Kiwifarms: Let's Watch the Watchers

[Heil]

I thought it was nice that Null acknowledged immediately that Emily Youcis was not really a lolcow in the thread that leftists made about her, that at least showed some restraint.

[anthony]

I thought it was nice that Null acknowledged immediately that Emily Youcis was not really a lolcow in the thread that leftists made about her, that at least showed some restraint.

I think we can all agree that null himself is basically fine. He stands up for some awful people, but only incidentally. His motivation is attacking internet hall-monitors by refusing to die. The hill doesn't seem to matter too much as far as I can see, the fact he's decided he's dying on it does. I'd be interested in talking to null about what he thinks of the current state of his site. No I will not watch the 75 hour long livestreams.

[calico]

Null has kept a thread up dedicated to stalking a clearly unbalanced woman who shot a porno two weeks after her 18th birthday for years. The entire thing appears to be updated by a single jaded and disturbed man who has been stalking her for a decade or more.

Even moreso than the shallow excuse that the normal crowd of autists have somehow invited it on themselves with their publicly pathetic behavior; this shows the inherent cruelty in the place. He could just take the thread down, but he won't. He's as bad as the worst of them.

What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?

[anthony]

Null has kept a thread up dedicated to stalking a clearly unbalanced woman who shot a porno two weeks after her 18th birthday for years. The entire thing appears to be updated by a single jaded and disturbed man who has been stalking her for a decade or more.

Even moreso than the shallow excuse that the normal crowd of autists have somehow invited it on themselves with their publicly pathetic behavior; this shows the inherent cruelty in the place. He could just take the thread down, but he won't. He's as bad as the worst of them.

What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?

This reads more like an argument against both porn and having personal details available on the internet at all, both of which I'd probably be inclined to agree with. Again, I see this as something awful enabled by null's autistic obstinacy (as far as I can tell, I don't actually know which parts of the site/culture he's into). Does anything get taken off the site?

[calico]

From my limited understanding before any thread is posted to the general audience it undergoes review and many are removed. 

I hardly see how some obscure perpetual liberal arts graduate student who appears desperate to escape her past (two porn videos from over a decade ago shot in some sort of manic state) is a "lolcow" worthy of constant ridicule and constant updates on her various name changes. The obvious answer appears to be that her father hired some law firm to DMCA the videos of his daughter being violated on the internet a decade ago and Null holds some sort of grudge. 

Is this a heroic stand against the forces of censorship?

[anthony]

From my limited understanding before any thread is posted to the general audience it undergoes review and many are removed. 

I hardly see how some obscure perpetual liberal arts graduate student who appears desperate to escape her past (two porn videos from over a decade ago shot in some sort of manic state) is a "lolcow" worthy of constant ridicule and constant updates on her various name changes. The obvious answer appears to be that her father hired some law firm to DMCA the videos of his daughter being violated on the internet a decade ago and Null holds some sort of grudge. 

Is this a heroic stand against the forces of censorship?

I'm not saying "heroic stand against the forces of censorship". I don't think anybody is (I don't care to read the thread again). I think null is a retarded autist. "Obstinacy" is the word I used. If he has some active interest in the thread I would call that a strong mark against his character, yes. There is a general trend in the thread of people holding a grudge against the idea of trying to cheat the internet like this. The fact she and her dad are rich, white coded, etc. Also the fact she was a 4chan meme first I suppose gives her internet reputation some kind of legacy status.

[Mason Hall-McCullough]

What principled stand is there in hosting links to decades old facefucking porn? Are Americans in danger of their "god-given right" to say vaccines cause cancer if Null complies with copyright protections surrounding footage of poorly-paid women undergoing irrumatio until they puke into dog-food bowls?

What use are principles if they only apply to things you already like and support? Null believes DMCA should not be abused with motivations unrelated to protecting copyright, to take down content that is permitted under fair use. Considering how common bad faith DMCA takedown requests are, I respect that.

[Montherlant]

Null is obsessed with lolicon and pedophillia. If you watch his streams, he constantly seethes about the existence of anime. He’s a lumberjack through and through.
I do admire his stance against censorship

[Recent Friend]

Null is obsessed with lolicon and pedophillia. If you watch his streams, he constantly seethes about the existence of anime. He’s a lumberjack through and through.
I do admire his stance against censorship

He's just trying hard to make up for his shota phase. Trying to make up for past flaws by making fun of others is a common theme among users there.