Claremont Institute, Michael Anton, several other podcasters like Jack Murphy, Alex Kuschata, several Twitter orbiters like 0hpl and more minor people.
2) The Nick Fuentes network seems to be funded by random bitcoin millionaires, retarded superchatters, and includes Fuentes, his orbiters, Milo Yianoppolus, Andrew Anglin, potentially Alex Jones and some weak connections to Russia (Fuentes goes on RT now occasionally) and some weakly connected congress persons like Paul Gosar and Margery Taylor Greene.
3) The third DR network is more mysterious in terms of funding. It includes Keith Woods, Joel Davis, Neema Parvini aka Academic Agent, some guy named Mike who runs "Imperium Press", a book publishing website that publishes these guys, and a few others. These guys thrive on their not-banned, medium sized Youtube channels, while being banned from Twitter collectively (except Parvini who has a retarded sock puppet called "Original Roland Rat") while Fuentes is btfo from everywhere and the THA network is the most powerful and uses many platforms such as Substack, Youtube, Twitter, etc. THA network can definitely make deals since BAP has been banned at least 2 times and gets to come back each time, while Fuentes is banned after 12 hours on his numerous sock puppets, as are Woods and Davis. Both Davis and Woods are probably being funded from someone because they were able to quit their jobs to face fag on medium sized Youtube channels. It is unclear who is funding them. They could be trust fund kids funding themselves. They could be reckless. Maybe "Mike" is a bitcoin millionaire. Some have suggested they could be a THA project, because they purged somebody named Chris Bond for stating that BAP was a part of the THA network (is this supposed to be secret? he is definitely in the network, we know who he is, he's publicly friends with Yarvin and astroturfed on their media platforms). Maybe they just want to court the THA network and get accepted into it. They have been observed courting both the NF network and the THA network, which suggests they are not a part of either, since NF hates the THA network, has done far worse than Chris Bond, to BAP in particular, stating his real name, posting his face, talking about his family, discussing his Zionist network, and claiming he is a pedophile zionist Jew subverter. Bond only made reference to the Kant Bot name doxx and family background. I am guessing the funding comes from Mike, or a friend of Mike, because publishing houses take seed money as do coordinated, risky, experimental full-time face phag Youtube channels run by 25 year old philosophy majors like Woods and Davis. The Imperium network, as I will call it, seems desperate to either join the NF or the THA network, and does not care which.
4) It seems dead and I know little about it, but there is/was a Wignat network that seemed connected. Richard Spencer is a millionaire IIRC. He was central to it at least before his "fall." NJP is probably a part of this network. If anyone has experience with these people please post what you know.
5) HBD network. Academic, you can center around Emil Kirkegaard if you want. He has a few friends he publishes papers with -- Edward Dutton, George Francis, Richard Lynn some others. Money seems to come from this thing called the Pioneer Fund, maybe some others. It was founded by old Southern Eugenicists. This is probably why they mostly focus on Negro inferiority in their research. It is a very based, elitist, intellectual operation, centered around furthering race science and persuading academics. The other networks are power players and grifters because they seek mass appeal and as much money as possible from their efforts. The HBD network rejects grifting and survives off of philanthropy and personal funding. It is the closest thing to a DR academia.
Once the different networks are identified, the people in them can be judged as to whether or not they are grifters or subverters. You can judge whole networks by understanding what range of traits are allowed to join, and who sits at the top of their hierarchies. Sometimes whole networks are bad, sometimes only individual members suck. For example, in the Imperium network, Neema Parvini is a mixed race mega grifter. He sells web courses for over 700 GBP. They consist of power point slides summarizing books he merely skimmed, like Jouvenel's On Power. Probably 80% of his substack posts are paywalled. He doesn't face fag and only name fagged once the income got good enough. He is a narcissist with anger problems and is 100% only in it for the money. His job which he recently quit was also grift -- he was a Shakespeare professor. Shamelessly parasiting off of students, first in the actual education system, now on the DR. Davis, Woods, and Mike don't seem as bad though. They seem like they might actually be based in some ways and wanted to go out of their way to make a modest living spreading basedness. Their main shortcoming is low intellectual rigor -- low enough that they let a notorious, noxious grifter into their ranks.
The NF network can basically be judged by judging Nick Fuentes, because he demands personal loyalty and, like it or not, has erected this network through personal comedic talent. There's little room for dissent, so you're basically either on board with his brand of Christian Nationalism or you aren't. He names the Jew, wants an 80%+ white Christian nation, and is based on the woman question. For now, he simps for blacks, pop culture, and his network is basically devoted to entertainment. I hope that he will support the HBD network eventually a start a think tank operation, but this has not happened yet.
The THA network is the largest and has the most variance, but Thiel-Andreesen-Horowitz are at the center, and you can't stray too far from the center. Nobody in it is anti-gay or pro-traditionalism, probably because Thiel won't tolerate it. Several big players are gay themselves. The network supports Israel, because of Horowitz. They are based on black people. They are not essentially Christian. They are basically Yarvinists -- BAP is the most extreme among them but is allowed to accrue influence among the hyper based on Twitter because they know he's loyal to the network IRL and doesn't disagree with the fundamentals.
The HBD network is based but not overtly political in a lot of ways. Respectability is big and 0 optics poasting is looked down on. BAP sphere is the main outlet for that currently -- THA has given it refuge and is harnessing its energy.
Will be posting more observations / classifications of people by network affiliation in the future.
Recently Joel Davis and Academic Agent sperged out on each other and Davis also got a cozy.tv (NF streaming site) channel https://cozy.tv/joeldavis. Keith Woods made a youtube video trying to debunk what AA was arguing that made Davis sperg. So it would seem that AA might be drifting away from the Imperium network, which is in turn drifting towards the NF network.
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/4nfrhMr.png]
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/gjXpID0.png]
Davis might fund the Imperium network with bitcoin bux or trust fund or something, I'm trying to figure out why Keith Woods acts like his bitch when Davis is lazy and has 8k youtube subscribers after like 3 years and Woods has 40k. Davis does not act like he needs money, a larger direct audience, and has no fear that starting tons of drama will negate people's loyalty to him. Similarly, NF starts tons of drama, resting secure on a few million from super chats and gay bitcoin donors who wanted to take the little catboy to baseball games.