Templism: A New European Paganism

[Guest]

I <3 larping

You are spiritually a troon. Dilate.

[Détaché]

Templism

[Verlion]

Templism

---

I think it is time for The Author to be "taken out" before he permits more blasphemy. The about section on his substack is more than enough evidence of that.

[Mladorossi88]

"I discovered a new ecumenical belief system that will unite the White Race and save the West."

"Is it something real or is it Templism?"

"It's Templism."


Yes I am a newfag doing winthrop dialogue but OP deserves it.

[Guest]

I interact with the world as it is. I don't "le schizo" by pretending to know or believe things that I don't. I recognize the demonstrable feasibility of institutional falsehoods, secrets and blindness. I have a few realizations from my personal experience and meditation. I have had a few supernatural-adjacent experiences. I have picked a few holes in contemporary nihilistic IFLS arguments. I have a few promising lines of research to follow up on. Even never achieving any deep dogma or certainties, even if I never discover the holistic truth behind instincts and anomalies, I would still have a more authentic religious experience than any templist.

You will never be a real religion. You have no roots in reality, you have no doctrine, you have no believers. You are a homosexual meme twisted by NRx and cope into a crude mockery of reality’s perfection.

[The_Author]

I interact with the world as it is. I don't "le schizo" by pretending to know or believe things that I don't. I recognize the demonstrable feasibility of institutional falsehoods, secrets and blindness. I have a few realizations from my personal experience and meditation. I have had a few supernatural-adjacent experiences. I have picked a few holes in contemporary nihilistic IFLS arguments. I have a few promising lines of research to follow up on. Even never achieving any deep dogma or certainties, even if I never discover the holistic truth behind instincts and anomalies, I would still have a more authentic religious experience than any templist.

You will never be a real religion. You have no roots in reality, you have no doctrine, you have no believers. You are a homosexual meme twisted by NRx and cope into a crude mockery of reality’s perfection.

This "I" guy sounds very impressive.

Templism is in fact the most thorough doctrine of any existing religion. It espouses real arguments. The number of believers is not relevant.

Do you want to rant more about this "I" character without making any real arguments? It is a common anti-Templist cope, and I maintain that nobody has yet advanced a proper argument against Templism, and perhaps never will. All criticisms to date have been, in some form or another, dressed-up expressions of reflexive disgust rather than arguments. Well, Templists are not retarded, so such expressions are irrelevant.

[Guest]

When "I" is used in an anon post, it is a stand in for a general type of person that could have made the post.

It is interesting that you attempt to cope about such a character being impossible. It is very easy to pick holes in clearly wrong arguments. Spiritual/religious experiences are not more rare today among the perceptive. There are a lot of people who could have made that post. You are not one of them. They are all better than you.

You will never be a prophet. You will always be a congenital atheist. Your religion does not exist.

[The_Author]

When "I" is used in an anon post, it is a stand in for a general type of person that could have made the post.

It is interesting that you attempt to cope about such a character being impossible. It is very easy to pick holes in clearly wrong arguments. Spiritual/religious experiences are not more rare today among the perceptive. There are a lot of people who could have made that post. You are not one of them. They are all better than you.

You will never be a prophet. You will always be a congenital atheist. Your religion does not exist.

You made a list of vague characteristics that are not mutually exclusive with Templism interspersed with ad hominem arguments. You're getting too excited about it.

Templism is not for guys who want to get excited. It is for cold blooded soldiers of Wotan.

Germanic Templism, at least. Maybe a variation of Greco-Roman Templism could accommodate your irrationality. You could make arguments like:

Templism is the religion of the gods. The religion of the past. The religion of the future. It has followers around the world. Its zeitgeist is manifest physically and metaphysically. The Author is a great man who has had a number of spiritual/religious experiences. He has convened with gods. He has been to the holy sites. He has experienced divine wonders.

