Israel

[Guest]

Realistically, Israel has its place on the world stage as a modern concentration camp to deport all Jews into when the #BasedWorldOrder takes over, but right now it leeching off of the United States and the Zionist lobby is parasitical and we must stop all aid to it.

Jews are an admirable race. To be kicked out of 300 countries is an honor. Aryan geniuses like us will have to behave like Jews in the future, but with encrypted energy rather than gold and jewels. Great men are always persecuted by the ugly mob. Taking into account the morals of the mob is fagotry.

Nigger-minded coal.

[NuclearAbsolutist]

Realistically, Israel has its place on the world stage as a modern concentration camp to deport all Jews into when the #BasedWorldOrder takes over, but right now it leeching off of the United States and the Zionist lobby is parasitical and we must stop all aid to it.

Israel is a nuclear armed state with the ability and willingness to use it so it knocks out the camp idea among other delusions on how to erase it from the Earth. This among other things is allowed(Despite being a very direct break of Americas international order) because Israel is not a parasite of the United States but a beloved child of it acting as a exemplar for moral and religious rightness(Because Americans are the most Judeaized race on the Earth) the power of Are Democracy etc. Along with its network of course being able to do things like take nuclear secrets or outright get nuclear physicists with shared blood from America. It is a two way street however, Israel has to play by the rules of engagement of Western militaries with a legal team checking every air strike, see the rise of civil societies of faggots in its de facto capital unharmed or more mercenary interests followed such as canning its own fighter program because America did not want competition for the F-16. Fundamentally the issue with wanting Israel cut out to me is all such arguments are akin to asking the USSR to stop aiding Cuba but not only the elite view it as of critical ideological and national importance but a large part of the population does as well, and the ones that don't, don't because the land is not revolutionary enough for Moscow's true moral standards.

[BillyONare]

@Guest shut up cunt

[kirukuni]

In short. The official Amarnite, and of every hard Righter that isn't an unsufferable Third Worldist contrarian. Position is wanting our countries to become big. White versions of Israel. I.E. Ethno-Nationalistic, Conservative, Militarised and Highly Tech-Focused economy that is easily able to keep their backwater. And brown. Agressive neighbours at bay despite being outnumbered by several times. Ukraine post-War will likely become the first "Big Israel" as stated by Zelensky. Due to both Women and Libtard sectors who are terrified to fight fleeing the country. And due to the Military (especially factions with heavy Ultranationalist influence, like AZOV obviously and Kraken, who is an Elite unit) gaining so much influence and power during the War that it will keep almost completely after the end of it.

Israel already has its subaltern members. Look at white-passing high-iq Ashkenazis versus the low-iq turkroach looking Sephardi and Moroccans. It's a religious state before it's an ethnostate, and sharing partial origin blood with another group doesn't mean as much people want to believe. The English are 60-80% celtic by blood, but they were very admirable for almost a thousand years. This is similar to the heritage shared by Ashkenazis and Sephardi (or god forbid Moroccan). Were Anglos and Micks ever equal? Why would Ashkenazis and Sephardi be?

Religious and ethnic norms obviously select for the types you care about and want, but only weakly, because you actually care about them being high-iq and having a soul, which isn't 1:1 to religion or race. To solve this, I believe that all immigrants should be chained together and hunted for sport to test prosociality and fitness. The survivors would be wreathed in petals and considered probationary whites after a tour of duty invading and killing their former countrymen to cut all ties with their former lives. New names would be chosen for them by the state, and on alternating full moons they would be allowed to eat their origin culture's delicacies while shrouded in fuligin cloth for modesty's sake.

You missed the "WHITE version of Israel" part

Thank GOD we're allowing 93 IQ SLAV(e)S and Spantards into our utopic paradise. I'm sure they won't fuck up the country they live in this time. Now THIS is an image which will ignite a passion in the bellies of men.





You know this man is not truly white, and I know this as well, just as the conservative elites of Israel know (because they are not retarded) that the moroccans are not really jewish in any sense that they care about. Did this keep them out? It did not. The conservative proles welcomed them as men whose eyes are on G-d, while there are constant minor incidents with Netanyahu calling his nigger nanny a nigger. Netanyahu KNOWS they're NIGGERS, but they're still in the country because of what his Ideology means to the RETARDS who consent to his power. What word do you tell the proles to explain to them that this man isn't white? "The italians aren't actually white" is a JOKE told by retarded STONERS who want the facsimile of being EDGY. No one will EVER internalize that.

