Amarna Forum

https://twitter.com/0dollars0cents/statu...1833150827

https://twitter.com/0dollars0cents/statu...7721892270

https://twitter.com/0dollars0cents/statu...0313914523

Everyone liking these posts cried in a shower for a day straight when they heard Hitler was big on pro-animal laws.

(10-05-2023, 02:46 PM)JohnTrent Wrote: [ -> ]"I don't think the essential takeaway of National Socialism is supposed to be animal laws..."

Never said they were, but to pretend they were never treated or enforced with severity is ignorant at best and outright delusional at worst. But thanks for the textbook deflection.

(10-05-2023, 04:19 PM)JohnTrent Wrote: [ -> ]I am a raging sped who can't get through a single conversation without putting words in others' mouths. 

Merely pointing something out does not equate to "we should have a day of mourning for a dead rodent". I'm not even that concerned with the rat itself, more so the simple fact that it comes across as encouraging violence for violence's sake, which is niggerbrained behavior. Also, vivisection laws being subject to change doesn't mean much when they were still enacted as a deliberate anti-Jewish measure, and even then I doubt they were changed that much.

(10-05-2023, 05:10 PM)JohnTrent Wrote: [ -> ]I am still a raging sped who can't get through a single conversation without putting words in others' mouths.

1. There's hardly any difference from which Lindy Observer posts are meant to be "serious" and which ones are meant to be "humorous". Even "humorously" there's nothing that sets them apart from the Amarnite's actual beliefs, that being the relinquishment of all morality. The only reason I posted it in two different threads at all was to see the reactions I'd get.

2. "It wasn't a freakin absolutino!!" No shit, they were in a war at the time and had to carefully divide their resources and what they wanted to put their attention towards.

3. "It becomes a mental exercise instead of anything serious, which is pointless" Then why the fuck did you reply to me in the first place? To prove that anyone who can button their shirt in the morning without help can be a right-winger?

geez chill guestchad the rat is going to be okay or whatever

To answer your question (I forgot to respond to it the last time, big fucking whoop), I do believe them to be animals for the same reasons most of you do. However, dealing with them is no different than dealing with pitbulls in that case.

https://twitter.com/SuillaLeo/status/171...2182564316
https://i.ibb.co/7GjrpVc/chrome-K9-AWUYNTby.png

These are not youthful and enterprising Nazis but rather people for whom "it's over" on a personal level, they're destined losers. Incidentally they're coalers as well. Making posts like this is the easiest thing in the world and the only goal is to disrupt the work of the actual stewards of the movement.

The only way MAGGOTS like this are afforded any breathing room is a political landscape which is too placid for high-quality individuals to have any interest in. This applies to people like Blepp as well.

You're talking about BAP, right?

BAP is explicitly subverting the movement unless you truly believe piracy is a more worthwhile ideal to rally behind than NS.

You seem like a Nicker/Keith Woodser shill. Clearly you have the communist brain worms and are immune to reasoning.

I'm sorry you don't like the version of me that you imagined in your head.

(10-27-2023, 10:14 PM)BillyONare Wrote: [ -> ]You seem like a Nicker/Keith Woodser shill. Clearly you have the communist brain worms and are immune to reasoning.

Not an argument.

(10-27-2023, 10:13 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]You're talking about BAP, right?

BAP is explicitly subverting the movement unless you truly believe piracy is a more worthwhile ideal to rally behind than NS.

I find wanton invoking of the Third Reich and Hitler that diminishes them into edgy jokes far more subversive than what BAP is doing. That quoteXost is stupid and impotent, just like Bleppsomali's "Hitler and violence". It indicates a lack of proper reverence and respect for the most important man, and his ideas, of the twentieth century.

