05-29-2023, 02:54 PM
I’m sure most of you are at least aware of Infrared, basically Marxist-Leninists who’ve rebranded as patriotic socialists or conservative Stalinists to ride the cultural wave of conservative nationalism and anti-wokeness. Hazcels can be seen mostly as a movement of ethnics, typically diaspora, who witnessing and sympathizing with the rise of the online right, but unable to partake in or agree with it on personal identity-based grounds, set out to create their own mimicry of online right politics, culture, and memes, which inevitably takes on a third-worldist character. This is what I call the ‘plight’ of the Hazcel, and there are several characteristics that define it.
Firstly, Hazcels don’t seem to actually “believe” in communism. By communism I mean a stateless, classless society. Their programme boils down to worshipping centralized states that could be construed as 'based' or Soviet-esque. As far as I can tell class conflict rhetoric among Hazcels goes as far as MAGA economic populism against the elites. Most of the time pretensions of class struggle are rarely entertained and they’ll openly admit their ideology is about a civilizational struggle between a based, inherently collectivist east vs a degenerate, liberal-individualist west. This is usually accompanied by worship of the Mongols or any other vaguely Eurasian historical civilization. I recall a Haz tweet in which he lists the Mughals, Ottomans, Mongols as being ‘socialist’ societies. This commitment is to the aesthetics and politics of a highly centralized collectivist eastern empire, not a Marxist society.
This travels over into the other notable ideological trait of Hazcels, and the one which exposes their origins most clearly. Their beliefs are essentially indistinguishable from a circa 2020 third positionist minus the explicit ethnic nationalism. Their critique of RWers isn’t some appeal to humanitarianism or egalitarianism but accusing RWers of being “degenerate transgender Nazis”. Fascism isn’t capitalism in decay anymore but ‘crisis liberalism’. Their conception of liberalism is also identical to that of many third positionists or even post-liberals. Infrared is very obviously based off of aping the online right. The assault on the west and on Europeans is about calling them gay and weak and degenerate, not racist or genocidal (though they do that too). Infrared is third worldism in its purest form. It is ethnics who have similar concerns to those which would make a white man become right wing, but because of their identity they cannot, and so it instead becomes third world nationalism instead of white nationalism. Racialized Marxism isn’t anything new, and was nothing more than an inevitable result of Marxism becoming submerged into a global world system. An ethnic-class oppressor vs oppressed dynamic is present already in Lenin’s writings on self-determination and imperialism, being fully realized by the Chinese. When pushed an argument, a Hazcel will almost certainly devolve into some form of “while you Europeans were living in mud huts, we was building civilizations”, or other typical third worlder resentments, or praising how China will soon overtake the west and rule the world. Infrared is the online right for resentful ethnics.
I want to dwell briefly on the existence of white Hazcels. Although most are expectedly MENA or asian, there are a number of white Hazcels. I believe the plight which creates them is almost the same as the conditions which create irony leftists: discontentment and an attachment to populism and an emergent online right culture, but an unwillingness to be racist. This generally ends in framing the recent populist wave solely in economics rather than correctly in identity/anti-immigration terms. They both share a commitment to the idea that racial strife is manufactured by elites to divide the masses which is their ideological reasoning to refuse to accept racism. The difference is that irony leftists seem to be mostly millennials, whereas Hazcels are overwhelmingly zoomers as far as I can tell. Stalin worship is fairly common even on the right, and used to be far more so. “He reopened the churches!”, “He banned abortion!”, “He criminalized homosexuality!” etc. Even people like Nick Fuentes will praise Stalin purely out of the appeal of a strong man figure. I believe this Stalinist philia is another root of the white Hazcel. It’s a commitment to economic populism and social conservatism with aesthetics far more radical than the ideas themselves are. If Haz himself were to drop Marxism he could join the sphere of conservative content creators and fit in without issue.
Firstly, Hazcels don’t seem to actually “believe” in communism. By communism I mean a stateless, classless society. Their programme boils down to worshipping centralized states that could be construed as 'based' or Soviet-esque. As far as I can tell class conflict rhetoric among Hazcels goes as far as MAGA economic populism against the elites. Most of the time pretensions of class struggle are rarely entertained and they’ll openly admit their ideology is about a civilizational struggle between a based, inherently collectivist east vs a degenerate, liberal-individualist west. This is usually accompanied by worship of the Mongols or any other vaguely Eurasian historical civilization. I recall a Haz tweet in which he lists the Mughals, Ottomans, Mongols as being ‘socialist’ societies. This commitment is to the aesthetics and politics of a highly centralized collectivist eastern empire, not a Marxist society.
This travels over into the other notable ideological trait of Hazcels, and the one which exposes their origins most clearly. Their beliefs are essentially indistinguishable from a circa 2020 third positionist minus the explicit ethnic nationalism. Their critique of RWers isn’t some appeal to humanitarianism or egalitarianism but accusing RWers of being “degenerate transgender Nazis”. Fascism isn’t capitalism in decay anymore but ‘crisis liberalism’. Their conception of liberalism is also identical to that of many third positionists or even post-liberals. Infrared is very obviously based off of aping the online right. The assault on the west and on Europeans is about calling them gay and weak and degenerate, not racist or genocidal (though they do that too). Infrared is third worldism in its purest form. It is ethnics who have similar concerns to those which would make a white man become right wing, but because of their identity they cannot, and so it instead becomes third world nationalism instead of white nationalism. Racialized Marxism isn’t anything new, and was nothing more than an inevitable result of Marxism becoming submerged into a global world system. An ethnic-class oppressor vs oppressed dynamic is present already in Lenin’s writings on self-determination and imperialism, being fully realized by the Chinese. When pushed an argument, a Hazcel will almost certainly devolve into some form of “while you Europeans were living in mud huts, we was building civilizations”, or other typical third worlder resentments, or praising how China will soon overtake the west and rule the world. Infrared is the online right for resentful ethnics.
I want to dwell briefly on the existence of white Hazcels. Although most are expectedly MENA or asian, there are a number of white Hazcels. I believe the plight which creates them is almost the same as the conditions which create irony leftists: discontentment and an attachment to populism and an emergent online right culture, but an unwillingness to be racist. This generally ends in framing the recent populist wave solely in economics rather than correctly in identity/anti-immigration terms. They both share a commitment to the idea that racial strife is manufactured by elites to divide the masses which is their ideological reasoning to refuse to accept racism. The difference is that irony leftists seem to be mostly millennials, whereas Hazcels are overwhelmingly zoomers as far as I can tell. Stalin worship is fairly common even on the right, and used to be far more so. “He reopened the churches!”, “He banned abortion!”, “He criminalized homosexuality!” etc. Even people like Nick Fuentes will praise Stalin purely out of the appeal of a strong man figure. I believe this Stalinist philia is another root of the white Hazcel. It’s a commitment to economic populism and social conservatism with aesthetics far more radical than the ideas themselves are. If Haz himself were to drop Marxism he could join the sphere of conservative content creators and fit in without issue.