Thread Ideas

[Guest]

The Bathhouse: Homosexual society, and what happens when homosexuality isn't punished. The Bathhouse is a false paradise in which the only goal is physical pleasure. Addiction and hunger is the foundation of The Bathhhouse, primarily for sex, but other vices like drugs and eating are common. Addiction always entails escalation, and naturally the satyrs of The Bathhouse are always seeking new highs. The social structure is predatory and brutal where one must abuse or be abused. Young boys are the most vulnerable to abuse, due to the inherent physical weakness and lesser mental faculties of childhood.

To the foolish and uninformed, The Bathhouse seems like an escape from the toil and misery of The Longhouse. It is by definition a patriarchy since there is a hierarchy in which women are totally absent. Externally, The Bathhouse presents itself as a place of friendship, joy, and compassion, where men from all walk of live live in harmony and understanding. As all who enter soon find out, it is a hellish dungeon where the strong and the wealthy torture all below them for no other reason than to feel good.

https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1668190311259558.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UTHLKHL_whs/hqdef...v=60f9dd9a
https://static1.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-c...-Image.jpg

[JohnTrent]

The Bathhouse: Homosexual society, and what happens when homosexuality isn't punished. The Bathhouse is a false paradise in which the only goal is physical pleasure. Addiction and hunger is the foundation of The Bathhhouse, primarily for sex, but other vices like drugs and eating are common. Addiction always entails escalation, and naturally the satyrs of The Bathhouse are always seeking new highs. The social structure is predatory and brutal where one must abuse or be abused. Young boys are the most vulnerable to abuse, due to the inherent physical weakness and lesser mental faculties of childhood.

To the foolish and uninformed, The Bathhouse seems like an escape from the toil and misery of The Longhouse. It is by definition a patriarchy since there is a hierarchy in which women are totally absent. Externally, The Bathhouse presents itself as a place of friendship, joy, and compassion, where men from all walk of live live in harmony and understanding. As all who enter soon find out, it is a hellish dungeon where the strong and the wealthy torture all below them for no other reason than to feel good.

There is one fault to this, which is that homosexuals don't really have sex anymore. That is, not nearly to the extent that earlier predecessors did in the '50s-90s. The Bathhouse is one symbol that points to this discrepancy: bathhouses has been able to exist in the Orient for centuries, appealing to the decadent attitudes of certain intellectuals (Flaubert used to privately write about his experiences there with a spirit of hedonist victory, as seen in Steegmuller's Collected Letters), yet it is not similarly noticeable in the American world.

[Guest]

What are you smoking? Recent statistics show that gays are extremely promiscuous, having at least 80 different sexual partners a year and up to 1000 over a lifetime. Are you misinformed or outright lying when you say homosexuals "don't really have sex anymore"?

[JohnTrent]

What are you smoking? Recent statistics show that gays are extremely promiscuous, having at least 80 different sexual partners a year and up to 1000 over a lifetime. Are you misinformed or outright lying when you say homosexuals "don't really have sex anymore"?

I am speaking of younger gays. You could say it's a little early to posit anything about them (Zoomers) yet, but I am of the conviction that the more asexual habits of this generation are transferred over to them as well. Notice that I said "not to the extent that earlier predecessors did".

Naturally, I am excluding browns from the equation since ANAG and they are not of any cultural significance — they would practicing sodomy no matter what historical age. I do not doubt the recent statistics you speak of, but consider that older gays and browns have far different habits than the younger ones. Do you think a homosexual Zoomer would really want to be in a literal bathhouse? The older homosexual certainly would, there's no doubt about that. The grooming that occurs now is far more subtle, as some have said in this thread.

[Guest]

I understand your position better, but I still disagree. A key feature of zoomers is that they are extremely oversocialized, and homosexuals have always been oversocialized relative to heterosexual men. Thus, gay zoomers are possibly the most oversocialized males to have ever existed. This means they effectively have no capacity (or desire) to reject advances by older or more savage gays. The "asexuality" of zoomers really applies only to heterosexual (usually white) boys. (Browncels exist, but that's another story) Hypergamy and things like the 80/20 rule still apply to zoomer girls. Even if I'm wrong about that, and teens in general are still more hesitant about sex than adults, gay zoomers fall into the same hedonistic spiral (The Bathhouse) that every generation of gays fall into once they get their cherries popped. While anecdotes mean nothing in the face of statistics, I have encountered gay zoomers who freely spill the details of their sex lives, one even stating that he was attending orgies roughly every two weeks.