In the end, it all gets diminished into an "edgy joke." This, however, might not be a bad thing by itself. Joke, joke, and then it's not

(10-29-2023, 01:00 PM)Svevlad Wrote: [ -> ]In the end, it all gets diminished into an "edgy joke." This, however, might not be a bad thing by itself. Joke, joke, and then it's not

What actually happens is that you joke and joke about Hitler and violence, and then, when you reveal it's not a joke and you actually believe in it, 90% of your compatriots turn on you because they are cowards who were only in it for the laughs. The other 10%, meanwhile, will be complete idiots whose idea of "Hitler and violence" is self-defeating, retarded nonsense built on received memes. "Hitler was a loli-loving libertarian Protestant.“ Only people who treat Hitler with the respect he deserves make it out unscathed.

(10-29-2023, 12:34 PM)cats Wrote: [ -> ]I find wanton invoking of the Third Reich and Hitler that diminishes them into edgy jokes far more subversive than what BAP is doing. That quoteXost is stupid and impotent, just like Bleppsomali's "Hitler and violence". It indicates a lack of proper reverence and respect for the most important man, and his ideas, of the twentieth century.

I interpreted the tweet not as a wanton edgy coalpost building off BAP's joke, but as an attack that attempts to shut the joke down.

A normie Jewish acquaintance of mine is fond of BAP and sometimes posts his own subversive political coal of a similar nature to the piracy flag tweet. As he is beginning his comedy routine to potentially set up for an aesthetic circlejerk, I feel the urge to indirectly point out that the political concepts he (as a Jew) considers to be amusing trivialities have actual significance to his audience. A crude, unfunny comment about something he would not joke about (e.g. TND) can be an effective reminder of this.

I see your argument and maybe using the swastika here was unwise and unintentionally subversive, but the tweet is not itself edgy humor. I also value seriousness about political concepts that matter, which is why BAP's aesthetic irony is offensive to me.

(10-29-2023, 02:04 PM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]I interpreted the tweet not as a wanton edgy coalpost building off BAP's joke, but as an attack that attempts to shut the joke down.

A normie Jewish acquaintance of mine is fond of BAP and sometimes posts his own subversive political coal of a similar nature to the piracy flag tweet. As he is beginning his comedy routine to potentially set up for an aesthetic circlejerk, I feel the urge to indirectly point out that the political concepts he (as a Jew) considers to be amusing trivialities have actual significance to his audience. A crude, unfunny comment about something he would not joke about (e.g. TND) can be an effective reminder of this.

I see your argument and maybe using the swastika here was unwise and unintentionally subversive, but the tweet is not itself edgy humor. I also value seriousness about political concepts that matter, which is why BAP's aesthetic irony is offensive to me.

I have no idea what you mean by "BAP's aesthetic irony". There is no joke here. BAP thinks pirates are cool, and that White pirates fighting under a Totenkopf flag would be cool. None of his statements are ironic. BAP is sincere to a fault.

That quoteXost was made out of malice and stupidity. There's nothing about the post or the man that made it that is in any way opposed to National Socialism. National Socialists themselves often invoked all manner of anti-social but non-partisan groups of White warriors — the Vikings and the Landsknechten, to name a few. What's he cucking on here? You can say it's tacky, I guess, but claiming this is somehow subversive is totally ridiculous. This person is participating in a Hitler cargo cult. He's as proximate to a National Socialist as the Arabs waving swastikas around to spite Israelis.

BAP understands Hitler better than anybody on this forum. His actual writing is proof enough. The fact that he is old and therefore generally uncritical about his likes, follows, and online presence really doesn't matter. Any other criticism of him eventually devolves into cuckservatism. Sorry, Submarnite overcorrectors.

(10-29-2023, 05:49 PM)cats Wrote: [ -> ]I have no idea what you mean by "BAP's aesthetic irony". There is no joke here. BAP thinks pirates are cool, and that White pirates fighting under a Totenkopf flag would be cool. None of his statements are ironic. BAP is sincere to a fault.

