"How are we supposed to cultivate a Nietzschean aristocracy if buff gay men are razing cities?"
Oh no...
Ancient men conquered by sword and flame.
You drink with "gf" in wine bar.
YOU ARE GAY
Still sufficient and total in its assault.
(10-31-2023, 02:15 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]snip
Should probably stay over on cozy tv then. Seems to be more your speed.
(10-31-2023, 09:04 AM)august Wrote: [ -> ] (10-31-2023, 02:15 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]snip
Should probably stay over on cozy tv then. Seems to be more your speed.
Not an argument (you’re right though).
Clearly seems like a Nicker/woodser/turd positionist.
(10-31-2023, 09:04 AM)august Wrote: [ -> ] (10-31-2023, 02:15 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]snip
Should probably stay over on cozy tv then. Seems to be more your speed.
Is the idea of forming one's own opinions really so foreign that you cannot understand another's viewpoint without relying on classifying the speaker into some group? I have no connection to any of these communities or grifters and harbor even less respect for most of them than I do BAP. Billy is visibly low IQ but I'm disappointed in you.
You remind me of normies who are highly disrespectful of notable people. “I think Nick Fuentes is an anti-Semitic idiot” -guy clearly influenced by Ben Shapiro types. “I don’t agree with everything Alex Jones says, but he was right about the chemicals and the frogs”. “I don’t agree with everything Jordan Peterson says, but blah blah blah.” It just shows you are too cowardly to be loyal or respectful to another man, in an infuriatingly smug way, as if you, random dumb guy, are so much smarter more nuanced these charismatic, wealthy, and varyingly intelligent figures and that you have absolute certainty that all of your whims and half baked opinions are absolutely correct.
I would still find you an ignoble character if you were a loud and proud Nicker, but at least I could respect your loyalty and humility. I have my disagreements with Nick (which I have been VERY SPECIFIC about), but I’ve always maintained that he is a highly intelligent, charismatic, and well-meaning sensitive young man.
(10-31-2023, 02:15 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]...
I am reminded of how leftist circles like to use the phrase "direct action". When arguing with each other, one comes out from the shadows and states that everything currently being discussed is irrelevant or meaningless; the times demand a fiercer approach, whether against the State or against "fascists". When another person enters the conversation, they may ask the question "What constitutes direct action? What shall we do?". The person who suggested direct action remains silent on the question and continues to advocate for direct action.
Perhaps this is unfounded but I believe DR people online share more in common with the
Il Regno writers than they do efficient political operatives. If we still have some faith in Gregor's historical account of the early fascist movement in Italy, external developments such as WW1 and the miserable state of the nation had grown to affect the spirits of these writers, and the metamorphosis that occurred is similar to ours. An adhesion was made between multiple disaffected intellectuals, a chain of reactions which lead to a coherent worldview and polity. This was a matter of decades, not a matter of a few years.
It isn't simply that Trump had used charismatic levity and had strong, concrete proposals, it is that he was the only person of prominence who could enter the political machine with his proposals. The demands of White Americans were present already, but they could not summon or invoke a strong-willed politician who could voice such views. There are a limited set of characters who can stay afloat during primaries, most of which being those who have sacrificed decades of their life to government employment. There were multiple characteristics of Trump in 2016 that could not be replicated by anyone else at the time.
Quote:"If an inspiring personality who has the gift of leadership cannot be found for the organization and direction of a local group it is better for the movement to refrain from establishing such a group than to run the risk of failure after the group has been founded.
The will to be a leader is not a sufficient qualification for leadership. For the leader must have the other necessary qualities. Among these qualities willpower and energy must be considered as more serviceable than the intellect of a genius. The most valuable association of qualities is to be found in a combination of talent, determination and perseverance"
Premature wignat imitations of Trump will only dampen the potential for a future movement. I know this is a loaded example but you and I have already seen the Patrick Little's of this world attempt to take office. A total failure reflecting poorly on us.