None of those are real arguments they are just Med superstitious faggotry. Here is, for example, a real argument that Templism espouses, that would have to be refuted in a rational way:

All knowledge is derived from experience. The gods have been experienced, not only in a few spurious occasions, but repeatedly, through history, in independent cases across independent cultures. Importantly, they are experienced in variable ways, thus proving that there are variable gods. Christians put faith in the attested experiences of one god only, but ignore pagan attestations. This ignorance is arbitrary, since their standard of evidence is also that of attested experience, and thus they have no reason to ignore the pagan attestations, which are in fact more numerous and stretch back across a longer period of history.

This could be refuted, in a rational way, for example, as follows: it is not sufficient proof to say that the gods have been experienced, even on many occasions. For, it is possible that all such occasions are lies, providing evidence of a common human tendency to lie, rather than the common existence of gods. Applying Occam's Razor, it seems much more likely that humans commonly lie about supernatural events, since we know that humans do often lie, and since supernatural events appear identical in nature to what are, in other cases, regarded as human fiction or imagination. The only difference between an imagined entity and an "attested" entity is that the latter is claimed to be "real", and it ought to arouse strong suspicion that the two cases are otherwise the same in appearance.

Your criticisms mean nothing to me and my mind easily recognizes them to be irrelevant. Nothing that you have said refutes any single proposition that I have made, and Templism is nothing more than a collection of propositions. Your next play, predictably, if I did not just now predict it, would be to say that "a religion of mere propositions is gay/atheistic/sciencey/autistic/liberal/modern etc", which simply shows your philosophical ignorance.

[Guest]

the biggest issue with creating legit religions is that if you truly find something real you shouldn't share it. if truly special things exist in this world in some way besides mere hysteria and psychology you shouldn't let people know. you should keep it inside a small clan the same way Rentech guards their algorithms and segregates their clan from the gen pop. if I can do a special magic trick that proves something abnormal is going on and is even maybe a little useful I gain little by telling the world so they can make a new set of particles, physical and biological laws to explain how it works. if I keep it in in my lineage father to son my closest allies/successors may have decades of unique insights and openmindedness not to mention cohesion from share experience of initiation into the mysteries. if I find wotan sleeping in the woods or a really weird big fish in the ocean or a sort of "ritual" that works that is a clan trade secret to hold dear not something im going to post on /x/

[Anon123]

Templism

[The_Author]

if I keep it in in my lineage father to son my closest allies/successors may have decades of unique insights and openmindedness not to mention cohesion from share experience of initiation into the mysteries. if I find wotan sleeping in the woods or a really weird big fish in the ocean or a sort of "ritual" that works that is a clan trade secret to hold dear not something im going to post on /x/

This is excessively general. Templism is not merely a ritual of power. It is a moral framework. It is worth sharing because its aim is to improve the broader culture. See the "but how does this affect you, personally?" meme. Yes, how does imperialistic racist tribalistic ethno-collectivist neo-paganism affect me, personally?

---

Templism

Templism. The opponents of Templism are basically just whiners Anon.

[GraalChud]

if I keep it in in my lineage father to son my closest allies/successors may have decades of unique insights and openmindedness not to mention cohesion from share experience of initiation into the mysteries. if I find wotan sleeping in the woods or a really weird big fish in the ocean or a sort of "ritual" that works that is a clan trade secret to hold dear not something im going to post on /x/

This is excessively general. Templism is not merely a ritual of power. It is a moral framework. It is worth sharing because its aim is to improve the broader culture. See the "but how does this affect you, personally?" meme. Yes, how does imperialistic racist tribalistic ethno-collectivist neo-paganism affect me, personally?

---

Templism

Templism. The opponents of Templism are basically just whiners Anon.

The arc of history is long, but it bends toward Templism.

Templism is inevitable. Any attempts to argue thereagainst are futile and, as the record clearly reflects, retarded.

[The_Author]

Templism is inevitable. Any attempts to argue thereagainst are futile and, as the record clearly reflects, retarded.