That quoteXost was made out of malice and stupidity. There's nothing about the post or the man that made it that is in any way opposed to National Socialism. National Socialists themselves often invoked all manner of anti-social but non-partisan groups of White warriors — the Vikings and the Landsknechten, to name a few. What's he cucking on here? You can say it's tacky, I guess, but claiming this is somehow subversive is totally ridiculous. This person is participating in a Hitler cargo cult. He's as proximate to a National Socialist as the Arabs waving swastikas around to spite Israelis.

BAP understands Hitler better than anybody on this forum. His actual writing is proof enough. The fact that he is old and therefore generally uncritical about his likes, follows, and online presence really doesn't matter. Any other criticism of him eventually devolves into cuckservatism. Sorry, Submarnite overcorrectors.

BAP's views are largely unserious and contradictory. He is sincere insofar as he sincerely thinks pirates look cool, but this is an intellectual fashion, not a serious political vision. He's aware that posting that flag is silly and admits he's drunk, he often presents these sentiments humorously. The reality of piracy isn't actually cool and is anti-civilizational. According to BAP populism is third-worldist but barbarian looting is honorable. How are we supposed to cultivate a Nietzschean aristocracy if buff gay men are razing cities?

He's not cucking because he's always been chiefly concerned with appearances over reality, specifically the novel and creative synthesis of aesthetics he created that makes people think he's cool. But nudism, bodybuilding, and barbarianism do not solve the problems facing a White kindred BAP does not possess as a rootless international bisexual Jew.

His understanding of Hitler doesn't matter when he has no skin in the game and his main priority is romantically pursuing 30 year old leftist podcasters.

I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about nor do you seem capable of thinking beyond the most simple levels of wigger nationalism.

(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]BAP's views are largely unserious and contradictory. He is sincere insofar as he sincerely thinks pirates look cool, but this is an intellectual fashion, not a serious political vision. He's aware that posting that flag is silly and admits he's drunk, he often presents these sentiments humorously. The reality of piracy isn't actually cool and is anti-civilizational. According to BAP populism is third-worldist but barbarian looting is honorable. How are we supposed to cultivate a Nietzschean aristocracy if buff gay men are razing cities?

It's called levity, the exact opposite of the Very Serious 'stuffed-shirt' / 'Excuse me, the Grown Ups are speaking now' conservatism, which has so far done nothing but sell out and viciously thwart any genuine attempts to reverse this frog boiling suicide that is, what we call, """Western civilisation""" of modern times. It's also unlike the incessant demoralising and constant doomerism that Keith Woods would have you believe is going to one day make the masses rise up against the Secret International Illuminati Machiavellian Criminal Masterminds headed by ... THE JEWS. Humor, laughter, having FUN... these things are Nietzschean, and that's what he is.

"Annihilate everything that exists" wouldn't be a catchphrase if society looked and functioned like late-1930s Berlin. Piracy being "anti-civilizational" is the point, because the civilisation you currently live in is a gynocratic, third-world infested shithole dictated by the screeches of 30-something latinks and punjabi women who hate all White people as a result of themselves having brown skin. Any impression of an extant Western civilisation is merely the thin veil that still remains of some architecture and innovations, created by greater men of the past, that haven't been destroyed and replaced by Soviet-style commemorations to George Floyd. 

Telling the truth and portraying your enemies as the incompetent retards that they are has been the most effective strategy that any "right wing" figure has done. What did you think about Trump's decision to return to twitter for a single tweet, just to post his own mugshot that all these Serious People thought releasing would be so damning against him? It was a stroke of brilliance, totally unexpected by the moronic "elites" that had it backfire in their gross, decrepit faces. Here's another question: do you remember this article on "The Rise and Fall of the Pajama-Boy Nietzscheans"? It's all been going right over your head, hasn't it? 

(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]He's not cucking because he's always been chiefly concerned with appearances over reality, specifically the novel and creative synthesis of aesthetics he created that makes people think he's cool. But nudism, bodybuilding, and barbarianism do not solve the problems facing a White kindred BAP does not possess as a rootless international bisexual Jew.

