/lit/ The Literature Board of 4chan

[synesth]

In the defence of Quentin @JohnTrent here he is on /lit/ charts, around 11:32



Q is brilliant, he managed to be a facefag without being cringe, probably because it wasn't explicitly political. Peak /lit/ culture. If anyone wants to see the old content here is an archive.

[BillyONare]

I always thought he was the same person as the anti-weed Quentin.

[synesth]

@BillyONare Maybe the Quentin @JohnTrent mentioned wasn't the one I thought it was. I might have mixed them up.

[J. L. Austin]

Before even reading this thread we're struck by the possibility that a huge war must've broken out here, names that signal either hatred or love were used unsparingly and perhaps even the people with mild-temperament were cast unto frenzy. And once we start reading the thread we're proven correct and shortly after we fall into despair. Of course there are few lions among the horde of NPCs.

That content in that screenshot is so bloated with ambiguity, it's actually embarrassing.

[Virtue]

Before even reading this thread we're struck by the possibility that a huge war must've broken out here, names that signal either hatred or love were used unsparingly and perhaps even the people with mild-temperament were cast unto frenzy. And once we start reading the thread we're proven correct and shortly after we fall into despair. Of course there are few lions among the horde of NPCs.

That content in that screenshot is so bloated with ambiguity, it's actually embarrassing.

http://www.nietzschesource.org/#eKGWB/NF-1887,9
165th fragment.
He is quoting a fragment from one of Nietzsche's notebooks, so it is bound to be ambiguous.