Twatter Drama Megathread
#41
As fun as it is to dunk on Logo it must be noted that he is still essentially, far down, a "right-winger" - certainly of a different kind than us, but still more Right than Left - think Junger and other "artistic aristocrats" opposing the Nazis. Just few weeks ago he had a tweet about how the evil of Germany in both world wars was that they didn't in fact seek to destroy the British Empire, but to ally with it. He also, when asked about Hitler, quoted Matthew 7:16, saying that Hitler was bad because - in losing -  he destroyed his country, calling Stalin the better statesman because more cunning (arguably true). He also hates gays and troons but for a "rational" reason, and opposes immigration because it is slavery. People make fun of him and his alts because they don't like anything chinese, but why is this hypocritical? True, it's funny when he posts covers of european books translated to jpn/chn and praises Xi for reading Goethe, but he himself, iirc, said something along the lines of "they (east- asians) are better westerners than we are", carrying the torch of the "true West", as it were. None of them are true sinophiles,  culturally speaking. Tldr: logo's rw views essentially haven't changed, he just thinks "our" format of it is vulgar and perhaps outdated. Of course he, too, likes to do the nazism = neoliberalism etc meme but he only means this geopolitically.
Also, as a true Logo-understander, I can impart this truth about his tweet format: He likes to make purposively provocative, offensive tweets about things he doesn't understand so people'll reply and QT to correct him, he doesn't block these people. This is a highly efficient way to learn new things, for him. What else? When he still read books his tweets always followed a certain pattern. He doesn't cite authors that often, but essentially he would read a book and either he was highly impressionable, or did it to understand that position better -  doesn't matter -  and tweet ideas from the book as his own without crediting the author. This is why you can find many contradictory tweets. He read a book, was influenced by it for 1-3 days and made tweets based on the ideas of that book until he would read another book and do it all over again. Also sidenote here, I forgot to mention that he dislikes Nietzsche because he copied Shakespeare, because Shakespeare already said it all - so not exactly a critique of Nietzsche's thoughts. Sadly now, he, for the most part, only watches youtube videos and twitch streams. Just do a youtube search for Michael Hudson and look at the channels he's appeared on, that's who Logo follows.
#42
Logo is complicated, and he's not simply some leftist faggot, but in the end he is still a faggot. The fact that he's committed so much energy to countersignaling everyone he associated with before the Trump Victory in 2016 is enough to be weary of him; I will never forgive Logo for constantly pushing the BAP Dox along with Fatbot. No one who goes out of their way to dox someone on the right can be considered an ally, and he deserves to have his skull bashed in for that alone. And while we're on the topic of Fatbot, you say that logo "hates gays and troons for a rational reason," and I agree he pays some lip service to this idea. But you shouldn't ignore that Fatbot, his best friend online, IS COHABITTING WITH A TRANSVESTITE. Disgusting behavior that Logo will never call out. He will play along with the idea that that fat fucking slob has a "wife."

As for this idea that he dislikes Nietzsche "because he copied Shakespeare," it's complete bullshit. You should never take Lolgo at face-value. Go look up his tweets where he talks about his disdain for Nietzsche, and you'll quickly realize he NEVER says anything of substance about Nietzsche's thought, or any of his works. It's entirely unclear to me he has even READ NIETZSCHE, that's how surface level all his critiques are. Everything Logo says about Nietzsche could just as easily be said by someone who's never read more than a wikipedia entry about the guy. And once you realize he does this with Nietzsche, you'll quickly notice he does it about a number of other figures. Do you think Logo ACTUALLY dislikes SPINOZA because he read The Ethics the Tractatus-Logico Philosophicus and found something deeply disagreeable? That faggot has probably never read more than a dozen pages of Spinoza. He dislikes Spinoza because he hates that other faggot Crumps, and he dislikes Nietzshce because BAP loves N, it's really not more complicated than that, it's all surface level. People need to stop falling for this bullshit where they believe he's read anything because he namedrops them or posts a single screenshot from some secondary-work about an author, despite never actually showcasing any working knowledge of said thinker's work.

TL;DR Logo is a pseud faggot that deserves to have his head bashed in. He's also a fake Christian and will burn for eternity in the pits of Hell for thinking himself a Messiah.

