04-01-2024, 09:00 AM
Saw this while idly flipping through a few sites I check in on tonight. Title looked like it might be interestingly bad.
https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2024/...the-nerds/
I've always considered Scott Locklin kind of a stupid fucking cretinous moron who needs to stay in his little autism-corner where he belongs. Amusingly, that's the type he is ostensibly writing about in this piece (maybe, it's a very bad and hard to parse one).
This piece interests me because Locklin doesn't really seem sure what the fuck he's saying, the impression that I get (I get this a lot from his writing) is that he's working out some personal issues with intelligence and masculinity. NERDS are what's wrong with America. NERDS and probably also DORKS.
You see the NERDS destroying society are disembodied brains who have not touched enough grass to active their alpha male cobra kai victory molecules in their brains. Local Burners like Elon Musk and and Mark Zuckerberg understand this (does Locklin have some need to believe a STEMfaggot can become a man by living up to a checklist of conditions?).
He then shows us a 4chan screencap (which is itself more anxious status posturing theory) and tells us that nerds are easily dogmatised. Yuo see the problem with the world today is that too many NERDS run everything, who are not necessarily intelligent people. How many of the problem nerds aren't actually intelligent and is outright unintelligent people proliferating in positions of responsibility not more a more dire problem? Maybe it is but beyond that note that this problem class of person does in fact exist this piece is about Scott Locklin telling you that he did good in Math class, "but Daddy, please, I still FUCK. I've done you proud, haven't I?"
I thought that this was an absolutely atrocious piece about an issue that's been interesting people here recently, smart people and leftism. I didn't forget about that. His piece ends with "Examples of nerd failure:", in here he links more retarded vapid bullshit that completely dodges the heart of the matter (our society being run into the ground by psychotic weirdos), and one piece I thought was good, which we can actually build a thread off of now. Like the other one I'll link it twice so you guys don't get lost. RPGcodex has me doubting human intelligence.
https://gaiusbaltar.substack.com/p/why-i...and-russia
Interesting title this time around. He needs his clicks I suppose. I'd have called it 'Why is The West so Weak and Russia Becoming Stronger'.
The thesis this time around makes far more sense, to the point I have to believe if Locklin actually read it he's insane to have been prompted to write what he did afterwards (I do suspect he will one day kill himself while talking to the ghost of his father like Jack Torrance).
Baltar's article is kind of like the old Bioleninism thing, but spun towards incompetence. The problem is deliberate selection against human quality. Specifically intelligence and a capacity for clear sighted decision making. The fundamental difference between these two pieces of course being that the connotations towards intelligence in Locklin's piece are primarily bad, while in this one they are positive. Intelligence and thought have not gone astray. The lost in ideas nerd is a popular hallucinatory punching bag because it allows us to ignore the elephant in the room. Society being progressively geared against human competence (primarily intelligence via education) for decades now.
Locklin says that the problem is accidental delusion caused by insufficient contact with grass. Baltar says the primary problem is incompetence facilitated by conspiracy.
There's a foot in the door for Locklin's interpretation here, we can say that general competence is separate from IQ. And from there if we hate ourselves and are suspicious of our own minds we can say that the high IQ low general competence (probably also lowstatusdysgenics) NERDS took the wheel from the football captain.
But this piece keeps going in another direction.
Amusingly like Locklin he also thinks Musk is some kind of supergenius fighting the power. He's apparently jesus to non nonsense rationalists.
Then we get to where we're meant to be. This section on education is a solid collection of bullet points.
And finally what I think is notable here.
I think this piece is a pretty sound rundown on the nature and effects of the spread and influence of wokeness. And the essential point that he really gets right is that this is fundamentally and primarily bad for smart people. This is not smart but lowstatusdysgenics people run amok. It is retards. One would think that hard-nosed highstatuseugenics men who know how to FUCK their way to an answer that's right in front of them would figure that the world getting stupid is stupid peoples' fault rather than blaming the highly intelligent, but as locklin says (baltar agrees), the intelligent can be deluded.
I'll leave it be now. You guys can read these things yourselves, I recommend both. This isn't the leftism and intellectuals thread, consider this a warmup prompted by me thinking about how much I hate Scott Locklin.