[august]

A reliable source in America made me aware a bit back of the confirmed present existence of underground gay orgy "parties" at one very notable uni in New England. Not a flimsy deduction to make then that this network subsequently spreads to multiple cities across the US after those bright college years.

[GraphWalkWithMe]

Kind of a side question, but how much did "Bathhouse addiction" phenomena owe to an easily-attained quantity of drugs (meth and cocaine being the prime carrots), + the potential acceptance into an underground society/regime-ordained "outcast" group? I can't imagine the mere enjoyance of getting cornholed by a dozen strange men every week would suffice for that kind of thing. All three factors played a role, but without the first two I don't see how the last could sufficiently provide the fuel for the Bathhouse-engine. This is worth thinking about, nohomo.

In any case Grindr, etc. have definitely replaced the role of the Bathhouse at this point. This might explain some of the flattened rate of "AIDS" mortality. Instead of injecting used needles of cocaine into yourself every 20 minutes before getting fucked in the ass by multiple different strangers, the modern faggot probably takes a psych-prescribed Adderall pill before he gets fucked in the ass by a single stranger. He still gets to be a member of a gov-preferred group but with a lessened risk of dying from ass sex. Even the faggots are gayer now.

[JohnTrent]

Since this has generated some discussion, I will make the thread for it. Despite personal reservations, I will stick to the Guest's theory as best as I can. Further posts can discuss The Bathhouse alone or similar questions involved.

[Guest]

I think there's something intrinsic to the nature of homosexuality that leads to addictions. Whenever I encountered a gay zoomer, he was almost always a stoner with slow, slurred speech. Despite what the media claims, everyone who has known a stoner can attest that weed really is a gateway drug, so it's only a matter of time before they move on to things like fentanyl, crack, or meth. (Seriously, look at tumblr posts from 2015-2017 and notice how many gays admit to being crack or meth addicts)

[Guest]

I don't know know where to ask this so I'll ask here, is there a full history of the origin of Amarna somewhere? I swear I vaguely remember there being some text doc on Amarna history
I'm fascinated by how a forum even comes into existence in the post twitter era (obviously I wasn't here when Amarna was created, I was about a year too late, sorry for being a newfag)

[Chud]

I don't know know where to ask this so I'll ask here, is there a full history of the origin of Amarna somewhere? I swear I vaguely remember there being some text doc on Amarna history
I'm fascinated by how a forum even comes into existence in the post twitter era (obviously I wasn't here when Amarna was created, I was about a year too late, sorry for being a newfag)

A few of our Enemies have inquired into this for sketchy reasons, but I see no harm in setting the record straight.

Amarna I was founded by Sphag (@ Vitilitagation) to provide an ad-hoc publishing / discussion platform for Anthony's long-form writings. The seed population was selected from his friends and Twitter mutuals. Amarna I grew slowly through word-of-mouth, especially on Twitter, where Sphag and a couple of his friends (Rabbit, Smeed, DSG, Mikka, et al.) were formulating a more jovial and acerbic kind of right-wing rhetoric which has since attained near-hegemony among the Canny. DSG and Mikka were especially vital promoters: the former led me to it; the latter had independently articulated the need for a forum, and promoted Sphag's new venue after finding it apropos.

