02-12-2024, 11:56 AM
Because KimK won't stop pinging me in the shoutbox and failing to follow the thread of a conversation. Yes I am mad, go tell Cool Nigger.
If you want to follow the discussion up to now it starts on page 565 of the shoutbox archive and goes on and off intermittently up to 572 (so far).
We've had a very interesting tranny sociology thread mostly with a focus on the male troon. They were the big issue in politics and on the internet, and as has recently been noted here, are now far less of an issue. And along the way we maybe made a few posts about pooners or adjacent to pooner-issues, but not a lot. It's interesting to me, but I know some people find this weird.
If you're so not into this you don't even know what the hell I'm saying, pooner is the pointy, trollish, doomerish image of what a female to male transsexual is as a trendy meme one can riff on. The FtMjak, we could say.
I think these are hilarious and all things pooner are at the very least fascinating. I've been discussing this stuff with a few people and looking in on things now and then for years now. So when the subject came up in the shoutbox I was happy to discuss it at some length spontaneously.
I think most of us are happy to start at the foundation that this is a stress response to circumstances and a social phenomena, to some extent that we can't quantify in each case. The stress is nothing new, girls have always had a rough time of maturing, accepting change in their bodies and places in life. Teenage girls have been known for doing all kinds of strange and extreme things when they have any kind of freedom. Most of these I believe constitute something between a search for self/meaning/belonging on one hand, and a revolt against felt impositions on another. Problems with their own bodies are recurring. In girls puberty can understandably be taken as a kind of imposed sentence. You're a woman now. You thought guys looked at you funny before... People I consider trustworthy internet historians have told me that Cracky-Chan used to post online about wanting to cut her tits off because she hated her body.
She hated her tits and wanted to cut them off and felt weird and uncomfortable about herself. But she didn't actually cut her tits off and decide she wasn't a woman, instead she became a weird trail blazing internet meme. She defined herself so intensely and personally that she's appearing in this thread nearly 20 years after the fact. Point being, she had something in common with the FtM of today, and she apparently got through it in her own way. But I'm a bit ahead of us now.
There was something like a point of contention in the shoutbox. We need to explain where the phenomena of FtM comes from, what is currently done to or about it, and what ought to be done.
Where does it come from? I've sort of already gone into that. The growing anxieties of girls. The world is weirder and less certain than ever. Social and cultural decay and politicisation (libtardism) are destroying what's left of old sources of sense and stability, while also strangling newer ones out and preventing new growth. Cracky Chan was clearly a somewhat sharp girl, undeniably ahead of her time. So she turned to the internet. As I said in the shoutbox, the internet took in all of the weird outlier girls who didn't know what the fuck was going on from all over the world. This did on one hand lead to some Cracky Chan types with the strength, luck, and ingenuity to find themselves with the help of the freedom and wider pool of human contacts provided by the internet. Especially earlier on I think this was more the case (due to who was coming in and what was available and happening online at the time), but things have been changing with time. The internet has become less personal, more mass political. Girl subcultures started to come into contact with and absorb the logic of psychology and civil rights. More personal and extreme outlets (hanging out with weirdos on 4chan, drawing shotas cutting each other with knives on deviantart, etc) started to draw heat and get cracked down on. Harder and less available than pre-formed political identities which were now being handed out on the streetcorners of girl-internet.
This happening paralleled the closing off of irl opportunities to build a relatively sane life. All that 'Bowling Alone' stuff. Civic life is dead. Public space is dying. Culture is becoming closed off, boring, weird gay and retarded. Economy is doing poorly. Again, stress response. STRESS is mounting. Old reliable outlets and controls for stress are DYING.