Templism is inevitable. It draws the ire of some people because it is a very masculine religion, in the way that it is argued. It triggers more feminine natures. That is why all criticisms to date look something like this:

"Templism will never be a real religion. You are a charlatan, a hack, a phony, and a gaylord. Your religion is not one iota of the worth of IESUS CHRISTUS REX, who died on the sins for our cross in heaven and love. I challenge you, so-called prophet, to produce your revelation before us, to vindicate your divinity and greatness just as JESUS, MOHAMMAD, JESUS, and MOHAMMAD did several years ago, by telling us - how did God come to you? When did you see a burning bush? When did you part the sea? Unless you do anything of this sort, it seems that you are just a fat gaylord fucking fat idiot piece of shit, and I will take my readership elsewhere, to greater books than your pseudo-neo-pagan atheist neo-nazi drivel. You are not a great prophet, you are a guy writing stupid fucking SHIT on his computer with his SHIT HANDS. Where is your soul? Where is your pomp? Where is your spiritual effluence of God and Jesus and God? Your religion makes me feel nothing inside. It does not rouse the inner fires of my soul. It is a collection of statements without purpose and without greatness, and you will never be a real emissary of the gods."

Women did do wonders for Christianity. They often converted their husbands, as we all know. But Templism is unconcerned with that. It is not about BOMBASTIC IDIOCY. Such effeminates are WHINING because my religion does not make them FEEL CARED FOR or FEEL GUIDED BY A DIVINE PATRIARCH. The answer is that I am not your DADDY. You read the documents and are capable of understanding them, guided by your own reason, and implementing them, guided by your own will and your own sense of practicality, or you can't.

Such people have a rather verbose way of saying "I can't"

[Handi]

[The_Author depicts his critics as soyjaks for saying he is not a literal emissary of the gods]

...

It is not about BOMBASTIC IDIOCY

[The_Author]

[The_Author depicts his critics as soyjaks for saying he is not a literal emissary of the gods]

...

It is not about BOMBASTIC IDIOCY

Handi, you will notice that I have portrayed my critics as soyjaks because their criticisms are soy. Handi, you will notice that I have not portrayed my critics as soyjaks merely because they take an opposite belief to my own. Yet another soy response therefore. They never end. Will there ever be an honest critic of Templism?

---

I would love to talk to him, wherever he is. He will lend more credence to Templism than he takes from it, surely, because he will contrast himself with all of the other critics, showing everyone how feeble they are. He will highlight the fact that there is no reasoned criticism against the One Truest of the Religions.

Where is this man? The First Critic, we shall call him, the man who argues against Templism without resorting to FAGGOTY arguments, like a scholastic philosopher, not a whiny bitch stomping his feet.

[ꦈꦒꦲꦸꦫꦲꦺꦴꦗ꦳ꦲ]

🅴🆄🆁🅾🅿🅴🅰🅽🆂...
🅴🅤🆁🅞🅿🅔🅰🅝🆂 🆆🅞🆄🅛🅳 🅽🅔🆅🅔🆁 🆄🅝🅳🅔🆁🅢🆃🅐🅽🅓 🅦🅷🅐🆃 🅸🅣 🅜🅴🅐🅽🅢 🅣🅾 🅱🅔 🅐🅽🅨🆃🅗🅸🅝🅶 🅾🅣🅷🅔🆁 🆃🅗🅰🅝 🅒🅰🅛🅸🅕🅾🅡🅽🅘🅰🅝. 🆃🅗🅴 🅳🅘🅵🅕🅴🅡🅴🅝🅲🅔 🅘🆂 🅽🅞🅽🅔🆇🅘🆂🅣🅴🅝🆃, 🅣🅷🅔🆈 🅰🅡🅴 🆃🅗🅴 🆂🅐🅼🅔 🅟🅴🅞🅿🅛🅴. 🅡🅴🅛🅸🅖🅸🅞🅽 🅸🅢 🅐 🅒🆁🅤🆃🅒🅷 🅵🅞🆁 🆃🅗🅴 🆆🅔🅰🅚. 🅸🅣 🅘🆂 🅲🅞🅽🅣🆁🅞🅻🅛🅴🅓 🅑🆈 🆃🅗🅴 🆆🅔🅰🅚, 🅰🅝🅳 🅾🅝🅻🅨 🅣🅷🅔 🅦🅴🅐🅺 🅽🅔🅴🅓 🅣🅷🅔 🅟🅴🅡🅼🅘🆂🅢🅸🅞🅽 🅾🅕 🅐 🅗🅸🅖🅷🅔🆁 🅰🅤🆃🅗🅾🅡🅸🅣🆈 🆃🅞 🅔🆇🅘🆂🅣..........

