Words That Annoy You
Though this falls outside the scope of "norwood" and "soy" slang, I do find the insult "pissbaby" somewhat annoying even though I can't fully figure out why I find it annoying other than the context in which it is usually used in. It seems more like a Tumblrism picked up by the soy crowd, so as to insult people they deem as sensitive without using heckin "problematic" language such as "bitch."

I think that a lot of soy slang words were originally Tumblrisms, as is that đź‘Ź thing đź‘Ź where đź‘Ź they đź‘Ź type đź‘Ź like đź‘Ź this.
This may have already been mentioned, but using "based" language/memes for fictional media. For instance, "Total Orc [or whatever] Death", using fake slurs, being an extreme partisan for fake vidya shit "I HATE HATE people who play as [z] character! [x] character fans unite!". Definitely related to wanting to appear as transgressive without actually breaking any barriers of wholesomeness by calling for TND, and also related to externalizing tribal preference onto inconsequential shit. Kind of like how boomers are obsessed with football teams. This may also be related to wholesome anti-British/anti-French/Balkan nationalist memes. Can't actually call for deporting all Mexicans but still have to get their tribalism out and appear edgy somehow, so they just latch onto this sort of shit.
gipazugos Wrote:This may have already been mentioned, but using "based" language/memes for fictional media. For instance, "Total Orc [or whatever] Death", using fake slurs, being an extreme partisan for fake vidya shit "I HATE HATE people who play as [z] character! [x] character fans unite!". Definitely related to wanting to appear as transgressive without actually breaking any barriers of wholesomeness by calling for TND, and also related to externalizing tribal preference onto inconsequential shit. Kind of like how boomers are obsessed with football teams. This may also be related to wholesome anti-British/anti-French/Balkan nationalist memes. Can't actually call for deporting all Mexicans but still have to get their tribalism out and appear edgy somehow, so they just latch onto this sort of shit.

Being the source of something that goes downstream is annoying but gratifying.
gipazugos Wrote:This may have already been mentioned, but using "based" language/memes for fictional media. For instance, "Total Orc [or whatever] Death", using fake slurs, being an extreme partisan for fake vidya shit "I HATE HATE people who play as [z] character! [x] character fans unite!". Definitely related to wanting to appear as transgressive without actually breaking any barriers of wholesomeness by calling for TND, and also related to externalizing tribal preference onto inconsequential shit. Kind of like how boomers are obsessed with football teams. This may also be related to wholesome anti-British/anti-French/Balkan nationalist memes. Can't actually call for deporting all Mexicans but still have to get their tribalism out and appear edgy somehow, so they just latch onto this sort of shit.

This sort of behavior is usually referred to as "safe edgy."
All TV journalists and media personalities pronounce forward as "foe-ward"
Muskox Wrote:All TV journalists and media personalities pronounce forward as "foe-ward"

Says a lot about are democracy.
anthony Wrote:
Muskox Wrote:All TV journalists and media personalities pronounce forward as "foe-ward"

Says a lot about are democracy.

"Woke more correct."
Trep Wrote:"Chose violence"/"woke up and chose violence" (not 100% sure if this is norwood specifically or another more general sort of vocal tic)

Also no one has mentioned "fuck around and find out" yet.

"fuck around and find out" is one of their favourite's. An old man will be brutally murdered in retaliation for calling an ape acting like an ape a nigger and the comments will no doubt be filled with scores of smug faggots reciting this phrase as evidence that the old man obviously had it coming somehow.

its indicative of a normiefaggot thinking as a whole. dont push beyond anything, dont try, dont be a faustian, dont violate our sacred moral laws that exist only to protect niggers and dysgenics, otherwise you are "fucking around" and therefore opening yourself up to some sort of magical cosmic karma. the whole normie worldview is built upon the idea that morally "evil" people are always inevitably punished, something that is drilled into their minds from birth by god knows how many tv shows movies ect. if this core belief is challenged they recoil in horror, its existential for them. every single one is wrapped up in kantian ideas of moral universalism.
Nigger
brownguernseycow Wrote:wrapped up in kantian ideas of moral universalism.

How is Kant relevant here? Do you actually believe Libtards care about or have been unknowingly influenced by Kant? The way you write gives me the impression that you're randomly copying others who seem important to you with no meaningful discretion. Saying the 'normie worldview' is built upon the idea that morally evil people are punished is sort of correct, but it has nothing to do with Kant. It would make much more sense for you to say Moral universalism is Jewish, though it'd be slightly unnatural for you or I to put it that way as it's quite divorced from our individual observations of reality. Further to the point, regardless of who you attribute it to, "Moral universalism" is in contradiction with what drives the example you used at the start of your post ("An old man will be brutally murdered in retaliation for calling an ape acting like an ape a nigger and the comments will no doubt be filled with scores of smug faggots reciting this phrase as evidence that the old man obviously had it coming somehow."). You could simply say "slave morality". Which is also unnatural to say, but not wrong. I strongly recommend that you choose your language by thinking through your own observations of phenomena rather than your observations of other people pretending to observe those phenomena.