Now apologies for awkward structuring, brief thoughts on lesbianism and the pooner impulse in general. I think it's a fairly common opinion around here that both lesbianism and poonerism are not real in the sense that they are a hard biologically determined reality. They are instead a response. A response to what? As said above, male sexuality can be scary. The roles imposed by acquiescence to it are scary. "Lesbianism" is the first kind of dodge. And I think it could perhaps be better defined in most cases as an abstention from or rejection of male sexuality than an active drive towards women. Can women be into women? I believe so. Some more than others? I believe so. Can they also be less into men? Of course. But still I wouldn't say I believe in a true and exclusive lesbianism. It strikes me as a choice, and a choice that's made against men rather than for women. Now I'm not a woman (and will never be one, of course), if one were to say I'm totally unqualified to speak on this I'd say that's fair.
Where I do feel more qualified to speak is the issue of FtMs, which I see as adjacent to lesbians. Now I'm not a woman, but I am a man. And I didn't choose to be one. I am one. Beyond bodies and the accidents of birth, I can spot a man online without any contact with his body and tell him apart from a woman. Men and women are very distinct. So what does it mean for one to choose to be another? As in the case of lesbianism, I believe that FtMs are not choosing to become men. As the silly memes above make fun of, they tend to be very unconvincing and unmanly. A woman can't become a man. The bodies can be mangled and pumped into a somewhat more manly shape, but they don't think like us. They simply aren't us. Again, what is one choosing when one becomes a man? The essence of a man can only be quantified biologically in ways that transition therapies cannot touch. The rest is up to interpretation. And manhood as interpreted by pooners tends to be very silly and distorted. Very fanciful. Fancies that feel less spawned from observation of men, and more like dreams of escaping a bad idea of what womanhood entails.
A point I don't see raised too often is that FtM seems to cluster a lot more strongly within a certain age cohort. The trans phenomena in general is very much a youth thing I'm aware, but MtF's reputation was seriously hurt by how many bizarre looking older men (so much further from womanhood) were into it. As far as I know older FtMs are virtually non-existent. The illustrator I wrote about in that other thread probably being about the oldest specimen we can readily find.
It shouldn't be controversial to point out that for a start, younger girls and pubescents are the most trend-pliable people in the world. And to tie into all the above, these are the ones who are very STRESSED about their BODIES and WHERE THEIR LIVES ARE GOING. They are a demographic that is anxious for stuff to do which they can hide in, identify with, find peers within, and gain some kind of sense of control over themselves and their destiny. In the past this would first probably be not as strong a drive (because the world made more sense and was less fucked up day to day), and secondly a lot more things existed to get into (fashions, scenes, subcultures, etc).
I didn't get to this above, what are pooners doing? Like lesbians, I think they are rejecting a life offered. All of the above lends itself to poonerism. The stress and anxiety of what womanhood entails, and the ability to take control and find like company in a new community and empowering (more on this in a moment) movement through poonerism. Specifically I say they are rejecting a life offered because the idealism of maleness in FtM tends to specifically not resemble the life and existence of a man very much. Instead it looks more like a fetishism towards the life of a boy. A boy defined by a kind of negation of life. Becoming a boy being like a return to girlhood only even purer and safer. Boys don't have to get leered at by men, they don't have to get locked in the foomeler trap if they don't feel like it (family life), etc, they just get to play outside in the sun and mess around in some kind of edenic bliss.
Point made I hope, I consider the pooner path an understandable reaction to an old girl problem that is getting worse. But I also consider it a very silly answer (how typical of women). The other point that needs brief touching on. The difficulty in addition to the absurdity. Becoming a goth might be absurd, you might look silly. But the clothes and makeup only cost so much, and one day you can just take it off. You're the time and cost of the clothes in the hole. Easy in and out. Gender transition is not easy. Activists like to fuss about the strain of doctor and therapist approval as though the difficulty is purely bureaucratic, but biologically it's a war on yourself that makes unalterable changes, and think of the damn logistics behind this. Are hormones free? Is the time of doctors free? There's a cost to patients, and more broadly, a cost to society to maintain, support, and broaden this option pathway.