I will add to this, that the entire WYDNA Grift runs off the fact that they pick topics and writers they perceive to be obscure or just unknown in this specific sphere, so they can pontificate about them and appear intelligent. A screenshot of tanker diagrams here, a screenshot of some book on Leibniz there. This works because, lets be honest, most people on Twitter have maybe read a handful of books in their life. This is the case no matter what circles you run in, most people are retards that cannot read to save their fucking lives. But ultimately this grift falls flat the moment they try talking about something YOU YOURSELF have actually read. You immediately realize the whole act is bullshit, and their knowledge of most things they bring up is entirely surface level.

This is why the Landshark "gotcha" against Logo is so fucking hilarious; LOGO is so unwilling to admit he simply doesn't know something, or hasn't Read It All, he will straight up lie about having read a book, and even after being outed as a liar, will act like nothing happened. How can you believe a single word that comes out of this faggot's mouth after something like this?[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN8DmotWQAYj...me=900x900]
#43
He is a leftist faggot with a mustache and fedora puffing on a pipe professorily.

Professor Daedalus strikers a sharp image sitting at his oak desk, puffing on…A Pipe, one leg crossed over the other. He wears a tasteful tweed sports coat and sweater vest over his shirt and tie. On his feet are a pair of fine broken-in brown Oxfords. He makes them look quite comfortable. However, there is one thing out of place about his appearance. He is wearing bright tie-dye billowing cotton pants today. On his desk sits a large glass jar of jelly beans. He says they are “All You Can Eat”. His students that come to office hours love taking him up on this offer while he helps them with their homework or fiercely debates with them about the history of The British Empire.
#44
(03-17-2022, 12:22 PM)Leverkühn Wrote: As for this idea that he dislikes Nietzsche "because he copied Shakespeare," it's complete bullshit. You should never take Lolgo at face-value. Go look up his tweets where he talks about his disdain for Nietzsche, and you'll quickly realize he NEVER says anything of substance about Nietzsche's thought, or any of his works. It's entirely unclear to me he has even READ NIETZSCHE, that's how surface level all his critiques are. Everything Logo says about Nietzsche could just as easily be said by someone who's never read more than a wikipedia entry about the guy. And once you realize he does this with Nietzsche, you'll quickly notice he does it about a number of other figures. Do you think Logo ACTUALLY dislikes SPINOZA because he read The Ethics the Tractatus-Logico Philosophicus and found something deeply disagreeable? That faggot has probably never read more than a dozen pages of Spinoza. He dislikes Spinoza because he hates that other faggot Crumps, and he dislikes Nietzshce because BAP loves N, it's really not more complicated than that, it's all surface level. People need to stop falling for this bullshit where they believe he's read anything because he namedrops them or posts a single screenshot from some secondary-work about an author, despite never actually showcasing any working knowledge of said thinker's work.
I think it would be even more of a self-own if he had actually read the books in question because it would be an admission that they were wasted on him.
#45
https://twitter.com/hispaniccosmist/stat...2083082248

The response to this joke tweet in the "RW" sphere is interesting to me. A lot of people still reticent to criticizing womeme after all this time.

Take this for example:
https://twitter.com/nealjclark1/status/1...9785309191
#46
So cringe. The worst are the replies that are like “I am raising my daughters to be strong Athenian warrior women”. Your daughters are going to get fucked by penises. This shieldmaiden crap is just because reckoning with this makes you feel uncomfortable so you retreat into a fantasy where Aryan warriors reproduce by hugging one another at age 30 in the forests of Sweden.

If you want your daughters to be maximally successful: They have to be hot, intelligent, submissive, know how to cook and clean, and they have to favor high quality men, which is the hardest part. If you’re a cucky limp dicked wignat then your daughter is going to find some cucky mediocre guy who treats her like a queen and you are going to have 1.5 underperforming grandchildren. All they talk about teaching their daughters is shooting guns (to protect her from penises obviously), carpentry, and “being a strong woman for the community” (being a feminist and failing to reproduce).
#47
I think doing it the traditional way won't cut it, and you'll get a lot of "mental attrition" unless you're in a very rural, remote area. But these environs are rare today. To stay competitive in our degenerated world, you have to fight a little dirtier...