Is our problem intelligent people who just thought too hard and flew off the rails, or is it malevolent retards? Or perhaps something else? Do you have thoughts on Locklin in Baltar? Did you read the comment sections of either and find anything interesting. I would like to know what some people make of this.
https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2024/...the-nerds/
I've always considered Scott Locklin kind of a stupid fucking cretinous moron who needs to stay in his little autism-corner where he belongs. Amusingly, that's the type he is ostensibly writing about in this piece (maybe, it's a very bad and hard to parse one).
This piece interests me because Locklin doesn't really seem sure what the fuck he's saying, the impression that I get (I get this a lot from his writing) is that he's working out some personal issues with intelligence and masculinity. NERDS are what's wrong with America. NERDS and probably also DORKS.
You see the NERDS destroying society are disembodied brains who have not touched enough grass to active their alpha male cobra kai victory molecules in their brains. Local Burners like Elon Musk and and Mark Zuckerberg understand this (does Locklin have some need to believe a STEMfaggot can become a man by living up to a checklist of conditions?).
He then shows us a 4chan screencap (which is itself more anxious status posturing theory) and tells us that nerds are easily dogmatised. Yuo see the problem with the world today is that too many NERDS run everything, who are not necessarily intelligent people. How many of the problem nerds aren't actually intelligent and is outright unintelligent people proliferating in positions of responsibility not more a more dire problem? Maybe it is but beyond that note that this problem class of person does in fact exist this piece is about Scott Locklin telling you that he did good in Math class, "but Daddy, please, I still FUCK. I've done you proud, haven't I?"
I thought that this was an absolutely atrocious piece about an issue that's been interesting people here recently, smart people and leftism. I didn't forget about that. His piece ends with "Examples of nerd failure:", in here he links more retarded vapid bullshit that completely dodges the heart of the matter (our society being run into the ground by psychotic weirdos), and one piece I thought was good, which we can actually build a thread off of now. Like the other one I'll link it twice so you guys don't get lost. RPGcodex has me doubting human intelligence.
https://gaiusbaltar.substack.com/p/why-i...and-russia
Interesting title this time around. He needs his clicks I suppose. I'd have called it 'Why is The West so Weak and Russia Becoming Stronger'.
The thesis this time around makes far more sense, to the point I have to believe if Locklin actually read it he's insane to have been prompted to write what he did afterwards (I do suspect he will one day kill himself while talking to the ghost of his father like Jack Torrance).
Baltar's article is kind of like the old Bioleninism thing, but spun towards incompetence. The problem is deliberate selection against human quality. Specifically intelligence and a capacity for clear sighted decision making. The fundamental difference between these two pieces of course being that the connotations towards intelligence in Locklin's piece are primarily bad, while in this one they are positive. Intelligence and thought have not gone astray. The lost in ideas nerd is a popular hallucinatory punching bag because it allows us to ignore the elephant in the room. Society being progressively geared against human competence (primarily intelligence via education) for decades now.
Locklin says that the problem is accidental delusion caused by insufficient contact with grass. Baltar says the primary problem is incompetence facilitated by conspiracy.
There's a foot in the door for Locklin's interpretation here, we can say that general competence is separate from IQ. And from there if we hate ourselves and are suspicious of our own minds we can say that the high IQ low general competence (probably also lowstatusdysgenics) NERDS took the wheel from the football captain.
But this piece keeps going in another direction.
Amusingly like Locklin he also thinks Musk is some kind of supergenius fighting the power. He's apparently jesus to non nonsense rationalists.
Then we get to where we're meant to be. This section on education is a solid collection of bullet points.
And finally what I think is notable here.
I think this piece is a pretty sound rundown on the nature and effects of the spread and influence of wokeness. And the essential point that he really gets right is that this is fundamentally and primarily bad for smart people. This is not smart but lowstatusdysgenics people run amok. It is retards. One would think that hard-nosed highstatuseugenics men who know how to FUCK their way to an answer that's right in front of them would figure that the world getting stupid is stupid peoples' fault rather than blaming the highly intelligent, but as locklin says (baltar agrees), the intelligent can be deluded.
I'll leave it be now. You guys can read these things yourselves, I recommend both. This isn't the leftism and intellectuals thread, consider this a warmup prompted by me thinking about how much I hate Scott Locklin.
Is our problem intelligent people who just thought too hard and flew off the rails, or is it malevolent retards? Or perhaps something else? Do you have thoughts on Locklin in Baltar? Did you read the comment sections of either and find anything interesting. I would like to know what some people make of this.