Unless if you're a good enough university student to invite the (positive) attention of the FBI/CIA, or if you think you have the Right Stuff for Project 2025, then "getting into power" is an impossibility at the moment. We have already been following, unconsciously, the method of permeation: certain images and symbols are propagated far and wide, attracting disparate youth. It does not appear systematic but that is to be expected; we are not a part of a system or an organization yet. The way in which a political will can be truly actualized requires the efficient 21st century equivalent of pamphleteers, aesthetes, tastemakers who can refine the actions of future civil servants — they will be the unacknowledged legislators. You may question the intentions of BAP, that is fine, but figures of similar import are all but required. White Americans can agree with Trump's proposals but they are not engaged
enough for anything more extreme. To engage them is a requirement of DR Americans, and I can't see them achieving this without wedding themselves to the written word. Ezra Pound used to have "disciples" who, upon being inspired by Pound, would write political texts. You do not hear much of Eustace Mullins today but you can understand Pound's intent, which is best suited to our time.
I was planning on writing more but it would've likely ended up as a never-posted draft. I would've preferred to state this more eloquently.
(10-31-2023, 12:57 PM)BillyONare Wrote: [ -> ]You remind me of normies who are highly disrespectful of notable people. “I think Nick Fuentes is an anti-Semitic idiot” -guy clearly influenced by Ben Shapiro types. “I don’t agree with everything Alex Jones says, but he was right about the chemicals and the frogs”. “I don’t agree with everything Jordan Peterson says, but blah blah blah.” It just shows you are too cowardly to be loyal or respectful to another man, in an infuriatingly smug way, as if you, random dumb guy, are so much smarter more nuanced these charismatic, wealthy, and varyingly intelligent figures and that you have absolute certainty that all of your whims and half baked opinions are absolutely correct.
I would still find you an ignoble character if you were a loud and proud Nicker, but at least I could respect your loyalty and humility. I have my disagreements with Nick (which I have been VERY SPECIFIC about), but I’ve always maintained that he is a highly intelligent, charismatic, and well-meaning sensitive young man.
Normies are right when they consider all mainstream politicians of today to be self-interested hacks, and I don't see why online is fundamentally different. Most notable people become notable because they're charismatic and intelligent, but that doesn't mean I "gotta hand it to them" for being effective deceivers and parasites. In creating so-called thought leaders who don't perform any leadership function, online political movements select for ruthless social climbers (which is probably why Jews thrive in the online right). In this environment, rising to the top as an altruist who primarily wants to improve the world is prohibitively challenging. It's not about being correct because the ultimate goal of grifters isn't being correct, it's money and/or status. They often are correct anyway since the truth is powerful, but they don't deserve trust or respect. Also note that idiots (unless Christian) are usually dishonest by default since they're too stupid to find perspective on their own self-interest.
The only popular figures I've respected and considered to be on my side are Richard Spencer before he became a fed (although obviously he made bad decisions) and Nightmare Vision. Fuentes is intelligent and charismatic, but he's not well-meaning, a clear narcissist.
The silly martyr delusion is the same thing that dampened what Trump could have been. "I must save them" In his case, it extended to the whole world.
There is nothing to save, if a man will not stand on his own then he is already dead.
This is the nature of the times. The fact that Americans, of all people, have some who are clinging to some vague racial, religious, cultural "solidarity" at this point is very funny. It goes along with that other fundamental misunderstanding. Biology was twisted long ago, and now some hold up the early twisted abomination as the "truth." It can be farther from the truth, but it is still not the truth.
The core of NEET-zsche is very plain on this. When all those other things die, there is no longer anything to save. Large collectives of men are a historical aberration. This is what piracy means as well. You will not understand, because you cannot understand. You, who feels "mercy" and "pity" for the broken. Who wants to do "good things." This is simply a divergence, amusingly, on the subject of divergence itself.
The height of things culminates in empires, expansion. But each height began in the same way, with that merry band of men. Starting from the current position, deluding yourself of some stasis followed by regrowth and re-expansion...it is silly. It will not happen, because there is no will for it to happen. The will for stasis is exactly the opposite of the will for expansion. Looking around, if you see things you wish to save, then you will never understand, and you will never be of that other type.
(10-31-2023, 01:18 PM)JohnTrent Wrote: [ -> ]I am reminded of how leftist circles like to use the phrase "direct action". When arguing with each other, one comes out from the shadows and states that everything currently being discussed is irrelevant or meaningless; the times demand a fiercer approach, whether against the State or against "fascists". When another person enters the conversation, they may ask the question "What constitutes direct action? What shall we do?". The person who suggested direct action remains silent on the question and continues to advocate for direct action.