I bolded the word "empowering" above, because this leads into politics. What is being done about FtMs right now? The pathway into becoming one is being actively maintained, supported, and expanded by purposeful top-down efforts. Yes, FtMs existed before this heavy top-down effort. That does not mean that the effort is not worth consideration or irrelevant. What is currently being done? This very extreme and impractical and obviously harmful solution to perennial but presently worsening girl-problems is receiving serious support from above. These people have infrastructure. Cops and bureaucrats protect them and attack their enemies. Tax money goes towards making more FtMs. The British police will suplex a pensioner into concrete for saying he loves his country and cheer for a dead-eyed zealot therapist telling anxious girls that misery is a sign of their inner boy screaming for testosterone injections.
At the same time this is happening the culture and arts spaces both irl and online are being destroyed by the same forces. Omocat was obviously at one point a weird girl with a head full of fancies. But she was able to join the weird fanciful girl internet, draw shotas cutting each other with knives, and not only did that carry her through the scary times of puberty and early womanhood, it became her career. She could not have done that if she were born ten years later. The sheer, vicious policing and scrutiny all remotely strong, eccentric, and real human impulses are subject to now makes such free and expressive outlets impossible. They killed my forum that was made of text, Omocats knife-shotas wouldn't have stood a chance. But she did get in in time. Worked out her feelings in a fun way that did no lasting damage (if you ask me), and got internet tenure just in time. So the sex-safety police can only smoulder from a distance.
There is now so much less room to be yourself online and have a personal time on the internet, explore and express yourself. It is all owned space as a certain Jew said. Every online streetcorner is crowded with weirdos telling you to pick a side. You can't find yourself in that. Only a team. And one of the biggest teams (thanks to heavy state backing) online is team pooner.
That's what I believe is happening with pooners, and how the issue is currently treated and handled in our time. Now the other question. What should be done?
My answer remains the same. Crush libtardism.
That answer means a lot of things. And it is not a positive program, intentionally so. By crush libtardism I mean start taking apart many of the social forces which are amplifying irl STRESS, some ought to be real no-brainers like can we please fucking solve crime and start taking shrill race-war psychotics off the tv so everyone can calm down? Then we can end the most egregious economic and career injustices like affirmative action and start attempting to correct towards a sustainable and plausible long term working life model for the first world. Maybe certain people who obviously don't belong on the continents they currently live on can go back. Etc.
It goes without saying that within this, massive built up infrastructure supporting what are basically weird sexual neurosis will start being dismantled. I understand many people are deeply attached to their therapists and psychs so I would probably kind of kick the ladder away and then slowly drain away what's currently present if that makes sense. Get as few new people into this stuff as possible (I don't believe this'd be too hard if you cut their free advertising and stopped brutalising alternative and opposing forces) and start cutting away subsidies. You want to be a weirdo injecting sex-hormones, try making a case from scratch that taxpayers owe you that.
Take all the issues with the above you care to, I'm trying to make the general point that it's all connected, and you can undermine the spread of poonerism from quite a distance.
The more specific charge made by KimK in the shoutbox was the lack of a positive answer. Maybe some of you can already see where I approach this from having read all of the above. I believe that culture is a kind of growth. Girls were finding ways to deal with the modern world themselves. Some part of me is still somewhat optimistic on the human race. I do believe that much of what's wrong comes down to what is in the way rather than peoples' bad natures driving them irresistibly towards filth and destruction. Women will always to some extent have to cope with life. Their existence is subsumed within the world of men. Sucks to be them on some level. No way around this. But I believe that with well intentioned oversight they can probably be entrusted to grow some new copes with the state of the current and coming world that will be good for them and everyone. No. This is not me saying they will learn to love being 50s tradwives and take up knitting. I don't know what's coming. But right now anarcho-tyranny is laying such absurd incentives towards such absurd answers and placing such impossible barriers in the way of sense and past solutions that any attempt at an answer working within their frame is pointless and hopeless.
A thought I might leave you with, KimK specifically, look at Japan. Do you see how this all becomes easier looking without the libtard master-factor having such an overwhelming advantage? Do you have questions? You are also free to disagree. But if your disagreement is only possible because you're ignoring something I've written here I won't be happy.