[Handi]

Handi, you will notice that I have portrayed my critics as soyjaks because their criticisms are soy. Handi, you will notice that I have not portrayed my critics as soyjaks merely because they take an opposite belief to my own. Yet another soy response therefore. They never end. Will there ever be an honest critic of Templism?

Let's cut past this tautology. Do you claim to be an emissary of the gods?

[Guest]

I haven't read these but I intend to check them out for similar reasons.

hjalmar schacht- highest iq of nuremberg defendants. economist, wrote 26 books total some translated to engl:

I haven't read Schacht, but I've read Princes of the Yen by Richard Werner. If you want a nice organic introduction to a lot of economics related ideas worked into a broadly interesting subject (modern Japanese history) it's an easy recommendation. Werner devotes a lot of time to explaining Schacht and the beliefs and mechanisms that were used to recover the German economy after WW1. I've been meaning to read Schact himself and may do so soon.

And for my own suggestion today I recommend the plays of Yukio Mishima. I particularly like his 'My Friend Hitler', which in my opinion should be almost mandatory reading for this place.

🅴🆄🆁🅾🅿🅴🅰🅽🆂...
🅴🅤🆁🅞🅿🅔🅰🅝🆂 🆆🅞🆄🅛🅳 🅽🅔🆅🅔🆁 🆄🅝🅳🅔🆁🅢🆃🅐🅽🅓 🅦🅷🅐🆃 🅸🅣 🅜🅴🅐🅽🅢 🅣🅾 🅱🅔 🅐🅽🅨🆃🅗🅸🅝🅶 🅾🅣🅷🅔🆁 🆃🅗🅰🅝 🅒🅰🅛🅸🅕🅾🅡🅽🅘🅰🅝. 🆃🅗🅴 🅳🅘🅵🅕🅴🅡🅴🅝🅲🅔 🅘🆂 🅽🅞🅽🅔🆇🅘🆂🅣🅴🅝🆃, 🅣🅷🅔🆈 🅰🅡🅴 🆃🅗🅴 🆂🅐🅼🅔 🅟🅴🅞🅿🅛🅴. 🅡🅴🅛🅸🅖🅸🅞🅽 🅸🅢 🅐 🅒🆁🅤🆃🅒🅷 🅵🅞🆁 🆃🅗🅴 🆆🅔🅰🅚. 🅸🅣 🅘🆂 🅲🅞🅽🅣🆁🅞🅻🅛🅴🅓 🅑🆈 🆃🅗🅴 🆆🅔🅰🅚, 🅰🅝🅳 🅾🅝🅻🅨 🅣🅷🅔 🅦🅴🅐🅺 🅽🅔🅴🅓 🅣🅷🅔 🅟🅴🅡🅼🅘🆂🅢🅸🅞🅽 🅾🅕 🅐 🅗🅸🅖🅷🅔🆁 🅰🅤🆃🅗🅾🅡🅸🅣🆈 🆃🅞 🅔🆇🅘🆂🅣..........

https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/man-t...l_alsolike

---

Accidentally quoted Anthony fuuuck Rabbit save me

[Guest]

“As a long time viewer with no voice I can safely say ꦈꦒꦲꦸꦫꦲꦺꦴꦗ꦳ꦲ is the coolest person here.”

Thought every guest reading this.

[The_Author]

Let's cut past this tautology. Do you claim to be an emissary of the gods?

You have to be humble Handi. You asserted that I portrayed my critics as soyjaks because they disagree with my claims. This is not true. I have portrayed my critics as soyjaks because they disagree incompetently. This refutes your claim. It is the difference between calling "all" critics soyjaks and calling "some" critics soyjaks. An elementary study of logic would do you good. "Tautology" is your attempt to save face. It's weak. Let me answer your question:

Yes.