Perhaps this is unfounded but I believe DR people online share more in common with the Il Regno writers than they do efficient political operatives. If we still have some faith in Gregor's historical account of the early fascist movement in Italy, external developments such as WW1 and the miserable state of the nation had grown to affect the spirits of these writers, and the metamorphosis that occurred is similar to ours. An adhesion was made between multiple disaffected intellectuals, a chain of reactions which lead to a coherent worldview and polity. This was a matter of decades, not a matter of a few years.
It isn't simply that Trump had used charismatic levity and had strong, concrete proposals, it is that he was the only person of prominence who could enter the political machine with his proposals. The demands of White Americans were present already, but they could not summon or invoke a strong-willed politician who could voice such views. There are a limited set of characters who can stay afloat during primaries, most of which being those who have sacrificed decades of their life to government employment. There were multiple characteristics of Trump in 2016 that could not be replicated by anyone else at the time.
Quote:"If an inspiring personality who has the gift of leadership cannot be found for the organization and direction of a local group it is better for the movement to refrain from establishing such a group than to run the risk of failure after the group has been founded.
The will to be a leader is not a sufficient qualification for leadership. For the leader must have the other necessary qualities. Among these qualities willpower and energy must be considered as more serviceable than the intellect of a genius. The most valuable association of qualities is to be found in a combination of talent, determination and perseverance"
Premature wignat imitations of Trump will only dampen the potential for a future movement. I know this is a loaded example but you and I have already seen the Patrick Little's of this world attempt to take office. A total failure reflecting poorly on us.
Unless if you're a good enough university student to invite the (positive) attention of the FBI/CIA, or if you think you have the Right Stuff for Project 2025, then "getting into power" is an impossibility at the moment. We have already been following, unconsciously, the method of permeation: certain images and symbols are propagated far and wide, attracting disparate youth. It does not appear systematic but that is to be expected; we are not a part of a system or an organization yet. The way in which a political will can be truly actualized requires the efficient 21st century equivalent of pamphleteers, aesthetes, tastemakers who can refine the actions of future civil servants — they will be the unacknowledged legislators. You may question the intentions of BAP, that is fine, but figures of similar import are all but required. White Americans can agree with Trump's proposals but they are not engaged enough for anything more extreme. To engage them is a requirement of DR Americans, and I can't see them achieving this without wedding themselves to the written word. Ezra Pound used to have "disciples" who, upon being inspired by Pound, would write political texts. You do not hear much of Eustace Mullins today but you can understand Pound's intent, which is best suited to our time.
I was planning on writing more but it would've likely ended up as a never-posted draft. I would've preferred to state this more eloquently.
For context, what I meant by the "direct action" BAPists might have otherwise taken against the conservative establishment was along the lines of Fuentes minions mocking Charlie Kirk at public events.
I find this framing persuasive. I had always considered Trump to be an example of the success of populism, but I suppose he was relying on his existing public image and wealth as influence to substitute for an lack of institutional backing. I wonder if populist movements in Europe or South America are similar or if they have institutional support, I don't know enough to say. I don't think BAP is trying to achieve political goals as I've said, but I can see now that aesthetics and symbolism are more important than concrete goals in situations like this, where any IRL dissident coordination is swiftly aborted by ZOG before it can take its first breath.
A few things strike me as unfortunate about this:
- People have an evolutionary preference for their political aesthetics to feature celebrity leaders, when the movement could be more decentralized at this stage with the advantage of limiting grifter subversion.
- People enjoy being sold populist fantasies such as useless and counterproductive rallies, for similar evolutionary reasons (in the past such a rally could have directly led to productive violence).
- It's easy for a subverter to pretend to support an aesthetic fashion using irony or rhetorical evasion, compared to opposing orders once the movement is actualized which is blatant and easily detected sedition.
- It can be difficult to predict what a elite aesthete (even if they are honest) will really do once they achieve power, since the game up until this point has been avoiding concrete policy.
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]BAP's views are largely unserious and contradictory. He is sincere insofar as he sincerely thinks pirates look cool, but this is an intellectual fashion, not a serious political vision.