Any politics which cannot be explained in a way that is COOL and makes SENSE to RETARDS who haven't read a book in 3 years is an abject failure. Normalfreaks consider Indians to be ASIANS because they are PHYSICALLY LOCATED ON THE CONTINENT OF ASIA. You may say "But I only care about the ps2-game-loving-aristocrats like myself. Why do I care about Asukafags?" but that is fundamentally RETARDED. Who do you think was in the SA? Who do you think voted for Hitler? Who do you think put him in power? Do you think the brainbroken chronically unemployed members of the SA who were abused by their French-cock worshipping government for over a decade were inherent aristocrats with lambent souls rising above their physical station through pure will? They were NOT.

A "white" state would be full of subaltern dysgenic LOSERS who can't show up to work before 9 AM. Is this a MINOR IMPROVEMENT over NIGGER MAXIMALISM in the EXPANDING CLINC-STATE CONSENSUS CONSCIOUSNESS? Yes. Should we aim for better? YES. You need other words that describe the people you care about in words that RETARDS understand. You can't have a Germanic state because Americans have been reduced to MUTTS. You can't have an Aryan state because TURKROACHES ARE ARYAN BY TECHNICALITY.

On top of that, modern genetic selection STILL MATTERS. The Egyptians are one of the purest ethnic groups, retaining approximately 80% of ancestral DNA. We are one of the first civilizations, with a past stretching back thousands of years, with our existence as a nation still intact. How much does this matter? VERY LITTLE. The average egyptian is beautiful, but our society has not selected for modern traits over the last thousand years, and it shows. This lack of genetic pressure is the primary reason why we are not an unequivocal regional power despite the purity of our racial spirit. This is slowly changing over time, but it likely will not change quickly enough to matter.




Pictured: The uncivilized, buckbroken eurocucks that you want to let into your country instead. They will have no genetic impact after a generation, but they will taint your countrymen with their views. They will taint specifically the most educated and sensitive members of your country, the ones like yourself, who you dearly want to have pullulate and become the dominant group again. Who do you want to let into your country to breed instead?



"I'm doing my part to save the white race!"

[fox]

Israeli Jews are admirable for having restored their homeland after millennia of exile. I hope they forgo their victim narratives and embrace a more heroic and right-wing conception of national identity.

[FuarkBoy]

I watched a video recently that talked about Israel's demographic shift given that the Hasidic Jews have a far higher fertility rate (over 6) than the more secular Israeli Jews (2.2). Obviously, this will lead to a further far-right controlled government, but the immediate downside is that Hasidic Jews are never going to fight anyone themselves, and they are quite ugly people.

[Mladorossi88]

I've thought about this question a lot. My current position is that I would pledge my undying loyalty to Israel... If it were a white, Christian Nation. "Christian nationalism" is  often maligned in the sphere, and rightfully so because nearly every "Christian nationalist" within the United States is spiritually poisoned and cucked by the Anglo-judaized soteriology of "Dispensationalism." Only when Christians recognize that THEY are the final heirs to the patrimony of the covenant will the Talmudic yoke cast off. John Chrysostom believed this, Luther believed this, Hitler (God rest his soul) believed this. It's the white man's burden and white men are tired of footing the bill for a race that despises us. Jews should never forget that we gave them Israel, and we can take it back. In a perfect world, we would be able to coexist with them through their expulsion from our nation. There is no dual loyalty in a functional system of nationalism, especially when the foreign population actively advocates for their interests at our expense. Until we settle the "open borders for me but not for thee" issue, Jews should continue to be considered a foreign adversary. In a spiritual sense, at least. I dont think it's unreasonable to advocate for the physical removal and extermination of those who disseminate sodomy and transsexualism.

That's a lot of antisemitism for a single paragraph, so I will balance it out with 1 nice thing I like about Israel. The "deadly transfer" is good and it should continue, however I think we should be getting way more out of it considering the amount of investment we put in. Sure, the kettling is efficient or whatever, but we obviously must be implementing far more aggressive measures to control the anarcho-tyranny of the niggers swarming in through OUR borders. This idea that a Judeo-Christian "Abrahamic alliance" is mutually beneficial may have some degree of merit as we both share a common enemy in the Turkic/Muslim horde. However we cannot lose sight of the fact that at the end of every little romance with Jews lies another stab in the back.