Reverse-engineer gene stealer and social climber values, subvert feminist principles by inducing a memetic virus of "only women are capable of the most empowering act - creating new people." Make her standards high, but not too high - can't shoot too far ahead of herself, that is again how raging feminists are created - and this is indeed the hardest part. You really gotta villainmaxx her to everyone except this "chosen victim" who she will be nice to and have kids with. Basically old femme fatale trope but breeder. It's a doomed world anyway, all you have to do is ensure maximum descendants, it's a little r-selecting for now...
#48
https://twitter.com/empathyhaver/status/...0053570570

Quote:So much insanity with the daughters of boomers can be rooted in how boomers had no idea how to raise a girl in a post-feminist landscape so they just decided it was easier to raise them as boys

I mean I can’t say I blame them, imagine being a father and teaching your teenage daughter how to responsibly take dick lmao

Matches what I was saying.
#49
https://twitter.com/EnzoEvacuated/status...6167150598
this exchange reflects my thoughts about somatotypes which led to me making the thread. observe the vitriolic contempt the lifter has for anybody who dares question the supremacy of his body type; "everyone who doesn't look like me is a faggot" is the mentality here. there is an acknowledgement that young girls have a preference for skinnier men but it's quickly dismissed.
if i may indulge myself in some psychoanalysis, our 'ectomorph' seems to understand on some level that being small is low-status among other men, so he couches his rhetoric in an almost humorous style. meanwhile, the 'mesomorph' believes his stance to be entirely justified. after all, can't anybody go to the gym and become like them? without wishing to appear biased, i ultimately think enzo is in the wrong here, his arrogance is unwarranted because in all likelihood vyl can do as much about the fact he doesn't look like arnold schwarzenegger as he can to make himself grow 6 inches taller.
#50
(03-23-2022, 07:48 PM)parsifal Wrote: https://twitter.com/EnzoEvacuated/status...6167150598
this exchange reflects my thoughts about somatotypes which led to me making the thread. observe the vitriolic contempt the lifter has for anybody who dares question the supremacy of his body type; "everyone who doesn't look like me is a faggot" is the mentality here. there is an acknowledgement that young girls have a preference for skinnier men but it's quickly dismissed.
if i may indulge myself in some psychoanalysis, our 'ectomorph' seems to understand on some level that being small is low-status among other men, so he couches his rhetoric in an almost humorous style. meanwhile, the 'mesomorph' believes his stance to be entirely justified. after all, can't anybody go to the gym and become like them? without wishing to appear biased, i ultimately think enzo is in the wrong here, his arrogance is unwarranted because in all likelihood vyl can do as much about the fact he doesn't look like arnold schwarzenegger as he can to make himself grow 6 inches taller.

I agree with you here. For whatever reason, a lot of people on rwbb twitter are full of "vitriolic contempt" as you say towards anyone who challenges the obsession with getting jacked above all else. It comes across as odd because Vyl's post, which should be apparent to anyone, is meant in a joking manner. Sort of reminds me of how so many RWBB guys also freaked out over this William Guppy tweet months back, which was the most obvious bait imaginable. With the second tweet, he's basically admitting that Vyl *is* getting at a practical truth, but like you say he dismisses this just to say that "uh yeah women like skinnier men because they like fags." To some extent that just sounds like cope to me. 

RWBB types should be straight up that 'getting big' is mostly a personal development thing, it's a challenge to become as strong as you can, or simply physically apply yourself in some way and seeing some internal value in this. The issue is they also want to hold that it's about being some kind of modern day Don Juan that is slaying pussy, but obviously lifting is only so helpful if women are going to end up preferring some Tom Holland/Harry Styles/Timmy Chamalet metrosexual faggot with a nice face over you anyway.[Image: https://libredd.it/img/peoq98yfkhd61.jpg]
#51
(03-23-2022, 10:08 PM)Leverkühn Wrote: I agree with you here. For whatever reason, a lot of people on rwbb twitter are full of "vitriolic contempt" as you say towards anyone who challenges the obsession with getting jacked above all else. It comes across as odd because Vyl's post, which should be apparent to anyone, is meant in a joking manner. Sort of reminds me of how so many RWBB guys also freaked out over this William Guppy tweet months back, which was the most obvious bait imaginable. With the second tweet, he's basically admitting that Vyl *is* getting at a practical truth, but like you say he dismisses this just to say that "uh yeah women like skinnier men because they like fags." To some extent that just sounds like cope to me. 