Yet the Amarna Forum owes its complete victory over Christian Conservatism™️ to his ideas and writings. You can't hold this view if you've actually read them. I have already stated that his X posts don't matter, not that there's anything wrong with the one which you insist on making such a fuss over. I'm not even sure what point you're trying to get across with the second sentence. BAP is sincere to a fault.
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]The reality of piracy isn't actually cool and is anti-civilizational. According to BAP populism is third-worldist but barbarian looting is honorable.
Pirates are cool to those with young and adventurous spirits. Civilization is a biological phenomenon, the heights of which were built upon a culture that sent its noble boys out on their own to rape, pillage, and kill their racial enemies. In other words, pirates. No, this is not the same as a retarded pavement ape randomly choosing to stab a White kid in an alley.
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]How are we supposed to cultivate a Nietzschean aristocracy if buff gay men are razing cities?
What, exactly, do you believe is contradictory between Nietzsche and the act of razing cities?
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]He's not cucking because he's always been chiefly concerned with appearances over reality, specifically the novel and creative synthesis of aesthetics he created that makes people think he's cool. But nudism, bodybuilding, and barbarianism do not solve the problems facing a White kindred BAP does not possess as a rootless international bisexual Jew.
Quite the zinger. Maybe it'd stick if you had something to propose in competition to nudist barbarian bodybuilding besides the shambling, humiliated corpse of Christian nationalism. So spiritually dead and humiliated that its proponents have to come to the Amarna Forum to have an intellectually stimulating discussion, despite hating everything the forum stands for. Societies based around the male, his martial prowess, his intellect, his virility, his grounding in tradition and nature, look like Greece and Rome. Societies based around whatever nonsense you're peddling allied themselves with provincialists and communists to try and stop the rise of Hitler in 1920s Germany.
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]His understanding of Hitler doesn't matter when he has no skin in the game
There are few people with as much skin in the game as BAP. Despite the Fuentesite aspersions you've cast against him, he is a stalwart enemy of Judeo-Christianity and is treated by his "ethnic brothers" as such. Not even a week ago, Israelis were kvetching en masse in his replies over his statements on the wholly justified treatment of Jewish revolutionaries in the Third Reich.
Of course, as an intelligent and well-informed individual, he also understands that Jewish primacy is long gone in America, replaced by the primacy of negroes and their proximates since at least the '70s. The fact that organizations like the ADL are so anemic about getting
brown people fired over their support for the barbaric, ethnocidal terrorist group Hamas, if anything having to play second fiddle to negro interest groups like BLM, is proof enough of that. Thus, he wages war on the bigger threat to Aryan civilization more regularly.
(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]...and his main priority is romantically pursuing 30 year old leftist podcasters.
Kino, just like my hero H.P. Lovecraft.
I've actually read BAM, I was genuinely unimpressed. I do grasp the appeal, but found the book a meandering set of exclamations and travelogue anecdotes. There are maybe four passages I half remember.
My only guess as to why the book is so popular is either intellectual standards have really dropped, or young men are just that demoralized and frustrated.
There are aspects of BAP I find distasteful, from his anti religiosity, to that incident with prostitutes on Christmas Eve, to the homoeroticism. Also the retarded baby voice.
In practice, the lifestyle BAP preaches is Andrew Tate with a college degree. Get jacked, fuck whores and don't wagecuck.
BAPists idealize gangsters, pirates and warlords yet no one here has tried to overthrow the government, Christian and Qanonist boomers actually did. His insistence not to coordinate in RL is also stupid, and makes me suspect he doesn't want an actual political movement, just an online scene or lifestyle. Whereas many of the WNs Amarnites trash like Keith Woods actually do real world work to counter mass migration.
Did they have keyboards in the Bronze Age?
But ultimately a movement is judged by its fruits, and in thirty years I seriously doubt anyone in this sphere will have:
Sacked a city
Invaded a country
toppled a sclerotic government
Engaged in real™ bronze age warfare.
If I'm wrong I'll eat crow. But I doubt it.
What I understood from this thread is that cats is a nigger
(11-01-2023, 10:10 AM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]I've actually read BAM, I was genuinely unimpressed. I do grasp the appeal, but found the book a meandering set of exclamations and travelogue anecdotes. There are maybe four passages I half remember.
My only guess as to why the book is so popular is either intellectual standards have really dropped, or young men are just that demoralized and frustrated.