I started this incarnation a couple days after the first's untimely suicide-by-janny, in response to an open request from Sphag:

Oldmarna was glorious in its heyday and I regret not having saved more of it. I'd participated lightly there as an incredulous failtroll without knowing any of the personalities nor the mindset behind the posts; but I was fascinated by what I couldn't comprehend, and wanted to stoke that fire a little longer, if possible - a task at which I have failed spectacularly. Much of the first forum's userbase dissipated into the aether; they (understandably) didn't trust me since they didn't know me, nor did they like my amateurish attempts to revive the discourse (also understandable; I don't like anything I've posted here either). Thus began the long-standing schism between the Twitter and Forum 'Marnites, and the ongoing comical misuse of the term.*

* Digression: the term "Amarnite" was coined by cats on Amarna I, where it was used remarkably little. That set was not amenable to demonyms. It was adopted en-masse by Twitter users who hadn't used either incarnation after they were derisively tarred with it by Mikka and Carlsbad (who'd both posted on the first forum). Its orthogonal relation to this website is something of a running joke on both sides of the divide.

[Guest]

Like the /Vergangenheit/ Interesting characters of history thread, a thread in /Culture / Society/ or /wired anthropology/ but for apparently unclustered individuals.

There are a few critical parameters to the human specimen that determine potential for eminence and freethinking. Self-reflective capacity, intelligence, habitual range of agency, an incorruptible core essence and above all a desire for -even insecurity regarding- one's influence on the world. At magnitude, the former four all clearly lend themselves to declustering even absent synergies; the latter as well- once provided the former for synergy. I'm not sure how to find people like this yet.

The energy that emanates off the superclusters escape post in the archives is magnificent.

Alternatively, each post in a thread could be a survey of the most lucid/intelligent/daring/freethinking characters from well known people-clusters. When we analyze clusters and mentality pipelines we (rightfully) dehumanize their composition, but the bulk of the lost accuracy from this abstraction can be retained thanks to the original application of the pareto principle. Why bother studying a sample of LessWrong-ers or SCP writers when you could abuse indicators of competence (e.g. people liking their posts) and controversy (e.g. people talking about their posts) as proxies for intelligence and ensoulment to rank them first?

My inspiration atm is finding some old 9/11 era anti-war leftist/libertarian cypherpunk blogs and discovering some of their endorsed more-normie blogs are still around and have even become popular. Unfortunately the bloggers seem dull, but if they were smart and free thinking and competent enough to blog prolifically- wouldn't that be a sight, especially if you disagree with them?

[GraphWalkWithMe]

Gen X seems to be the first proximate Western generation that largely found themselves with "nothing to grow into", as Whites hurtling into middle-age as "grown children"... an analogous phenomenon occurred in Japan maybe a few years prior. This is something that's only ever expanding under present circumstances, with personality development seeming to be increasingly stunted at earlier and earlier ages, across both sexes. Everyone regardless of individual perspective seems to collectively recognize and bemoan this, but as far as I can tell there's a marked absence of diagnoses RE: the causes of this. It seems to stem from a combination of deliberate culture-detonation + technological development/the advent of mass media, but a finer grain of scope is in order to read it in full.

@PIGSAW interested in your insight here. Why did the age of the White Kidult seem to begin in earnest with Gen X?

[Guest]

A discussion on the Kiwi Farms and how it represents almost everything awful about normalfag/'safe edgy' culture.

[PIGSAW]

Gen X seems to be the first proximate Western generation that largely found themselves with "nothing to grow into", as Whites hurtling into middle-age as "grown children"... an analogous phenomenon occurred in Japan maybe a few years prior. This is something that's only ever expanding under present circumstances, with personality development seeming to be increasingly stunted at earlier and earlier ages, across both sexes. Everyone regardless of individual perspective seems to collectively recognize and bemoan this, but as far as I can tell there's a marked absence of diagnoses RE: the causes of this. It seems to stem from a combination of deliberate culture-detonation + technological development/the advent of mass media, but a finer grain of scope is in order to read it in full.

@PIGSAW interested in your insight here. Why did the age of the White Kidult seem to begin in earnest with Gen X?

You answered your own question with the first line. Boomers were the last generation to have real opportunity, which is why for all their faults and how grotesque 99% of them are— we see a tremendous amount of realized greatness from them:



Not that there were no Gen X superstars, those were the ones I grew up with— and there were plenty of them. They had significantly more than Gen Y and Z will ever have, which is why Skallas refers to "Stuck" as us being trapped in the '00s— this is true to an extent (only to the extent that the worst elements of the '00s are still dead-alive), because Gen X had more opportunities. You could become rich and famous as a 'racist' provocateur or similar, y'know, as a rockstar— in the same way Boomers were able to, the seats were just shrinking. 