RWBB types should be straight up that 'getting big' is mostly a personal development thing, it's a challenge to become as strong as you can, or simply physically apply yourself in some way and seeing some internal value in this. The issue is they also want to hold that it's about being some kind of modern day Don Juan that is slaying pussy, but obviously lifting is only so helpful if women are going to end up preferring some Tom Holland/Harry Styles/Timmy Chamalet metrosexual faggot with a nice face over you anyway.[Image: https://libredd.it/img/peoq98yfkhd61.jpg]
it's too easy to use this as an excuse to disparage bodybuilding in general, but i don't think that's fair. bodybuilding is in general a good thing, the issue lies moreso with those who fail to realize or accept the role their genetics played in their success with the endeavour, attributing this instead to their hard work which anybody could do, and whence they derive a sense of moral superiority. it's entirely conceivable that vyl could work harder in the gym than enzo and still end up looking like a "sigma prowler" instead of what one thinks of as a 'bodybuilder.'
#52
GIRLS ARE ATTRACTED TO THIS TRAIT. MY PROOF? GIRLS SAY THEY ARE HIGHLY ATTRACTED TO THESE FOUR GUYS: famous guy, famous guy, famous guy, famous guy

Hmmmm what do they have in common
#53
(03-23-2022, 10:42 PM)BillyONare Wrote: GIRLS ARE ATTRACTED TO THIS TRAIT. MY PROOF? GIRLS SAY THEY ARE HIGHLY ATTRACTED TO THESE FOUR GUYS: famous guy, famous guy, famous guy, famous guy

Hmmmm what do they have in common

Yeah I think what's also a part of the joke is that they don't even all have the same body type. Chamalet is a twink faggot, Brad Pitt is just sort of normally fit (iirc in that movie he's in shape and moderately muscular), but Adam Driver is actually somewhat ripped. The whole thing is obvious bait.
#54
Girls like status above all else, like icy says. Being stronger and more muscular definitely makes you more attractive as long as you are not eating massive amounts of food and/or taking steroids. Twinks are attractive because they have low bodyfat and slim waists. The people saying "young girls only like FAGGY guys now"--sounds like boomer bullshit to me.
#55
The people who get sore about this are the ones who make lifting and improoving their identity. It's an identity crutch. Challenging the value of lifting weights is an attack on who they are. This is gay because they tend to fall hideously short of a complete and coherent picture of human virtue.

And on the aesthetics question gymmaxxers tend to look like shit. The ones who are epigenetically inclined to gain mass go too far and become bulky and ugly, and on the other hand there are ugly pin-heads who end up looking exactly like the bad end of the 'gym-maxxed incel v no-effort chad' cartoon. As I said on old amarna, real beauty is in baseline traits, which are genetically AND epigenetically determined. Human beauty is in flowering, not building. This 'built' standard of beauty is tranny in nature. The principle of pain & gain is tranny. If it's genuinely unpleasant for you it's not for you. Heroic virtue is pursuing excellence when it would hurt *not* to do so.
#56
Physiognomy Bros Vindicated

https://twitter.com/wydna00/status/1507562863514247172
#57
(03-26-2022, 09:59 AM)Leverkühn Wrote: Physiognomy Bros Vindicated

https://twitter.com/wydna00/status/1507562863514247172

A fascinating picture. Posting it straight here for accessibility and preservation.

[Image: https://i.ibb.co/FhvpDmy/image.png]
#58
"I'm not so sure that Boomer was scared of your conspiracy theories Kantbot...I think he was scared that you were going to eat him!"

https://twitter.com/wydna00/status/1507153399367835654
#59
(03-23-2022, 11:15 PM)anthony Wrote: The people who get sore about this are the ones who make lifting and improoving their identity. It's an identity crutch. Challenging the value of lifting weights is an attack on who they are. This is gay because they tend to fall hideously short of a complete and coherent picture of human virtue.

And on the aesthetics question gymmaxxers tend to look like shit. The ones who are epigenetically inclined to gain mass go too far and become bulky and ugly, and on the other hand there are ugly pin-heads who end up looking exactly like the bad end of the 'gym-maxxed incel v no-effort chad' cartoon. As I said on old amarna, real beauty is in baseline traits, which are genetically AND epigenetically determined. Human beauty is in flowering, not building. This 'built' standard of beauty is tranny in nature. The principle of pain & gain is tranny. If it's genuinely unpleasant for you it's not for you. Heroic virtue is pursuing excellence when it would hurt *not* to do so
prove it
#60
(03-26-2022, 10:29 AM)Guest Wrote: prove it

When I say 'Fat People Hate Thread poster' what comes to your mind?


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)