BAP essay -
The Populist Movement Never Happened
I agree with the overall thrust of the essay that economic populism probably isn't a sufficient solution and can be corrupted by non-White interests. However, BAP presents a false dichotomy between populism and libertarianism and overlooks the latter's glaring flaws. I don't think BAP is being genuine here. In fact, he is being quite subversive. My suspicion is that this (along with his general Nietzschean sentiments) stem from a lack of sympathy for the average White American, which is ultimately downstream from his rootless elite Jewish heritage.
Quote:I suspect that, although when out of power such parties insinuate that migrants are being let in for “cheap labor” as a conspiracy by Capital or devious capitalists who plan to build an orbital station like in Elysium movie; and so they promise — maybe genuinely — the lower middle and middle classes that they will stop this migration and improve the labor market, wages, and their economic condition. But then once in power, left-populist parties discover that the migrants were never being brought in by capitalists for Machiavellian reasons; that at most, the capitalists were being bought off, and not all the capitalists but only some industries, who were allowed to profit and who therefore complied… although it’s unclear their willingness to comply or not would have been at all relevant. That the migrants were in fact being brought in primarily as political clients and political tools for the left and by those who opposed “the rich” — a shifting definition that often comes to include much of the middle class as well.
It's important to recognize that some migration is indeed caused by simple corruption and liberals importing voters, but it's also evident that both factors are driving migration. I don't see how tech companies importing people on H-1B visas is driven by anything other than the booming tech sector. And this
is "hypercapitalism", isn't it? People leaving their homelands for the US so they can send money back to their families is farcical and could only be justified by our comparatively extreme wealth. Note that libertarianism does not provide a solution to
either problem.
Quote:The left is right that libertarianism in Argentina would be “de facto white supremacy.” In fact they’re right about it in the United States too, except that the “dissident right” brain trust has convinced itself that the white “working class,” who are already highly taxed at the local level, would profit not from an elimination of racial legal handicaps against them and their children, as well as a lowering of their taxes—that would be Neoliberalism! Libertarianism!—but through “conservative populist socialism,” that is, taking more taxes from them and then funneling it back in the forms of “credits” or “services” after being filtered and laundered through the hands of various government employees.
Libertarianism entails elimination of
all racial legal handicaps, not just those against us. Obviously right now we have the opposite case of policies that are designed specifically to hurt the White working class, but let's be realistic and drop the survival of the fittest LARP, we do need the protection of sensible and positively pro-White government policies. Competing solely on merit without protectionism in a global economy when the White race represents less than 10% of the world population is not realistic, companies are obviously going to continue sponsoring the visas of laborers and graduates of foreign universities in competition with the native population.
BAP seems to ignore that libertarians explicitly and vocally promote mass migration. Is there also another counterintuitive effect where if you elect a libertarian after they say they will import foreign workers "to help the economy", they end up deporting them instead? I can't see how libertarianism would benefit us at all. It would not be "de facto white supremacy".
Quote:And all wrecked by “economic populism” that results in crushing taxation, regulations in the name of social justice that destroy all enterprise, and ultimately really the enslavement of the good, intelligent, and talented part of the population in the service of providing goods to the dumb, dusky stupid many so that these many may vote for petty politicians invoking selfrighteous “union” language.
Is advocating for the White race "selfrighteous union language" too? "The dumb, dusky stupid many" may not be Alamariu's kin, but they are ours. Economic populism does not require high taxation or quasi-socialist policies, in fact it could look similar to libertarianism except we don't welcome foreign workers, free trade, and foreign investment with open arms.
If anything, I would attribute the failures of Argentina's economic populist movement to the fact that Argentinians are
fucking retarded with an average IQ of 86. It's expected that every South American political project is hopelessly corrupt by default, whether leftist or rightist. Populist movements are perhaps more sensitive to a nation's intelligence because they directly appeal to the population.
We could simply do economic populism but elect White people as public officials and have them not accept bribes and it might halt the decline. There are better solutions entirely, but no form of libertarianism is among them.