Norwood Vocal Tics
@Jaume Great post. Keep posting.
Any statement that begins with “ah yes” seems to be a Norwoodism. Very snarky and sarcastic but never in a good way.

For instance: https://mobile.twitter.com/Testudinefan/...9617122306
The essence of Norwooding is legitimated-to-self conformity. It's not enough to repeat mass media slogans. They have to present themselves as an authorizing force. There arises a desire to get outside of something in order to conform to it. Norwoods will posture with the newly minted argot of the relative margins to generate the worldly-wise impression they crave.

They will lift terminology from the anon-right, niggers, "indie" media, so long as it doesn't genuinely slay the sacred nigger-tranny cow. It will be repeated ad nauseum, but unlike us, the repetition is designed to produce conformity with an artificial consensus. That's why posting gigachad for the 500th time to own a libtard is qualitatively distinct from saying 'My brother in Christ' any amount of times. You should always call attention to the spectacle of authenticity for the craven faggotry it is.
Unsure if it’s already been mentioned but “taking Ls or Ws” is definitely Norwood. Imitating a niggerism.
"holy BASED".
"terminally online"
"irony poisoned"
and anything to do with DFW
(05-24-2022, 10:06 AM)Guest Wrote: "terminally online"




"The internet is CRAZY! Had you a mere glimpse of the MADNESS I am subjected to every day as a participant in the 'discourse', it would drive you INSANE! INSANE!"

"Communists! NAZIS! Demons! Hot takes! SEED OILS! Podcasters! RAW MEAT! RAW EGGS! MALE PATTERN BALDNESS! INCELS! Illicit drugs!"



I can't think of any other (sub)culture in human history where people are expected to constantly humble-brag about how CRAZY they are for daring to participate in it. You spend a lot of time discussing particular topics, and thus absorb a lot of knowledge about said topics by osmosis. This is how every culture works. It's not some Lovecraftian process of forbidden knowledge-seeking that will forever alienate you from the rest of humanity.
THAT exact thing I think is at the root of so many of these social phenomena we have today: the making of the mundane into something special. From bookcels to pothead enthusiasts, they all take these completely common, near everyday things and act special. "Wow, I read books. I am special. Wow, I smoke weed with niggers, I'm special. Wow, I listen to the number 2 most popular band instead of number 1. I special." And so on and so forth.

I think it's related to "The Great Flattening." They either lost the ability to differentiate themselves, or never had it, but due to how things work, everyone must be an unique individual with special tastes n shit, or whatever. Now, some of those things weren't so mundane in the past, up to the recent past - reading books was only for the literate. To listen to music you had to go to a live performance, or buy a whole system that was rather expensive. Weed had ritual significance, then was just more expensive. With mass literacy, libraries, and now the internet reading became a basic human action. Listening to music became a basic human action. Substance imbibement became basic human action in a way as well.

Yet, it seems norwoods, still sort of operate on past settings when these things were a bit more luxurious. The cope is that nobody reads books anymore (false) or that everyone listens to shit music (false, but they do), or that doing drugs is epic fighting the system (a portion of every drug sale cash ends up with the local police/government).
Using “chud” in any context except humorously making fun of one’s self.
“Pfff. Whatever, BROOOO!”
Calling someone a “retard” but will never say any other slur.

I’ll just pay closer attention to my roommates and fill a book.
“groomer”
“pedophile”
"She's too young bro"
"Jailbait"
"That's just wrong..."
"Kiddy fuckers are the first to go"
"Underage"
"You should be locked up"
"Having sex with children is bad"
"Having sex with preteens is bad"
"If you think about having sex with preteens you should go to jail/are going to Hell"
"Date someone your own age bro"
"Yep. That's a kidfucker."
"Yep. That's a child rapist."
"Loli wife? You are fucking sick"
"You watch cartoon porn of children"

Feel free to amend
(05-24-2022, 06:27 PM)Guest Wrote: "She's too young bro"
"Jailbait"
"That's just wrong..."
"Kiddy fuckers are the first to go"
"Underage"
"You should be locked up"
"Having sex with children is bad"
"Having sex with preteens is bad"
"If you think about having sex with preteens you should go to jail/are going to Hell"
"Date someone your own age bro"
"Yep. That's a kidfucker."
"Yep. That's a child rapist."
"Loli wife? You are fucking sick"
"You watch cartoon porn of children"

Feel free to amend
[Image: https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/orig...00/563.jpg]
All good additions
Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but anything where you are self-diagnosing yourself as a schizo - or rather - general "schizo" internet aesthetic is extremely norwood. I've seen countless memes where it's some sort of image or video captioned "Schizos when (insert WACKY scenario)" and it's like a scene from American Psycho or some other similar film. "I am living in your walls/I am inside your walls" is a phrase used a lot by the types who find this thing funny. 