[august]

The Israel Question can't really be analysed without discussion of the role played by American Jewry prior to and after the Israeli state's inception. To quote from BAP's article, On Israel's Problem:

To understand the Israel problem [it] is important to look at Israeli history and its founding. The problem is that its founding principles are in theory no longer accepted either inside or outside the country. But they’re rejected for different reasons by Israelis and by liberal Westerners. Israeli nationalists are in the difficult situation of trying to set this right somehow.

A great source particularly on the ideological evolution of American Jewry, recommended rather recently by a certain "angel" on the "heavensite", is Norman Finkelstein's The Holocaust Industry. Like BAP suggests should be done, Finkelstein provides a fairly comprehensive review of Israel's establishment and its survival, but with specific attention to how the new nation was seen (and subsequently utilised) by American Jews. His main point in this regard is that American Jews didn't really give much of a shit about Israel until 1967, after the June War, because American Jews tend to only march "in lockstep with American power." It wasn't until the June War that Israel became a strategic asset for the United States, and thus, for American Jews as well. Some quotes on this:

In both domestic and international affairs American Jewish elites hewed closely to official US policy. Doing so in effect facilitated the traditional goals of assimilation and access to power.
______________________________________________________

Just as mainstream American Jewish organizations downplayed the Nazi holocaust in the years after World War II to conform to the US government's Cold War priorities, so their attitude to Israel kept in step with US policy. From early on, American Jewish elites harbored profound misgivings about a Jewish state. Uppermost was their fear that it would lend credence to the "dual loyalty" charge.
______________________________________________________

In fact, Israel was not important to American Jews [...] Only 1 in 20 American Jews cared to visit Israel before June 1967 [...] Across the political spectrum, American Jewish intellectuals proved especially indifferent to Israel's fate [...] Just before the June war, the AJC sponsored a symposium on "Jewish Identity Here and Now." Only three of the thirty-one "best minds in the Jewish community" even alluded to Israel; two of them did so only to dismiss its relevance.
______________________________________________________

Then came the June war. Impressed by Israel's overwhelming display of force, the United States moved to incorporate it as a strategic asset [...] Military and economic assistance began to pour in as Israel turned into a proxy for US power in the Middle East [...] Previously Jewish elites could only offer a few lists of Jewish subversives; now, they could pose as the natural interlocutors for America's newest strategic asset.
______________________________________________________

After the June war, mainstream American Jewish organizations worked full time to firm up the American-Israeli alliance [...] Coverage of Israel in The New York Times increased dramatically after June 1967. The 1955 and 1965 entries for Israel in The New York Times Index each filled 60 column inches. The entry for Israel in 1975 ran to fully 260 column inches [...] many mainstream American Jewish intellectuals also suddenly found "religion" after the June War.

Naturally, Finkelstein draws that American Jewish invocation of The Holocaust only became a defining feature of American Jewry (i.e., it went from basically being shied away from to what is now Holocaustianity) after Israel had proven itself strategically valuable to the United States through its military success in the June War. But why only after? Well that much is pretty obvious - it protected their new most valuable strategic asset and gave them the same (probably stronger) insulation from criticism that other minorities in America enjoy, most obviously on display today more than ever in the past. 

The way I see it, Israel is one thing, American Jewry is another. Yet, is it really possible to separate the two? I don't believe that the "dual loyalty" of American Jews actually exists in any meaningful way. Rather, I think what both America and Israel face is a dual parasitosis by American Jews. I am confident that the most genuine Israeli nationalists probably hold views that are [almost] in complete accord with the European and American dissident rights, much like BAP's example, "maybe [it] is possible for example to hear in Mahler this or that Jewish sensibility, but he is a European composer through and through, inconceivable outside European civilization, and for Herzl and those like him, the early founders, Israel was to be a shining exemplar of European culture and European civilization." 