Anyway, what lies at the base of Normie "morality" is, but is not exactly, something you yourself said. "The idea that morally "evil" people are always inevitably punished". This belief and other similar beliefs are the codified versions of fantasies that emerge from insignificant people being unable to meaningfully channel any of the rage born from the unjustifiable world they live in. They aren't thinking about morality or justice really, they're thrashing about hungry for revenge. Whether someone is worth something or nothing, our world doesn't present them any kind of agreeable arrangement for a pleasant life. Nearly everyone is thrashing about in this cage. Yet those who are more sentient than average (the ones who don't instinctually jump to violent revenge) are the ones who often react the least violently to their situation, or don't at all. Even for more intelligent retards such as yourself who can figure out what the problem is, and thus direct their rage appropriately, there is no way out of this unpleasantness. You've come here to the Amarna Forum (as a cow), which to you is the best place one can find to make retarded sputtering sounds at a BASED frequency ("dysgenicsfaustianniggerkantian"). In a way it reflects poorly on you that you're here at all. You have been gifted the tools to properly fight against the world with everything you have, and this is what and how you communicate? I reckon that there are many who could make much better use of these tools than you and are scared away by the thuggishness it requires to be here (not helped by those of your nature). As for when a Normie finds himself angry (which he should be), he will most likely choose something more in line with his naturally low sensibilities than you would (or as you would put it: because of his "Unfaustian nigga shit"). Sometimes this isn't so bad, he may choose something angry and ultimately unproductive, but not resentful against civilization. Like Qanon or Gamergate. But more often than not it manifests as misplaced, resentful sadism. Such as what this post is touching on.

In the future, start capitalizing your words properly, get a fucking Anime profile picture like a normal person, and try being less retarded. If you start with one the other two should come easily.
Erika Wrote:In the future, start capitalizing your words properly, get a fucking Anime profile picture like a normal person, and try being less retarded. If you start with one the other two should come easily.

I was under the impression that admins make the rules on forums. I would prefer if ordinary users here didn't make demands they can't enforce.
(04-14-2024, 04:08 PM)elhanan Wrote: Forgive me if I make a faux pas
[Image: JBqHIg7.jpeg]
Let me alone to recover a little, before I go whence I shall not return
elhanan Wrote:I was under the impression that admins make the rules on forums. I would prefer if ordinary users here didn't make demands they can't enforce.

The Detective does not have to listen to the pointless anklebiting of cowards who strongly resemble peasants.

The default avatar here is Anime enough, and you do appear to have a grasp on capitalization. I suppose only time will tell if the remaining point applies to you or not. If you ever decide to post anything of value, that is.
Erika Wrote:
brownguernseycow Wrote:wrapped up in kantian ideas of moral universalism.

How is Kant relevant here? Do you actually believe Libtards care about or have been unknowingly influenced by Kant? 

You do realize “kantian” is an adjective right? He purposefully didn’t say “Kant’s.” The rest of your post is irrelevant/erroneous because you lack sufficient literacy.
Guest Wrote:You do realize “kantian” is an adjective right? He purposefully didn’t say “Kant’s.” The rest of your post is irrelevant/erroneous because you lack sufficient literacy.

You do realize "kantian" refers to things related to Kant's works? Yes, he did not LITERALLY mean Libtards' beliefs are tied up in what they got out of reading the works of Kant. He instead meant that Kantian sounds like something in a substack post and I can use it here to win Dissident points because Kant believed in universal morals, or something.

Please demonstrate how we need to relate back to Kant's works in order to understand the psychology of Libtards. Please also make an actual argument, as your lazy dismissal does nothing to diminish the obvious reality that the Brown Cow guy is a retarded cackling wigger.
Erika Wrote: He instead meant that Kantian sounds like something in a substack post and I can use it here to win Dissident points because Kant believed in universal morals, or something.

I get that you’re embarrassed but there’s no need for these churlish nonsense arguments. You didn’t understand his point in his first post and now you’re purposefully misconstruing his point. And no, I will not in good faith engage with you as you’ve shown through your actions that you lack the character to honor other peoples work. Even if I did write a response clarify what he (Mr. moomoo cow) meant it would be wasted on you.
Guest Wrote:I get that you’re embarrassed but there’s no need for these churlish nonsense arguments. You didn’t understand his point in his first post and now you’re purposefully misconstruing his point. And no, I will not in good faith engage with you as you’ve shown through your actions that you lack the character to honor other peoples work. Even if I did write a response clarify what he (Mr. moomoo cow) meant it would be wasted on you.

You have not proven anything, because you can't. This means I win the game, as you have forfeited.

Also, "you lack the character to honor other peoples work". Take your kindergarten art class morality and kill yourself in the Losers Hall. I don't owe his lowercase mumbling anything. All you can do is imitate the way others react to someone being destroyed in a laborious argument, which you have not even attempted to try engaging in. Retard.
Erika Wrote: laborious argument

It’s a shame that this rhetorical feat was based off a misunderstanding (ergo erroneous), or you might’ve had a point.
Guest Wrote:
Erika Wrote: laborious argument

It’s a shame that this rhetorical feat was based off a misunderstanding (ergo erroneous), or you might’ve had a point.
To clarify: “this rhetorical feat” refers to the wall of text you responded to the cow with.
(04-17-2024, 12:01 AM)Guest Wrote:
Guest Wrote:
wall of text
Go back to twitter.
[Image: image.webp][Image: final.jpg]
"Only people with anime avatars have anything of substance to say, it serves as a marker of being an intelligent young man. Your profile picture depicts a witless looking creature, your post reflects this."
"nigger"
"The Detective does not have to listen to the pointless anklebiting of cowards who strongly resemble peasants."
"nigger"



[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)