There are aspects of BAP I find distasteful, from his anti religiosity, to that incident with prostitutes on Christmas Eve, to the homoeroticism. Also the retarded baby voice.
In practice, the lifestyle BAP preaches is Andrew Tate with a college degree. Get jacked, fuck whores and don't wagecuck.
BAPists idealize gangsters, pirates and warlords yet no one here has tried to overthrow the government, Christian and Qanonist boomers actually did. His insistence not to coordinate in RL is also stupid, and makes me suspect he doesn't want an actual political movement, just an online scene or lifestyle. Whereas many of the WNs Amarnites trash like Keith Woods actually do real world work to counter mass migration.
Did they have keyboards in the Bronze Age?
But ultimately a movement is judged by its fruits, and in thirty years I seriously doubt anyone in this sphere will have:
Sacked a city
Invaded a country
toppled a sclerotic government
Engaged in real™ bronze age warfare.
If I'm wrong I'll eat crow. But I doubt it.
You read this book the same way you read Nietzsche’s book, meaning that you didn’t. Every one here know you can’t read and don’t read books, stop pretending that you do. Also would you mind not using the most threadbare insults? It reveals that all your information comes second hand.
For the record Christians and Qanonboomers did not almost topple a government. The only people who believe this are leftists. If someone were to evaluate your posts and examine the initial assumptions you have they would be sure to find that you are actually pretty left of the political spectrum. The assumptions that predicate one’s thought process are called a worldview and your worldview is an assortment of generic ZOGbox truisms.
"Uh you just didn't understand it"
So tiresome. Yet somehow like clockwork.
(11-01-2023, 01:38 PM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]"Uh you just didn't understand it"
So tiresome. Yet somehow like clockwork.
Actually I said you didn’t read it. Not that you understand what I wrote because you can’t read.
(11-01-2023, 01:43 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ] (11-01-2023, 01:38 PM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]"Uh you just didn't understand it"
So tiresome. Yet somehow like clockwork.
Actually I said you didn’t read it. Not that you understand what I wrote because you can’t read.
You forgot a comma after your "actually". Also, it's inappropriate to use "not" to start a sentence.
(11-01-2023, 01:56 PM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ] (11-01-2023, 01:43 PM)Guest Wrote: [ -> ] (11-01-2023, 01:38 PM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]"Uh you just didn't understand it"
So tiresome. Yet somehow like clockwork.
Actually I said you didn’t read it. Not that you understand what I wrote because you can’t read.
You forgot a comma after your "actually". Also, it's inappropriate to use "not" to start a sentence.
Wow I’m impressed by your diversion from the contents of you former posts. But your mind is weak. You don’t really think that by correcting my grammar(the not thing is non applicable) everyone will forget about your inability to read? What is done is done. Somethings can’t be forgotten like your blatant illiteracy that now from your own posts it can be attested that your posts come from a low iq and not lack of education. It’s seems you can understand grammar but the concepts that underlie language are beyond you. Very interesting.
Btw before you make another post to divert attention from your former posts. This nigger doesn’t read books and gets all his information from second hand sources.
(11-01-2023, 10:10 AM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]BAPists idealize gangsters, pirates and warlords yet no one here has tried to overthrow the government, Christian and Qanonist boomers actually did.
Who says that, CNN? As Christian QAnon boomers will tell you, the capitol protest was a peaceful guided tour that the media and FBI then blew up to justify putting Trump supporters in maximum security prison.
And, if you think Christian QAnon boomers are superior to us, why not go and spend your time with them? You will not be missed if you cease flitting around Amarnite circles like a desperate groupie.
(11-01-2023, 10:10 AM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]His insistence not to coordinate in RL is also stupid, and makes me suspect he doesn't want an actual political movement, just an online scene or lifestyle. Whereas many of the WNs Amarnites trash like Keith Woods actually do real world work to counter mass migration.
Some of us do not have the memory of a goldfish and remember what happened every time somebody tried to organize far right groups in real life - regime-approved violence against UTR protestors, mass doxxing of NJP, Patriot Front, and Identity Evropa members, the aforementioned subjection of pro-Trump protestors to kangaroo courts and unlawful detainment.
