Not a single one of the guest posters have been able to stop drooling on themselves for a moment- the thread is being filled with the turgid smell of stale hot-pockets. Here is where skin in the game and a little bit of assumed dignity would be beneficial for the sake of the argument, at least. Could you perhaps bring some information to the table that you didn't scrape off of the truck-station bathroom that is Battle Beagle's twitter account? I'm not overly happy that you've shat up what could have been a promising thread.
Quote:Muh Semiconductors, Muh Taiwan, Muh Tiktok
Three-year old information, so it falls under the "nothing happens" category. Not useful. Tiktok was a one-way flow of Western culture back out into the world, targeted because a couple geriatrics fancied an easy target. Also not useful.
Quote:I'm willing to "settle" for Russia and China because their resources are absolutely necessary in this struggle.
You're a whore, and not a particularly expensive one, either. What exactly is allying with two fading powers on the other side of the world going to do for you? Russia isn't going to ship you steel-case, China isn't going to get you Yuan or whatever. You say "resources" in the abstract, in the same manner that you use "socialism". These words you use don't mean anything, they're vague gestures at husks.
Quote:If you think western leftism is in any way similar to communism, you are quite mistaken. There is no victim narrative or biological Leninism. Why do you think it is that the west is the one that adopted these ideas, do you think communists are secretly in control or just maybe the real source of the poison is liberalism? I don't know how people purity spiral into this idea of strict Nazism, national socialism itself was a compromise between worker's grievance and combatting international finance. And what do you know, communism champions both of these causes. Getting caught up in pointless details is a waste of energy.
Most eminently moronic thing I've heard since I was locked a week ago. Buzzword index at 10%, whereas the threshold should be closer to about 3% for reasonable work. This kind of styrofoam writing style is immediately apparent as the signature of the DUMB WORDCEL, who plays algebra with entire words and terms to make them roughly equal (and thus appealing) to his basal mind. "Socialism beats International Finance! Liberalism Causes Socialism! Therefore, Support Communism to Beat Liberalism And Thus Socialism! Shocking! Read my Substack!" So long as the focus is on this retarded, Mad-Libs politics, we move nowhere.
Let me be firm here- NOTHING the "Communist" says means anything. The words themselves have been stripmined of all value- it's why we have such success squatting in their toxic pit-mines when we want to have a laugh. They are nations of (best-case recovering) parasites, which the guest may understand on some level, which contain nothing of value. This concept that ideas have influence on lesser races is farcical- that a Maoist is distinct from a Confucianist, that both are somehow different shades of "Communist" is missing the forest for the trees, when one can biologically describe the group. Ideologies are chiefly justifications for biological urges- suggesting that one deals with the "communists" is like suggesting we deal with "blue" or the concept of "time".
So. "Would the Han support us?" A Century of Humiliation tells us, no. Not in any meaningful capacity, even to spite the countries we came from. Perhaps just enough support to make us into an embarrassment or a frustration for our mother nations, but nothing past that- no more Western strength for the Han, which is fine, as they have nothing to offer us that isn't already ours by right.
"Would the Russians help us?" No. They are currently struggling with a war on their borders. Neither side is doing well. There are not excess resources to devote to "us" thru normal channels, no competents to help us covertly.