All of this is just a very shallow way to cast yourself as an outsider who "gets it" but while still remaining well within the bounds of acceptable mainstream discourse. Alex Jones and the AlexJonesWasRight type of content overlaps with this as does any Joe Rogan-esque conspiracy talk. Being into CIA and UFO conspiracies doesn't make you a schizo, nor does asking about Epstein - it makes you a faggot.
(06-07-2022, 05:19 PM)macintoshuser Wrote: Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but anything where you are self-diagnosing yourself as a schizo - or rather - general "schizo" internet aesthetic is extremely norwood. I've seen countless memes where it's some sort of image or video captioned "Schizos when (insert WACKY scenario)" and it's like a scene from American Psycho or some other similar film. "I am living in your walls/I am inside your walls" is a phrase used a lot by the types who find this thing funny. 

All of this is just a very shallow way to cast yourself as an outsider who "gets it" but while still remaining well within the bounds of acceptable mainstream discourse. Alex Jones and the AlexJonesWasRight type of content overlaps with this as does any Joe Rogan-esque conspiracy talk. Being into CIA and UFO conspiracies doesn't make you a schizo, nor does asking about Epstein - it makes you a faggot.

It used to be a strictly left wing phenomenon of bringing up obscure conspiracies that don't really matter or rehashing the same early 2000s Joe Rogan/George Carlin esque family friend conspiracy theory (9/11 was an inside job, lizard people) but lately I've begun to see right wingers do this too probably because of the influx of spiritually left wing people and norwoods (synonymous with left wing) in our spaces. 

The norwood is ultimately a self-defeatist. In the same vein as the atheist redditor, (of course, redditor and norwood are different archetypes) the norwood is a self-defeatist. So what if all of these theories are true? What if your world is controlled by elites/all a lie? What are you going to do about it? Nothing.
(06-07-2022, 05:19 PM)macintoshuser Wrote: Not sure if this has been brought up yet, but anything where you are self-diagnosing yourself as a schizo - or rather - general "schizo" internet aesthetic is extremely norwood. I've seen countless memes where it's some sort of image or video captioned "Schizos when (insert WACKY scenario)" and it's like a scene from American Psycho or some other similar film. "I am living in your walls/I am inside your walls" is a phrase used a lot by the types who find this thing funny. 

All of this is just a very shallow way to cast yourself as an outsider who "gets it" but while still remaining well within the bounds of acceptable mainstream discourse. Alex Jones and the AlexJonesWasRight type of content overlaps with this as does any Joe Rogan-esque conspiracy talk. Being into CIA and UFO conspiracies doesn't make you a schizo, nor does asking about Epstein - it makes you a faggot.

That specific point hasn't been brought up but we do have a thread on 'schizoposters'
(06-10-2022, 02:33 PM)Heil Wrote: Terminally online really is an obnoxious norwood word, I think the most annoying part about it is that it's just not an insult, because the people who say it are also "terminally online", the only problem they have with other "terminally online" people is that they used the internet wrong and should've been wholesome chungus instead of racist or an incel
And of course there's nothing wrong with being 'terminally online' anyway. 

All it means is they've deemed you (personally) incapable of being left alone to your own devices online because you've developed along lines they didn't want you to. You were supposed to laugh at the funny niggerman on Vine and make spongebob jokes. Instead you looked up crime statistics and downloaded books on Eugenics. You need to go outside, "touch grass," go interact with the friendly mulatto couple at the bodega, smoke a joint and do lines with someone at an EDM show. It's akin to people telling you to "just be normal" or "just chill out." "You're scaring the hoes" is I guess the niggerfied form of this talk; I imagine niggers don't tell each other they're "terminally online" and this is likely just a thing specific to White people. 
[Image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FULFwFfVEAAO...me=900x900]
I myself tear off any meaning from such phrases and give them my own, better ones (I recommend everyone do this. Just straight up interpret everything how you want, because it doesn't matter anyway.) Terminally online - overly invested in the digital, participates in e-drama outside of entertainment purposes and such. Most people tossing the word around are the ones it's intended for anyway.
Unironic and (most probably) reflexive use of singular "they" in cases where "he" could be used and has been used in literature. Can be noticed even among non-norwoods, hence the assumption it's used without conscious thought and has been accepted as norm.
Irrational hatred for all things anime/manga outside Azumanga (oldgroid posing), Junji Ito (hack), and that one Gunsmith Cats frame. Speaking in terms of avatars and the like mostly
(06-17-2022, 05:21 AM)Fra Longino Wrote: Excessive countersignaling of pornography. It is likely True that online pornography has altered the minds of men where it's available and not for the better, but for the Norwood this almost always warps into a vicious attack on maleness and male sexuality. "You will NEVER be worthy of a woman's touch if you so much as glance upon the full-bosomed anime girl" etc ... Again, this rhetoric is typically employed by wholesome tradcath tweedmen but is also a rhetorical weapon of choice for anti-Troon Dykes and Troons themselves.
This perhaps touches on the irrational, bandwagon hatred of anime, or perhaps resentment. I don't think it's pornography; as we all know it's the Woman's Right to sell herself. More likely the former in the case of the chungus caths and the latter in the case of the women/"women".


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Human Verification
Please tick the checkbox that you see below. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)