People who advocate for Real Organization™️ are stupid, crazy, malicious, or some combination of the three. It's called the Zionist Occupied Government, remember? MLK was operating with regime support. Action and protest is suicide without that support. Keith Woods has achieved nothing besides making himself unemployable and using his position in the right to moralfag about Arabs getting killed thousands of miles away. Some of these advocates for real organization are literal Washington spooks. Trump won because of anonymous posters on 4chan and Twitter. Anybody who opposes BAP on this should be expelled as a malicious subversive.
(11-01-2023, 10:10 AM)The Green Groyper Wrote: [ -> ]But ultimately a movement is judged by its fruits, and in thirty years I seriously doubt anyone in this sphere will have:
Sacked a city
Invaded a country
toppled a sclerotic government
Engaged in real™ bronze age warfare.
If I'm wrong I'll eat crow. But I doubt it.
More accurately, the crows will be eating you, after your execution for being a Bleppsomalian subversive who pretends to read books. That is, if an Antifoid doesn't brain you with a bike lock at one of your Real Protests that make Real Change™️ first (no arrests made by ZOG, of course).
As I said before, none of your criticisms stick when your alternative is the shambling corpse of Christian nationalism. Your kind have done nothing but nervously squawk about the rapid ruination of the West, even before World War II. I suppose you are capable of Real Action™️ — if you consider real action to be sitting in a church full of rotting, bloated old ladies to pray the gay away, or going to Guatemala on a church-sponsored trip to build houses for brown people (as a certain advocate for Christian nationalism on this forum did).
Ultimately, it will fall on faceless, homoerotic, nudist bodybuilders to order nuclear strikes against Africa and rampage through refugee camps full of brown families and their sewer spawn with belt-fed machineguns to save the West, while people like you kvetch about how amoralist it all is.
"Who says that, CNN? As Christian QAnon boomers will tell you, the capitol protest was a peaceful guided tour that the media and FBI then blew up to justify putting Trump supporters in maximum security prison.
And, if you think Christian QAnon boomers are superior to us, why not go and spend your time with them? You will not be missed if you cease flitting around Amarnite circles like a desperate groupie."
Its already being treated as an insurrection college poli sci textbooks. I don't see why the Right should not own it. Rather than claiming it was the FEDS or ANTIFA that made the Trump voters storm the capitol.
"Some of us do not have the memory of a goldfish and remember what happened every time somebody tried to organize far right groups in real life - regime-approved violence against UTR protestors, mass doxxing of NJP, Patriot Front, and Identity Evropa members, the aforementioned subjection of pro-Trump protestors to kangaroo courts and unlawful detainment."
Yet NJP and Patriot Front still organize and do real world work. You can say its ineffective or that they have compromised leadership, but who doesn't?
"People who advocate for Real Organization™️ are stupid, crazy, malicious, or some combination of the three. It's called the Zionist Occupied Government, remember? MLK was operating with regime support. Action and protest is suicide without that support. Keith Woods has achieved nothing besides making himself unemployable and using his position in the right to moralfag about Arabs getting killed thousands of miles away. Some of these advocates for real organization are literal Washington spooks. Trump won because of anonymous posters on 4chan and Twitter. Anybody who opposes BAP on this should be expelled as a malicious subversive."
"Trump won because of 4chan", I think he won because White voters felt dispossessed and wanted to kick out all the Mexicans.
"As I said before, none of your criticisms stick when your alternative is the shambling corpse of Christian nationalism. Your kind have done nothing but nervously squawk about the rapid ruination of the West, even before World War II. I suppose you are capable of Real Action™️ — if you consider real action to be sitting in a church full of rotting, bloated old ladies to pray the gay away, or going to Guatemala on a church-sponsored trip to build houses for brown people (as a certain advocate for Christian nationalism on this forum did)."
You're projecting a strawman. I believe actual organization, mannerbunds, koryos, etc... are necessary. If you want to overthrow ZOG or ravage Africa you will never do it alone. I fail to see how this is somehow controversial.
"Ultimately, it will fall on faceless, homoerotic, nudist bodybuilders to order nuclear strikes against Africa and rampage through refugee camps full of brown families and their sewer spawn with belt-fed machineguns to save the West, while people like you kvetch about how amoralist it all is."
I'll bet my life this will never happen. If in a generation it has, consider my life forfeit through this wager. But you and I both know it won't.