If you want to follow the discussion up to now it starts on page 565 of the shoutbox archive and goes on and off intermittently up to 572 (so far).
We've had a very interesting tranny sociology thread mostly with a focus on the male troon. They were the big issue in politics and on the internet, and as has recently been noted here, are now far less of an issue. And along the way we maybe made a few posts about pooners or adjacent to pooner-issues, but not a lot. It's interesting to me, but I know some people find this weird.
If you're so not into this you don't even know what the hell I'm saying, pooner is the pointy, trollish, doomerish image of what a female to male transsexual is as a trendy meme one can riff on. The FtMjak, we could say.
I think these are hilarious and all things pooner are at the very least fascinating. I've been discussing this stuff with a few people and looking in on things now and then for years now. So when the subject came up in the shoutbox I was happy to discuss it at some length spontaneously.
I think most of us are happy to start at the foundation that this is a stress response to circumstances and a social phenomena, to some extent that we can't quantify in each case. The stress is nothing new, girls have always had a rough time of maturing, accepting change in their bodies and places in life. Teenage girls have been known for doing all kinds of strange and extreme things when they have any kind of freedom. Most of these I believe constitute something between a search for self/meaning/belonging on one hand, and a revolt against felt impositions on another. Problems with their own bodies are recurring. In girls puberty can understandably be taken as a kind of imposed sentence. You're a woman now. You thought guys looked at you funny before... People I consider trustworthy internet historians have told me that Cracky-Chan used to post online about wanting to cut her tits off because she hated her body.
She hated her tits and wanted to cut them off and felt weird and uncomfortable about herself. But she didn't actually cut her tits off and decide she wasn't a woman, instead she became a weird trail blazing internet meme. She defined herself so intensely and personally that she's appearing in this thread nearly 20 years after the fact. Point being, she had something in common with the FtM of today, and she apparently got through it in her own way. But I'm a bit ahead of us now.
There was something like a point of contention in the shoutbox. We need to explain where the phenomena of FtM comes from, what is currently done to or about it, and what ought to be done.
Where does it come from? I've sort of already gone into that. The growing anxieties of girls. The world is weirder and less certain than ever. Social and cultural decay and politicisation (libtardism) are destroying what's left of old sources of sense and stability, while also strangling newer ones out and preventing new growth. Cracky Chan was clearly a somewhat sharp girl, undeniably ahead of her time. So she turned to the internet. As I said in the shoutbox, the internet took in all of the weird outlier girls who didn't know what the fuck was going on from all over the world. This did on one hand lead to some Cracky Chan types with the strength, luck, and ingenuity to find themselves with the help of the freedom and wider pool of human contacts provided by the internet. Especially earlier on I think this was more the case (due to who was coming in and what was available and happening online at the time), but things have been changing with time. The internet has become less personal, more mass political. Girl subcultures started to come into contact with and absorb the logic of psychology and civil rights. More personal and extreme outlets (hanging out with weirdos on 4chan, drawing shotas cutting each other with knives on deviantart, etc) started to draw heat and get cracked down on. Harder and less available than pre-formed political identities which were now being handed out on the streetcorners of girl-internet.
This happening paralleled the closing off of irl opportunities to build a relatively sane life. All that 'Bowling Alone' stuff. Civic life is dead. Public space is dying. Culture is becoming closed off, boring, weird gay and retarded. Economy is doing poorly. Again, stress response. STRESS is mounting. Old reliable outlets and controls for stress are DYING.
Now apologies for awkward structuring, brief thoughts on lesbianism and the pooner impulse in general. I think it's a fairly common opinion around here that both lesbianism and poonerism are not real in the sense that they are a hard biologically determined reality. They are instead a response. A response to what? As said above, male sexuality can be scary. The roles imposed by acquiescence to it are scary. "Lesbianism" is the first kind of dodge. And I think it could perhaps be better defined in most cases as an abstention from or rejection of male sexuality than an active drive towards women. Can women be into women? I believe so. Some more than others? I believe so. Can they also be less into men? Of course. But still I wouldn't say I believe in a true and exclusive lesbianism. It strikes me as a choice, and a choice that's made against men rather than for women. Now I'm not a woman (and will never be one, of course), if one were to say I'm totally unqualified to speak on this I'd say that's fair.