Gen X became "kidults" because they were all manually reset in 2008 under Obama and didn't know what to do afterwards, so they gradually kept going backwards, as far away from their "bad selves" in the '90s - '00s as possible (Troll's Remorse).
I don't know if this was intentional or not, but "the first black president" meant that if they were 'Raging Against the Machine' as they had been doing, they were the "biggest racists on earth" in their minds. Total moral death for them. Millennials, being possibly the most cowardly generation that has ever existed, were happy to follow Gen X in lockstep and throw themselves off a cliff with them and relinquish their future-control seat of culture as an offering for their sins of having fun online (saying the n-word).
As such, Millennials do not really "run" culture now (this is not to excuse them, they should be punished FOR this reason specifically), and largely why society is so fucked up. The people "running" shit is a kind of hodgepodge of Boomers that won't die, Gen X'rs that won't quit (being faggots), and the Millennial faggotstrivers that did take the throne, who only did so to POZ as much for Zoomers as possible, with the only Zoomers being let in functionally being tranny mulattos.

Unfortunately, the current trajectory is that people will become demoralized at younger and younger ages, as everything in life revolves around weaponizing mass depression.
TRUMP was an agent against this, and everything we watched and are still watching happen to him is for the purpose of darkening him as a sun that was burning away ZOG's haze.
Let no one tell lies about his "policies"— that doesn't matter and never did. TRUMP is an egregore; he became the hammer to strike ZOG with. Why was he chosen? That's anyone's guess. But he is the most famous person on earth now, through all of this he was even able to beat Michael Jackson and suffer worse than he did at the hands of the public and government as the price.

If there is anyone on earth who has the circumstances to become the next Hitler, it's him:

[Guest]

A thread on the Counterculture of the 1960-1970s. 
(In the proceeding thread all references to counterculture will be to the 1960-1970s interval)

Not only is the Counterculture an interesting phenomenon in itself but it also holds genealogical significance if one believes that the tide of culture, from that time, have lead to the current culture we(Americans and other Anglosphere) have today. But what specific significance am I referring to?—the revolt against standards; this event was undoubtably one of the most unique and significant in history.

 There is no want for slave revolt narratives(which libtards love masterbaiting to) in the annuals of history, yet there was never a time in where a mass revolt against higher culture was perpetrated by the children of that higher culture. Typical slave revolt narratives show the unwashed slaves rising up against the clean and well manner masters. The culture of the master is alien to them, and this is why they can so easily dispose of it; the only significance it has to them is it’s relation to the master. But what if they had gotten a taste for the fruits of civilization, would they have been so eager to see it all burn? Of course not. Yet we see in the counterculture this exact inclination. Thus we can understand its essence.

To demonstrate my point compare the hippie to his middle class father. The father has clean-cut gelled hair, sharply dressed, good manners, good hygiene, ect. Now let’s look at the hippie.
Messy hair, poor clothes, unhygienic, vulgar, and a druggie. 

Now my example may be abstract but it nevertheless gets to the point: the counter culture was a revolt against standards; a revolt against— manners, hygiene, hard work, discipline, and healthy social structures. If I were to name off these attributes to you without any context a picture of modern America would present itself in your mind. Fat pajama wearing Mexicans on their way to Walmart to buy more ZOGslop.

Now to clear some misconceptions: the counterculture was neither a revolt of youth(vitality) nor a revolt against conformity. Starting with the latter point I will, unfortunately, draw from American tv tropes. One trope is of the conservative character having a refined unique hobby, on the lower end with things like stamp collecting, to the higher end with ships built in bottles.

This makes sense, only an austere person would have such refined and meticulous hobbies. Now why have I gone on a tangent about ships in bottles? To demonstrate that the culture from which the counterculture revolted was not as conformist as it seemed. Under the veil of uniform suburbia awaited a significant number of assiduous hobbyists. From Ham radios to crafting all sorts of neat doohickies, they were anything but conformist. A paralelle to make is the modern Japanese; uniform business suits parading through subway stations on their way home to some niche hobby.
 