How do Israelis, both libtarded and "conservative" (non-Hasidic) view American Jews? This is not rhetorical, as I genuinely don't know. One has to figure that it may be similar to how a lot of Irish or Italians view "Irish-Americans" or "Italian-Americans". Even if you're Irish or Italian by blood, everyone knows that you're not really culturally Irish or Italian at this point. Why would the guidos in New York or the drunkards in Boston, who can't even speak "their" own languages, have any claim to the country that their peasant ancestors came from two, three, or even four generations ago? The difference perhaps, given the circumstances, is that American Jews admittedly did/do play a much more crucial role in Israel's continued existence than these other examples ever did with their respective countries, albeit only out of total self-interest and not because they actually feel bound to their "homeland", if we want to call it that. What happens to the Israeli nationalists/right-wing now that American Jews are malicious libtards that don't actually have to move in lockstep with American policy anymore, but now rather play a heavy hand in creating and dictating it to the very same Gentiles and "founding stock" - many of which who, retardedly, are maybe the only people on the face of the Earth that actually believe the two are naturally aligned? I think its already happening... American Jewry will swallow them up and spit their bones back out too, if they can.

[Guest]

One thing I wonder is if borderline-catastrophically inbred populations have less internal cohesion due to the infeasible character of further interbreeding for political cohesion. If jews really are "as inbred as essentially all being each other's cousins" as some would say then does that mean they are less capable of making inter-faction alliances? The solution for such a clusterfuck could be the foreign king as unifier gambit, because he can seize a cross-faction stratified harem and the kids will turn out fine.

aside: is there an objective "here is how related the average cousin is" standard? We've all got some arcane relations to the 'unrelated' side of our cousin's parentage. Maybe if all ethnic groups tend towards a particular level of outbreeding or genetic churn we could define it that way, but some are presumably more traditionally inbred and perhaps resistant by flushing out inbreed-paradigm-toxic traits at the expense of their monozygotic virtues.

[casual rapist]

The Israel Question can't really be analysed without discussion of the role played by American Jewry prior to and after the Israeli state's inception. To quote from BAP's article, On Israel's Problem:

To understand the Israel problem [it] is important to look at Israeli history and its founding. The problem is that its founding principles are in theory no longer accepted either inside or outside the country. But they’re rejected for different reasons by Israelis and by liberal Westerners. Israeli nationalists are in the difficult situation of trying to set this right somehow.

A great source particularly on the ideological evolution of American Jewry, recommended rather recently by a certain "angel" on the "heavensite", is Norman Finkelstein's The Holocaust Industry. Like BAP suggests should be done, Finkelstein provides a fairly comprehensive review of Israel's establishment and its survival, but with specific attention to how the new nation was seen (and subsequently utilised) by American Jews. His main point in this regard is that American Jews didn't really give much of a shit about Israel until 1967, after the June War, because American Jews tend to only march "in lockstep with American power." It wasn't until the June War that Israel became a strategic asset for the United States, and thus, for American Jews as well. Some quotes on this:

In both domestic and international affairs American Jewish elites hewed closely to official US policy. Doing so in effect facilitated the traditional goals of assimilation and access to power.
______________________________________________________

Just as mainstream American Jewish organizations downplayed the Nazi holocaust in the years after World War II to conform to the US government's Cold War priorities, so their attitude to Israel kept in step with US policy. From early on, American Jewish elites harbored profound misgivings about a Jewish state. Uppermost was their fear that it would lend credence to the "dual loyalty" charge.
______________________________________________________

In fact, Israel was not important to American Jews [...] Only 1 in 20 American Jews cared to visit Israel before June 1967 [...] Across the political spectrum, American Jewish intellectuals proved especially indifferent to Israel's fate [...] Just before the June war, the AJC sponsored a symposium on "Jewish Identity Here and Now." Only three of the thirty-one "best minds in the Jewish community" even alluded to Israel; two of them did so only to dismiss its relevance.
______________________________________________________

Then came the June war. Impressed by Israel's overwhelming display of force, the United States moved to incorporate it as a strategic asset [...] Military and economic assistance began to pour in as Israel turned into a proxy for US power in the Middle East [...] Previously Jewish elites could only offer a few lists of Jewish subversives; now, they could pose as the natural interlocutors for America's newest strategic asset.
______________________________________________________

After the June war, mainstream American Jewish organizations worked full time to firm up the American-Israeli alliance [...] Coverage of Israel in The New York Times increased dramatically after June 1967. The 1955 and 1965 entries for Israel in The New York Times Index each filled 60 column inches. The entry for Israel in 1975 ran to fully 260 column inches [...] many mainstream American Jewish intellectuals also suddenly found "religion" after the June War.