Where I do feel more qualified to speak is the issue of FtMs, which I see as adjacent to lesbians. Now I'm not a woman, but I am a man. And I didn't choose to be one. I am one. Beyond bodies and the accidents of birth, I can spot a man online without any contact with his body and tell him apart from a woman. Men and women are very distinct. So what does it mean for one to choose to be another? As in the case of lesbianism, I believe that FtMs are not choosing to become men. As the silly memes above make fun of, they tend to be very unconvincing and unmanly. A woman can't become a man. The bodies can be mangled and pumped into a somewhat more manly shape, but they don't think like us. They simply aren't us. Again, what is one choosing when one becomes a man? The essence of a man can only be quantified biologically in ways that transition therapies cannot touch. The rest is up to interpretation. And manhood as interpreted by pooners tends to be very silly and distorted. Very fanciful. Fancies that feel less spawned from observation of men, and more like dreams of escaping a bad idea of what womanhood entails.
A point I don't see raised too often is that FtM seems to cluster a lot more strongly within a certain age cohort. The trans phenomena in general is very much a youth thing I'm aware, but MtF's reputation was seriously hurt by how many bizarre looking older men (so much further from womanhood) were into it. As far as I know older FtMs are virtually non-existent. The illustrator I wrote about in that other thread probably being about the oldest specimen we can readily find.
It shouldn't be controversial to point out that for a start, younger girls and pubescents are the most trend-pliable people in the world. And to tie into all the above, these are the ones who are very STRESSED about their BODIES and WHERE THEIR LIVES ARE GOING. They are a demographic that is anxious for stuff to do which they can hide in, identify with, find peers within, and gain some kind of sense of control over themselves and their destiny. In the past this would first probably be not as strong a drive (because the world made more sense and was less fucked up day to day), and secondly a lot more things existed to get into (fashions, scenes, subcultures, etc).
I didn't get to this above, what are pooners doing? Like lesbians, I think they are rejecting a life offered. All of the above lends itself to poonerism. The stress and anxiety of what womanhood entails, and the ability to take control and find like company in a new community and empowering (more on this in a moment) movement through poonerism. Specifically I say they are rejecting a life offered because the idealism of maleness in FtM tends to specifically not resemble the life and existence of a man very much. Instead it looks more like a fetishism towards the life of a boy. A boy defined by a kind of negation of life. Becoming a boy being like a return to girlhood only even purer and safer. Boys don't have to get leered at by men, they don't have to get locked in the foomeler trap if they don't feel like it (family life), etc, they just get to play outside in the sun and mess around in some kind of edenic bliss.
Point made I hope, I consider the pooner path an understandable reaction to an old girl problem that is getting worse. But I also consider it a very silly answer (how typical of women). The other point that needs brief touching on. The difficulty in addition to the absurdity. Becoming a goth might be absurd, you might look silly. But the clothes and makeup only cost so much, and one day you can just take it off. You're the time and cost of the clothes in the hole. Easy in and out. Gender transition is not easy. Activists like to fuss about the strain of doctor and therapist approval as though the difficulty is purely bureaucratic, but biologically it's a war on yourself that makes unalterable changes, and think of the damn logistics behind this. Are hormones free? Is the time of doctors free? There's a cost to patients, and more broadly, a cost to society to maintain, support, and broaden this option pathway.