Now to address the point on youth: the counterculture was not an outbreak of creative vital youth culture. The current left wants you to think that they are the youthful punk rock fans revolting against their conservative conformists parents—which is false in that they are just as, if not more, dogmatic, conformist, and (some how) older(less vital) then their parents. Can the same be said about the counterculture? The drugs of the counterculture were marijuana and LSD. They took these to relax and have a “trippy” experience. Now for any of you whom have ever been around potheads, do they seem real energized to you? No, they kind of look half dead. They act stupid and not responsive. Does this look vital and youthful to you?
Well it’s not. Certain drugs could could be argued to be youthful, but marry wanna and acid are not those drugs. Look up at this picture, do you feel a youthful vibe? Kinda reminds you of 30yo bearded soyllenials, doesn’t it?

In conclusion, the counterculture was a revolt against standards by the children of a higher culture and that won, standards are no more. (Now would an amarnite please make this a thread?)

[Guest]

A thread on Climate Change.

I know about the Medieval Warm Period and the African Humid Period. I understand that earths climate had a capricious nature to it that leads to drastic and devestating effects on local ecosystems resulting in mass extinction effects. I also know about man made environmental disasters like the Dust Bowl. Humans obviously have the power to impact earths ecosystems in extreme ways. 

But is this the case with claims about climate change today(I have not seen any proof to show that the climate has changed at all beyond normal fluctuations)? And if we accept that there is some climate change: is it totally man made or are we trying to stop some naturally preforming process? Now, I would not be so skeptical of the validity of climate change claims today if not for the weird actions and measures to mitigate climate change that are pushed by the hysteric media consumed cattle. Carbon taxes are one of them that I find ridiculous(especially because they only effect first world nations(Great Reset)). And I’m not the only one who sees these measures as crazy or harmful; recently there was a backlash to these extreme measures called the Dutch Farmers’ protests. Obviously, many of these measures are taken without considering the effects they will have on local populations— no doubt proof of the hysterical impetuous brainwashed state of legislators whom pass these actions.

So I propose a thread to talk on this topic. Is it all a ploy by the globalist like the videos on bitchute claim?

[Guest]

@carcinoEugenicist are you going to create the homestuck thread? If you are still here.
I don't know much about it, but I am curious about your thoughts.

[T. L.]

1. Holocuast and generalplanost: what is true and what is a kike fanfiction?
   
2. Anthem community and its norwooding. In the mid 2010s there used to be a very big community of people dedicated to uploading, translating and creating video clips of old nationalistic and patriotic music from various countries. Most notorious creators were, among others, Kocayine, Fascistball and Derovolk. All of them were nuked from youtube, but their legacy still lives on. Fascistball's videos have been reuploaded and have millions of views, and there are dozens of channels that copycat his visual style. Derovolk has not reuploaded all of his videos (fortunately they are preserved on archive.org), but he has inspired many other creators. Kocayine was in part responsible for the popularization of the remove kebab meme (which has been influential on the internet not just because it was edgy, but because it was a way of saying that the Serbs were the right side in the yugoslav wars). Those people were, even if not consciously, responsible for spreading right-wing sentiment on the internet.
   
   I recall that there were many other similar youtube channels (e.g. united states of fascism, elvis sinatra, proudest swede) that were not as popular and have been lost due to the big tech censorship. Even though I have progressed past the kind of thought that they were popularizing (it's either primitive wignatism or being a tradcath), I am nostalgic for them. Today the only channel that is allowed to create music videos for patriotic songs is Ingen and he is a retarded norwoodist that virtue signals GNC every time he has an opportunity to do it (e.g. during nigger riots of 2020, or at the beginning of russian invasion of ukraine).
   

[Guest]

I've been thinking about a potential thread about actually good contemporary art. The traditional art scene has been obviously rather disappointing as of late, and it might seem like art is dead, but I believe art can be found where people express themselves, and there is a lot of very beautiful contemporary art that is essentially overlooked by the retarded tradsphere and their inane definition of art as only possible on the mediums people used in the 19th century. Would make it, but obviously I'm a guest and I don't believe guests can make threads.