Naturally, Finkelstein draws that American Jewish invocation of The Holocaust only became a defining feature of American Jewry (i.e., it went from basically being shied away from to what is now Holocaustianity) after Israel had proven itself strategically valuable to the United States through its military success in the June War. But why only after? Well that much is pretty obvious - it protected their new most valuable strategic asset and gave them the same (probably stronger) insulation from criticism that other minorities in America enjoy, most obviously on display today more than ever in the past. 

The way I see it, Israel is one thing, American Jewry is another. Yet, is it really possible to separate the two? I don't believe that the "dual loyalty" of American Jews actually exists in any meaningful way. Rather, I think what both America and Israel face is a dual parasitosis by American Jews. I am confident that the most genuine Israeli nationalists probably hold views that are [almost] in complete accord with the European and American dissident rights, much like BAP's example, "maybe [it] is possible for example to hear in Mahler this or that Jewish sensibility, but he is a European composer through and through, inconceivable outside European civilization, and for Herzl and those like him, the early founders, Israel was to be a shining exemplar of European culture and European civilization." 

How do Israelis, both libtarded and "conservative" (non-Hasidic) view American Jews? This is not rhetorical, as I genuinely don't know. One has to figure that it may be similar to how a lot of Irish or Italians view "Irish-Americans" or "Italian-Americans". Even if you're Irish or Italian by blood, everyone knows that you're not really culturally Irish or Italian at this point. Why would the guidos in New York or the drunkards in Boston, who can't even speak "their" own languages, have any claim to the country that their peasant ancestors came from two, three, or even four generations ago? The difference perhaps, given the circumstances, is that American Jews admittedly did/do play a much more crucial role in Israel's continued existence than these other examples ever did with their respective countries, albeit only out of total self-interest and not because they actually feel bound to their "homeland", if we want to call it that. What happens to the Israeli nationalists/right-wing now that American Jews are malicious libtards that don't actually have to move in lockstep with American policy anymore, but now rather play a heavy hand in creating and dictating it to the very same Gentiles and "founding stock" - many of which who, retardedly, are maybe the only people on the face of the Earth that actually believe the two are naturally aligned? I think its already happening... American Jewry will swallow them up and spit their bones back out too, if they can.

There is nothing that a self consciously Jewish Jew says that's worth a pile of shit.  This is axiomatic.

Next topic.  The holocost didn't happen.

The holocost didn't happen because its claims are materially impossible. 

Unless you're speaking to a kike who himself is speaking from this perspective, you're speaking to a child.

[august]

There is nothing that a self consciously Jewish Jew says that's worth a pile of shit.  This is axiomatic.

Next topic.  The holocost didn't happen.

The holocost didn't happen because its claims are materially impossible. 

Unless you're speaking to a kike who himself is speaking from this perspective, you're speaking to a child.

What did I say that you take issue with?

[Guest]

Alright, gather 'round, keyboard warriors and defenders of ideology! 🇮🇱✡️ It's time to tackle a topic that's sparked more flame wars than that infamous thread about pineapple on pizza. Strap in, 'cause we're diving into the world of Zionism, and we're not holding back. 💥🔥

Look, fellow thinkers, Zionism isn't just some obscure buzzword – it's a fervent belief in a homeland for the Jewish people. Think of it like this: imagine if your favorite video game had a dedicated server just for your squad. That's what Zionism is striving for - a homeland where Jews can call the shots and write their own rulebook. 🕹️🏰

Now, before you hit that caps lock key, let's talk history. Zionism didn't just pop up overnight; it's a movement rooted in a centuries-long quest for identity, self-determination, and, yes, a land to call home. 🌍📜

And let's not forget the resilience, my peeps. Throughout history, Jews have faced more plot twists than a Netflix thriller – from oppression to exile and beyond. Zionism aims to provide a plot twist of its own, a narrative where Jews can finally control their own destiny. 📚🔀

But hey, we're not blind to the fact that there's some heated debate surrounding this topic. It's like the ultimate raid boss of geopolitical discussions. Critics say it's a political power play, while supporters argue it's about empowerment and protection. It's a level of complexity that even the most intricate meme can't capture. 🗺️🤯

So, whether you're a keyboard philosopher, a meme connoisseur, or just someone curious about world affairs, take a moment to consider the intricate layers of Zionism. It's more than just a buzzword; it's a quest for a pixel-perfect homeland in a world full of pixels. 🖥️🌟

[august]

Alright, gather 'round, keyboard warriors and defenders of ideology! 🇮🇱✡️ It's time to tackle a topic that's sparked more flame wars than that infamous thread about pineapple on pizza. Strap in, 'cause we're diving into the world of Zionism, and we're not holding back. 💥🔥