I bolded the word "empowering" above, because this leads into politics. What is being done about FtMs right now? The pathway into becoming one is being actively maintained, supported, and expanded by purposeful top-down efforts. Yes, FtMs existed before this heavy top-down effort. That does not mean that the effort is not worth consideration or irrelevant. What is currently being done? This very extreme and impractical and obviously harmful solution to perennial but presently worsening girl-problems is receiving serious support from above. These people have infrastructure. Cops and bureaucrats protect them and attack their enemies. Tax money goes towards making more FtMs. The British police will suplex a pensioner into concrete for saying he loves his country and cheer for a dead-eyed zealot therapist telling anxious girls that misery is a sign of their inner boy screaming for testosterone injections.
At the same time this is happening the culture and arts spaces both irl and online are being destroyed by the same forces. Omocat was obviously at one point a weird girl with a head full of fancies. But she was able to join the weird fanciful girl internet, draw shotas cutting each other with knives, and not only did that carry her through the scary times of puberty and early womanhood, it became her career. She could not have done that if she were born ten years later. The sheer, vicious policing and scrutiny all remotely strong, eccentric, and real human impulses are subject to now makes such free and expressive outlets impossible. They killed my forum that was made of text, Omocats knife-shotas wouldn't have stood a chance. But she did get in in time. Worked out her feelings in a fun way that did no lasting damage (if you ask me), and got internet tenure just in time. So the sex-safety police can only smoulder from a distance.
There is now so much less room to be yourself online and have a personal time on the internet, explore and express yourself. It is all owned space as a certain Jew said. Every online streetcorner is crowded with weirdos telling you to pick a side. You can't find yourself in that. Only a team. And one of the biggest teams (thanks to heavy state backing) online is team pooner.
That's what I believe is happening with pooners, and how the issue is currently treated and handled in our time. Now the other question. What should be done?
My answer remains the same. Crush libtardism.
That answer means a lot of things. And it is not a positive program, intentionally so. By crush libtardism I mean start taking apart many of the social forces which are amplifying irl STRESS, some ought to be real no-brainers like can we please fucking solve crime and start taking shrill race-war psychotics off the tv so everyone can calm down? Then we can end the most egregious economic and career injustices like affirmative action and start attempting to correct towards a sustainable and plausible long term working life model for the first world. Maybe certain people who obviously don't belong on the continents they currently live on can go back. Etc.
It goes without saying that within this, massive built up infrastructure supporting what are basically weird sexual neurosis will start being dismantled. I understand many people are deeply attached to their therapists and psychs so I would probably kind of kick the ladder away and then slowly drain away what's currently present if that makes sense. Get as few new people into this stuff as possible (I don't believe this'd be too hard if you cut their free advertising and stopped brutalising alternative and opposing forces) and start cutting away subsidies. You want to be a weirdo injecting sex-hormones, try making a case from scratch that taxpayers owe you that.
Take all the issues with the above you care to, I'm trying to make the general point that it's all connected, and you can undermine the spread of poonerism from quite a distance.
The more specific charge made by KimK in the shoutbox was the lack of a positive answer. Maybe some of you can already see where I approach this from having read all of the above. I believe that culture is a kind of growth. Girls were finding ways to deal with the modern world themselves. Some part of me is still somewhat optimistic on the human race. I do believe that much of what's wrong comes down to what is in the way rather than peoples' bad natures driving them irresistibly towards filth and destruction. Women will always to some extent have to cope with life. Their existence is subsumed within the world of men. Sucks to be them on some level. No way around this. But I believe that with well intentioned oversight they can probably be entrusted to grow some new copes with the state of the current and coming world that will be good for them and everyone. No. This is not me saying they will learn to love being 50s tradwives and take up knitting. I don't know what's coming. But right now anarcho-tyranny is laying such absurd incentives towards such absurd answers and placing such impossible barriers in the way of sense and past solutions that any attempt at an answer working within their frame is pointless and hopeless.
A thought I might leave you with, KimK specifically, look at Japan. Do you see how this all becomes easier looking without the libtard master-factor having such an overwhelming advantage? Do you have questions? You are also free to disagree. But if your disagreement is only possible because you're ignoring something I've written here I won't be happy.