Internet Tranny Sociology Thread

[Guest]

In Zizian thought this concept is expanded to justify behavior that would make a Sovereign Citizen blush. Zizians do not think it is ever valid to surrender. The reasoning goes that if someone is trying to extract a surrender from you, giving in is choosing a strategy that gets coerced into surrender. If you fight bitterly you prevent the coercion in the first place by making it too costly to fight you. (Associated phrases: "nosell"; "collapse the timeline"

I think if nongoods took vengeance, even in a disorganized fashion, without crippling self-doubt about whether they were justified, then vampireland would not have come about.

holy based

and apparently they aren't even tranny-presenting under the logic of "no-sell" or whatever. Imagine for a moment a strong bearded dude telling silicon valley twinks that they are women, keeping them up all night for spiritual reasons, writing an autistic blog about le morality and eventually escaping the trail of gaslit 'cides by faking his own death. Dr. Soyberg strikes again!

That said: yeah, the posts are not as interesting as I thought they might be from that altitude. it is basically just roko basilisk except they don't care if you know about the punishment or not. That clarification would be the one interesting thing that might be worthwhile but it is unexplored and the post where it should be was never made or at least archived- plus it was named after the multiverse concept which smacks of pleroma principle of explosion garbage. the character ziz doesn't seem that interesting either anymore, just another quirky psycho.

[Mason Hall-McCullough]

A clearly very epistemologically unique, rather intelligent character had a blog. Weird thing is that the archive is archived like every day for a year before it presumably went down.

https://web.archive.org/web/202306010441...l-warfare/
longwinded ass boring libtard tranny BS for the most part. ctrl + f to skip to this paragraph and probably skip the rest too? their other posts are probably more interesting that this tranny one.
"When I was a pre-teen, I thought I was the only one who knew puberty was evil, puberty was death, hormones were not part of the soul"

Here are some related posts I found memorable: Aliveness, Vampires And More Undeath

I like his categorization of "undead types", here's a list from the glossary:

Living

From this post, the (null) undead type of someone not exposed to the Shade. I.e. sheltered children.

Zombie

From this post, the most common undead type, substantive cognitive agency is disassembled in fear/pain (probably actually fear/pain as survival agency in the brain’s native interpretation-as-values, but that does not ). May manifest compute in a sandbox, i.e. be a programmer, but cannot use much intelligence towards the root of the call stack of agency. Alignment is always neutral.

Corpse

From this post, the extrapolated end-state of the zombie path of rot. Here the literal meaning and metaphorical meaning converge.

Lich

From this post, someone who manages to stave off exposure to the Shade by sealing their soul in a vessel called a phylactery, thereby retaining their life-force, so long as the phylactery is unbroken. (In mythology, the lich cannot be killed while the phylactery survives.) In the limit of a perfect phylactery, approaches living. Selected by the requirement of this process for intelligence and mental arts. Alignment is any nongood. (While the creation of a phylactery is not inherently evil as in many stories, it is inherently suboptimally good, and unnecessary for a good soul to retain agency; see revenant) In the scope of flaws to the phylactery, will act Leverage!connection-theory-esque. Often less suited to short term combat than vampires, but is the most powerful (known) nongood undead type when measured over the long game.

Revenant

A form of undead created by a choice that some change to the world is important enough to turn away from heaven in full knowledge and damn themselves, seemingly. In fiction there are both good and nongood revenants, but IRL I have only met good ones. Proceeding on the assumption there are no nongood ones, the rules of being a revenant are basically a consequence of a good core-structure system not having a stable state at arbitrary amounts of damage where the healing stops, because the vastness of the world always contains the majority of possible utility. Tends to develop structure in a strange inversion of death knight structure. Like being in the same place but having chosen it and not regretting. Mythologically, is essentially a broken body being dragged about by a soul that cannot break, forming something with no more or less powers than a very determined person who can’t die. A revenant’s healing is goal-directed. A side effect of the body being dragged, and intends to converge on completing the quest rather than achieving wholeness. Their bodies tend to remain rotten and incomplete. Otherwise, they would be phoenixes.

Mummy

An undead type between lich and zombie, that fails at preservation of deep optimization like liches, but preserves a lot of intact surface structure. Where liches retain the ability to act on hope, mummies don’t but retain the ability to act on fun. See e.g. Randall Munroe, Zach Weinersmith, the cool old mariners that exercised original agency enough to learn to blackmail ghouls we met in the course of Rationalist Fleet. The only remotely common undead type fit for building things. Not remotely capable of standing up to vampireland in its entirety. So they build vampireland’s tech for them. But if you’ve seen lich revenant or phoenix built tech there’s no compare. Check out normie “#vanlife” stuff for examples of mummy optimization.

Vampire

An undead type based on having been broken into the service of a pattern of structure called “the Beast”. Take blood. Something needed by others to survive which does you no good. Do harm to others wherever possible. In a picafied bid for wholeness through social power. Seem strangely obsessed with sex for sapient undead. Obsessed with consuming the blood of the living. Would be probably the third weakest undead type (after zombie and ghoul), except for their ability to reproduce by breaking others like them, and by extension create vampireland. This is an ability not really under their control.

See e.g. Jeffrey Epstein. See also. There are also lone wolf vampires, known as serial killers.

Ghoul

An undead type between vampire and zombie. Follows the beast like vampires but has disassembled agency like zombies. The undead type of middle management and cops. And Donald Trump.

Death Knight

An inverted undead type based on broken desire to die instead of broken desire to live. The undead type of school shooters, Elliot Rodgers, and likely Hitler (although for infohazardous elaboration on that, see here). They serve the Shade very directly. Note the tendency to blow their brains out afterward.

Phoenix

A good undead type based on a bet that their personal death is not defeat for their values, because others will rise and take their place.

Despite it being a little cartoonish and arbitrary I find this to be a pretty great taxonomy of the different kinds of behaviors adults tend to adopt to cope with the realities of life, but I also think his views on this topic may have been overly pessimistic due to his status as a mentally ill troon living surrounded by mentally ill troons. It's probably not that hard to stay "living" throughout adulthood, although many normies would seem to fall into these undead categories.

The split hemisphere thing was the main other concept he wrote about, which despite being a funny piece of troll science I don't find as interesting to read about.

More quotes that I found funny:

Show Content

Spoiler

They said someone had come to them with another idea. Allegedly health insurance paid out in the case of suicide as long as it was two years after the insurance began. Therefore, enroll in all the health insurance, wait two years, will everything to MIRI, then commit suicide. They said this was a bad idea because even though it would cause a couple million dollars to appear (actually I suspect this is an underestimate), if someone found it would be very bad publicity.

If my plan worked, and they were apparently dead, with their brain severely damaged, and I’d exhausted the damage I could do while maintaining my grip like that, I’d block playing dead as a tactic by just continuing to strangle them for 6 minutes. Without any movement, then I’d throw their body on the ground, stand up, and mindful of my feet, losing balance if it somehow was a trick, walk up to their head, start stomping until I could see their brain and that it was entirely divided into at least two pieces.

“And then?” they asked.

I broke up with my family. They were a place I could my mind not just doing what I thought was the ideal consequentialist thing. My feelings for them, my interactions with them, were human. Not agentic. Never stray from the path.

Note I bet Hitler was single good. There does not seem to be a hard boundary to how hard one hemisphere can act against the values of the other, how much one can win.

Seems to have been the most extreme case in history of a death knight core winning the mind control battle.

Update, delayed posting from a while ago: I’m actually pretty fucking sure Hitler was not single good. Just a death knight. I was confused by:

[...random bullshit no one cares about...]