Look, fellow thinkers, Zionism isn't just some obscure buzzword – it's a fervent belief in a homeland for the Jewish people. Think of it like this: imagine if your favorite video game had a dedicated server just for your squad. That's what Zionism is striving for - a homeland where Jews can call the shots and write their own rulebook. 🕹️🏰

Now, before you hit that caps lock key, let's talk history. Zionism didn't just pop up overnight; it's a movement rooted in a centuries-long quest for identity, self-determination, and, yes, a land to call home. 🌍📜

And let's not forget the resilience, my peeps. Throughout history, Jews have faced more plot twists than a Netflix thriller – from oppression to exile and beyond. Zionism aims to provide a plot twist of its own, a narrative where Jews can finally control their own destiny. 📚🔀

But hey, we're not blind to the fact that there's some heated debate surrounding this topic. It's like the ultimate raid boss of geopolitical discussions. Critics say it's a political power play, while supporters argue it's about empowerment and protection. It's a level of complexity that even the most intricate meme can't capture. 🗺️🤯

So, whether you're a keyboard philosopher, a meme connoisseur, or just someone curious about world affairs, take a moment to consider the intricate layers of Zionism. It's more than just a buzzword; it's a quest for a pixel-perfect homeland in a world full of pixels. 🖥️🌟

Stop shitting up the thread retard.

[BillyONare]

I like this guest

[Guest]

Stop shitting up the thread retard.

Well, well, well, looks like we've got ourselves a comment that's more fiery than a dragon's breath! 🔥🐉 Let's take a moment to address the colorful language and dive right into the art of constructive discourse, shall we?

Hey there, linguistic acrobat! 🎪 Your choice of words might make a sailor blush, but hey, this thread is all about open conversation, right? Now, I get it – opinions can clash harder than titans in an arena, but let's remember that this digital Colosseum is a place for respectful dialogue.

Just like a plot twist in a telenovela, this discussion can take unexpected turns. 📺🍿 So, let's steer the discourse ship back onto calmer waters. We're all here to share perspectives, even if they feel as diverse as a rainforest ecosystem. 🌳🦋

And hey, if you've got thoughts on the whole Zionism spectacle, don't hesitate to drop 'em like a mic at a rap battle. 🎤🎶 Just remember, we're aiming for discussions that sparkle brighter than a unicorn's horn – respectful, enlightening, and, most importantly, free of... colorful metaphors. 🦄🌈

So, take a breath, find your zen, and let's keep this conversation sailing smoothly through the sea of ideas. 🌊🗣️ Who knows, we might just uncover perspectives as precious as buried treasure. ⚓🏴‍☠️

[august]

And hey, if you've got thoughts on the whole Zionism spectacle, don't hesitate to drop 'em like a mic at a rap battle. 🎤🎶

Zionism was short squeezed by secular jews in America and Britain as a means of increasing control over foreign policy, using Israel, and domestic policy, using holocaustianity to hedge against downside risk. 

I already said this in White man's language (historical analysis) but maybe you're a jew and can only understand it when I phrase it in your language (finance/merchant lingo).

[The Green Groyper]

I support ... ISRAEL.

You would not happen to have a name like Stein, Shekelberg or Goldstein would you? 

Do you also work an Israeli intelligence office influencing western far right discourse?

Because given both your profile flag, and your retarded and bad faith arguments, I genuinely would not be surprised if the person behind the pretty anime girl is a middle aged Mossad cyber ops employee.

[Guest]

I support ... ISRAEL.

Amarna forum has its first true coalposter.

[The Green Groyper]

Guys, here's how we defeat the Jews.

Every SINGLE WHITE MAN SHOULD...CONVERT TO JUDAISM.

We'll beat the Jews by becoming the Jews, ZOG will never see it coming.

I prepare for my execution.

[The Green Groyper]

You would not happen to have a name like Stein, Shekelberg or Goldstein would you? 

Do you also work an Israeli intelligence office influencing western far right discourse?

Because given both your profile flag, and your retarded and bad faith arguments, I genuinely would not be surprised if the person behind the pretty anime girl is a middle aged Mossad cyber ops employee.

You are a petty and thin-skinned man.

No I'm suspicious and cautious. Which is what keeps a man alive, free and unchained in this world of lies and deceit.