Yeah, he posts photos of men with pristine physiques and tells his followers to exercise and be healthy because he ackshually is just a homo AND (don't forget!) a Jew. Nice job, you exposed him. He should be posting photos of white picket fence 1950s America and telling his followers to do nofap and get married to the huge selection of potential brides that are out there today.

Have you ever stood in front of Cellini's Perseus or Michelangelo's David? "... and how did it make you feel?" What he does is supposed to inspire a similar feeling, a fire. If something as simple as this also went over your head then you likely never understood the first thing about his concerns to begin with. 

(10-30-2023, 12:44 AM)Mason Hall-McCullough Wrote: [ -> ]His understanding of Hitler doesn't matter when he has no skin in the game and his main priority is romantically pursuing 30 year old leftist podcasters.

What would you have him do, remain a relatively unknown academic for his entire life? How has that worked out for others of today? Look back through some of the posts here where anthony describes his concept of leverage. I have no interest in the Red Scare girls either, but they have a massive, mostly female audience that considers itself 'contrarian' enough to be seduced by BAP's ideas. You can say all you want about how they are leftists or post-leftist or whatever - it doesn't matter because 99% of women have no serious political or ideological convictions and merely follow the winners / most attractive. Don't you see that "BAP" is merely a character? He isn't a politician, or the leader of some kind of political movement, but everything involves playing politics and using leverage to accomplish something more. 

Recent events have shown that, in comparison to every face fag of the so-called "dissident right", the "BAP" character has basically executed everything flawlessly. His influence is unparalleled. He could've been like Richard Spencer, or Nick Fuentes, both completely compromised and responsible for leading their followers to being arrested and having their futures ruined. How far would that have gotten him, or us?

(10-30-2023, 12:15 PM)august Wrote: [ -> ]It's called levity, the exact opposite of the Very Serious 'stuffed-shirt' / 'Excuse me, the Grown Ups are speaking now' conservatism, which has so far done nothing but sell out and viciously thwart any genuine attempts to reverse this frog boiling suicide that is, what we call, """Western civilisation""" of modern times. It's also unlike the incessant demoralising and constant doomerism that Keith Woods would have you believe is going to one day make the masses rise up against the Secret International Illuminati Machiavellian Criminal Masterminds headed by ... THE JEWS. Humor, laughter, having FUN... these things are Nietzschean, and that's what he is.

"Annihilate everything that exists" wouldn't be a catchphrase if society looked and functioned like late-1930s Berlin. Piracy being "anti-civilizational" is the point, because the civilisation you currently live in is a gynocratic, third-world infested shithole dictated by the screeches of 30-something latinks and punjabi women who hate all White people as a result of themselves having brown skin. Any impression of an extant Western civilisation is merely the thin veil that still remains of some architecture and innovations, created by greater men of the past, that haven't been destroyed and replaced by Soviet-style commemorations to George Floyd. 

Telling the truth and portraying your enemies as the incompetent retards that they are has been the most effective strategy that any "right wing" figure has done. What did you think about Trump's decision to return to twitter for a single tweet, just to post his own mugshot that all these Serious People thought releasing would be so damning against him? It was a stroke of brilliance, totally unexpected by the moronic "elites" that had it backfire in their gross, decrepit faces. Here's another question: do you remember this article on "The Rise and Fall of the Pajama-Boy Nietzscheans"? It's all been going right over your head, hasn't it?

Call it what you want, claiming you have loyalty to the pirate flag above all others is subversive and/or dumb. I agree with cats' response to Svevlad, levity shouldn't form the basis of a political movement. Humor has its place, but you're not getting into power through memes alone. Tarring the entire concept of seriousness because some people were serious about the wrong ideas seems self-defeating.

We should be willing to destroy parts of our existing civilization, but notice how vague "Annihilate everything that exists" is. Out of context it reads as nihilism, but that can't be right given BAP presents himself as a vitalist. Perhaps it's romantic language and we are supposed to annihilate some things while leaving the vital spirit intact. But are we really annihilating the liberal order here? The pirate flag post seems like more of an anarchist sentiment, that we should annihilate all political order. It doesn't really matter, because this contradictory nonsense is not meant to be taken seriously.

Trump used levity to great effect, but importantly his silliness was accompanied by strong, concrete proposals that spoke to White Americans. He wouldn't have been elected if he was just saying funny things, though people would have loved him on Twitter. "Build the wall and make Mexico pay for it" is specific and clear. These think tank types should be thanking BAP for occupying the time of disaffected young men with weightlifting and dietary fads which may have prevented them from taking direct political action to threaten their power base.

Quote:Yeah, he posts photos of men with pristine physiques and tells his followers to exercise and be healthy because he ackshually is just a homo AND (don't forget!) a Jew. Nice job, you exposed him. He should be posting photos of white picket fence 1950s America and telling his followers to do nofap and get married to the huge selection of potential brides that are out there today.

Have you ever stood in front of Cellini's Perseus or Michelangelo's David? "... and how did it make you feel?" What he does is supposed to inspire a similar feeling, a fire. If something as simple as this also went over your head then you likely never understood the first thing about his concerns to begin with.

Being a homosexual Jew in itself isn't necessarily disqualifying, but BAP also acts like I would expect a homosexual Jew to: he's anti-family with only an opportunistic loyalty to Whites. He's probably not a Zionist or a fed, but he opposes populism because as a Jew he doesn't feel a sense of kinship with the bulk of the White population (who he describes as "the dumb, dusky stupid many").

I haven't visited Italy. Do you start hearing Little Dark Age when you look at pictures of statue asses? Or is this more intentionally ambiguous ironic "levity"? I'm not interested in following aesthetic fashions by pretending it inspires something transcendent in me beyond a simple pride in the achievements of my ancestors.

Quote:What would you have him do, remain a relatively unknown academic for his entire life? How has that worked out for others of today? Look back through some of the posts here where anthony describes his concept of leverage. I have no interest in the Red Scare girls either, but they have a massive, mostly female audience that considers itself 'contrarian' enough to be seduced by BAP's ideas. You can say all you want about how they are leftists or post-leftist or whatever - it doesn't matter because 99% of women have no serious political or ideological convictions and merely follow the winners / most attractive. Don't you see that "BAP" is merely a character? He isn't a politician, or the leader of some kind of political movement, but everything involves playing politics and using leverage to accomplish something more. 

Recent events have shown that, in comparison to every face fag of the so-called "dissident right", the "BAP" character has basically executed everything flawlessly. His influence is unparalleled. He could've been like Richard Spencer, or Nick Fuentes, both completely compromised and responsible for leading their followers to being arrested and having their futures ruined. How far would that have gotten him, or us?

BAP should start telling the truth and portraying our enemies as incompetent retards, instead of subverting such efforts. He obviously hasn't executed everything flawlessly if you need to apologize for his homosexual proclivities and interactions with Red Scare.

Women are indeed unable to grasp political concepts, so if you want political change, don't waste time and public favor attaching your public persona to them. BAP is smart and socially savvy enough to understand this, but he doesn't really care about political change. He's also probably smart enough to succeed where Spencer and Fuentes failed, if he wanted to. For all you've said about BAP wanting to annihilate civilization, I'm fairly confident in guessing he hasn't actually been approached by feds, because vague aesthetic gestures don't threaten the establishment.

Red Scare fans, the vile bugpeople that they are, also haven't been seduced by BAP's ideas in the slightest. If these are the fruits of some advanced attempt to obtain leverage, then BAP is a moron, but he isn't. He just enjoys messing around for attention on Twitter, actualizing his aesthetics was never part of the plan.